11.3 Surface Water Treatment Rules & Log Removal Credit
Key Takeaways
- Surface Water Treatment Rule and Amendments is a named sub-topic in the SWRCB treatment Expected Range of Knowledge.
- The SWTR requires an overall 3-log Giardia and 4-log virus removal or inactivation for all surface water and GWUDI systems.
- Conventional filtration receives 2.5-log Giardia and 2.0-log virus removal credit, so disinfection must supply the remaining 0.5-log Giardia and 2.0-log virus.
- Direct filtration receives only 2.0-log Giardia and 1.0-log virus credit, so it carries a much larger disinfection burden than conventional treatment.
- The Interim Enhanced SWTR requires combined filter effluent turbidity at or below 0.3 NTU in 95 percent of monthly measurements and never above 1.0 NTU, plus individual filter effluent monitoring.
A Layered Set of Rules
The Surface Water Treatment Rule and Amendments is listed by name in the treatment blueprint. It is not one rule but a stack, each layer adding a requirement without repealing the one below:
| Rule | Year | Applies to | What it added |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWTR | 1989 | All surface water and GWUDI systems | 3-log Giardia and 4-log virus removal/inactivation; filtration and disinfection required; disinfectant residual entering and in the distribution system |
| IESWTR | 1998 | Systems serving ≥ 10,000 | 2-log Cryptosporidium removal; tightened turbidity to 0.3 NTU; individual filter effluent (IFE) monitoring; sanitary survey requirements |
| LT1ESWTR | 2002 | Systems serving < 10,000 | Extended IESWTR requirements to small systems |
| LT2ESWTR | 2006 | All surface water and GWUDI systems | Source water Cryptosporidium monitoring, bin classification, additional treatment for higher bins, uncovered finished reservoir requirements |
Two universal SWTR residual requirements operators must know:
- A detectable disinfectant residual must be maintained in the distribution system, or an HPC of ≤ 500 CFU/mL may be used in lieu of a detectable residual.
- The residual entering the distribution system may not be undetectable for more than 4 hours.
Log Removal, Log Inactivation, and Total Log Reduction
Log removal is credit for physically taking organisms out - coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, membranes. Log inactivation is credit for killing or disabling them - chlorine, ozone, chlorine dioxide, UV. A log is a factor of ten:
| Log reduction | Percent reduction |
|---|---|
| 0.5-log | 68.4% |
| 1-log | 90% |
| 2-log | 99% |
| 2.5-log | 99.68% |
| 3-log | 99.9% |
| 4-log | 99.99% |
Filtration Removal Credits
| Filtration technology | Giardia | Virus | Cryptosporidium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional (coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration) | 2.5-log | 2.0-log | 2.0-log |
| Direct filtration (no sedimentation) | 2.0-log | 1.0-log | 2.0-log |
| Slow sand filtration | 2.0-log | 2.0-log | 2.0-log |
| Diatomaceous earth filtration | 2.0-log | 1.0-log | 2.0-log |
What Disinfection Must Then Supply
| Plant type | Required total | Filtration credit | Disinfection must provide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional | 3-log Giardia / 4-log virus | 2.5 / 2.0 | 0.5-log Giardia and 2.0-log virus |
| Direct filtration | 3-log Giardia / 4-log virus | 2.0 / 1.0 | 1.0-log Giardia and 3.0-log virus |
| Slow sand | 3-log Giardia / 4-log virus | 2.0 / 2.0 | 1.0-log Giardia and 2.0-log virus |
[!IMPORTANT] This is the single most useful table in the whole SWTR topic. A direct filtration plant needs twice the Giardia inactivation and much more virus inactivation than a conventional plant treating the same water, because it gets less physical credit. That is why so many California direct filtration plants run higher chlorine residuals or added ozone or UV. When a question compares two plants with identical CT, the direct filtration plant is the one closer to non-compliance.
Turbidity Performance Standards
Turbidity is the day-to-day proxy for physical removal, and the standards are performance-based rather than health-based:
| Measurement | Conventional and direct filtration | Slow sand and DE |
|---|---|---|
| Combined filter effluent (CFE) | ≤ 0.3 NTU in at least 95 percent of the measurements taken each month | ≤ 1.0 NTU in 95 percent |
| CFE maximum | Never above 1.0 NTU | Never above 5.0 NTU |
| Measurement frequency | Every 4 hours minimum for CFE | Same |
Individual Filter Effluent (IFE) Monitoring
Under IESWTR/LT1, each individual filter must be monitored continuously, with readings recorded at least every 15 minutes. Reporting triggers:
- IFE turbidity > 1.0 NTU in two consecutive 15-minute readings - report and, if it recurs in three consecutive months, conduct a filter self-assessment
- IFE turbidity > 0.5 NTU in two consecutive readings at the end of the first four hours after the filter returns to service
- IFE turbidity > 2.0 NTU in two consecutive readings, in two consecutive months - a comprehensive performance evaluation (CPE) by the State or a third party
[!TIP] The rule targets filter ripening deliberately. The 0.5 NTU four-hour trigger exists because the worst water a filter produces is in the first minutes after backwash, which is also when Cryptosporidium is most likely to pass. Filter-to-waste during ripening is the standard operational answer.
LT2 and Bin Classification
LT2 required systems to monitor source water for Cryptosporidium (large systems by direct measurement; small systems by E. coli screening first) and then be assigned to a bin:
| Bin | Source water Cryptosporidium (oocysts/L) | Additional treatment required beyond conventional |
|---|---|---|
| Bin 1 | < 0.075 | None |
| Bin 2 | 0.075 to < 1.0 | 1.0-log |
| Bin 3 | 1.0 to < 3.0 | 2.0-log |
| Bin 4 | ≥ 3.0 | 2.5-log |
Additional credit is earned from the microbial toolbox: watershed control, bank filtration, second-stage filtration, membranes, bag/cartridge filters, combined filter performance, presedimentation, roughing filters, ozone, chlorine dioxide, and UV - which is the most common answer because UV delivers large Cryptosporidium credit at low dose.
LT2 also addressed uncovered finished water reservoirs: systems had to cover them or treat the discharge to achieve 4-log virus, 3-log Giardia, and 2-log Cryptosporidium inactivation. This is why California utilities spent the 2010s covering or replacing open finished-water reservoirs.
Putting It Together
A conventional plant treats a Bin 2 source.
- Giardia: 3-log required; filtration gives 2.5-log; disinfection must supply 0.5-log.
- Virus: 4-log required; filtration gives 2.0-log; disinfection must supply 2.0-log.
- Cryptosporidium: 2-log from conventional filtration plus 1.0-log additional for Bin 2 = 3.0-log total. Chlorine provides essentially no Cryptosporidium credit at practical CT, so the plant must add UV or ozone to earn the extra log.
That single scenario explains most California plant upgrades of the past two decades: UV was added not for Giardia or viruses, but for Cryptosporidium bin credit.
A direct filtration plant treats surface water. How much Giardia inactivation must its disinfection process provide to meet the Surface Water Treatment Rule?
A filter returns to service after backwash and its individual filter effluent turbidity reads 0.62 NTU on two consecutive 15-minute readings at the end of the first four hours. What does the rule require?
Why did many California conventional filtration plants add ultraviolet disinfection after LT2?