7.3 Text-Level Grammar & Cohesive Devices: Discourse Markers, Anaphoric Demonstratives & Modality Alignment (Grammar Mondai 3)

Text-Level Grammar & Cohesive Devices: Discourse Markers, Anaphoric Demonstratives & Modality Alignment (Grammar Mondai 3)

Core Principle: Grammar Mondai 3 (文章の文法 - Text-Level Grammar) bridges sentence-level syntax and full-scale reading comprehension (読解 - Dokkai). Instead of testing isolated, one-line sentences, Mondai 3 embeds 4 to 5 cloze blanks within an authentic 250–350 word passage (such as a personal blog post, an email to a professor, a community bulletin notice, or a cultural narrative). Solving these questions requires tracking discourse markers, anaphoric demonstrative pronouns (こ・そ・あ), and sentence-final modality alignment across paragraph boundaries.

---

1. Taxonomy of Japanese Discourse Markers (接続詞・接続表現)

Discourse markers signal the logical relationship between the preceding sentence/paragraph and the forthcoming assertion. On the JLPT N4, choosing the correct conjunction requires identifying the semantic polarity (agreement vs. contradiction) and functional progression (cause, example, summary, or topic shift).

DISCOURSE MARKER FUNCTIONAL SPECTRUM
┌──────────────────┬─────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Function         │ Key Connectors              │ Semantic Role                       │
├──────────────────┼─────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Adversative   │ しかし、けれども、ところが  │ Reverses expectations; introduces   │
│    (逆接)        │ でも、それに対して          │ contrasting facts or counter-arguments│
├──────────────────┼─────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2. Causal/Result │ だから、そのため、したがって│ Establishes logical consequence;    │
│    (順接・原因)  │ それで、ですから            │ Sentence A leads directly to B      │
├──────────────────┼─────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 3. Additive      │ そして、それに、また、さらに│ Stacks additional supporting facts  │
│    (累加・並列)  │ それから                    │ or introduces parallel information  │
├──────────────────┼─────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 4. Clarifying    │ たとえば、つまり、なぜなら  │ Supplies concrete illustrations,    │
│    (例示・説明)  │ というのは                  │ restatements, or underlying reasons │
├──────────────────┼─────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5. Topic-Shift   │ ところで、さて              │ Terminates previous discussion;     │
│    (転換)        │ それはそうと                │ pivots to an entirely new subject   │
└──────────────────┴─────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────┘

A. Adversative & Contrastive Markers (逆接)

• しかし (shikashi): Formal "However / But". The gold standard contrast marker in essays, reports, and formal notices.
  • 昨日は大雨が降りました。しかし、試合は予定通り行われました。(It rained heavily yesterday. However, the match was held as scheduled.)
• ところが (tokoroga): "However / Surprisingly..." Used when the subsequent event violates expectations or brings an unexpected outcome.
  • 一生懸命勉強しました。ところが、試験は不合格でした。(I studied hard. However [contrary to expectations], I failed the exam.)
• でも / けれども (demo / keredomo): Conversational "but / although". Frequent in personal diary entries and friendly emails.

B. Causal & Result Markers (原因・結果)

• だから / ですから (dakara / desukara): "Therefore / That is why". Expresses subjective reasoning, suggestions, or decisions based on the preceding fact.
  • 明日は大切な試験があります。だから、今夜は早く寝ます。(Tomorrow is an important exam. Therefore, I will sleep early tonight.)
• そのため (sono tame): Objective "For that reason / Consequently". Connects an objective cause to an inevitable natural or factual result (common in expository texts).
  • 台風が近づいています。そのため、電車が運転を見合わせています。(A typhoon is approaching. For that reason, trains have suspended operations.)
• したがって (shitagatte): Formal "Consequently / Thus". Used in formal explanatory texts and academic logic.

C. Clarification, Restatement & Explanation Markers (説明・例示)

• たとえば (tatoeba): "For example / For instance". Introduces concrete supporting examples illustrating a prior general claim.
  • 日本の伝統文化には興味深いものがたくさんあります。たとえば、茶道や歌舞伎などです。(Japanese traditional culture has many fascinating things. For example, the tea ceremony and Kabuki.)
• つまり (tsumari): "In other words / In short / Namely". Restates or summarizes a complex preceding statement in simpler, definitive terms.
  • 彼は私の母の弟です。つまり、私のおじです。(He is my mother's younger brother. In other words, he is my uncle.)
• なぜなら(ば) / というのは (nazenara / to iu no wa): "This is because / The reason is...". Pairs with sentence-final 〜からだ / 〜ためだ to provide the retrospective cause for a preceding conclusion.
  • 私はこの町が大好きです。なぜなら、自然が豊かで人々が親切だからです。(I love this town. This is because nature is rich and people are kind.)

D. Topic-Shifting Markers (転換)

• ところで (tokorode): "By the way / Incidently". Abruptly shifts conversational or thematic focus to a completely new topic.
  • 今日はお疲れ様でした。ところで、来週の会議の時間は決まりましたか。(Thank you for your hard work today. By the way, has the time for next week's meeting been decided?)
• さて (sate): "Now then / Well". Marks a transition to the main business or agenda (frequently opens the body of business emails after greetings).

