13.2 Precision Approaches: ILS Categories & Profiles

Key Takeaways

  • A Precision Approach (PA) provides both ground-generated electronic lateral course guidance (Localizer) and electronic vertical path guidance (Glide Slope).
  • Standard Category I (Cat I) ILS minimums are a 200-foot Height Above Touchdown (HAT) Decision Altitude (DA) and 1/2 SM visibility (2,400 ft RVR, reducible to 1,800 ft RVR with TDZ/CL lighting).
  • Category II and Category III ILS approaches require specialized aircraft certification, dual avionics, radar altimeters, and autoland/HUD systems for minimums down to zero ceiling and zero visibility.
  • The glide slope beam is 1.4 degrees thick, paired automatically with localizer VHF frequencies, and must always be intercepted from below to avoid hazardous false glide slope lobes at higher multiples.
  • Decision Altitude (DA) is an immediate decision point: if visual references under 14 CFR § 91.175 are not acquired upon reaching DA, an immediate missed approach must be initiated without leveling off.
Last updated: August 2026

Precision Approaches: ILS Categories & Profiles

Quick Answer: A Precision Approach (PA) provides ground-generated electronic lateral guidance (Localizer) and vertical guidance (Glide Slope). Standard Category I (Cat I) ILS minimums are 200 ft HAT Decision Altitude (DA) and 1/2 SM visibility (2,400 ft RVR), reducible to 1,800 ft RVR with touchdown zone and centerline lighting. Category II provides 100 ft DH and 1,200 ft RVR, while Category III enables operations down to zero ceiling and zero visibility (Cat IIIc). Glide slope must always be intercepted from below to avoid false lobes. The required descent rate on a $3^\circ$ glide slope is computed as $\text{FPM} = \text{Groundspeed} \times 5$. DA is an absolute decision point—never level off at DA; initiate an immediate missed approach if visual references are not established.

The Instrument Landing System (ILS) represents the gold standard of precision instrument navigation in worldwide aviation. By combining ground-based electronic VHF lateral localizer signals with UHF vertical glide slope signals, an ILS guides aircraft safely along a stabilized $3^\circ$ descent path down to within 200 feet (or lower) of the runway touchdown zone in dense fog and low clouds.

Understanding ILS component frequencies, category classifications, glideslope geometry, descent rate calculations, and the mandatory execution protocol at Decision Altitude is fundamental for every instrument aviator.


Electronic Architecture of the Instrument Landing System (ILS)

An ILS consists of two primary electronic directional guidance transmitters, supplemented by range markers and visual approach lighting systems:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                        ILS SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE & COMPONENTS                             |
|                                                                                         |
|               Localizer Antenna (Far End of Runway)                                     |
|               • Frequency: 108.10 - 111.95 MHz (Odd tenths)                             |
|               • Course Width: 3° to 6° (700 ft wide at threshold)                       |
|                                                                                         |
|               Glide Slope Antenna (750-1,250 ft down runway, 250-650 ft offset)         |
|               • Frequency: 329.15 - 335.00 MHz (Paired with LOC)                          |
|               • Beam Thickness: 1.4° (0.7° above/below 3.0° glidepath)                  |
|                                                                                         |
|               Marker Beacons / DME / Compass Locators                                  |
|               • Outer Marker (OM) / LOM: 4-7 NM out (FAF, 400 Hz low dashes, Blue)     |
|               • Middle Marker (MM): ~3,500 ft from threshold (DA, 1300 Hz dot-dash, Amber)|
|               • Inner Marker (IM): Threshold on Cat II/III (3000 Hz dots, White)        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1. The Localizer (LOC)

  • Frequency Band: $108.10\text{ MHz}$ to $111.95\text{ MHz}$ with odd tenths (e.g., $108.10, 108.15, 108.30, 109.90\text{ MHz}$).
  • Location: Situated approximately 1,000 feet beyond the stop end of the instrument runway.
  • Angular Width: Tailored to provide a full-scale width of 700 feet at the landing threshold (typically between $3^\circ$ and $6^\circ$ total beam width, or $\pm 2.5^\circ$ half-scale deflection).
  • Sensitivity: Approximately four times more sensitive than a standard VOR ($2.5^\circ$ full-scale deflection vs. $10^\circ$ for a VOR).
  • Signal Coverage: Extends $35^\circ$ on either side of centerline out to 10 NM, and $10^\circ$ on either side out to 18 NM, from 1,000 ft above the highest obstacle up to 4,500 ft AGL.

