8.2 Control Synchros, Resolvers & Inductive Sensors
Key Takeaways
- Control synchro loops (CX and CT) are utilized where the driven load requires heavy mechanical torque (autopilot actuators, radar antennas) that exceeds the output capacity of delicate torque receivers.
- A Control Transformer (CT) rotor features a cylindrical drum-type core to maintain constant magnetic reluctance at all angles, eliminating magnetic reaction torque on the drive shaft, and is never energized from the AC reference bus.
- The CT rotor output voltage is proportional to angular misalignment (V_error = V_max sin Δθ), producing a 90° electrical null (0 V) when perpendicular to stator flux, with its phase (0° or 180°) indicating error direction to the servo amplifier.
- Avionic resolvers feature two orthogonal stator windings and two orthogonal rotor windings spaced at 90°, producing sine and cosine output voltages (V_in sin θ and V_in cos θ) for coordinate transformation between polar and Cartesian domains.
- The syllabus inductance transmitters (variable-reluctance E-and-I bar transformers, LVDTs and RVDTs) and capacitance transmitters (concentric-tube fuel probes) provide rugged, contactless sensing of airframe pressure, altitude, and true fuel mass independent of temperature-induced density changes.
8.2 Control Synchros, Resolvers & Inductive Sensors
While torque synchro systems (TX-TR) are ideal for driving light instrument pointers, they cannot deliver significant mechanical power. Attempting to position a heavy flight control surface, an autopilot hydraulic power control unit (PCU), or an airborne weather radar antenna pedestal directly with a torque receiver causes massive positional lag, excessive stator heating, and loss of synchronization. In high-power aerospace positioning, aircraft design relies on Control Synchros, Resolvers, and solid-state Inductive/Capacitive Transmitters.
Control Synchro Systems: CX & CT
A control synchro system replaces the direct mechanical drive of a torque receiver with an electromechanical closed-loop servo system consisting of a Control Transmitter (CX), a Control Transformer (CT), a high-gain Servo Amplifier, and an AC/DC Servomotor coupled to a mechanical gear train:
graph TD
subgraph ClosedLoopServo["Closed-Loop Control Synchro Servo System"]
CMD["Mechanical Command Input (Pilot / Flight Guidance)"] --> CX["Control Transmitter (CX)<br/>Rotor Excited by 400 Hz Ref"]
CX -->|"Stator Lines S1, S2, S3<br/>Transmits Flux Angle"| CT["Control Transformer (CT)<br/>Stator reproduces Flux"]
CT -->|"Rotor Output Terminals R1-R2<br/>AC Error Voltage V_error"| AMP["Phase-Sensitive Servo Amplifier"]
AMP -->|"Amplified Drive Power"| MOTOR["Servomotor & Reduction Gearbox"]
MOTOR --> LOAD["Heavy Output Load<br/>(Flight Surface / Radar Pedestal)"]
MOTOR -.->|"Mechanical Follow-Up Shaft"| CT
end
1. Control Transmitter (CX)
The physical construction of a Control Transmitter (CX) is virtually identical to a Torque Transmitter (TX). It consists of a laminated stator with three wye-connected single-phase windings spaced $120^\circ$ apart (S1, S2, S3) and a salient-pole dumbbell rotor energized through two slip rings (R1, R2) by the aircraft $400\text{ Hz}$ reference bus ($115\text{ V}$ or $26\text{ V AC}$). The CX converts its shaft mechanical angle into a set of three single-phase stator voltages that establish the direction of the system command vector.
2. Control Transformer (CT) Constructional Differences
Although a Control Transformer looks externally similar to other synchros, its internal design differs fundamentally from a torque receiver (TR):
- Cylindrical (Non-Salient) Drum Rotor: The CT rotor core is completely cylindrical with slots housing a single distributed winding. Unlike the salient dumbbell rotor of a TX/TR, a cylindrical rotor presents a completely uniform air gap and constant magnetic reluctance to the stator flux at all rotor angles. Consequently, the stator magnetic flux exerts zero magnetic pull or reaction torque on the CT rotor shaft. The CT rotor can be positioned by delicate instrument gear trains without reflecting mechanical loading back into the system.
