10.1 Reaction Rates, Rate Laws, and Integrated Rate Equations

Key Takeaways

  • Reaction rate is defined unambiguously by normalizing the rate of concentration change by the stoichiometric coefficient: rate=−1ad[A]dt=1cd[C]dt\text{rate} = -\frac{1}{a}\frac{d[A]}{dt} = \frac{1}{c}\frac{d[C]}{dt}.

  • Differential rate laws relate rate to species concentrations (v=k[A]m[B]nv = k [A]^m [B]^n), where reaction orders (m,nm, n) are determined experimentally and the units of the rate constant kk follow (mol/L)1−ns−1(\text{mol}/\text{L})^{1-n} \text{s}^{-1}.

  • Integrated rate equations model concentration decay over time: zero-order ([A]t=[A]0−kt[A]_t = [A]_0 - kt), first-order (ln⁡[A]t=ln⁡[A]0−kt\ln[A]_t = \ln[A]_0 - kt), and second-order (1/[A]t=1/[A]0+kt1/[A]_t = 1/[A]_0 + kt).

  • Half-life expressions provide immediate diagnostic signatures for reaction order: t1/2=[A]0/(2k)t_{1/2} = [A]_0 / (2k) (zero-order, drops with concentration), t1/2=ln⁡2/k=0.693/kt_{1/2} = \ln 2 / k = 0.693 / k (first-order, strictly concentration-independent), and t1/2=1/(k[A]0)t_{1/2} = 1 / (k [A]_0) (second-order, inversely proportional to [A]0[A]_0).

  • Radioactive decay is an exact first-order process (N(t)=N0e−λtN(t) = N_0 e^{-\lambda t}), underpinning geochronological and archaeological dating methodologies including radiocarbon dating (t1/2=5730 yearst_{1/2} = 5730\text{ years}).

Last updated: October 2026

Reaction Rates, Rate Laws, and Integrated Rate Equations

Chemical kinetics investigates the rates of chemical processes, the physical and chemical variables that alter these rates, and the microscopic molecular mechanisms connecting reactants to products. While chemical thermodynamics determines the spontaneous direction and theoretical equilibrium yield of a reaction (ΔG<0\Delta G < 0), it reveals nothing about the timescale required to attain equilibrium. On the PRC Chemist Licensure Examination, mastery of chemical kinetics demands rigorous proficiency with stoichiometric rate definitions, differential and integrated rate laws, graphical transformations, half-life relationships, experimental rate-order evaluations, and radioactive decay processes.


1. Stoichiometric Definition of Reaction Rate

For a general homogeneous reaction occurring in a closed system at constant volume:

aA+bB⟶cC+dDaA + bB \longrightarrow cC + dD

the rate of disappearance of reactants and rate of appearance of products are stoichiometrically coupled. To avoid ambiguous rates that depend arbitrarily on which chemical species is monitored, the IUPAC defines the rate of reaction (vv) as the time derivative of the extent of reaction (ξ\xi) divided by system volume (VV), or the rate of change of concentration divided by the stoichiometric coefficient (νJ\nu_J, taken as negative for reactants and positive for products):

v≡1νJd[J]dtv \equiv \frac{1}{\nu_J} \frac{d[J]}{dt}

Rate=−1ad[A]dt=−1bd[B]dt=+1cd[C]dt=+1dd[D]dt\text{Rate} = -\frac{1}{a}\frac{d[A]}{dt} = -\frac{1}{b}\frac{d[B]}{dt} = +\frac{1}{c}\frac{d[C]}{dt} = +\frac{1}{d}\frac{d[D]}{dt}

Instantaneous vs. Average Rates

  • Average Rate: Calculated over a finite macroscopic time interval Δt=t2−t1\Delta t = t_2 - t_1: Rateavg=−1a[A]2−[A]1t2−t1=−1aΔ[A]Δt\text{Rate}_{avg} = -\frac{1}{a} \frac{[A]_2 - [A]_1}{t_2 - t_1} = -\frac{1}{a}\frac{\Delta[A]}{\Delta t}
  • Instantaneous Rate: The derivative evaluated at an infinitesimal instant tt (the tangent slope of the concentration-time curve at that specific point): Rateinst=−1alim⁡Δt→0Δ[A]Δt=−1ad[A]dt\text{Rate}_{inst} = -\frac{1}{a} \lim_{\Delta t \to 0} \frac{\Delta[A]}{\Delta t} = -\frac{1}{a}\frac{d[A]}{dt}
  • Initial Rate (v0v_0): The instantaneous rate at the exact commencement of the reaction (t=0t = 0), prior to any significant depletion of initial reactants or interference from reverse reactions and product inhibition.

