10.4 Initiating a Project and Its Agile Workshops
Key Takeaways
- Initiating a project establishes solid foundations for the project, so everyone understands the work before committing to delivery.
- It has seven activities covering tailoring, the management approaches, project controls, the project plan, the detailed business case and assembling the PID.
- The project initiation workshop aligns the team on vision, objectives and goals and develops the detailed project canvas.
- The project kickoff workshop forms the delivery team — introductions, values and norms, decision-making and the team dashboard.
- Tailoring decisions, including how agile will be used, are agreed and recorded here rather than left to emerge.
10.4 Initiating a Project and Its Agile Workshops
Quick summary: IP exists to establish solid foundations for the project. It runs during the initiation stage, after the board has authorized initiation. Its two agile workshops are the project initiation workshop and the project kickoff workshop.
Purpose
The purpose of initiating a project is to establish solid foundations for the project, enabling the organization to understand the work needed to deliver the products before committing to significant spend.
Solid foundations is the phrase that identifies IP in a purpose question.
The seven activities
| Activity | What it settles |
|---|---|
| Agree the tailoring requirements | How PRINCE2 will be scaled for this project, including how agile will be used |
| Agree the management approaches | Risk, quality, issue and communication management approaches, plus the benefits management approach and sustainability approach |
| Set up the project controls | Stage structure, tolerances, reporting cadence, dashboards, the change authority and any change budget |
| Create the project plan | The overall plan, including the release map |
| Prepare the detailed business case | Elaborating the outline case from SU |
| Assemble the project initiation documentation | Bringing the above into an agreed whole |
| Request authorization to deliver the project | Presenting the PID, project canvas and release map to the board |
These need not run sequentially. They overlap and are revisited — deciding the tailoring changes the controls, and creating the plan changes the business case.
The project canvas becomes the detailed business case
In PRINCE2 Agile the project canvas carries the business case. The outline canvas created in SU is developed here into the detailed version, incorporating what planning has revealed: the release map, the benefit forecast per release, the confirmed user group priorities and the tailoring decisions.
Presenting the detailed canvas and release map to the board, and formally requesting authorization to deliver, is a separate step from the workshops themselves.
The project initiation workshop
The project initiation workshop aligns the people who will deliver the project on the same picture. It:
- Establishes shared understanding of the vision, objectives and goals
- Develops the detailed project canvas, drawing on lessons gathered in SU
- Works through the management approaches and controls collaboratively rather than by circulating drafts
- Surfaces disagreement early, while it is cheap to resolve
The project manager prepares by reviewing the daily log and lessons log and assembling the project documentation so the workshop starts from evidence rather than from a blank page.
The project kickoff workshop
Where the initiation workshop aligns the project, the project kickoff workshop forms the team. It establishes:
- Team introduction — the element that fosters familiarity and establishes connections, and the foundation of the psychological safety the team will need
- Team values and norms — the working agreements governing how the team operates
- Decision-making arrangements — often a team decision matrix, frequently arrived at through delegation poker
- The team dashboard — how the team will make its work visible
Getting these agreed before delivery starts is what separates a group of individuals assigned to a project from a team.
Agile tailoring of IP
Right-size the documentation. The PID is assembled, but its components can be short and can point to living artifacts. A management approach that fits on a page and is followed beats one that runs to twenty pages and is not read.
Record the tailoring decisions explicitly. Which agile approach the teams will use, how tolerances are set, what the Definition of Done contains, how progress will be reported, what the change authority may approve. Recording these is what makes tailoring deliberate rather than drift.
Agree the Definition of Done with governance. Because quality is a target held firm, the board needs to know what the guarantee actually is. This is a governance artifact as much as a team one.
Plan in layers. IP produces the project plan and the release map, not a detailed schedule of every iteration. Detail is added progressively.
Set up the controls that make agile governable. Dashboards rather than reports, a change budget so that ordinary change does not become an exception, and a delegated change authority so decisions do not queue.
What is produced
| Artifact | State at the end of IP |
|---|---|
| Project initiation documentation | Assembled |
| Project canvas | Detailed — carrying the business case |
| Release map | Created within the project plan |
| Project plan | Created |
| Management approaches | Agreed — risk, quality, issue, communication, benefits, sustainability |
| Project controls | Set up, including tolerances and dashboards |
| Definition of Done | Agreed and visible |
| Team working agreements and dashboard | Established in the kickoff workshop |
Which two workshops support the 'initiating a project' process?
Why are tailoring decisions recorded during initiating a project rather than left to emerge during delivery?
What is developed in the project initiation workshop that carries the project's detailed business case?