5.3 Worked Cable Selection Examples
Key Takeaways
- Work every cable example in order: CCC after derating → voltage drop → fault/disconnection thinking → mechanical fit, showing units at each step
- Domestic example: long single-phase final subcircuit often passes Iz on a modest size but fails Clause 3.6 until the conductor is upsized
- When upsizing for drop, re-state Ib ≤ In ≤ Iz and recompute Vd with the new Vc — do not assume the old drop figure still applies
- Small commercial example: three-phase submain drop must use three-phase Vc and the 400 V (20 V) 5% limit, while still leaving budget for final circuits if checking end-to-end
- Capstone answers score marks for transparent working and the correct limit (5% total), not for an unexplained final mm²
Worked Cable Selection Examples
Quick Answer: Treat every sizing problem as a four-gate workflow. The domestic example shows a long 230 V final subcircuit that needs upsizing for Clause 3.6 even after CCC passes. The commercial example shows a three-phase submain checked with three-phase Vc against a 20 V (5% of 400 V) limit while preserving end-to-end thinking.
How to Read These Examples
Figures for Vc and some Iz values below are illustrative teaching numbers chosen so arithmetic is clear in an open-book setting. On assessment day you must read the actual AS/NZS 3008 tables in the edition your RTO permits. The method, order, and 5% Clause 3.6 rule are what transfer — not the sample millivolt figures.
Assume copper PVC/PVC multicore cables, clipped or enclosed as stated, and MEN 230/400 V supply unless noted.
Example A — Domestic: Long Single-Phase Final Subcircuit
Scenario
A Queensland dwelling needs a dedicated single-phase circuit to a detached workshop:
| Given | Value |
|---|---|
| Supply | 230 V a.c., MEN |
| Load / design current Ib | 20 A continuous (workshop outlets / small tools diversified to 20 A for this circuit) |
| Protective device In | 20 A circuit breaker |
| Route length L (MSB to workshop DB/outlet) | 45 m |
| Installation | Two-core + earth, enclosed in conduit for part of the run; after derating, treat required Iz ≥ 20 A |
| Consumer mains drop already calculated | 3.0 V (≈ 1.3%) on the path feeding this MSB |
| No submain | Final subcircuit leaves the main switchboard |
Clause 3.6 allowance to the workshop point of consumption: 5% of 230 V = 11.5 V total from POS. With 3.0 V already used on consumer mains, the final subcircuit may use at most 11.5 − 3.0 = 8.5 V.
Step 1 — Current after derating
Ib = 20 A, In = 20 A → need Iz ≥ 20 A after derating.
Suppose AS/NZS 3008 (illustrative) shows:
| Conductor | Iz after your derating factors | CCC result |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 mm² | 18 A | Fail — Iz < In |
| 4 mm² | 24 A | Pass — Ib ≤ In ≤ Iz |
Candidate after Step 1: 4 mm².
Step 2 — Voltage drop
Illustrative single-phase Vc:
| Size | Vc (mV/A·m) |
|---|---|
| 4 mm² | 11.2 |
| 6 mm² | 7.5 |
| 10 mm² | 4.5 |
For 4 mm²:
Vd = (45 × 20 × 11.2) / 1000 = 10.08 V
Final subcircuit alone is 10.08 V, but only 8.5 V remains after mains. Total POS → load ≈ 3.0 + 10.08 = 13.08 V (5.7%) → fails Clause 3.6.
Upsize to 6 mm²:
Vd = (45 × 20 × 7.5) / 1000 = 6.75 V
Remaining budget 8.5 V → OK for this segment. Total ≈ 3.0 + 6.75 = 9.75 V (4.2%) → passes 5%.
Re-check Step 1: 6 mm² Iz will be higher than 4 mm² → still Ib ≤ In ≤ Iz.
Step 3 — Short-circuit / earth-fault disconnection (summary check)
- Confirm the 20 A breaker and 6 mm² actives (with correctly sized earth) give a plausible Zs for 0.4 s disconnection on a final subcircuit — long 45 m runs are exactly where undersized earths fail EFLI even if actives were upsized for drop.
- Confirm short-circuit withstand for the prospective fault level at the MSB is within cable/device limits (usually comfortable at domestic fault levels for these sizes, but still state the check).
Step 4 — Mechanical / installation
- Conduit diameter and bend radius accept 6 mm² 2C+E.
- Underground section (if any) uses a cable type permitted for burial / in conduit underground.
- Terminations at 20 A breaker and workshop accessories suit 6 mm².
Domestic result
Select 6 mm² (not 4 mm²): CCC passed at 4 mm², but voltage drop against the remaining 8.5 V budget forced the upsize. Document mains drop + subcircuit drop = total ≤ 11.5 V.
Example B — Small Commercial: Three-Phase Submain
Scenario
A small warehouse distribution board is fed from the main switchboard:
| Given | Value |
|---|---|
| Submain | Three-phase + neutral + earth |
| Nominal voltage | 400 V phase–phase (230 V phase–neutral) |
| Design current Ib | 63 A (after diversity for that DB) |
| Protective device In | 63 A MCCB |
| Route length L | 55 m |
| Installation | Multicore copper, cable tray; after grouping/ambient derating, need Iz ≥ 63 A |
| Consumer mains drop POS → MSB | 4.0 V on the 400 V basis already assessed for three-phase |
| Longest final subcircuit from warehouse DB (separate later check) | Design target leave ~6 V on 400 V basis for finals |
End-to-end three-phase limit: 5% of 400 V = 20 V. After 4.0 V mains, 16 V remains for submain + finals. If finals may use 6 V, submain budget ≈ 10 V (design allocation inside the mandatory 20 V total).
Step 1 — Current after derating
Need Iz ≥ 63 A.
Illustrative CCC after derating:
| Conductor | Iz | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10 mm² | 55 A | Fail |
| 16 mm² | 72 A | Pass |
| 25 mm² | 95 A | Pass |
Candidate: 16 mm².
Step 2 — Voltage drop (three-phase Vc)
Illustrative three-phase Vc:
| Size | Vc (mV/A·m) |
|---|---|
| 16 mm² | 2.4 |
| 25 mm² | 1.55 |
For 16 mm²:
Vd = (55 × 63 × 2.4) / 1000 = 8.32 V
Against a 10 V submain design budget → passes the allocation. End-to-end so far: 4.0 + 8.32 = 12.32 V, leaving 7.68 V for finals (near the 6 V planning figure — finals must be checked explicitly on the longest run).
If a question instead asked only “does the submain alone stay within 5%?”, 8.32 V ≪ 20 V — but that weaker question is not the full Clause 3.6 story when mains and finals also exist. Capstone-quality answers keep the POS → load narrative.
Suppose grouping was worse and only 16 mm² barely passed Iz, but the longest final later consumed 9 V. Then total 4.0 + 8.32 + 9.0 = 21.32 V > 20 V → fail. Remedy: upsize submain to 25 mm²:
Vd = (55 × 63 × 1.55) / 1000 = 5.37 V
Total with 9 V final ≈ 18.37 V → passes 5%.
Step 3 — Fault performance
- Check MCCB breaking capacity ≥ prospective fault current at the MSB.
- Confirm cable short-circuit capacity for the clearing time.
- Confirm earth size and length keep Zs within disconnection limits for the warehouse DB protection scheme.
Step 4 — Mechanical
- Tray fill and support spacing for 16 mm² or 25 mm² multicore.
- Gland and MCCB lug capacity.
- Neutral and earth continuity through the submain consistent with MEN rules (MEN link remains at the main switchboard — do not create parallel MEN links at the warehouse DB).
Commercial result
Start at 16 mm² for CCC; confirm three-phase Vd; if end-to-end finals push the installation over 20 V, upsize to 25 mm² and re-check. Always use three-phase Vc and the 400 V / 20 V limit for the three-phase path.
Capstone Template (Copy This Structure Into Your Working)
- Ib, In, installation method, derating → Iz (state Ib ≤ In ≤ Iz).
- List series segments from POS; convert 5% → volts.
- Vd = (L × I × Vc)/1000 per segment; sum; compare.
- Fault / EFLI / withstand note.
- Mechanical / termination note.
- Final selected size with one sentence why (usually “CCC OK at X mm²; Vd required Y mm²”).
That template is the calculation mindset: open book, ordered gates, no mystery millimetres.
In Example A, why was 4 mm² rejected even though Iz after derating was adequate for a 20 A breaker?
For the three-phase warehouse submain, which voltage should be used when converting the Clause 3.6 5% limit into volts for a phase-to-phase drop check?
After upsizing a cable solely to pass voltage drop, what must you do next in the selection order?