- High-Impedance Stator Windings: The CT stator coils are wound with many turns of finer-gauge wire, resulting in a much higher input impedance than a TR stator. This ensures that the CT draws negligible circulating current from the CX, preventing voltage drops and thermal loading along the interconnect lines.
- De-energized Rotor Output: The CT rotor winding is NEVER connected to the AC reference power supply. Instead, its rotor terminals (R1 and R2) serve purely as an electrical signal generator, delivering an AC error voltage into the high-input-impedance terminals of a servo amplifier.
The $90^\circ$ Electrical Null & Error Generation
In a control synchro loop, the stator coils of the CT are energized by the stator voltages transmitted from the CX. These currents establish an alternating magnetic flux in the CT core whose spatial angle matches the shaft position of the command transmitter ($\theta_{CX}$):
The Mathematical Error Formulation
The voltage induced in the CT rotor winding ($V_{error}$) depends on the physical orientation of the rotor coil relative to this stator magnetic field:
graph LR
subgraph CT_Null["CT 90-Degree Electrical Null Physics"]
FLUX["Stator Magnetic Field Axis (Aligned with CX Angle)"]
ROTOR_COIL["CT Rotor Coil Plane (Physically Perpendicular at 90 deg)"]
FLUX -->|Zero Flux Linkage| ROTOR_COIL
ROTOR_COIL --> OUTPUT["V_error = 0.00 V (True Null)"]
end
Why is it Called the $90^\circ$ Electrical Null?
- When the CT rotor shaft is mechanically aligned with the CX command shaft ($\theta_{CT} = \theta_{CX}$), the physical turns of the CT rotor coil are oriented exactly perpendicular ($90^\circ$) to the direction of the stator magnetic flux lines.
- Under Faraday's Law of Induction, induced voltage is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux linking the coil: $e = -N (d\Phi/dt)$. When the coil is perpendicular to the flux lines, the net flux cutting through the winding turns is zero. Hence, the induced voltage across terminals R1 and R2 is zero ($V_{error} = 0$). This zero-signal position is defined as the $90^\circ$ electrical null.
Off-Null Error Dynamics & Phase Sensitivity
When the pilot or flight control computer commands a new position, $\theta_{CX}$ changes, altering the angle of the CT stator field. Because the CT rotor is momentarily stationary, misalignment exists ($\Delta \theta = \theta_{CX} - \theta_{CT} \neq 0$):
- Voltage Magnitude: An AC voltage appears across CT terminals R1 and R2. For angular errors up to $\pm 15^\circ$, $\sin \Delta \theta \approx \Delta \theta$ (in radians), making the error voltage magnitude strictly linear with angular error ($V_{error} \propto \Delta \theta$).
- Phase Polarity: The phase of $V_{error}$ relative to the $400\text{ Hz}$ reference bus indicates the direction of misalignment:
- If $\theta_{CX} > \theta_{CT}$ (clockwise error), $V_{error}$ is in-phase ($0^\circ$) with the reference.
- If $\theta_{CX} < \theta_{CT}$ (counter-clockwise error), $V_{error}$ is $180^\circ$ out-of-phase with the reference.
- Servo Nulling Action: The phase-sensitive servo amplifier senses this magnitude and phase, supplying drive power of the correct polarity to the servomotor. The motor drives both the heavy flight surface load and the CT rotor shaft via a mechanical feedback gear train until the CT rotor re-establishes the $90^\circ$ perpendicular relationship. At that point, $V_{error} \to 0$, the motor stops, and the system locks in rigid alignment.
[!WARNING] Never Energize a CT Rotor: Applying $115\text{ V}$ or $26\text{ V}$ aircraft AC power directly to CT rotor terminals R1 and R2 will burn out the fine-wire signal winding and potentially destroy the sensitive input stages of the connected servo amplifier.
Resolvers: Physical Architecture & Coordinate Conversion
A resolver is a specialized, high-precision electromagnetic rotary sensor designed for analog trigonometric computation and angular position measurement.
