Proxy Voting & Other Client Obligations
Investment advisers have important obligations related to proxy voting, best execution, and trade allocation. These duties flow from the adviser's fiduciary relationship with clients.
Proxy Voting (Rule 206(4)-6)
When the Rule Applies
Rule 206(4)-6 applies when an investment adviser:
- Has voting authority over client securities (explicit or implicit)
- Exercises discretion that includes proxy voting authority
- Has not specifically excluded proxy voting from the advisory agreement
Requirements for Advisers with Voting Authority
| Requirement | Description |
|---|---|
| Written Policies | Must adopt and implement written proxy voting policies |
| Vote in Best Interest | Must vote proxies in clients' best interests |
| Conflict Disclosure | Must address how conflicts of interest are handled |
| Client Disclosure | Must describe policies in Form ADV Part 2A |
| Provide Upon Request | Must provide copy of policies and voting records |
| Recordkeeping | Must maintain records for 5 years |
Conflicts of Interest
Advisers must address how they handle conflicts, such as:
- Voting on securities of clients who are issuers
- Voting when adviser has business relationship with issuer
- Voting when adviser or personnel have personal interests
Use of Proxy Advisory Firms
If using a proxy advisory firm (like ISS or Glass Lewis):
- Must conduct due diligence on the firm's capabilities
- Must assess accuracy and conflicts of the firm
- Cannot blindly follow recommendations
- Ultimate responsibility remains with the adviser
Record Retention Requirements
Must maintain for 5 years:
- Proxy voting policies and procedures
- Proxy statements received (or where available)
- Records of actual votes cast
- Client requests for voting information
- Documents prepared for voting decisions
Best Execution
The Duty of Best Execution
Investment advisers have a duty to seek the most favorable terms reasonably available under the circumstances for client transactions.
Factors to Consider
| Factor | Consideration |
|---|---|
| Price | Most important but not the only factor |
| Commission/Spread | Cost of execution |
| Speed | How quickly the order is executed |
| Likelihood of Execution | Can the order be filled? |
| Size of Order | Impact on market |
| Settlement | Settlement capabilities |
| Broker Reputation | Financial responsibility and integrity |
| Research | Value of research services (soft dollars) |
Soft Dollar Arrangements
Definition: Using client commission dollars to pay for research and brokerage services.
Section 28(e) Safe Harbor: Protects advisers from breach of fiduciary duty claims if:
| Requirement | Description |
|---|---|
| Eligible Services | Only brokerage and research services qualify |
| Lawful Assistance | Services must assist in investment decision-making |
| Good Faith Determination | Adviser believes commissions are reasonable for services |
Eligible vs. Ineligible Services
| Eligible (Safe Harbor) | Ineligible (Not Protected) |
|---|---|
| Research reports and analysis | Office rent and equipment |
| Trading systems for execution | General administrative expenses |
| Market data services | Marketing costs |
| Financial publications | Employee salaries |
| Seminars on investment topics | Travel expenses (most) |
Mixed-Use Items
For items that are partly eligible and partly ineligible:
- Must make reasonable allocation
- Only eligible portion can be paid with soft dollars
- Ineligible portion must be paid with adviser's own funds
- Documentation of allocation required
Disclosure Requirements
Soft dollar arrangements must be disclosed in:
- Form ADV Part 2A (Item 12—Brokerage Practices)
- Description of products/services received
- Description of how they benefit clients
Directed Brokerage
Client-Directed Brokerage
When a client directs the use of a particular broker:
- Client may not receive best execution
- Adviser must disclose this risk
- Client must consent to the arrangement
- Trades may cost more or execute at inferior prices
Adviser-Directed Brokerage
When an adviser directs brokerage for non-best execution reasons:
- May create conflicts of interest
- Must be disclosed
- Must still consider client interests
Trade Allocation
Fair Allocation Requirements
When an adviser manages multiple accounts with similar investment objectives:
- Must allocate trades fairly among clients
- Cannot favor certain clients over others
- Cannot allocate based on fee structure
- Must have written allocation policies
Aggregation (Bunching) of Orders
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Reduce costs and improve execution |
| Average Price | All participating accounts receive same average price |
| Pro-Rata Allocation | Generally allocated proportionally |
| Partial Fills | Must be allocated fairly |
| Documentation | Written policies and procedures required |
Prohibited Practices
- Favoring accounts that pay higher fees
- "Cherry-picking" profitable trades for certain accounts
- Allocating IPO shares unfairly
- Giving preferential treatment to proprietary accounts
On the Exam: Know the three-step test for Section 28(e) safe harbor for soft dollars: (1) eligible service, (2) lawful assistance in investment decisions, (3) good faith belief that commissions are reasonable. Also know that proxy voting authority creates specific compliance obligations.
Key Takeaways
- Proxy voting authority requires written policies and best-interest voting
- Best execution considers multiple factors, not just lowest cost
- Section 28(e) provides safe harbor for eligible soft dollar arrangements
- Trade allocation must be fair—no favoritism allowed
- All these obligations flow from the adviser's fiduciary duty
If an investment adviser has authority to vote client proxies, they must:
The Section 28(e) safe harbor for soft dollar arrangements requires:
When aggregating (bunching) client orders, an adviser must:
18.1 Fiduciary Duties
Chapter 18: Ethics & Fiduciary Obligations