4.3 Section I Perils Insured Against and Exclusions
Key Takeaways
- Named-peril forms list covered causes (the classic 'broad form' perils run from fire and lightning through windstorm, theft, and falling objects).
- On HO-3, Coverage A and B are open peril while Coverage C is the named-peril broad list; HO-5 makes all three open peril.
- Section I excludes earth movement, flood/surface water, war, nuclear hazard, neglect, ordinance or law, and intentional loss.
- Earthquake and flood are excluded and must be added back by endorsement (earthquake) or a separate NFIP policy (flood).
- Anti-concurrent causation language denies coverage if an excluded peril contributes to the loss, even alongside a covered peril.
Perils Insured Against
The Perils Insured Against section defines the covered causes of loss. How it reads depends on the form:
- HO-2 applies a named-peril broad form list to both dwelling and contents.
- HO-3 applies open peril to the dwelling (Coverage A/B) and the same broad-form named-peril list to personal property (Coverage C).
- HO-5 applies open peril to all property.
The Broad-Form Named Perils
The broad-form list, tested heavily, includes:
- Fire or lightning
- Windstorm or hail
- Explosion
- Riot or civil commotion
- Aircraft and vehicles
- Smoke
- Vandalism or malicious mischief
- Theft
- Falling objects
- Weight of ice, snow, or sleet
- Volcanic eruption
- Accidental discharge or overflow of water/steam
- Sudden tearing/cracking/burning of a heating or AC system
- Freezing of plumbing
- Sudden artificial electrical-current damage
Note: gradual or repeated leakage (a slow plumbing drip) is not the sudden discharge peril and is excluded.
Section I Exclusions
Eight exclusions apply to all Section I coverage. Memorize them:
- Ordinance or Law - extra cost to rebuild to current building codes.
- Earth Movement - earthquake, landslide, sinkhole (but ensuing fire is covered).
- Water Damage - flood, surface water, sewer/drain backup, subsurface water.
- Power Failure occurring off the residence premises.
- Neglect - failure to protect property after a loss.
- War, including undeclared war and warlike acts.
- Nuclear Hazard - reaction, radiation, contamination.
- Intentional Loss by an insured.
Earthquake and Flood
The two most-tested exclusions are earthquake and flood:
- Earthquake (part of Earth Movement) is excluded but can be bought back with an Earthquake endorsement.
- Flood (rising surface water) is excluded entirely; it is covered only through a separate National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) policy or a private flood policy.
A scenario where 'a storm caused water to rise and enter through the front door' is flood (excluded). Water entering through a wind-torn roof is wind (covered).
Sewer or drain backup is part of the water exclusion and is bought back with a Water Backup and Sump Overflow endorsement, typically with its own sublimit (for example $5,000). Sinkhole collapse falls under earth movement in many states and may require a separate add-back. Always match the exact mechanism in the fact pattern to the right exclusion and the right endorsement that restores it.
Anti-Concurrent Causation
The exclusions open with anti-concurrent causation language: a loss is excluded if an excluded peril contributes to it, regardless of any other cause or event contributing concurrently or in any sequence.
Example: a hurricane brings wind (covered) and storm surge flooding (excluded). If surge contributes to the loss, the anti-concurrent clause lets the insurer deny the flood-related portion even though wind also acted. This wording was central to post-hurricane coverage litigation.
Ensuing Loss
Many exclusions contain an ensuing loss (or 'ensuing fire') exception. If an excluded peril leads to a covered peril, the resulting damage may still be paid.
Classic example: an earthquake (excluded) ruptures a gas line and the resulting fire (covered) destroys the home. The shaking damage is excluded, but the fire damage is paid. Distinguish the excluded cause from the covered ensuing peril.
A related concept is doctrine of proximate cause in named-peril analysis: the policy responds when a covered peril is the efficient proximate cause that sets the chain of events in motion. Open-peril forms remove much of this debate for the dwelling because everything is covered unless an exclusion clearly applies, which is why HO-3 and HO-5 are easier for insureds to collect under than HO-2.
Form-Specific Peril Notes
Several peril rules vary by form and occupancy and are common exam fodder:
- Theft of property from a dwelling under construction is excluded until the insured moves in.
- Vandalism and malicious mischief are suspended once a dwelling has been vacant for more than 60 consecutive days; an ensuing covered loss may still apply.
- Freezing of plumbing is excluded if the insured failed to maintain heat or shut off and drain the system in an unoccupied home.
- Mold, fungus, and wet rot are limited (often to a small sublimit) and generally excluded as a maintenance issue rather than a sudden peril.
Reading the occupancy status and the maintenance facts in a scenario is often the key to the correct answer.
Open-peril versus named-peril burden of proof in homeowners
The HO-3 is the form to understand because it is split: the dwelling and other structures (A and B) are open-peril while personal property (C) is named-peril. That split decides who proves what. For a damaged roof (Coverage A), the insurer must prove an exclusion to deny; for damaged furniture (Coverage C), the insured must show the loss came from a listed peril. The HO-5 upgrades contents to open-peril as well. Reading which coverage a loss falls under tells you the burden of proof - a recurring multiple-choice hinge.
The big exclusions and the ensuing-loss exception
Homeowners forms exclude a consistent set of catastrophic and maintenance perils: flood, earthquake/earth movement, war, nuclear hazard, intentional loss, neglect, ordinance or law (beyond the built-in 10%), governmental action, and power failure originating off premises, plus wear-and-tear and gradual deterioration.
The tested nuance is the ensuing-loss exception: although faulty workmanship or a defect is excluded, if that defect causes a covered ensuing peril - say, defective wiring that starts a fire - the resulting fire damage is covered even though the defective wiring itself is not. Anti-concurrent-causation language still lets the insurer deny the flood/earthquake portion of a mixed loss.
A homeowner with an HO-3 suffers damage when an earthquake cracks the foundation and severs a gas line, starting a fire that burns the house. How does the unendorsed policy respond?
During a hurricane, both wind and rising storm surge damage a home. The insurer denies the surge-related loss citing wording that excludes a loss if an excluded peril contributes 'in any sequence.' This wording is known as: