3.7 Concision: Eliminating Wordiness and Redundancy
Key Takeaways
- The official Concision skill is improving the economy of word choice by eliminating wordiness and redundancy.
- On concision items the shortest grammatically correct choice that preserves meaning is usually right.
- Redundancy pairs restate a meaning already carried by another word, as in 'past history' or 'combined together'.
- Empty scaffolding such as 'due to the fact that' and 'in order to be able to' can nearly always be reduced without loss.
- Shortness never overrides meaning; a shorter choice that deletes required information or breaks grammar is wrong.
A Sub-Skill With a Usable Heuristic
Effective Language Use has four sub-skills: Precision, Concision, Style and tone, and Syntax. Concision is the one with the clearest official definition and the most actionable test strategy:
Concision: The student will revise text as needed to improve the economy of word choice (i.e., to eliminate wordiness and redundancy).
Two distinct defects are named. Redundancy is saying the same thing twice. Wordiness is using more words than the meaning requires. They call for different repairs.
The Shortest-Answer Pattern
On concision items, answer choices are typically four ways of expressing the same idea at different lengths. Because economy is the scored quality, the shortest grammatically correct choice that preserves the full meaning is usually correct.
This runs against ingrained student instinct. Years of academic writing train people to associate length with rigor, so the elaborate option feels safer. On this test it is usually the trap.
The heuristic has firm boundaries, and stating them matters more than stating the heuristic:
- The choice must remain grammatically correct.
- It must preserve all necessary meaning. A shorter option that deletes a required qualifier is wrong.
- It must fit the passage's tone. Extreme compression into telegraphic phrasing can break register.
So: shortest among the choices that are correct and complete — not shortest outright.
Redundancy Patterns
Redundancy occurs when one word already contains the meaning of another.
| Redundant | Concise | Why |
|---|---|---|
| past history | history | History is past by definition |
| combined together | combined | Combining is joining |
| revert back | revert | Re- means back |
| advance planning | planning | Planning precedes |
| end result | result | Results come at the end |
| completely eliminate | eliminate | Elimination is total |
| unexpected surprise | surprise | Surprises are unexpected |
| basic fundamentals | fundamentals | Fundamentals are basic |
| collaborate together | collaborate | Co- means together |
| free gift | gift | Gifts are free |
| final outcome | outcome | Outcomes are final |
| each and every | each or every | Same quantifier twice |
A second variety operates across a clause rather than within a phrase:
The committee postponed the vote until a later date.
Postponed already means "moved to a later date." Repair: The committee postponed the vote.
The researchers repeated the trial again.
Repeated contains again.
Detection habit: for any modifier, ask whether the word it modifies could be otherwise. If a result cannot be anything but final, final is doing no work.
Wordiness Patterns
Wordiness uses grammatically sound but inflated constructions.
Empty Scaffolding
| Wordy | Concise |
|---|---|
| due to the fact that | because |
| in spite of the fact that | although |
| in the event that | if |
| at this point in time | now |
| for the purpose of | to |
| in order to be able to | to |
| has the ability to | can |
| is in a position to | can |
| it is often the case that | often |
| a large number of | many |
| in the near future | soon |
| on a daily basis | daily |
| during the time that | while |
Nominalization
Burying a verb inside a noun forces extra machinery around it:
The committee made a determination that the proposal was inadequate. → The committee determined that the proposal was inadequate.
Implementation of the policy was carried out by the district. → The district implemented the policy.
Watch for -tion, -ment, -ance nouns paired with weak verbs (make, carry out, provide, conduct, perform). Restoring the verb usually removes three or four words.
Passive Padding
It was determined by the auditors that the figures were inaccurate. → The auditors determined the figures were inaccurate.
Passive voice is not an error and is sometimes preferable — when the actor is unknown or irrelevant. But it was determined by X that is padding whenever X is named.
Expletive Openings
There is, there are, and it is constructions frequently delay the real subject:
There are several factors that contribute to the delay. → Several factors contribute to the delay.
Worked Example
Due to the fact that the sensor array had a tendency to produce readings that were inaccurate in cold weather, the team made the decision to replace it.
Three separate defects:
- Due to the fact that → Because
- had a tendency to produce readings that were inaccurate → produced inaccurate readings (nominalization plus a stretched relative clause)
- made the decision to → decided to
Because the sensor array produced inaccurate readings in cold weather, the team decided to replace it.
Twenty-eight words to seventeen, with no meaning lost.
When the Shortest Choice Is Wrong
The heuristic fails in three recognizable situations, and the test exploits all three.
1. Required information deleted.
Original: The district reduced bus routes in the three northern attendance zones. Shortest: The district reduced bus routes.
Shorter, grammatical — and it discards the specific scope. Wrong.
2. Grammar broken.
The district, reducing bus routes.
A fragment. Length is irrelevant once the sentence fails.
3. Necessary qualification removed.
Original: Preliminary data suggest the program may reduce absenteeism. Shortest: The program reduces absenteeism.
This deletes two hedges and converts a tentative finding into a fact. It is now a Precision error and a factual misrepresentation.
The operative order: correctness first, completeness second, brevity third. Apply brevity only among choices that have already passed the first two.
Which revision best improves the concision of "Due to the fact that the shipment was delayed, the store made a decision to offer refunds"?
Which phrase contains a redundancy of the kind the Concision sub-skill targets?
The original sentence reads: "Early trial results indicate the compound may slow tissue degeneration." Why is the shorter choice "The compound slows tissue degeneration" incorrect?