Stoichiometric Rate Conversion Example

Consider the gas-phase decomposition of dinitrogen pentoxide: 2N2O5(g)⟶4NO2(g)+O2(g)2\text{N}_2\text{O}_5(g) \longrightarrow 4\text{NO}_2(g) + \text{O}_2(g) If the rate of decomposition of N2O5\text{N}_2\text{O}_5 is measured as −d[N2O5]dt=0.040 mol⋅L−1⋅s−1-\frac{d[\text{N}_2\text{O}_5]}{dt} = 0.040\text{ mol}\cdot\text{L}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}, the rates of appearance of products are: d[NO2]dt=−4−2d[N2O5]dt=2×(0.040)=0.080 mol⋅L−1⋅s−1\frac{d[\text{NO}_2]}{dt} = -\frac{4}{-2}\frac{d[\text{N}_2\text{O}_5]}{dt} = 2 \times (0.040) = 0.080\text{ mol}\cdot\text{L}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1} d[O2]dt=−1−2d[N2O5]dt=12×(0.040)=0.020 mol⋅L−1⋅s−1\frac{d[\text{O}_2]}{dt} = -\frac{1}{-2}\frac{d[\text{N}_2\text{O}_5]}{dt} = \frac{1}{2} \times (0.040) = 0.020\text{ mol}\cdot\text{L}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1} Overall Reaction Rate v=0.020 mol⋅L−1⋅s−1\text{Overall Reaction Rate } v = 0.020\text{ mol}\cdot\text{L}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}


2. Differential Rate Laws and Reaction Orders

A differential rate law expresses the instantaneous reaction rate as a mathematical function of the instantaneous concentrations of reacting species:

v=k[A]m[B]n[C]pv = k [A]^m [B]^n [C]^p

  • Rate Constant (kk): A proportionality constant specific to a given reaction at a specified temperature. It is strictly independent of reactant concentrations, but varies exponentially with temperature and ionic strength.
  • Partial Orders (m,n,pm, n, p): The powers to which individual concentrations are raised. The partial order with respect to component AA is mm, with respect to BB is nn. Reaction orders are strictly experimental quantities; they cannot be deduced from the stoichiometric coefficients of an overall balanced chemical equation (unless the reaction is known to proceed via a single elementary step).
  • Overall Reaction Order (ntotn_{tot}): The algebraic sum of all partial orders: ntot=m+n+pn_{tot} = m + n + p Reaction orders can be positive integers (0,1,2,30, 1, 2, 3), negative numbers (indicating inhibition), or fractional values (common in free-radical gas reactions, e.g., the thermal synthesis of phosgene CO+Cl2→COCl2\text{CO} + \text{Cl}_2 \rightarrow \text{COCl}_2 follows v=k[CO][Cl2]3/2v = k [\text{CO}][\text{Cl}_2]^{3/2} with overall order 2.52.5).

Dimensional Analysis of the Rate Constant kk

Because reaction rate always carries units of concentration per unit time (typically mol⋅L−1⋅s−1\text{mol}\cdot\text{L}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1} or M⋅s−1\text{M}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}), the dimensional units of kk depend directly on the overall reaction order ntotn_{tot}:

Units of k=(concentration)1−ntot⋅(time)−1=(molL)1−ntots−1=M1−ntots−1\text{Units of } k = (\text{concentration})^{1 - n_{tot}} \cdot (\text{time})^{-1} = \left(\frac{\text{mol}}{\text{L}}\right)^{1 - n_{tot}} \text{s}^{-1} = \text{M}^{1 - n_{tot}} \text{s}^{-1}