---

2. Anaphoric Demonstrative Pronouns (指示詞: こ・そ・あ・ど)

In text grammar, demonstrative pronouns do not just point to physical objects in front of the speaker (現場指示); they refer back to ideas, people, or facts mentioned within the text itself (文脈指示 - Anaphoric Reference).

TEXTUAL REFERENCE MATRIX (文脈指示のコ・ソ・ア)
┌────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Series         │ Text-Level Functional Rule                                  │
├────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ソ-Series      │ Refers back to a fact, concept, or person PREVIOUSLY        │
│ (それ・その・そこ)│ MENTIONED in the preceding sentence. The standard text workhorse│
├────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ コ-Series      │ Refers to a topic the writer is CURRENTLY introducing,      │
│ (これ・この・ここ)│ or brings a previously mentioned topic into immediate focus │
├────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ア-Series      │ Refers to SHARED BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE or mutual memories    │
│ (あれ・あの・あそこ)│ known to both the writer and reader                         │
└────────────────┴─────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────┘

A. The そ-Series (The Standard Textual Anaphor)

Whenever a sentence refers to a specific noun or situation introduced in the immediately preceding sentence, standard Japanese grammar demands the そ-series:

• 先週、新しい辞書を買いました。その辞書はとても使いやすいです。(Last week I bought a new dictionary. That dictionary is very easy to use.)
• 田中さんは留学することに決めました。それを聞いて、皆驚きました。(Tanaka decided to study abroad. Hearing that, everyone was surprised.)

B. The こ-Series (Immediacy & Upcoming Topics)

Used when the writer wants to create psychological closeness, emphasize their thesis, or refer to what they are about to state:

• 私は一つの夢を持っています。これは子供の頃からの夢です。(I have a dream. This is a dream from my childhood.)
• この文章では、日本の環境問題について考察する。(In this essay, I will consider Japan's environmental issues.)

C. The あ-Series (Shared Knowledge)

Used in letters or conversations when referring to an experience or entity both the author and recipient experienced together:

• 先月一緒に行ったあのレストランの料理は美味しかったですね。(The food at that restaurant we went to together last month was delicious, wasn't it?)

---

3. Sentence-Final Modality Consistency (文末表現の統一)

In Grammar Mondai 3, blanks frequently target the final predicate of the paragraph. To choose the correct ending, you must analyze the author's communicative purpose:

---

4. Complete Authentic Passage Walkthrough (Mondai 3 Simulation)

Read the following passage and analyze how discourse markers, anaphoric references, and modality markers create cohesion:

【Text: Exchange Student Letter to Host Family】

先月は大変お世話になりました。日本でのホームステイは、私にとって忘れられない素晴らしい
思い出になりました。

帰国してから、毎日大学の授業で忙しく過ごしています。 [ Blank 1 ] 、日本での生活を思い
出さない日はありません。特に、お母さんと一緒に作った肉じゃがの味が忘れられません。
[ Blank 2 ] 料理の作り方を教えていただいたおかげで、昨日自分でも作ることができました。
家族も「おいしい」と言って喜んでくれました。

[ Blank 3 ] 、来年の夏休みにまた日本へ行く計画を立てています。その時は、ぜひ皆様のお宅に
お伺いしたいと [ Blank 4 ] 。またお会いできるのを楽しみにしています。

Detailed Blank-by-Blank Deconstruction:

Blank 1: Discourse Marker Selection

• Preceding Context: "Since returning home, I spend everyday busy with university classes."
• Subsequent Context: "...not a single day passes where I don't remember my life in Japan."
• Logical Relation: Being busy with daily life normally distracts people from past memories, but the writer still remembers daily. This is an adversative contrast (逆接).
• Correct Choice: しかし (However). (Distractors like だから or そして create logical incoherence).

Blank 2: Anaphoric Demonstrative Selection

• Preceding Context: Mentions "肉じゃが" (meat and potato stew) specifically in the prior sentence.
• Subsequent Context: "Thanks to you teaching me how to cook [ Blank 2 ] dish..."
• Logical Relation: Refers back to a specific entity introduced in the immediately preceding sentence.
• Correct Choice: その (That [previously mentioned]). (Yields その料理 - that dish).

Blank 3: Transition / Additive Marker

• Preceding Context: Discussing home cooking and family reactions.
• Subsequent Context: Introducing a new future plan: "...I am planning to visit Japan again next summer vacation."
• Logical Relation: Shifting from reminiscing about the past to announcing a new, exciting plan (転換 / 累加).
• Correct Choice: ところで (By the way) or 実は (Actually / In fact).

Blank 4: Sentence-Final Modality

• Preceding Context: "At that time, to your home I would definitely like to visit... [ Blank 4 ]"
• Communicative Stance: Expressing the writer's own personal desire, intention, and humble hope.
• Correct Choice: 思っております (I am thinking / hoping [humble]) or 考えています.

---

5. Tactical Strategy for Mondai 3 on Test Day

1. Do NOT Read in Syntactic Isolation: Never try to answer a blank by reading only the fragment inside the brackets. Always read the preceding full sentence and the subsequent full sentence to capture the clausal momentum.
2. Check the Macro-Genre: Identify immediately whether the text is a formal email/letter (requires keigo, respectful requests), a diary/blog (expresses internal thoughts, casual/polite transitions), or an informative notice (objective rules, polite imperatives).
3. Test Pronoun Substitutions: When choosing between この, その, and あの, mentally substitute the original noun from the preceding sentence into the blank to confirm referential clarity.