9.5 Post-Construction Stormwater, SCMs & the NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual
Key Takeaways
- Post-construction stormwater is governed by 15A NCAC 02H .1000, with project-level design requirements in .1003 and Minimum Design Criteria for Stormwater Control Measures in .1050 through .1062.
- A project is either low density, meeting the criteria of .1003(2) with vegetated conveyances, or high density, which must achieve either runoff treatment or runoff volume match through Stormwater Control Measures.
- For high density projects designed to achieve runoff treatment, the required storm depth is one inch; coastal projects draining to SA or ORW waters carry the more stringent 1.5-inch requirement.
- Vegetated setbacks from perennial waterbodies, perennial streams, and intermittent streams shall be at least 30 feet wide for both low and high density development.
- The Board Guidelines exclude dams, retaining walls, structures requiring special or structural design, and pumping stations, so an engineered SCM with a structural outlet or an embankment meeting dam criteria is beyond a land surveyor's incidental authority.
9.5 Post-Construction Stormwater, SCMs & the NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual
The Board's reference list names the NCDEQ Stormwater BMP Manual — now published as the NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual — as a state-specific exam resource. Post-construction stormwater is a different regulatory program from erosion control: erosion control governs the construction period and is administered by the Sedimentation Control Commission, while post-construction stormwater governs the completed development in perpetuity and is administered by the Environmental Management Commission through the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources.
The rules were comprehensively readopted effective January 1, 2017, replacing the old "BMP" vocabulary with Stormwater Control Measure (SCM) and consolidating the design requirements into Minimum Design Criteria (MDC).
1. Where the Rules Live
| Rule | Subject |
|---|---|
| 15A NCAC 02H .1002 | Definitions, including runoff treatment, runoff volume match, built-upon area |
| 15A NCAC 02H .1003 | Design requirements for low density and high density projects, and vegetated setbacks |
| 15A NCAC 02H .1019 - .1021 | Coastal county and other program-specific requirements, including the coastal storm depth |
| 15A NCAC 02H .1050 | MDC for all Stormwater Control Measures — applies to every SCM |
| 15A NCAC 02H .1051 - .1062 | MDC for specific SCM types |
Rule .1050 opens with the sizing principle that governs everything downstream: "The design volume of SCMs shall take into account the runoff at build out from all surfaces draining to the system. Drainage from off-site areas may be bypassed. The combined design volume of all SCMs on the project shall be sufficient to handle the required storm."
2. The Low Density / High Density Fork
Every regulated project takes one of two paths.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 15A NCAC 02H .1003 - THE FORK |
| |
| LOW DENSITY (.1003(2)) HIGH DENSITY (.1003(3)) |
| ------------------------ --------------------------- |
| Built-upon area at or below the Any project that does not |
| applicable density threshold conform to the low density |
| criteria |
| Stormwater conveyed primarily by |
| VEGETATED CONVEYANCES: Must achieve either |
| - trapezoidal, min bottom width 2 ft RUNOFF TREATMENT or |
| - side slopes no steeper than 3:1 RUNOFF VOLUME MATCH |
| - minimum length 100 ft through engineered SCMs |
| - or treatment swales per .1061 |
| SCMs must meet the MDC in |
| No engineered SCM required .1050 and the type-specific |
| rules in .1051 - .1062 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The density threshold is not a single statewide number — it varies by program, watershed, and local ordinance. Greenville, for example, applies a 24 percent built-upon-area threshold. The design decision on a subdivision is therefore always a two-part question: what program applies here, and what threshold does it set?
3. The Design Storm
| Context | Required storm depth |
|---|---|
| High density project designed to achieve runoff treatment | One inch |
| Coastal county projects draining to SA (shellfishing) or ORW (Outstanding Resource Waters) | 1.5 inches, with a comparison of pre- and post-development runoff for the 1-year 24-hour storm |
The Simple Method (Schueler) is the conventional volume computation in the NCDEQ manual:
where V is the design volume in cubic feet, R_D is the design storm rainfall depth in inches (typically 1.0 or 1.5), R_v is the dimensionless runoff coefficient derived from impervious fraction, and A is the drainage area in acres. The constant 3,630 converts acre-inches to cubic feet. If the discrete SCS Curve Number method yields a greater volume, that greater volume may be used.