Overall Order (nn)Dimensional Units of kkAlternative SI Representation
0 (Zero-order)mol⋅L−1⋅s−1\text{mol}\cdot\text{L}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}mol⋅m−3⋅s−1\text{mol}\cdot\text{m}^{-3}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}
1 (First-order)s−1\text{s}^{-1}s−1\text{s}^{-1}
2 (Second-order)L⋅mol−1⋅s−1=M−1⋅s−1\text{L}\cdot\text{mol}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1} = \text{M}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}m3⋅mol−1⋅s−1\text{m}^3\cdot\text{mol}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}
3 (Third-order)L2⋅mol−2⋅s−1=M−2⋅s−1\text{L}^2\cdot\text{mol}^{-2}\cdot\text{s}^{-1} = \text{M}^{-2}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}m6⋅mol−2⋅s−1\text{m}^6\cdot\text{mol}^{-2}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}
1/21/2 (Half-order)mol1/2⋅L−1/2⋅s−1\text{mol}^{1/2}\cdot\text{L}^{-1/2}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}mol1/2⋅m−3/2⋅s−1\text{mol}^{1/2}\cdot\text{m}^{-3/2}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}

Tip

Licensure exam questions frequently hide the reaction order inside the stated numerical units of kk. Whenever a problem gives k=4.2×10−3 s−1k = 4.2 \times 10^{-3}\text{ s}^{-1}, you immediately know without checking that the reaction is first-order.


3. Integrated Rate Equations and Half-Life Derivations

Integrated rate laws express reactant concentration directly as an explicit function of continuous reaction time tt. Let us examine the three fundamental classical rate laws for reactions of the type A⟶ProductsA \longrightarrow \text{Products}.

1. Zero-Order Reactions

A zero-order reaction proceeds at a constant velocity that is entirely independent of reactant concentration (common in surface-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions where active sites are fully saturated, and enzyme reactions under substrate saturation):

−d[A]dt=k-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k

Integrating from initial concentration [A]0[A]_0 at t=0t = 0 to [A]t[A]_t at time tt:

∫[A]0[A]td[A]=−k∫0tdt  ⟹  [A]t−[A]0=−kt\int_{[A]_0}^{[A]_t} d[A] = -k \int_{0}^{t} dt \implies [A]_t - [A]_0 = -kt

[A]t=[A]0−kt[A]_t = [A]_0 - kt

  • Linear Graphical Plot: Plotting [A]t[A]_t versus tt yields a straight line with slope m=−km = -k and yy-intercept =[A]0= [A]_0.
  • Half-Life (t1/2t_{1/2}): The time required for the concentration to drop to half its initial value ([A]t1/2=[A]0/2[A]_{t_{1/2}} = [A]_0 / 2): [A]02=[A]0−kt1/2  ⟹  kt1/2=[A]02\frac{[A]_0}{2} = [A]_0 - k t_{1/2} \implies k t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2} t1/2=[A]02kt_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k} Crucial Diagnostic: For a zero-order reaction, the half-life is directly proportional to the initial reactant concentration. Successive half-lives become progressively shorter (t1/2,12t1/2,14t1/2t_{1/2}, \frac{1}{2}t_{1/2}, \frac{1}{4}t_{1/2}). The reaction terminates completely in finite time tcompletion=[A]0/k=2t1/2t_{completion} = [A]_0 / k = 2 t_{1/2}.

2. First-Order Reactions

A first-order reaction has a rate directly proportional to the first power of concentration:

−d[A]dt=k[A]-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k[A]

Separating variables and integrating:

∫[A]0[A]td[A][A]=−k∫0tdt  ⟹  ln⁡([A]t[A]0)=−kt\int_{[A]_0}^{[A]_t} \frac{d[A]}{[A]} = -k \int_{0}^{t} dt \implies \ln\left(\frac{[A]_t}{[A]_0}\right) = -kt

ln⁡[A]t=ln⁡[A]0−kt  ⟺  [A]t=[A]0e−kt\ln[A]_t = \ln[A]_0 - kt \iff [A]_t = [A]_0 e^{-kt}

Converting to base-10 logarithms: log⁡10[A]t=log⁡10[A]0−k2.3026t\log_{10}[A]_t = \log_{10}[A]_0 - \frac{k}{2.3026} t

