5.1 状況把握問題: Situation Comprehension (Photo + Audio)
Key Takeaways
- The 状況把握問題 sub-section pairs one photograph with a 30–60 second audio scene played only once, then asks a single question with four written options.
- Identify three things during the audio: who is talking (役割), what triggered the conversation (起因), and what they are trying to decide or do (目的).
- The official sample's answer is クレーム処理 (handling a complaint), signaled by 「契約、打ち切るとまで言ってたんだ」 plus 「品質管理が徹底してなかったのかなあ」 — a symptom, not the topic itself.
- The detail-as-topic trap names a genuinely mentioned sub-topic (e.g., 品質管理) but elevates it to the main topic; the correct option names the action being taken at the right altitude.
- Pre-read the photo for 5 seconds (setting, people, props, mood) to eliminate impossible topics before the audio starts.
5.1 状況把握問題: Situation Comprehension (Photo + Audio)
The 状況把握問題 sub-section of Part 2 confronts you with a single photograph and a short audio scene (typically 30–60 seconds). One question is asked, and you choose from four written options. The audio plays only once. Your job is not to translate every word — it is to identify, from the photograph's context plus the dialogue, what is actually happening.
What the Photograph Tells You
The photo is not decoration. It eliminates dozens of possible topics before the audio even begins. Scan it for these four signals:
- Setting — office, factory floor, store, conference room, construction site, hospital, warehouse.
- People — number, apparent roles (suit vs. uniform vs. coveralls), facial expressions.
- Props — documents on a desk, a product sample, a smartphone, a delivery truck, a calendar, a chart on a whiteboard.
- Mood — heads-down concentration, a tense exchange, a briefing, an inspection.
A photo of three people in shirtsleeves huddled over a printed report in a meeting room already rules out "factory line stoppage" and "customer reception." Before the audio starts, form a one-sentence hypothesis: Three employees are discussing a problem in a meeting.
The Three Things You Must Identify
During the audio, listen for exactly three pieces of information. Anything that does not serve one of these three is a distractor.
- 役割 (Who is talking) — Are the speakers colleagues, a boss and a subordinate, a vendor and a client, a manager and a technician? Roles are signaled by register (desu/masu vs. da/de aru), address terms (部長, 課長, お客様), and apology weight.
- 起因 (What triggered the conversation) — A complaint arrived, a sample failed, a deadline slipped, a customer called back, a budget was rejected. Listen for the trigger phrase that opens the scene: 「実は…」「先ほど…」「お客様から…」.
- 目的 (What they are trying to decide or do) — Are they diagnosing cause, deciding a response, scheduling a follow-up, drafting an apology, escalating to headquarters? The last sentence of the audio usually states the purpose.
When all three are clear, the correct option is the one that summarizes all three at the right altitude — not too narrow, not too broad.
Common Situations You Will See
| Japanese | English | Trigger cues in the audio |
|---|---|---|
| クレーム対応 | Handling a customer complaint | 「契約、打ち切るとまで言ってたんだ」「お客様から電話」「謝罪に行く」 |
| 不具合報告 | Defect report | 「ロット番号」「不良品」「交換に出します」「全数回収」 |
| 納期遅延相談 | Consultation on delivery delay | 「今週中には間に合わない」「最長で」「納期は〇日」 |
| トラブル相談 | Trouble consultation | 「現場から連絡が」「動かない」「原因を確認中」 |
| 方針決定 | Policy decision | 「方針としては」「これからは…ルールにする」 |
| スケジュール調整 | Schedule adjustment | 「〇日なら」「都合をつけます」「別の日程で」 |
| 顧客対応 | Customer response | 「お客様にどうお伝えしましょう」「まずは電話で」 |
| 採用面接 | Hiring interview | 「御社では」「前職では」「いつからお勤めいただけますか」 |
| 人事異動 | Personnel reassignment | 「異動が決まりまして」「来月から」「引き継ぎを」 |
| 商品不良 | Product defect | 「サンプルを確認したら」「規格を満たしていない」「再製造」 |
Memorize this vocabulary list. In the official sample, the words 「契約、打ち切るとまで言ってたんだ」 and 「品質管理が徹底してなかったのかなあ」 together signal クレーム処理 (handling a complaint), not just a "quality control discussion."
Trap Patterns to Recognize
The test writers reuse the same four traps. Recognize the shape and you will not be fooled.
- Detail-as-topic trap — An option names something genuinely mentioned (品質管理, 納期, 単価) but it is a symptom or sub-topic, not the topic. The main topic is the action being taken (e.g., クレーム処理, not 品質管理).
- Rejected-topic trap — A speaker raises an option that the others shoot down ("いや、それは…"). The wrong answer paraphrases the rejected branch.
- Symptom-as-topic trap — An option paraphrases a visible consequence ("売上が下がった") as if it were the meeting's purpose, when the meeting is actually about how to respond.
- Wrong-altitude trap — An option that is technically true but too narrow (one person's task) or too broad ("会社の経営全般") to match the dialogue.
A Mini-Dialogue Walkthrough
Hypothesis from the photo: three office workers at a conference table, papers in front of them, one person pointing at a printed report.
A: 「先ほどお客様から電話がありまして、先月納品したロット、全数打ち切るとまで言ってたんだ。」 B: 「そんなに…。やはり品質管理が徹底してなかったのかなあ。」 C: 「まずは事実関係を確認して、午後にお客様へ謝罪行く日程を調整しましょう。」
Question: 3人は何について話していますか。
- A 品質管理の徹底方法
- B 顧客からのクレーム対応
- C 納品ロットの製造工程見直し
- D 来月の納期の再調整
Reasoning: The trigger is 「お客様から電話…打ち切るとまで」 (customer threatened to cancel) — a complaint. The purpose decided at the end is 「謝罪行く日程を調整」 (schedule the apology visit). The option that captures both the trigger and the purpose is the correct one. Option A is the detail-as-topic trap (品質管理 is B's speculation, not the topic). Option C is a possible future action but not what the meeting is about. Option D invents a future scheduling task. The correct choice names the action being taken.
Core Vocabulary to Recognize Instantly
| Japanese | English |
|---|---|
| クレーム / 苦情 | complaint |
| 不具合 / 不良品 | defect / defective product |
| 納期 / 納品 / 遅延 | delivery date / delivery / delay |
| 期限 / 打ち切る / 解約 | deadline / terminate / cancel contract |
| 訂正 / 交換 / 返品 | correction / exchange / return |
| 見舞い / 謝罪 | sympathy call / apology |
| 対応 / 処理 / 対策 | response / handling / countermeasure |
| 検討 / 見直し | study / review |
Recognizing these in the first three seconds of the audio lets you predict 起因 before the speakers spell it out.
Strategy Checklist
- In the 5 seconds before the audio: scan the photo, name the setting, name the apparent roles, predict two or three likely topics.
- During the audio: tag each speaker (A/B/C), write down 起因 and 目的 as two short notes.
- After the audio: eliminate any option that names only a sub-detail, a rejected branch, or a symptom. Pick the option that names the action being taken at the right altitude.
In a 状況把握問題 scene, three colleagues are heard saying 「お客様から電話がありまして」 and 「まずは謝罪行く日程を調整しましょう」. The photograph shows a meeting room. What is the best description of the situation?
Which of the following options best describes the classic "detail-as-topic" trap in a 状況把握問題 question?
During the audio, you hear one speaker propose 「来週の会議にしようか」 and another reply 「いや、今週中にまとめないと」. Which option is most likely a trap?