7.3 Deductive Logic, Linear/Circular Seating Arrangements & Truth-Value Puzzles
Key Takeaways
A single person who is -th from the front and -th from the back stands in a queue of total size .
When is -th from the front, is -th from the back, and people stand strictly between them, the non-overlapping maximum is and the overlapping minimum is .
In circular seating around an even -seat table, fix one person as the rotational anchor and pair diametrically opposite seats at index offset .
A conditional statement is false only in the case, and is logically equivalent to its contrapositive .
In 'exactly one statement is true' puzzles (İfadelerden yalnız biri doğrudur), locating two mutually contradictory statements () confines the single truth to and immediately forces all other statements to be false.
7.3 Deductive Logic, Linear/Circular Seating Arrangements & Truth-Value Puzzles
To keep the examination accessible across multiple languages, TR-YÖS designs its deductive reasoning items (Sayısal/Sözel Mantık, Sıralama ve Doğruluk Kurguları) around compact symbolic rules rather than long paragraphs of prose. These problems fall into three recurring categories: linear queue and floor-stacking orderings, circular seating and attribute-matching grids, and propositional truth-value puzzles.
1. Linear Ordering, Queue Position & Floor-Stacking Puzzles (Sıralama ve Kuyruk Problemleri)
Queue Position Formulas (Kuyruk / Sıra Problemleri)
- Single Person Ranked from Both Ends: If a person is -th from the front (baştan . sırada) and -th from the back (sondan . sırada), adding counts that person twice. The total number of people in the queue is:
- Two People with People Strictly Between Them:
Suppose Person is -th from the front, Person is -th from the back, and there are people strictly between and . Because the problem does not state whether stands ahead of or stands ahead of , two configurations exist:
- Maximum Queue Size (Non-Overlapping — is ahead of ): The first people (ending at ), the people in the middle, and the last people (starting at ) are completely disjoint:
- Minimum Queue Size (Overlapping — is ahead of ): Here , , and the people between them are counted inside both the front prefix and the back suffix (an overlap of people):
*(Feasibility check: the overlapping case requires $k + 2 \le \min(n, m)$ so that neither $A$ nor $B$ extends past the ends of the line. Note also that $N_{\max} - N_{\min} = 2k + 2$.)*
Block-Glue Notation & Slot Templates for Linear/Floor Arrangements
When ordering items across numbered slots (such as books on a shelf or tenants on floors through ):
- Adjacent Glue Block (
[AB]or[BA]): If " and are on consecutive floors" without specifying order, fuse them into a single -slot block[AB/BA]and mark its internal swap factor (). - Fixed Gap Template (
A _ _ B): If "exactly people sit between and ," their slot indices satisfy . Write down the valid index pairs immediately to eliminate impossible branches. - Strict Inequality Chains (): Place the longest chain first; any entity with the highest number of constraints acts as your anchor.
2. Circular Seating & Attribute-Matching Matrices (Dairesel Masa ve Eşleştirme Tabloları)
Circular Seating Rules (Yuvarlak Masa Sıralaması)
In a circle of equally spaced seats, rotating everyone clockwise by seat produces the exact same relative arrangement:
- Fix the Anchor at 12 O'Clock (Seat ): Always place the most constrained person at the top seat first. This eliminates the -fold rotational ambiguity and reduces the remaining seats to a fixed linear benchmark.
- Immediate Neighbors vs. Diametrically Opposite Seats:
- "Immediately next to " ('in hemen yanında) means Seat or .
- "Directly opposite " ('in tam karşısında) in an even -seat circle means the seat at index offset . For example, around a -person table (), opposite pairs are , , and . Around an -person table (), opposite pairs are , , , and .
Elimination Matrix () for Multi-Attribute Matching
When matching people to cities and professions under one-to-one bijections, draw an grid. The moment you deduce a positive match () at cell , immediately place across all other cells in row and column . If cells in a row or column contain , the single remaining cell in that line must be .