  • Linear Graphical Plot: Plotting ln⁡[A]t\ln[A]_t versus tt yields a straight line with slope m=−km = -k and yy-intercept =ln⁡[A]0= \ln[A]_0. (Or plotting log⁡10[A]t\log_{10}[A]_t vs tt with slope −k/2.303-k/2.303).
  • Half-Life (t1/2t_{1/2}): Substituting [A]t1/2=[A]0/2[A]_{t_{1/2}} = [A]_0 / 2: ln⁡([A]0/2[A]0)=ln⁡(12)=−ln⁡2=−kt1/2\ln\left(\frac{[A]_0 / 2}{[A]_0}\right) = \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = -\ln 2 = -kt_{1/2} t1/2=ln⁡2k=0.69315kt_{1/2} = \frac{\ln 2}{k} = \frac{0.69315}{k} Crucial Diagnostic: For a first-order process, the half-life is strictly independent of the initial concentration. Every successive half-life takes the exact same duration (t1/2t_{1/2}). After nn half-lives, the remaining fraction is (1/2)n(1/2)^n.

3. Second-Order Reactions (Single Reactant: 2A⟶Products2A \longrightarrow \text{Products})

When the reaction rate depends on the square of a single reactant concentration:

−d[A]dt=k[A]2-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k [A]^2

Separating variables and integrating:

∫[A]0[A]t−d[A][A]2=k∫0tdt  ⟹  [1[A]][A]0[A]t=kt\int_{[A]_0}^{[A]_t} -\frac{d[A]}{[A]^2} = k \int_{0}^{t} dt \implies \left[ \frac{1}{[A]} \right]_{[A]_0}^{[A]_t} = kt

1[A]t=1[A]0+kt\frac{1}{[A]_t} = \frac{1}{[A]_0} + kt

  • Linear Graphical Plot: Plotting 1[A]t\frac{1}{[A]_t} versus tt yields a straight line with positive slope m=+km = +k and yy-intercept =1/[A]0= 1/[A]_0.
  • Half-Life (t1/2t_{1/2}): Substituting [A]t1/2=[A]0/2[A]_{t_{1/2}} = [A]_0 / 2: 2[A]0=1[A]0+kt1/2  ⟹  1[A]0=kt1/2\frac{2}{[A]_0} = \frac{1}{[A]_0} + kt_{1/2} \implies \frac{1}{[A]_0} = kt_{1/2} t1/2=1k[A]0t_{1/2} = \frac{1}{k [A]_0} Crucial Diagnostic: For a second-order reaction, the half-life is inversely proportional to the initial concentration. Each successive half-life is double the preceding one (t1/2,2t1/2,4t1/2,8t1/2t_{1/2}, 2t_{1/2}, 4t_{1/2}, 8t_{1/2}). As the reactant dilutes, the collision probability falls quadratically, drastically prolonging the decay.

4. Second-Order Reactions (Two Reactants: A+B⟶ProductsA + B \longrightarrow \text{Products})

When the rate law is first-order in AA and first-order in BB (v=k[A][B]v = k [A][B]) with unequal initial concentrations ([A]0≠[B]0[A]_0 \ne [B]_0):

Let xx be the concentration of AA and BB that has reacted at time tt, such that [A]t=[A]0−x[A]_t = [A]_0 - x and [B]t=[B]0−x[B]_t = [B]_0 - x: dxdt=k([A]0−x)([B]0−x)\frac{dx}{dt} = k ([A]_0 - x)([B]_0 - x) Integrating by partial fractions yields the integrated rate law: 1[A]0−[B]0ln⁡([B]0[A]t[A]0[B]t)=kt\frac{1}{[A]_0 - [B]_0} \ln\left( \frac{[B]_0 [A]_t}{[A]_0 [B]_t} \right) = kt Plotting ln⁡([B]0[A]t[A]0[B]t)\ln\left(\frac{[B]_0 [A]_t}{[A]_0 [B]_t}\right) versus tt yields a straight line with slope k([A]0−[B]0)k([A]_0 - [B]_0).


