4.10 The Effect of Inflation, Taxation and Investment Costs on Returns
Key Takeaways
In the study guide's example, a 10% investment return with a 10% tax rate and 5% inflation leaves a real after-tax return of 4% a year.
At 5% inflation, something costing RM100,000 today will cost about RM265,329 in 20 years.
The Rule of 72 estimates the years needed to double money, or to halve its real value, by dividing 72 by the rate of return or inflation.
At 3.5% inflation, the Rule of 72 says money loses half its real value in about 20.6 years.
In the study guide's 20-year example, the fund with an 8% entry cost but a 1% annual fee ends with RM59,250 more than the fund with no entry cost and a 2% annual fee.
Why Consultants Must Explain These Effects
Many investors ignore inflation, tax and costs and later find their real wealth is far lower than expected. Consultants are expected to explain these effects as part of managing expectations (section 4.9).
Inflation
To most people inflation means rising prices; to an investor it means loss of purchasing power. RM100,000 today cannot buy what it bought ten years ago. Investors need returns above inflation just to keep pace, and a savings target for 15 years ahead must be adjusted for future prices.
Tax and Inflation Together
The study guide assumes 5% inflation and shows the real return after tax:
| Tax rate | Investment return | After tax | After tax and 5% inflation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10% | 5% | 4.5% | −0.5% |
| 10% | 10% | 9.0% | +4.0% |
| 10% | 15% | 13.5% | +8.5% |
| 20% | 5% | 4.0% | −1.0% |
| 20% | 10% | 8.0% | +3.0% |
| 20% | 15% | 12.0% | +7.0% |
| 30% | 5% | 3.5% | −1.5% |
| 30% | 10% | 7.0% | +2.0% |
| 30% | 15% | 10.5% | +5.5% |
The rates are illustrative and the table ignores inflation's effect on capital. The lesson: a portfolio should include investments expected to grow above inflation after tax.
How Much a Goal Grows with Inflation
Amount needed to keep the real value of RM100,000:
| End of year | 2.0% inflation | 3.5% inflation | 5.0% inflation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | RM110,408 | RM118,768 | RM127,628 |
| 10 | RM121,899 | RM141,059 | RM162,889 |
| 15 | RM134,586 | RM167,534 | RM207,892 |
| 20 | RM148,594 | RM198,978 | RM265,329 |
| 25 | RM164,060 | RM236,324 | RM338,635 |
Each figure is . An apartment costing RM100,000 today would cost RM265,329 after 20 years of 5% inflation (if property prices track inflation). A portfolio growing at exactly 5% only keeps pace; wealth grows only if returns exceed inflation.
The Rule of 72
It estimates how long it takes to halve the real value of money at a given inflation rate, or to double money at a given return.
| Example | Calculation | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| Halve the real value of RM150,000 at 3.5% inflation | 72 ÷ 3.5 | 20.6 years (about 20 years 7 months) |
| Double RM100,000 at 7.5% return | 72 ÷ 7.5 | 9.6 years (about 9 years 7 months) |
| Inflation rate | Years to halve real value | Return | Years to double |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0% | 36.0 | 5.0% | 14.4 |
| 3.0% | 24.0 | 6.0% | 12.0 |
| 4.0% | 18.0 | 8.0% | 9.0 |
| 5.0% | 14.4 | 10.0% | 7.2 |
Higher inflation halves real value faster; higher returns double money faster.
The Effect of Charges
The study guide compares three UTS for an investor with RM100,000 to invest for 20 years, assuming the same underlying returns:
| UTS 1 | UTS 2 | UTS 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial entry cost | RM8,000 | RM5,000 | Nil |
| Annual management fee | 1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% |
| "Working money" invested | RM92,000 | RM95,000 | RM100,000 |
| Value after 1 year | RM100,374 | RM103,123 | RM108,000 |
| Value after 10 years | RM219,845 | RM215,806 | RM215,892 |
| Value after 20 years | RM525,346 | RM490,232 | RM466,096 |
UTS 3 leads early, but by year 20 UTS 1 is ahead by RM59,250 because its annual fee is lowest. Over long periods, ongoing fees matter more than a one-off entry charge.
In practice the choice is harder because funds produce different returns, and higher fees do not reliably mean better performance. Consultants and planners should build costs into any return estimate, alongside inflation and tax.
Putting It Together for a Client
Encik Azman, 35, wants RM300,000 in today's money for retirement at 55 and plans to keep his savings in fixed deposits earning 3% while inflation runs at about 3%.
- Target in future ringgit – at 3% inflation, prices double in about 72 ÷ 3 = 24 years, so in 20 years his target will be well above RM300,000 (about RM541,800, since ).
- Real return on deposits – a 3% deposit rate less 3% inflation gives roughly 0% real growth before tax, so his savings would only keep pace with prices.
- Costs – if he invests in a fund instead, a sales charge and annual fees reduce the return he actually earns, so the fund's net return must clearly exceed inflation to make progress.
The Consultant's role is to show these effects plainly, not to promise a return. A diversified, growth-oriented allocation matched to his risk tolerance may be appropriate, but only after a full suitability assessment.
Quick Formulas
| Purpose | Formula |
|---|---|
| Approximate real return | Nominal return after tax − inflation rate |
| Future cost of a goal | Today's cost × (1 + inflation rate) raised to the number of years |
| Years to double or halve | 72 ÷ rate |
Using the Rule of 72, roughly how long will it take for money to double at an 8% annual return?
12 years
9 years
14.4 years
6 years
An investment earns 10% a year, the investor's tax rate on that income is 30% and inflation is 5%. Using the study guide's approach, what is the return after tax and inflation?
7.0%
5.0%
2.0%
3.5%
In the study guide's 20-year comparison, why does the fund with the highest entry cost end up with the most money?
Because its annual fee is the lowest
Because its entry cost is refunded after ten years
Because higher entry costs signal better managers
Because the other funds stopped earning returns
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.