Drawdown. Volume-based SCMs are conventionally designed to release the treatment volume over two to five days — long enough to provide treatment, short enough to restore storage before the next storm.
4. Vegetated Setbacks
Rule .1003 requires vegetated setbacks from perennial waterbodies, perennial streams, and intermittent streams of at least 30 feet in width, for both low and high density development.
This 30-foot setback is a stormwater requirement and is distinct from three other buffers a North Carolina surveyor encounters, all of which can apply to the same project simultaneously:
| Buffer | Source | Width |
|---|---|---|
| Post-construction stormwater vegetated setback | 15A NCAC 02H .1003 | 30 ft |
| Trout waters erosion-control buffer | G.S. 113A-57(1) | 25 ft undisturbed, or wider as needed |
| Nutrient-sensitive riparian buffers (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Jordan, Falls, Catawba, Randleman) | EMC basin rules | commonly 50 ft, in two zones |
| Coastal Area Management Act estuarine shoreline area of environmental concern | CAMA rules under G.S. 113A-100 et seq. | 75 ft (30 ft in some urban waterfronts) |
Mapping all applicable buffers is the surveyor's job on a subdivision plat regardless of who designs the SCM.
5. Common SCM Types
The MDC rules address, among others, infiltration systems, bioretention cells, wet ponds, stormwater wetlands, permeable pavement, sand filters, rainwater harvesting, green roofs, level spreaders and filter strips, disconnected impervious surface, treatment swales, and dry ponds.
| SCM | Primary mechanism | Typical constraint |
|---|---|---|
| Wet pond | Settling in a permanent pool | Requires reliable base flow or a high water table; embankment height matters |
| Bioretention cell | Filtration through engineered media, plant uptake | Media specification and underdrain design |
| Infiltration system | Full infiltration into the soil profile | Requires soils investigation and separation to seasonal high water table |
| Permeable pavement | Infiltration through the surface course | Subgrade infiltration rate; maintenance against clogging |
| Sand filter | Filtration through a sand bed | Structural chambers |
| Treatment swale (.1061) | Conveyance with treatment | The low-density workhorse |
| Level spreader / filter strip | Diffuse flow into a vegetated filter | Precise grading tolerances |
6. The Scope Line — Read This Before Designing an SCM
Post-construction SCM design is where a surveyor is most likely to drift out of the incidental exception without noticing. Run the Section 9.1 checklist:
| Feature of the SCM | Board Guideline consequence |
|---|---|
| An embankment impounding water | Exclusion 4 — dams. And if it meets the jurisdictional criteria of the Dam Safety Law of 1967, it is a regulated dam requiring a PE. |
| A retaining wall forming any side of the facility | Exclusion 4 — retaining walls |
| A structural outlet — riser and barrel, weir structure, engineered energy dissipator | Exclusion 5 — special or structural design |
| A pump to move water into or out of the facility | Exclusion 11 — pumping stations |
| Serving a large upstream drainage basin routed through the subdivision | Exclusion 6 |
| Serving a site that is not a subdivision | Exclusion 3, and G.S. 89C-3(7)b.(vi) |
| Anything the surveyor is not totally competent to design in all aspects | Exclusion 2 |
[!CAUTION] A great many post-construction SCMs fail at least one of those tests. A wet detention pond with a riser-and-barrel outlet in an earthen embankment implicates exclusions 4 and 5 immediately. The realistic incidental scope is closer to vegetated conveyances, treatment swales, and simple grading-based measures — the low-density path — plus the survey, topography, drainage-area delineation, and plat work that any SCM project needs and that only a surveyor can provide.
That is not a small role. Delineating drainage areas, computing built-upon area, mapping buffers and setbacks, establishing SCM as-built geometry and elevations, and platting the drainage easements and access corridors that maintenance requires are all squarely within the practice of land surveying, and they are what most stormwater projects actually need from a PLS.
Under 15A NCAC 02H, what is the required storm depth for a high density project designed to achieve runoff treatment outside the coastal SA and ORW context?
What vegetated setback does 15A NCAC 02H .1003 require from perennial waterbodies, perennial streams, and intermittent streams?
A surveyor proposes to design a wet detention pond for a subdivision, formed by an earthen embankment with a riser-and-barrel structural outlet. Under the Board Guidelines, is this within incidental practice?
Under 15A NCAC 02H .1050, how must the design volume of a Stormwater Control Measure be determined?