4. Comprehensive Comparison of Integrated Rate Laws

Kinetic PropertyZero-Order (n=0n = 0)First-Order (n=1n = 1)Second-Order (n=2n = 2, single reactant)
Differential Law−d[A]dt=k-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k−d[A]dt=k[A]-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k[A]−d[A]dt=k[A]2-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k[A]^2
Integrated Law[A]t=[A]0−kt[A]_t = [A]_0 - ktln⁡[A]t=ln⁡[A]0−kt\ln[A]_t = \ln[A]_0 - kt1[A]t=1[A]0+kt\frac{1}{[A]_t} = \frac{1}{[A]_0} + kt
Exponential Form—[A]t=[A]0e−kt[A]_t = [A]_0 e^{-kt}[A]t=[A]01+kt[A]0[A]_t = \frac{[A]_0}{1 + kt[A]_0}
Linear Plot[A]t[A]_t vs. ttln⁡[A]t\ln[A]_t vs. tt1[A]t\frac{1}{[A]_t} vs. tt
Slope of Linear Plot−k-k−k-k+k+k
yy-Intercept[A]0[A]_0ln⁡[A]0\ln[A]_01/[A]01/[A]_0
Half-Life (t1/2t_{1/2})[A]02k\frac{[A]_0}{2k}ln⁡2k=0.693k\frac{\ln 2}{k} = \frac{0.693}{k}1k[A]0\frac{1}{k [A]_0}
Dependence of t1/2t_{1/2} on [A]0[A]_0Directly proportional (t1/2∝[A]0t_{1/2} \propto [A]_0)Independent (t1/2∝[A]00t_{1/2} \propto [A]_0^0)Inversely proportional (t1/2∝[A]0−1t_{1/2} \propto [A]_0^{-1})
Successive Half-Lives1:0.5:0.251 : 0.5 : 0.25 (halving)1:1:11 : 1 : 1 (constant)1:2:4:81 : 2 : 4 : 8 (doubling)
Units of kkM⋅s−1\text{M}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}s−1\text{s}^{-1}M−1⋅s−1\text{M}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}

5. Experimental Methods of Determining Reaction Order

1. Initial Rates Method (Method of Initial Rates)

In this classic quantitative method, multiple kinetic trials are executed with systematically varied initial reactant concentrations. Because the rates are evaluated at t=0t = 0, reaction products have not yet accumulated, eliminating reverse reactions.

v0,1v0,2=k[A]0,1m[B]0,1nk[A]0,2m[B]0,2n=([A]0,1[A]0,2)m(holding [B]0 constant)\frac{v_{0, 1}}{v_{0, 2}} = \frac{k [A]_{0, 1}^m [B]_{0, 1}^n}{k [A]_{0, 2}^m [B]_{0, 2}^n} = \left(\frac{[A]_{0, 1}}{[A]_{0, 2}}\right)^m \quad \text{(holding } [B]_0 \text{ constant)} Taking natural logarithms: m=ln⁡(v0,1/v0,2)ln⁡([A]0,1/[A]0,2)m = \frac{\ln(v_{0, 1} / v_{0, 2})}{\ln([A]_{0, 1} / [A]_{0, 2})}

Worked Step-by-Step Problem: Initial Rates Analysis

Experimental Data: Determine the rate law and rate constant for 2NO(g)+O2(g)→2NO2(g)2\text{NO}(g) + \text{O}_2(g) \rightarrow 2\text{NO}_2(g) at 298 K298\text{ K}:

  • Run 1: [NO]0=0.0100 M[\text{NO}]_0 = 0.0100\text{ M}, [O2]0=0.0100 M[\text{O}_2]_0 = 0.0100\text{ M}, v0=2.50×10−5 M⋅s−1v_0 = 2.50 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}
  • Run 2: [NO]0=0.0200 M[\text{NO}]_0 = 0.0200\text{ M}, [O2]0=0.0100 M[\text{O}_2]_0 = 0.0100\text{ M}, v0=1.00×10−4 M⋅s−1v_0 = 1.00 \times 10^{-4}\text{ M}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}
  • Run 3: [NO]0=0.0100 M[\text{NO}]_0 = 0.0100\text{ M}, [O2]0=0.0200 M[\text{O}_2]_0 = 0.0200\text{ M}, v0=5.00×10−5 M⋅s−1v_0 = 5.00 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}

