5.2 North Carolina Real Property History, Colonial Grants & the Granville District

5.2 North Carolina Real Property History, Colonial Grants & the Granville District

Understanding the historical origin of land titles is an essential competency for the North Carolina Professional Land Surveyor. Unlike the thirty western and midwestern "public land" states partitioned under the rectangular Public Land Survey System (PLSS), North Carolina is an original colonial metes and bounds state. Every private boundary retraced today traces its root of title back through a complex historical progression of English proprietary charters, royal crown grants, the Granville Proprietary District, post-revolutionary state confiscation acts, and the North Carolina State Land Grant Office.

---

1. The Colonial Charters of Carolina (1663 & 1665)

The root of all real property titles in North Carolina begins with King Charles II of England:

• The Charter of 1663: King Charles II granted the vast territory of "Carolina" (spanning from 31° to 36° North latitude, and westward from the Atlantic Ocean to the "South Seas" / Pacific Ocean) to eight Lords Proprietors who had supported his restoration to the English throne.
• The Expanded Charter of 1665: Charles II enlarged the grant northward to 36°30' N latitude (the current North Carolina–Virginia state line) to encompass established settlers along the Albemarle Sound.
• Feudal Tenures and Socage: The Lords Proprietors held the land in free and common socage, granting parcels to early colonists in exchange for annual perpetual rental payments known as quitrents.
• The Great Deed of Grant (1668): A crucial early constitutional document in which the Proprietors guaranteed Albemarle settlers that they could hold their lands under the same favorable terms and quitrent rates as Virginia colonists.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                   HISTORICAL CHRONOLOGY OF NC LAND TITLE                    |
|                                                                             |
|   1663 / 1665  --> Royal Charters to Eight Lords Proprietors                |
|   1729         --> Crown Purchase: 7 Proprietors Sell to King George II     |
|                    (NC becomes a Royal Colony; Earl Granville retains 1/8)  |
|   1744         --> Granville District Partitioned (35°34' N to VA Border)   |
|   1776         --> NC Declaration of Rights: State Asserts Sovereign Domain |
|   1777 / 1779  --> NC Confiscation Acts: Granville & Crown Lands Seized     |
|   1777-Present --> NC State Land Grant System (G.S. Chapter 146)            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

---

2. The Crown Purchase of 1729 and The Granville District (1744)

By the 1720s, proprietary governance in North Carolina was plagued by political instability, piracy, and violent resistance to quitrent collections.

The Crown Buyout of 1729:

In 1729, King George II bought out seven of the eight Lords Proprietors for £2,500 each, transforming North Carolina into a Royal Crown Colony. However, one proprietor—John Carteret, 2nd Earl Granville (later Lord President of the Privy Council)—refused to surrender his territorial interest.

The Partition of 1744 and The Granville Line:

Because Carteret owned an undivided one-eighth share of the entire original Carolina grant, King George II and the Privy Council agreed in 1744 to partition his share into a single, contiguous geographic tract located entirely within North Carolina:

• Southern Boundary of Granville District: A line surveyed at latitude 35° 34' North.
• Northern Boundary: The Virginia border at latitude 36° 30' North.
• East-West Extent: From the Atlantic Ocean westward to the Pacific Ocean (the "South Seas").
• Significance: The Granville District contained approximately the northern half of North Carolina (including modern Raleigh, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, Durham, and the entire northern coastal plain and Piedmont), comprising over two-thirds of the colony's total population and the majority of its fertile agricultural lands.

                      NORTH CAROLINA COLONIAL DIVISION (1744-1776)
  36°30' N  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐  VIRGINIA BORDER
            │                                                            │
            │                 THE GRANVILLE DISTRICT                     │
            │      (Private Proprietary Grants issued by Earl Granville) │
            │      (Land Offices at Edenton; Managed by Agents)          │
            │                                                            │
  35°34' N  ├════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════┤  GRANVILLE LINE
            │                                                            │
            │                  ROYAL CROWN LANDS                         │
            │         (Grants issued by Royal Governors in name          │
            │          of King George II / King George III)              │
            │                                                            │
  33°50' N  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘  SOUTH CAROLINA

Dual Land Grant Administration (1744–1776):

For thirty-two years prior to the American Revolution, land titles in North Carolina were granted through two completely separate, parallel legal jurisdictions:

1. In the Granville District (Northern Half): Grants were issued as private conveyances from Earl Granville (and his heirs) through his land agents in Edenton (such as Francis Corbin and Thomas Child). Grantees received proprietary deeds requiring annual quitrents to the Carteret family.
2. In the Crown Domain (Southern Half): Grants were issued directly by the Royal Governor and the Governor's Council in the name of the British King, recorded in royal patent books.

[!NOTE] The Granville Land Office closed abruptly upon the death of the 2nd Earl Granville in 1763 and, due to legal disputes and the impending Revolution, never fully reopened. This created an extensive period of unauthorized squatting, unperfected entries, and conflicting boundary surveys throughout northern North Carolina.

