13.2 Part One (Workers Comp) and Part Two (Employers Liability)
Key Takeaways
- Part One (Workers Compensation) pays all statutory benefits the law requires, with NO dollar limit.
- Part Two (Employers Liability) covers employer tort liability for work injuries not subject to the comp statute.
- Standard Part Two limits are written three ways: bodily injury by accident (each accident), by disease (policy limit), and by disease (each employee).
- Part Two responds to third-party-over actions, dual-capacity, consequential, and loss-of-consortium suits.
- The standard form is the NCCI Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance Policy (WC 00 00 00).
One Policy, Two Coverages
The nationally standard form is the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance Policy (WC 00 00 00). It contains two distinct insuring agreements.
Part One: Workers Compensation Insurance
Part One is the insurer's promise to pay promptly all benefits required by the workers compensation law of the states listed in the policy. Key features tested on the exam:
- No dollar limit. Whatever the statute requires, the insurer pays. The policy does not cap medical or indemnity benefits.
- The insurer pays even if the employer disputes the claim, then may seek reimbursement from the employer for any amounts not actually required by law.
- It includes occupational disease benefits required by statute.
Part One is essentially the funding mechanism for the employer's statutory obligation; it is not 'liability' insurance in the negligence sense.
Part Two: Employers Liability Insurance
Part Two (Employers Liability) is genuine liability coverage. It responds to bodily injury by accident or disease that arises out of and in the course of employment but is NOT compensable under the statute, so the injured party (or someone standing in their shoes) sues the employer in tort.
Four classic Part Two exposures appear on exams:
- Third-party-over actions: an injured worker sues a third party (e.g., a machine maker), who then sues the employer for contribution.
- Dual-capacity suits: the employer is sued in a second role, such as manufacturer of the product that hurt its own employee.
- Consequential bodily injury: injury to a family member flowing from the worker's injury.
- Loss of consortium / care, custody: a spouse's claim arising from the worker's injury.
The Three-Part Limit
Part Two limits are stated three ways, and the standard default is $100,000 / $500,000 / $100,000:
| Limit | Applies to |
|---|---|
| Bodily injury by accident, each accident | $100,000 per accident, all employees combined |
| Bodily injury by disease, policy limit | $500,000 aggregate for all disease claims |
| Bodily injury by disease, each employee | $100,000 per employee |
Worked Limit Example
An explosion injures three employees in one accident. Part Two limits are $100,000 / $500,000 / $100,000.
- The relevant limit is bodily injury by accident, each accident = $100,000.
- That $100,000 is the most the insurer pays for all three employees combined in that one accident, not $100,000 each.
Contrast a disease scenario: ten workers develop the same occupational lung disease over time.
- The each-employee limit ($100,000) caps any single worker.
- The policy (aggregate) disease limit ($500,000) caps all disease claims combined, so the insurer would not pay ten times $100,000.
Higher Limits
Insureds frequently buy increased Part Two limits (for example $1,000,000 / $1,000,000 / $1,000,000) because the standard $100,000 layer is thin and because an umbrella usually requires a minimum underlying employers liability limit before it will sit excess.
Exam trap: do not confuse Part Two with Commercial General Liability (CGL). CGL specifically excludes bodily injury to an employee; that gap is exactly what Part Two fills.
Why Part Two Exists
Exclusive remedy bars the employee from suing the employer directly, so why is liability coverage needed at all? Because not every work-related suit is brought by the employee, and not every injury is compensable under the statute.
A third-party-over action is the classic example. A worker hurt by a defective machine collects statutory benefits, then sues the machine's manufacturer. The manufacturer turns around and sues the employer for indemnity, alleging the employer's misuse caused the loss. That suit against the employer is a tort claim, not a comp claim, and Part Two responds.
Likewise, a worker whose claim falls outside the statute (perhaps an exempt class) may sue in tort. Part Two is the safety net behind the no-fault wall, which is why prudent insureds raise its limits well above the $100,000 default and coordinate them with any umbrella.
How Part One and Part Two interact in one claim
The two parts can both be implicated by a single event without overlapping payment. Suppose a warehouse worker is crushed by a forklift made by an outside manufacturer. Part One pays the worker's statutory medical and indemnity benefits immediately and without regard to fault. The worker then sues the forklift manufacturer, who impleads the employer for allegedly removing a safety guard - a third-party-over action. Part Two funds the employer's defense and any tort liability to the manufacturer.
The insurer's Part One subrogation interest in the worker's recovery from the manufacturer is coordinated so the system is not paying twice for the same loss. Recognizing which part responds to which suit is a high-yield exam skill.
The 'other states' and territory conditions of Part Two
Part Two coverage applies to bodily injury that occurs in the United States, its territories, or Canada and to a suit brought in those jurisdictions. Injuries to workers temporarily outside that territory may need a foreign voluntary compensation endorsement. Part Two also requires that the employment be necessary or incidental to the named insured's work in a state listed in the policy, tying the liability coverage back to the same geographic listing that governs Part One. This is why aligning Items 3.A and 3.C of the Information Page protects both the statutory benefit and the employers-liability promise.
Exam Tip: Part One = no-limit statutory benefits funded for the employer; Part Two = true liability insurance with the $100,000/$500,000/$100,000 default that fills the employee-injury gap the CGL excludes.
Under standard Part Two (Employers Liability) limits of $100,000 / $500,000 / $100,000, a single explosion injures three employees. What is the most the insurer will pay for that accident?
Why does an employer need Part Two (Employers Liability) when the firm already carries a CGL policy?