Step 1: Determine order with respect to NO\text{NO} (using Runs 1 and 2): v0,2v0,1=1.00×10−42.50×10−5=4.00=(0.02000.0100)m=(2.00)m  ⟹  2m=4  ⟹  m=2\frac{v_{0, 2}}{v_{0, 1}} = \frac{1.00 \times 10^{-4}}{2.50 \times 10^{-5}} = 4.00 = \left(\frac{0.0200}{0.0100}\right)^m = (2.00)^m \implies 2^m = 4 \implies m = 2

Step 2: Determine order with respect to O2\text{O}_2 (using Runs 1 and 3): v0,3v0,1=5.00×10−52.50×10−5=2.00=(0.02000.0100)n=(2.00)n  ⟹  2n=2  ⟹  n=1\frac{v_{0, 3}}{v_{0, 1}} = \frac{5.00 \times 10^{-5}}{2.50 \times 10^{-5}} = 2.00 = \left(\frac{0.0200}{0.0100}\right)^n = (2.00)^n \implies 2^n = 2 \implies n = 1

Step 3: State rate law and overall order: Rate=k[NO]2[O2],ntot=2+1=3(Third-order overall)\text{Rate} = k [\text{NO}]^2 [\text{O}_2], \quad n_{tot} = 2 + 1 = 3 \quad \text{(Third-order overall)}

Step 4: Compute rate constant kk with units using Run 1: k=v0[NO]02[O2]0=2.50×10−5 M⋅s−1(0.0100 M)2(0.0100 M)=2.50×10−51.00×10−6 M3=25.0 M−2⋅s−1k = \frac{v_0}{[\text{NO}]_0^2 [\text{O}_2]_0} = \frac{2.50 \times 10^{-5}\text{ M}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}}{(0.0100\text{ M})^2 (0.0100\text{ M})} = \frac{2.50 \times 10^{-5}}{1.00 \times 10^{-6}\text{ M}^3} = 25.0\text{ M}^{-2}\cdot\text{s}^{-1}

2. Graphical Method

Experimental concentration-versus-time data are transformed into three parallel graphs:

  1. [A]t[A]_t vs. tt
  2. ln⁡[A]t\ln[A]_t vs. tt
  3. 1/[A]t1/[A]_t vs. tt The plot exhibiting strict linearity (highest correlation coefficient R2R^2) identifies the true order (0,1,0, 1, or 22), and the slope gives the numerical magnitude of kk.

3. Half-Life Dependence Method

For any reaction of arbitrary overall order nn (where n≠1n \ne 1): t1/2∝1[A]0n−1=[A]01−nt_{1/2} \propto \frac{1}{[A]_0^{n - 1}} = [A]_0^{1 - n} Comparing two distinct initial concentrations [A]0,1[A]_{0, 1} and [A]0,2[A]_{0, 2} with measured half-lives t1/2,1t_{1/2, 1} and t1/2,2t_{1/2, 2}: t1/2,1t1/2,2=([A]0,1[A]0,2)1−n  ⟹  1−n=ln⁡(t1/2,1/t1/2,2)ln⁡([A]0,1/[A]0,2)  ⟹  n=1−ln⁡(t1/2,1/t1/2,2)ln⁡([A]0,1/[A]0,2)\frac{t_{1/2, 1}}{t_{1/2, 2}} = \left( \frac{[A]_{0, 1}}{[A]_{0, 2}} \right)^{1 - n} \implies 1 - n = \frac{\ln(t_{1/2, 1} / t_{1/2, 2})}{\ln([A]_{0, 1} / [A]_{0, 2})} \implies n = 1 - \frac{\ln(t_{1/2, 1} / t_{1/2, 2})}{\ln([A]_{0, 1} / [A]_{0, 2})}

