15.3 Construction Process: Facilitating the Construction Process
Key Takeaways
- Submittals are the contractor's package of shop drawings, product data, and samples submitted to the designer for review against design intent
- The designer reviews submittals for conformance with the design intent but does not approve means, methods, or safety—that is the contractor's responsibility
- RFIs (Requests for Information) are the contractor's formal written questions that the designer answers to clarify the contract documents
- Cuttings for Approval (CFAs) and strike-offs are physical material samples the designer reviews and approves before full production of textiles, wallcovering, or finishes
- Pre-construction and OAC (Owner-Architect-Contractor) progress meetings are the primary communication forums during construction
15.3 Facilitating the Construction Process
Quick Answer: During construction, the designer facilitates the process by reviewing submittals (shop drawings, product data, samples), answering RFIs, reviewing mockups and cuttings for approval, attending OAC progress meetings, and visiting the site. The designer reviews for conformance with the design intent expressed in the contract documents—not for means, methods, or safety, which remain the contractor's responsibility.
Why Construction Facilitation Matters
Construction is where the design meets reality. The designer's facilitation role ensures the contractor builds what the contract documents describe, clarifies ambiguities through formal channels, and documents the resolution of field questions. On the IDPX, this role is tested through the submittal-review workflow, the RFI process, and the boundary between design-intent review and contractor responsibility.
Submittals
A submittal is the package the contractor submits to the designer for review before fabricating or installing a component. Submittals demonstrate that the contractor has understood the design intent and intends to furnish the correct product. The four main submittal types are:
| Submittal Type | What It Shows | Designer Reviews For |
|---|---|---|
| Shop drawings | Fabricator's detailed drawings (millwork, custom casework, structural steel) | Conformance with design intent, dimensions, finishes |
| Product data | Manufacturer cut sheets for specified products | Conformance with specified performance, materials, finish, model |
| Samples | Physical samples of finishes (wood, stone, paint, laminate) | Color, texture, material conformance with design intent |
| Mockups / prototypes | Full-size on-site samples of an assembly (wall type, ceiling, room) | Conformance before full production, approval to proceed |
The designer reviews submittals only for conformance with the design intent in the contract documents. The designer does not review for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or safety precautions—those remain the contractor's responsibility under AIA A201 §3.3.1. The designer's stamp on a submittal is not an approval to build; it is a confirmation that the submitted product matches the specified design intent.
Cuttings for Approval and Strike-Offs
Cuttings for Approval (CFAs) are physical samples cut from the actual production run of a material—typically textiles, wallcovering, or resilient flooring—submitted to the designer to confirm color and pattern match before the full quantity is shipped. A strike-off is a similar pre-production sample for custom-printed or woven textiles, showing the actual colorway and pattern at scale. The designer approves or rejects the CFA or strike-off in writing before the manufacturer ships the full order. Approving a CFA is the final color and pattern checkpoint.
Mockups and Prototypes
A mockup is a full-size, on-site representation of a wall, ceiling, floor, or room assembly built by the contractor for the designer's review before full production. Mockups are used when a finish assembly is complex, repeated many times, or critical to the design—typical examples include a single guestroom in a hotel, a representative corridor section, or a feature wall. The designer reviews the mockup, documents approved deviations as the standard for the work, and the contractor proceeds to replicate the approved mockup throughout the project.
Requests for Information (RFIs)
An RFI is the contractor's formal written question to the designer when the contract documents are ambiguous, conflicting, or incomplete. The designer's response is a written clarification that becomes part of the contract record. RFI responses may confirm an interpretation, require a sketch or bulletin, or trigger a change order if the clarification has cost or schedule impact. RFIs must be answered promptly—delays in RFI responses delay construction.
| RFI Response Type | When Used | Cost / Schedule Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Clarification only | Documents are clear; contractor misread | None |
| Sketch / bulletin | Clarification requires a drawing | Maybe—may trigger a change |
| Change order | Clarification changes scope, time, or cost | Yes—requires owner approval |
Construction Meetings
Two meeting types anchor construction communication:
- Pre-construction conference — held before work begins; the designer, owner, contractor, and major subcontractors review procedures, submittal log, RFI process, schedule, site rules, and communication protocols.
- OAC (Owner-Architect-Contractor) progress meetings — held regularly (weekly or biweekly) during construction; the three parties review progress, RFIs, submittals, changes, payment applications, and schedule. The designer typically chairs the OAC meeting and issues minutes.
Designer's Site Visit Role
The designer visits the site at appropriate intervals to observe the work for conformance with the contract documents and to answer field questions. Under AIA B101, the architect visits the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction. The visit is observation, not supervision or inspection—the designer does not direct the contractor's workforce or assume responsibility for construction means and methods. Site visit reports document observations and are distributed to the owner and contractor.
Submittal Review Workflow
The submittal cycle:
- Contractor prepares and submits the submittal package
- Designer reviews for conformance with design intent
- Designer returns the submittal marked: Approved, Approved as Noted / Revise and Submit, Furnish as Submitted, or Rejected
- If revisions are required, the contractor resubmits
- Once approved, the contractor proceeds with fabrication or installation
A rejected submittal must not proceed. An "approved as noted" submittal proceeds with the noted modifications.
Exam Scenario
A contractor submits shop drawings for custom millwork that match the dimensions but show a different wood veneer species than specified. The correct action is to mark the submittal "Revise and Submit" or "Rejected" with a note requiring the specified veneer species, because the submittal does not conform to the design intent. Do not approve the submittal simply because the dimensions match—material conformance is part of design-intent review.
Key Reminders
- The designer reviews submittals for design intent conformance, not means and methods.
- CFAs and strike-offs are the final color and pattern checkpoint before full production.
- RFIs must be answered promptly; delays delay construction.
- Mockups set the approved standard for repeated assemblies.
- The designer observes the site; the contractor supervises the work.
What is the scope of the designer's review when a contractor submits shop drawings for custom millwork?
What is a Cutting for Approval (CFA), and when is it used?
A contractor's RFI response requires a clarification that changes the scope of the work and adds cost. What must happen before the change is implemented?
Which of the following correctly describes the designer's site visit role during construction under standard AIA B101?