5.2 Core Principle 1: Honesty and Integrity
Key Takeaways
Core Principle 1 requires Distributors and Consultants to act honestly and with integrity, act in investors' best interests, deal in good faith and treat investors fairly, and protect the industry's reputation.
Amending or altering any information provided by an investor without the investor's written consent is prohibited conduct under the FIMM Code.
Disclosing only the favourable features of a scheme, or comparing schemes using unrelated characteristics, counts as misrepresentation under the Code.
Consultants must not use the titles financial planner, financial advisor, investment advisor or investment consultant unless authorised by the relevant regulator or professional body.
Dealing in schemes or products that are unauthorised, unlicensed or published on an authority's alert list is prohibited.
The Required Conduct
Under Core Principle 1 a Distributor and Consultant must at all times:
- act honestly and with integrity;
- act in the best interest of investors;
- deal with investors in good faith and ensure fair treatment; and
- uphold and protect the reputation of the industry.
The study guide sums it up: Distributors and Consultants must put the client's interests ahead of their own.
The Prohibited Conduct
The Code's Chapter 4 lists conduct that breaches this principle (the list is not exhaustive).
Dishonesty with money and documents
| Prohibited | Example |
|---|---|
| Misappropriating investors' funds | Using a client's payment for personal expenses before passing it on |
| Knowingly or recklessly falsifying documents, or submitting falsified documents | Back-dating an application form |
| Forgery, including forging an investor's or anyone else's signature | Signing on the client's behalf "to save time" |
| Amending or altering investor information without written consent | Changing the client's stated risk tolerance to fit the product |
| Using documents or information that are false or misleading | Presenting an out-of-date fact sheet as current |
Misrepresentation
The Code prohibits misrepresenting or making false or exaggerated statements about schemes, including:
- the characteristics of schemes;
- their past or present performance;
- names or advertising expressions likely to mislead investors;
- outdated facts or information;
- disclosing only favourable features; and
- comparing schemes using unrelated characteristics.
It also prohibits making false statements or spreading false information about schemes, the SC, FIMM, the industry, or other Distributors or Consultants.
Unauthorised titles
A Distributor or Consultant must not use, adopt or display the designation "financial planner", "financial advisor", "investment advisor" or "investment consultant" unless authorised by the relevant regulator or professional body. (Chapter 6 explains when someone may lawfully call themselves a financial planner.)
Dealing in the wrong products
Distributors and Consultants must not deal in, introduce, promote, market or distribute, or be involved in any way with:
- schemes or products not authorised or recognised under securities laws;
- schemes or products they are not licensed or registered to market; or
- schemes or products listed on an authority's alert list (such as the SC's Investor Alert List).
Applying the Principle
| Scenario | Breach? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A Consultant tells a client a balanced fund "returned 15% last year" when the figure is two years old | Yes | Using outdated information; misrepresenting performance |
| A Consultant shows only the fund's three best years in a presentation | Yes | Disclosing only favourable features |
| A Consultant introduces a client to an overseas "forex fund" that is not authorised in Malaysia | Yes | Dealing in unauthorised products |
| A Consultant corrects a typing error in the client's address after the client confirms the change in writing | No | The client gave written consent |
| A Consultant's business card says "Investment Consultant" without any licence | Yes | Unauthorised designation |
Why Honesty Is Tested So Heavily
Misrepresentation and misappropriation are among the most damaging misconduct for investors and for the industry. FIMM's practice questions often describe a scenario and ask which principle applies. Remember:
- Lies, forgery, falsification and misrepresentation → Honesty and integrity.
- Omitting a material fact when explaining a scheme → Disclosure of information (Core Principle 4), as FIMM's own practice question confirms.
- Switching a client to earn commission → Avoidance of conflict of interest (Core Principle 3).
Linking to the Study Guide's Duty of Care
The study guide's chapter on regulation says Consultants owe investors a duty of care: act with honesty, integrity and dignity; treat investors with respect and disclose all pertinent information; and not misrepresent the scheme, its funds or past performance. Core Principle 1 is the ethical foundation of that duty.
Protecting the Industry's Reputation in Practice
The fourth duty, upholding and protecting the reputation of the industry, reaches beyond individual sales:
- Check before you promote. Before introducing any product or "investment opportunity" to clients, confirm it is authorised in Malaysia and not on the SC's Investor Alert List. Involvement "in any way" with an unauthorised scheme is prohibited, even without selling it.
- No rumours. Spreading false information about another Distributor, a competing Consultant, FIMM or the SC damages trust in the whole industry and is itself prohibited.
- Honest marketing materials. A fund name, slogan or chart that is likely to mislead investors breaches the principle even if every number is technically correct.
A Short Case
Encik Faiz, a Consultant, is two sales short of his monthly target. A client asks whether a new equity fund is "safe like a fixed deposit". Faiz is tempted to say "almost no risk – it has never lost money". That statement would be false and exaggerated about the fund's characteristics and performance, and would put his interest ahead of the client's. The honest answer explains that the fund's value can fall, that it is not a deposit and not guaranteed, and that the right choice depends on the client's risk profile.
A Consultant changes the risk tolerance on a client's completed form from "low" to "high" so that an equity fund appears suitable, without the client's written consent. Which prohibited conduct is this?
Churning the client's portfolio for commission
Assigning the sale to another Consultant
Altering investor information without written consent
Using an unauthorised designation such as investment advisor
Which designation may a UTS Consultant NOT use unless authorised by the relevant regulator or professional body?
Financial planner
Unit Trust Consultant
Registered Consultant of FIMM
PRS Consultant
A Consultant compares two funds by highlighting only the features in which his preferred fund looks better. Under the Code this is an example of
misrepresentation by disclosing only favourable features
a breach of confidentiality
a conflict of interest that only needs verbal disclosure
acceptable marketing practice
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.