4. Isolation Method (Flood Method) and Pseudo-Order Kinetics

When a reaction involves multiple reactants (e.g., v=k[A]m[B]n[C]pv = k [A]^m [B]^n [C]^p), measuring individual orders simultaneously is challenging. In the isolation method, reactants BB and CC are added in vast stoichiometric excess relative to AA ([B]0,[C]0≫[A]0[B]_0, [C]_0 \gg [A]_0, typically 50×50\times to 100×100\times excess). As reactant AA is consumed completely, the concentrations of BB and CC change by an imperceptible percentage and remain effectively constant:

v=k[A]m[B]0n[C]0p=kobs[A]mwhere kobs=k[B]0n[C]0pv = k [A]^m [B]_0^n [C]_0^p = k_{obs} [A]^m \quad \text{where } k_{obs} = k [B]_0^n [C]_0^p

The reaction behaves as a pseudo-mm-order process. For instance, acid-catalyzed ester hydrolysis in dilute aqueous solution involves water as both solvent and reactant ([H2O]≈55.5 M[\text{H}_2\text{O}] \approx 55.5\text{ M}). Because [H2O][\text{H}_2\text{O}] is effectively invariant, the second-order process v=k[ester][H2O]v = k [\text{ester}][\text{H}_2\text{O}] collapses to pseudo-first-order kinetics with v=kobs[ester]v = k_{obs}[\text{ester}], where kobs=k[H2O]k_{obs} = k[\text{H}_2\text{O}].


6. Radioactive Decay Kinetics and Radiocarbon Dating

Nuclear transmutation and radioactive decay processes are pure first-order kinetic phenomena occurring at the atomic nucleus, completely independent of chemical environment, pressure, or temperature.

Governing Equations

Let N(t)N(t) be the number of undecayed radioactive nuclei at time tt:

−dNdt=λN  ⟹  N(t)=N0e−λt-\frac{dN}{dt} = \lambda N \implies N(t) = N_0 e^{-\lambda t} ln⁡(N(t)N0)=−λt\ln\left(\frac{N(t)}{N_0}\right) = -\lambda t

where λ\lambda is the decay constant (equivalent to first-order kk), related to half-life by: λ=ln⁡2t1/2=0.69315t1/2\lambda = \frac{\ln 2}{t_{1/2}} = \frac{0.69315}{t_{1/2}}

Activity (AA)

The activity is the disintegration rate: A(t)=−dNdt=λN(t)=λN0e−λt=A0e−λtA(t) = -\frac{dN}{dt} = \lambda N(t) = \lambda N_0 e^{-\lambda t} = A_0 e^{-\lambda t}

  • Units: Becquerel (1 Bq=1 disintegration per second1\text{ Bq} = 1\text{ disintegration per second}) and Curie (1 Ci=3.700×1010 Bq1\text{ Ci} = 3.700 \times 10^{10}\text{ Bq}). Specific activity is typically expressed in disintegrations per minute per gram of total carbon (dpm/g C\text{dpm/g C}).

Radiocarbon (14C^{14}\text{C}) Dating Principles

  • Atmospheric cosmic-ray neutrons react with atmospheric 14N^{14}\text{N}: 01n+714N⟶614C+11p^1_0 n + {^{14}_7\text{N}} \longrightarrow {^{14}_6\text{C}} + {^1_1 p}
  • Radioactive 14C^{14}\text{C} (t1/2=5730 yearst_{1/2} = 5730\text{ years}) oxidizes to 14CO2^{14}\text{CO}_2 and incorporates into the biosphere via photosynthesis and the food chain, establishing a steady-state specific activity in living organisms of approximately A0=15.30 dpm/g CA_0 = 15.30\text{ dpm/g C}.
  • Upon death, carbon exchange ceases. The 14C^{14}\text{C} decays via beta emission (614C→714N+β−{^{14}_6\text{C}} \rightarrow {^{14}_7\text{N}} + \beta^-), causing the residual specific activity to decline exponentially: t=−1λln⁡(A(t)A0)=−t1/2ln⁡2ln⁡(A(t)A0)=t1/20.69315ln⁡(A0A(t))t = -\frac{1}{\lambda} \ln\left(\frac{A(t)}{A_0}\right) = -\frac{t_{1/2}}{\ln 2} \ln\left(\frac{A(t)}{A_0}\right) = \frac{t_{1/2}}{0.69315} \ln\left(\frac{A_0}{A(t)}\right)

Worked Step-by-Step Calculation: Archaeological Artifact Dating

Scenario: A buried wood fragment recovered from a lake-sediment core has a measured 14C^{14}\text{C} specific activity of 3.825 dpm/g C3.825\text{ dpm/g C}. If fresh wood has a specific activity of 15.30 dpm/g C15.30\text{ dpm/g C} and t1/2=5730 yearst_{1/2} = 5730\text{ years}, calculate the archaeological age of the wood.

Step 1: Compute fraction of remaining activity: A(t)A0=3.825 dpm/g C15.30 dpm/g C=0.2500\frac{A(t)}{A_0} = \frac{3.825\text{ dpm/g C}}{15.30\text{ dpm/g C}} = 0.2500 Notice that 0.2500=(1/2)20.2500 = (1/2)^2, which corresponds to exactly two elapsed half-lives.

Step 2: Calculate age rigorously using the exponential decay equation: λ=0.693155730 yr=1.2097×10−4 yr−1\lambda = \frac{0.69315}{5730\text{ yr}} = 1.2097 \times 10^{-4}\text{ yr}^{-1} t=ln⁡(A0/A(t))λ=ln⁡(15.30/3.825)1.2097×10−4 yr−1=ln⁡(4.000)1.2097×10−4=1.386291.2097×10−4 yr−1=11460 yearst = \frac{\ln(A_0 / A(t))}{\lambda} = \frac{\ln(15.30 / 3.825)}{1.2097 \times 10^{-4}\text{ yr}^{-1}} = \frac{\ln(4.000)}{1.2097 \times 10^{-4}} = \frac{1.38629}{1.2097 \times 10^{-4}\text{ yr}^{-1}} = 11460\text{ years} Conclusion: The wood died approximately 11460 years11460\text{ years} ago.

Loading diagram...
Integrated Rate Law Linear Plots and Half-Life Diagnostics
Test Your Knowledge

For the gas-phase reaction 2 NO(g) + Br2(g) -> 2 NOBr(g) at 273 K, initial rate data were recorded across three experiments: Run 1 ([NO]_0 = 0.10 M, [Br2]_0 = 0.10 M, Initial Rate = 1.30 x 10^-3 M/s); Run 2 ([NO]_0 = 0.20 M, [Br2]_0 = 0.10 M, Initial Rate = 5.20 x 10^-3 M/s); Run 3 ([NO]_0 = 0.20 M, [Br2]_0 = 0.30 M, Initial Rate = 1.56 x 10^-2 M/s). What is the experimental rate law, overall reaction order, and numerical rate constant k?

A

Rate = k[NO][Br2], overall order = 2, and k = 0.130 M^-1*s^-1

B

Rate = k[NO][Br2]^2, overall order = 3, and k = 0.650 M^-2*s^-1

C

Rate = k[NO]^2[Br2], overall order = 3, and k = 1.30 M^-2*s^-1

D

Rate = k[NO]^2[Br2]^2, overall order = 4, and k = 13.0 M^-3*s^-1

Test Your Knowledge

The gas-phase dimerization of 1,3-butadiene (2 C4H6 -> C8H12) is second-order with respect to 1,3-butadiene with rate constant k = 0.0140 M^-1*s^-1 at 500 K. If the initial concentration of 1,3-butadiene is 0.0500 M, what is the initial half-life (t_1/2) and the total time required for 75.0% of the butadiene to react?

A

t_1/2 = 49.5 s and t_75% = 99.0 s

B

t_1/2 = 714 s and t_75% = 2143 s

C

t_1/2 = 1429 s and t_75% = 4286 s

D

t_1/2 = 1429 s and t_75% = 2857 s

Test Your Knowledge

An archaeological charcoal sample recovered from an excavation site in Palawan, Philippines exhibits a 14C specific activity of 2.40 disintegrations per minute per gram of carbon (dpm/g C). Modern living biological carbon has a steady-state activity of 15.30 dpm/g C. Given that the half-life of 14C is 5730 years, what is the estimated archaeological age of the charcoal specimen?

A

7640 years

B

15310 years

C

11460 years

D

22920 years

Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.