2. The Glide Slope (GS)

  • Frequency Band: $329.15\text{ MHz}$ to $335.00\text{ MHz}$ (UHF), automatically paired and channeled with the selected VHF localizer frequency (AIM 1-1-9).
  • Location: Located 750 to 1,250 feet down from the approach threshold and offset 250 to 650 feet from runway centerline.
  • Glidepath Angle: Standard angle is $3.00^\circ$ above the horizon, delivering a Threshold Crossing Height (TCH) of 50 feet.
  • Beam Thickness: The total vertical beam thickness is $1.4^\circ$ ($0.7^\circ$ above and $0.7^\circ$ below the $3.0^\circ$ center beam).
  • Usable Range: Operates reliably to a distance of 10 NM from the transmitter.

ILS Category Classifications & Operating Minimums

The FAA and ICAO categorize ILS precision approaches into three operational tiers based on decision heights, runway visual range (RVR), and required aircraft/crew equipage:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                         ILS CATEGORY SPECIFICATIONS TABLE                               |
|                                                                                         |
|  Category     | Decision Height (DH/DA)    | Visibility / RVR Minimum                   |
|  ------------ | -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
|  Category I   | 200 ft HAT (DA)            | 1/2 SM or 2,400 ft RVR                     |
|  (Standard)   |                            | (1,800 ft RVR w/ TDZ & CL lights or FD/HUD)|
|  ------------ | -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
|  Category II  | 100 ft HAT (DH via RadAlt) | 1,200 ft RVR (Touchdown)                   |
|  ------------ | -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
|  Category IIIa| < 100 ft or No DH          | 700 ft RVR (Fail-Passive Autoland)         |
|  Category IIIb| < 50 ft or No DH           | 150 - 700 ft RVR (Fail-Operational Autoland)|
|  Category IIIc| Zero DH (No Decision Height)| Zero RVR (Zero Ceiling & Zero Visibility)  |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Category I (Cat I)

  • Standard instrument-rated general aviation and commercial operations.
  • Minimum ceiling/visibility: 200 feet Height Above Touchdown (HAT) and 1/2 statute mile (2,400 feet RVR).
  • Can be authorized down to 1,800 feet RVR if the runway is equipped with operable Touchdown Zone (TDZ) and Runway Centerline (CL) lights, or if flown using an approved Head-Up Display (HUD) or Flight Director.

Category II (Cat II)

  • Requires special pilot authorization, dual avionics systems, radar altimeter (measured in radio height DH), autothrottles/flight directors, and a rain-clearing system.
  • Minimums: 100 feet DH and 1,200 feet RVR.

Category III (Cat III)

  • Utilizes advanced automatic landing systems (autoland) with redundant fail-passive or fail-operational architecture:
    • Cat IIIa: Down to 700 feet RVR (DH $< 100\text{ ft}$ or no DH).
    • Cat IIIb: Down to 150 feet RVR (DH $< 50\text{ ft}$ or no DH, includes automatic rollout control).
    • Cat IIIc: Zero-Zero (0 ft DH, 0 ft RVR, includes surface taxi guidance; currently not fully operational commercially due to taxi/rescue limitations).

ILS Profile Management & Glideslope Intercept

Flying an ILS requires precise airspeed, altitude, and energy management from the intermediate approach fix down to touchdown.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                ILS FLIGHT PROFILE                                       |
|                                                                                         |
|     Level Flight Intercept                                                              |
|     [Intermediate Altitude]                                                            |
|     ───────────────────────────⚡ Glide Slope Intercept (FAF)                           |
|                                 \                                                       |
|                                  \ Target Descent Rate: FPM = GS x 5                    |
|                                   \                                                     |
|                                    \                                                    |
|                                     \                                                   |
|                                      \                 Decision Altitude (DA)           |
|                                       \                [200 ft HAT]                     |
|                                        \                     │                          |
|                                         \                    ▼ Runway Touchdown Zone    |
|                                          ════════════════════■═══════════════════       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

The Golden Rule: Intercept Glide Slope from Below

  • Instrument approach procedures are engineered with intermediate segment altitudes that place the aircraft below the glide slope beam prior to the Final Approach Fix (denoted by the lightning bolt ⚡).
  • Why Intercept from Below?
    1. Prevents False Glideslope Capture: Ground transmitters generate secondary harmonic lobes at higher elevation angles ($6^\circ, 9^\circ, 12^\circ$). False lobes feature reverse sensing (commanding pitch down when low or pitch up when high) and dangerously steep descent angles.
    2. Energy Management: Capturing from below allows the pilot to configure flaps and gear in level flight, trim for approach speed, and smoothly pitch down into the glide slope without high descent rates.