Construction: Orthogonal $90^\circ$ Windings
Unlike synchros, which utilize $120^\circ$ wye-connected stator windings, a resolver uses two-phase orthogonal windings:
- Stator: Contains two separate windings physically and electrically positioned at $90^\circ$ to each other in space (labeled Stator 1 / Stator 2, or $S_{1-3}$ and $S_{2-4}$).
- Rotor: Contains two separate windings also physically and electrically positioned at $90^\circ$ to each other in space (labeled Rotor 1 / Rotor 2, or $R_{1-3}$ and $R_{2-4}$), terminated via four slip rings.
graph LR
subgraph ResolverWinding["Orthogonal Resolver Geometry"]
S_A["Stator Winding A (0 deg Axis)"]
S_B["Stator Winding B (90 deg Axis)"]
R_A["Rotor Winding 1 (Shaft Angle theta)"]
R_B["Rotor Winding 2 (theta + 90 deg)"]
end
S_A -.->|Induced Coupling| R_A
S_B -.->|Induced Coupling| R_B
Mathematical Formulation
When a single rotor winding (e.g., Rotor 1) is energized with reference voltage $v_{ref}(t) = V_{in} \sin(\omega t)$, the alternating magnetic field couples into the two orthogonal stator windings in proportion to the sine and cosine of the rotor shaft angle ($\theta$): where $K$ is the transformation ratio.
Primary Avionics Applications
- Radar Coordinate Transformation (Polar to Cartesian): Airborne weather radar and search radar detect targets in polar coordinates: slant range ($R$) and antenna azimuth angle ($\theta$). Cockpit plan position indicator (PPI) displays and digital sweep scan converters require Cartesian coordinates ($X$ and $Y$ raster coordinates): By applying a linear range sweep ramp voltage ($V_{range} \propto R$) to the rotor of an antenna-driven resolver, the two orthogonal stator windings directly output the instantaneous $X$ and $Y$ sweep voltages, driving the display deflection plates or digitizers.
- Inertial Reference Units (IRU / INS): Resolvers mounted on the gimbal axes of stabilized gyro platforms perform real-time Euler angle transformations, resolving aircraft roll, pitch, and yaw rates from the aircraft body frame into the local-vertical geographic navigation frame (North, East, Down).
Inductive & Capacitive Transmitters in Aircraft Sensing
Beyond rotary angle transmission, avionics instrumentation utilizes variable-reluctance electromagnetic and capacitive sensors for linear and pressure parameter sensing. The Part-66 syllabus names these two families explicitly: inductance transmitters, which vary mutual inductance or magnetic reluctance (the E-and-I bar transmitter below, together with the LVDT and RVDT of Section 7.2), and capacitance transmitters, which vary dielectric capacitance:
1. E and I Bar Differential Transformers (Inductance Transmitters)
The E-and-I bar transmitter is an inductive sensor widely used in cabin altimeters, engine pressure ratio (EPR) indicators, and manifold pressure transducers:
- Construction: A stationary laminated magnetic core shaped like the letter "E" carries three coils. The center leg carries a primary winding energized by $400\text{ Hz}$ AC. The two outer legs carry identical secondary sensing coils connected in series-opposing (differential connection). A movable laminated armature shaped like the letter "I" is pivoted above the pole faces, mechanically connected to a capsule (such as a Bourdon tube, evacuated aneroid bellows, or differential diaphragm).
- Operation: When the I-bar is centered (pressure neutral), the magnetic reluctance of the two outer magnetic loops is identical. Equal voltages are induced in both outer secondary coils. Because they are connected series-opposing, their voltages cancel, yielding a net output of $0\text{ V}$ (null).
- When pressure deflects the capsule, the I-bar tilts. This narrows the air gap on one outer leg (reducing reluctance and increasing secondary voltage) while widening the air gap on the opposite leg (increasing reluctance and lowering secondary voltage). The net output is an AC error voltage whose amplitude is proportional to capsule displacement (pressure magnitude) and whose phase ($0^\circ$ or $180^\circ$) indicates deflection direction.