---

3. The American Revolution & The Confiscation Acts of 1777 and 1779

With the outbreak of the Revolutionary War and the adoption of the North Carolina Constitution and Declaration of Rights in 1776, the newly independent state asserted sovereign ownership over all vacant, ungranted, and crown lands within its borders.

The Confiscation Acts:

To fund the war effort and eliminate foreign proprietary claims, the North Carolina General Assembly enacted the Confiscation Acts of 1777 (Ch. 17) and 1779 (Ch. 5):

• Extinguishment of Proprietary & Crown Title: The General Assembly formally confiscated all real property and ungranted lands owned by British subjects, loyalists (Tories), and the heirs of Earl Granville.
• Vesting in the State: Absolute fee-simple ownership of all ungranted lands within the former Granville District and Crown territories was vested in the State of North Carolina.
• Judicial Confirmation (Bayard v. Singleton, 1 N.C. 5 (1787)): In this landmark North Carolina case (which established the American doctrine of judicial review prior to Marbury v. Madison), the court addressed title disputes arising from property seized under the Confiscation Acts, ultimately solidifying the state's legal authority to convey sovereign title.

---

4. The North Carolina State Land Grant Process (G.S. Chapter 146)

Beginning in 1777, the General Assembly established a formal statutory process for citizens to acquire state-owned vacant lands. Codified today under Chapter 146 of the North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 146), early state land grants followed a strict four-stage administrative and surveying sequence:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                THE FOUR-STEP NC STATE LAND GRANT PROCESS                    |
|                                                                             |
|   1. ENTRY (County Entry Taker)                                             |
|      --> Claimant filed written entry describing location, watercourses,    |
|          and estimated acreage; paid statutory entry fees.                  |
|                                     │                                       |
|                                     ▼                                       |
|   2. WARRANT OF SURVEY (Issued to County Surveyor)                          |
|      --> Entry Taker issued official warrant ordering the official County   |
|          Surveyor to lay out and survey the tract within a fixed time.      |
|                                     │                                       |
|                                     ▼                                       |
|   3. PLAT & CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (Field Survey)                            |
|      --> County Surveyor ran lines on ground, marked corner trees, and      |
|          prepared duplicate plats with sworn chain carriers named.          |
|                                     │                                       |
|                                     ▼                                       |
|   4. GRANT ISSUANCE & REGISTRATION (Secretary of State & Register of Deeds) |
|      --> Secretary of State issued official Land Patent signed by Governor; |
|          Grantee required to record grant in County Registry of Deeds.      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

1. The Entry: The applicant filed an entry with the elected County Entry Taker, providing a general written description of the vacant land (identifying nearby creeks, roads, or existing neighbors). This established an equitable claim to the land.
2. The Warrant of Survey: If no caveat (protest) was filed by an adjoining owner within statutory notice periods, the Entry Taker issued a Warrant of Survey directing the County Surveyor to survey the tract.
3. The Field Survey and Plat:
   • The County Surveyor or an appointed deputy executed the survey on the ground using a magnetic compass and Gunter's chain.
   • Sworn Chain Carriers: By statutory mandate, the surveyor was accompanied by two chain carriers (often neighbors or youths) who were placed under oath to measure lines impartially and accurately. Their names were legally required to be written on the survey certificate.
   • The surveyor prepared two identical copies of the Plat and Certificate of Survey, delineating the courses, distances, natural bounds, and marked corner trees.
4. Grant Issuance and Recording:
   • The survey plats and purchase receipts were submitted to the North Carolina Secretary of State in Raleigh.
   • The Secretary of State drafted the formal Land Grant (Patent), which was signed by the Governor, sealed with the Great Seal of the State, and assigned a unique Grant Number.
   • The patent was recorded in the state Land Grant Books, and the original parchment was delivered to the grantee, who was required by law to record it in the County Register of Deeds within 12 months.

[!IMPORTANT] The North Carolina State Land Grant Office records are maintained permanently in the State Archives of North Carolina in Raleigh. Surveyors retracing senior grants must consult these original entry warrants, surveyor certificates, and grant maps to resolve fundamental boundary ambiguities.

---

5. Metes and Bounds vs. PLSS: Surveying Challenges in North Carolina

Because North Carolina never adopted the rectangular Public Land Survey System (PLSS) of 6-mile-square townships and 640-acre sections, boundary retracement in NC presents unique legal and geometric complexities:

Indiscriminate Location and Junior/Senior Overlaps:

Under early North Carolina land law, entrymen were free to locate their warrants in any shape or orientation they desired. Consequently, surveyors frequently laid out tracts that inadvertently overlapped older, unrecorded, or poorly monumented senior grants. In North Carolina, the senior grant always holds legal title over the junior grant (prior in tempore potior in jure), creating what courts term a "lappage" or overlap that must be resolved through senior title research and adverse possession principles.