Rate of Descent Formula for a Standard 3° Glidepath

To maintain the glide slope needle centered on an ILS, the vertical descent rate in feet per minute (FPM) must exactly match the aircraft's groundspeed.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                        GLIDE SLOPE DESCENT RATE FORMULA                                 |
|                                                                                         |
|                    Rate of Descent (FPM) = Groundspeed (knots) x 5                     |
|                                                                                         |
|                    Alternative Rule: FPM = (Groundspeed / 2) x 10                       |
|                                                                                         |
|                    Example at 90 knots GS:   90 x 5 = 450 FPM                           |
|                    Example at 120 knots GS: 120 x 5 = 600 FPM                           |
|                    Example at 150 knots GS: 150 x 5 = 750 FPM                           |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Groundspeed vs. Required Vertical Speed Matrix ($3.0^\circ$ Glidepath)

Groundspeed (KT)Required Descent Rate (FPM)Rule of Thumb Check
70 KT350 FPM$(70 / 2) \times 10 = 350$
80 KT400 FPM$(80 / 2) \times 10 = 400$
90 KT450 FPM$(90 / 2) \times 10 = 450$
100 KT500 FPM$(100 / 2) \times 10 = 500$
110 KT550 FPM$(110 / 2) \times 10 = 550$
120 KT600 FPM$(120 / 2) \times 10 = 600$
130 KT650 FPM$(130 / 2) \times 10 = 650$
140 KT700 FPM$(140 / 2) \times 10 = 700$
150 KT750 FPM$(150 / 2) \times 10 = 750$

Wind Dynamics on Final Approach

  • Headwind on Final: Decreases groundspeed $\rightarrow$ requires a lower descent rate (e.g., 90 kt GS = 450 FPM).
  • Tailwind on Final: Increases groundspeed $\rightarrow$ requires a higher descent rate (e.g., 120 kt GS = 600 FPM). If the tailwind creates a descent requirement exceeding 1,000 FPM below 1,000 ft AGL, the approach violates stabilized approach criteria and must be discontinued.

The Decision Altitude (DA) Execution Protocol

Under 14 CFR § 91.175, Decision Altitude (DA) is defined as a specified altitude in the precision approach at which a missed approach must be initiated if the required visual reference that would continue the approach has not been established.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                    DA vs. MDA OPERATIONAL COMPARISON MATRIX                             |
|                                                                                         |
|  Feature              | Decision Altitude (DA)             | Minimum Descent Alt (MDA)  |
|  -------------------- | ---------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
|  Approach Types       | Precision (ILS) & APV (LPV)        | Non-Precision (VOR, LOC, LP)|
|  Vertical Nature      | Point in space along glidepath     | Level altitude floor       |
|  Leveling Off?        | NEVER LEVEL OFF                     | MANDATORY LEVEL OFF        |
|  Missed App Action    | Initiate climb immediately upon reaching DA if visual criteria unmet | Fly level to MAP; climb at MAP |
|  TERPS Obstacle Buffer| Accounts for momentary dip below DA| Zero dip permitted below MDA|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Critical Rules for Decision Altitude (DA)

  1. DA is a Decision Point, NOT a Minimum Altitude: Unlike an MDA, an aircraft flying an ILS does not level off at DA. As the altimeter indicates DA, the pilot makes an immediate decision:
    • Option A (Land): Visual references under 14 CFR § 91.175 are secured, the aircraft is continuously in a position from which a normal descent can be made, and flight visibility meets minimums $\rightarrow$ Continue descent to landing.
    • Option B (Missed Approach): Visual references are not acquired $\rightarrow$ Immediately apply full go-around power, pitch up to establish climb attitude, clean up flaps/gear, and fly the published missed approach procedure.
  2. Momentary Dip Below DA: TERPS precision approach design criteria explicitly account for the momentary sink of the aircraft as it transitions from a $3^\circ$ descent to a positive climb gradient upon initiating a missed approach at DA. In contrast, dipping below an MDA is a strict regulatory violation.
Loading diagram...
Precision Approach ILS Glidepath Intercept and Decision Altitude Flow
Test Your Knowledge

What is the standard civil minimum for a Category I (Cat I) Instrument Landing System (ILS) precision approach with all ground and airborne equipment fully operational?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

During an ILS approach with an expected groundspeed of 110 knots on a standard 3.0-degree glide slope, what vertical descent rate must the pilot maintain on the Vertical Speed Indicator (VSI)?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Which of the following actions is legally required when an aircraft reaches the published Decision Altitude (DA) on an ILS approach and the approach lights are visible, but the red terminating bars or red side row bars are not distinctly visible?

A
B
C
D