2. Capacitance Transmitters: Fuel Quantity Probes
Aircraft fuel quantity indication systems (FQIS) require accurate mass measurement across extreme flight attitudes and temperatures ($-55^\circ\text{C}$ to $+50^\circ\text{C}$):
- Construction: A capacitance probe consists of two concentric, open-ended aluminum tubes mounted vertically inside the aircraft fuel tank, acting as an electrical capacitor.
- Dielectric Physics: The capacitance of concentric cylindrical plates is governed by: where $\epsilon_r$ is the relative permittivity (dielectric constant) of the medium between the plates. Dry air has a dielectric constant of $\epsilon_{air} \approx 1.0$, whereas Jet-A/Jet-A1 aviation kerosene has a dielectric constant of $\epsilon_{fuel} \approx 2.1$.
- Linear Mass Sensing: As fuel fills the tank, it rises between the concentric tubes, replacing air with kerosene. This increases total capacitance linearly. Crucially, as fuel temperature changes, fuel volume expands or contracts (density changes), but its dielectric constant ($\epsilon_r$) shifts in direct proportion to density. Consequently, a capacitance FQIS measures true fuel mass (kilograms or pounds) rather than volume—vital because aircraft engine thrust, takeoff weight, and range calculations depend strictly on the mass of fuel available for combustion.
Worked Engineering Calculations
Calculation 1: Control Transformer (CT) Error Voltage & Phase
A $400\text{ Hz}$ control synchro loop has a Control Transformer sensitivity rating of $K_{CT} = 1.05\text{ V AC RMS per degree}$ of angular misalignment. The flight computer commands a rudder trim change such that the CX rotor moves to $\theta_{CX} = +42.5^\circ$, while the CT follow-up shaft is at $\theta_{CT} = +38.0^\circ$.
Step 1: Calculate the angular misalignment error ($\Delta \theta$)
Step 2: Compute the CT output error voltage ($V_{error}$)
Using the small-angle linear sensitivity:
Step 3: Determine phase angle
Because $\theta_{CX} > \theta_{CT}$ (positive error), $V_{error}$ is in-phase ($0^\circ$ phase shift) relative to the $400\text{ Hz}$ reference line.
Step 4: Evaluate opposite deflection
If the rudder trim commanded $\theta_{CX} = +33.5^\circ$ while $\theta_{CT} = +38.0^\circ$: , with a $180^\circ$ phase shift relative to the reference line. Servomechanism Result: The servo amplifier detects the $180^\circ$ phase reversal, reversing the motor drive current to rotate the trim actuator counter-clockwise back to null.
Calculation 2: Resolver Radar Coordinate Conversion
An airborne weather radar antenna is scanning at an azimuth angle of $\theta = 60.0^\circ$. The transmitter produces an instantaneous range sweep ramp voltage of $V_{in} = 12.0\text{ V}$ across the resolver Rotor 1 winding ($R_{1-3}$), representing an airborne weather return at a slant range of $R = 40.0\text{ nautical miles}$. The resolver transformation ratio is $K = 1.00$.
Calculate the Cartesian display sweep voltages across the two orthogonal stator windings ($V_X$ across $S_{2-4}$ and $V_Y$ across $S_{1-3}$):
Step 1: Compute $X$-sweep (Cosine) Stator Voltage ($V_{S2-S4}$)
Step 2: Compute $Y$-sweep (Sine) Stator Voltage ($V_{S1-S3}$)
Step 3: Verify vector magnitude
Display Electronics Result: The $X$-deflection plates receive $+6.00\text{ V}$ and the $Y$-deflection plates receive $+10.39\text{ V}$, deflecting the electron beam or digital raster to the exact screen position representing $40\text{ NM}$ at $60^\circ$ azimuth.
What is the primary structural reason why a Control Transformer (CT) rotor is constructed with a cylindrical (non-salient) drum core rather than a salient dumbbell core?
In a closed-loop control synchro loop, what is the physical relationship between the CT rotor coil and the CT stator magnetic field at the 90° electrical null?
How do the stator and rotor winding arrangements of an avionic resolver differ from those of a standard synchro transmitter?
Why do capacitance fuel quantity indication systems (FQIS) utilize concentric aluminum tubes to measure fuel quantity by mass rather than by volume?