3. Propositional Logic & Knights-and-Knaves Truth Puzzles (Doğruluk Tabloları ve Doğrucu-Yalancı Kurguları)
Symbolic Connectives & Truth-Value Rules
Each proposition takes a truth value in :
- Conjunction (, AND): only when and ().
- Disjunction (, OR): only when and ().
- Exclusive OR (, XOR): when ; when .
- Implication (, IF-THEN): Equivalent to . It is False () in only one case: when a true hypothesis leads to a false conclusion (). Its contrapositive has the exact same truth value: .
- Biconditional (, IFF): when (both True or both False); when . Note that .
- De Morgan's Negation Laws: and .
The Contradiction Shortcut for "Exactly One Statement Is True" (İfadelerden Yalnız Biri Doğrudur)
| Logic / Ordering Concept | Core Formula / Equivalence | Key Deduction Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Person Queue | Subtract because the person is counted from both ends | |
| Two-Person Queue ( between) | ; | ; requires |
| Circular Opposite Seats () | Fix anchor at Seat ; pair | |
| Implication () | False solely when and () | |
| Contradictory Pair () | (one True, one False) | In "only 1 True" puzzles, every is False |
Worked Examples
Worked Example 7.3.1: Overlapping vs. Non-Overlapping Queue Positions
Problem: In a single-file ticket line, Kerem is -th from the front and Pelin is -th from the back. There are exactly people standing strictly between Kerem and Pelin. Find (a) the maximum and minimum possible number of people in the line, and (b) Pelin's position from the front in the minimum-queue case.
Solution:
- Maximum Queue Size (Non-Overlapping — Kerem ahead of Pelin):
- Minimum Queue Size (Overlapping — Pelin ahead of Kerem):
- Pelin's Position from the Front when : Using the single-person formula :
Verification: With Pelin at -th and Kerem at -th from the front, the people at positions are the people strictly between them.
Worked Example 7.3.2: Contradiction Shortcut in a 4-Box Truth Puzzle
Problem: A gold coin is placed inside one of four locked boxes (). Each box bears a printed statement:
- Box : "The coin is in Box ."
- Box : "The coin is in Box ."
- Box : "The coin is not in Box ."
- Box : "The coin is not in Box ."
If only one of the four statements is true and the other three are false, which box contains the gold coin, and which box's statement is true?
Solution:
- Identify the contradictory pair: Box ("The coin is in Box ") and Box ("The coin is not in Box ") are exact logical negations (). Therefore, one of is True and the other is False.
- Deduce the truth values of the remaining statements: Since only one statement in total is true, both Box 's statement and Box 's statement must be False ().
- Negate the false statement on Box : Box claims "The coin is not in Box ." Since this statement is False, its negation is True: the coin is in Box !
- Verify all four labels when the coin is in Box :
- Box ("in "): False ().
- Box ("in "): False ().
- Box ("not in "): True ().
- Box ("not in "): False (). Thus, the coin is in Box and Box has the sole true statement.
Review the Method
In 'exactly one statement is true' puzzles (İfadelerden yalnız biri doğrudur), locating two mutually contradictory statements () confines the single truth to and immediately forces all other statements to be false.
In a single-file queue at a campus cafeteria, Selin is -th from the front and Bora is -th from the back. If there are exactly students standing strictly between Selin and Bora, what is the difference between the maximum and minimum possible number of students in the queue?
Six colleagues () sit around a circular table at six equally spaced seats numbered to clockwise. You are given that: (1) sits directly opposite ; (2) sits immediately clockwise of ; (3) sits immediately between and ; and (4) does not sit adjacent to . Who sits directly opposite ?
Given that the compound proposition has a truth value of (False), what are the respective truth values of ?
Exactly one of three suspects () accidentally broke a laboratory beaker, and when questioned, ONLY ONE of the three suspects told the truth while the other two lied:
- Suspect : 'Suspect broke the beaker.'
- Suspect : 'Suspect did not break the beaker.'
- Suspect : 'Suspect did not break the beaker.' Which suspect broke the beaker, and who told the truth?
broke the beaker; told the truth
broke the beaker; told the truth
broke the beaker; told the truth
broke the beaker; told the truth
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.