Free BCSP SMP Exam Flashcards

To manage safety as a repeatable organizational process through policy, planning, implementation, evaluation, and continual improvement.

It is specific, measurable, assigned, time-bound, and linked to a meaningful risk or organizational goal.

A structured review of hazards and controls before changes to equipment, materials, processes, staffing, or organization are implemented.

An audit evaluates whether a management system is designed and functioning as intended; an inspection mainly identifies conditions or practices at a point in time.

A documented corrective action with an owner, due date, root-cause consideration, and verification that the action was effective.

A proactive measure of activities or conditions that can influence future performance, such as control verifications or corrective-action closure.

An outcome measure recorded after harm or loss, such as injury rates, severity, property damage, or workers' compensation cost.

Required competencies against current worker capability, considering regulatory duties, task risk, performance gaps, and change.

Practice in realistic conditions, supervisor reinforcement, accessible procedures, timely feedback, and verification of competent performance.

Each employer retains duties for its workers while coordinating hazards, controls, communication, and interfaces with the other employers.

By risk and urgency, giving highest priority to actions that address credible high-severity exposures or failed critical controls.

The likelihood of an unwanted event and the severity of its consequence, evaluated with stated criteria.

The risk that remains after controls are selected and implemented; it must be evaluated for acceptability and monitored.

A preference order: elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls, then personal protective equipment.

Elimination removes the hazard, while PPE leaves the hazard present and depends on correct selection, fit, use, and maintenance.

Addressing hazards and life-cycle risk during design, when safer equipment, processes, materials, and maintenance access can be built in.

To apply consistent likelihood and severity categories so hazards can be compared, prioritized, and assigned response criteria.

Breaking a job into steps, identifying hazards at each step, and defining controls before the work is performed.

After implementation, incidents, changes, abnormal conditions, worker feedback, or evidence that expected risk reduction was not achieved.

Risk is reduced as low as reasonably practicable, considering whether further reduction is grossly disproportionate to its benefit.

Shifting specified financial consequences through mechanisms such as insurance or contracts; it does not remove the underlying hazard.

Its failure would materially increase the likelihood or severity of a major event, so performance standards and verification are essential.

Standardized hazard, handling, storage, exposure-control, emergency, and disposal information for a chemical product.

To communicate classes of chemical hazard consistently through standardized symbols used with labels and safety data sheets.

First reduce noise at the source or along its path; use administrative limits and hearing protection for remaining exposure.

The total heat burden from environment, workload, and clothing that can overwhelm the body's ability to regulate temperature.

A job feature such as force, repetition, awkward posture, vibration, contact stress, or inadequate recovery that raises injury risk.

Effective energy isolation through lockout/tagout, verified zero-energy state, and machine guarding appropriate to the hazard.

Fuel, oxygen, and sufficient heat form the fire triangle; interrupting any element can prevent or extinguish combustion.

It has a serious atmospheric, engulfment, configuration, or other recognized hazard requiring controlled entry and rescue planning.

De-energize and verify absence of voltage when feasible; otherwise apply justified energized-work controls, boundaries, and appropriate PPE.

Ionizing radiation can remove electrons from atoms; non-ionizing radiation generally excites or heats matter without ionization.

They can reduce friction between footwear and the walking surface, especially when contaminants, slope, or poor tread are present.

Treat potentially infectious materials with standard precautions and prevent exposure through engineering controls, safe practices, and PPE.

System and organizational factors that allowed an event, not merely the worker action closest to the outcome.

An immediate cause is directly present at the event; an underlying cause explains why that condition or action existed.

An unplanned event that caused no injury or damage but had the potential to do so under slightly different circumstances.

Recordable cases × 200,000 ÷ total employee hours worked during the period.

Credible scenarios, affected people and assets, existing capabilities, consequences, and gaps that emergency planning must address.

To establish scalable roles, authority, communication, resource coordination, and common objectives during an emergency.

To test plans, roles, communication, equipment, and decision-making, then convert observed gaps into corrective actions.

The hazard or causal factor addressed, responsible owner, completion date, expected risk reduction, and method of effectiveness verification.

Prompt reporting, appropriate care, communication, work-capacity coordination, safe return-to-work planning, and protection of confidentiality.

A cost readily assigned to the event, such as medical treatment, damaged equipment, or an insured claim payment.

A less visible consequence such as disruption, investigation time, retraining, schedule delay, reputation damage, or lost productivity.

The monetized benefits of an intervention with its costs, using consistent assumptions, time horizons, and treatment of uncertainty.

People actively seek risk information, report concerns, learn across boundaries, and improve systems without waiting for adverse events.

A shared belief that people can raise concerns, questions, and mistakes without interpersonal punishment or humiliation.

Connect material risks, legal exposure, operational continuity, trends, and resource decisions to organizational objectives.

Disclose it promptly, avoid compromised judgment, and follow professional and organizational requirements for independent review or recusal.