Key Takeaways
- Standard deviation measures TOTAL risk (both systematic and unsystematic) and is appropriate for non-diversified portfolios
- Variance is standard deviation squared; both measure dispersion around the mean return
- Beta measures SYSTEMATIC risk only and is appropriate for well-diversified portfolios
- Alpha represents excess return above what CAPM predicts; positive alpha = outperformance
- R-squared (coefficient of determination) measures what percentage of returns is explained by the market; higher R-squared means beta is more reliable
Measures of Risk and Return
Quantitative risk and return measures are heavily tested on the CFP exam. Understanding when to use each measure--and how to calculate them--is essential for evaluating investment performance.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation measures the dispersion of returns around the average (mean) return. It quantifies total risk--both systematic and unsystematic risk combined.
Key Characteristics
- Measures volatility or "how much returns flip-flop around the average"
- Higher standard deviation = more risky/volatile investment
- Appropriate for non-diversified portfolios or individual securities
- Expressed in the same units as the returns (percentages)
The Normal Distribution
Standard deviation relates to the normal distribution (bell curve). For a normally distributed set of returns:
| Range | Probability |
|---|---|
| Mean +/- 1 standard deviation | 68% of observations |
| Mean +/- 2 standard deviations | 95% of observations |
| Mean +/- 3 standard deviations | 99% of observations |
Calculating Probability with Standard Deviation
Example: A fund has an expected return of 12% with a standard deviation of 6%. What is the probability of a return less than 0%?
Step 1: Determine how many standard deviations 0% is from the mean.
- Distance from mean: 12% - 0% = 12%
- Number of standard deviations: 12% / 6% = 2 standard deviations below the mean
Step 2: Use the normal distribution.
- 95% of returns fall within +/-2 standard deviations (between 0% and 24%)
- 5% falls outside this range (2.5% above 24%, 2.5% below 0%)
- Probability of return less than 0% = 2.5%
Comparing Investments Using Standard Deviation
Example: Which investment is more risky?
| Asset A | Asset B | |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8% | 19% |
| Year 2 | 10% | 20% |
| Year 3 | 12% | 21% |
| Mean | 10% | 20% |
Asset B has higher returns but look at the consistency:
- Asset A ranges from 8% to 12% (4 percentage point spread)
- Asset B ranges from 19% to 21% (2 percentage point spread)
Asset A has higher standard deviation despite lower returns. Asset B is actually less volatile relative to its returns.
Variance
Variance is simply the standard deviation squared. While less intuitive, it is mathematically useful for portfolio calculations.
Key Points:
- Variance = Standard Deviation squared
- Standard Deviation = Square root of Variance
- Variance is always positive
- Used in portfolio risk calculations with covariance
Coefficient of Variation (CV)
The coefficient of variation standardizes risk per unit of return. It allows comparison of investments with different return levels.
Formula
CV = Standard Deviation / Mean Return
Interpretation
- Higher CV = More risk per unit of return (less desirable)
- Lower CV = Less risk per unit of return (more desirable)
- CV is useful when comparing investments with different expected returns
Example: Comparing Risk-Adjusted Performance
| Asset A | Asset B | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Return | 8% | 8% |
| Standard Deviation | 10% | 12% |
| CV | 10/8 = 1.25 | 12/8 = 1.50 |
Asset A has the lower CV, meaning less risk per unit of return. Asset A offers better risk-adjusted performance.
Another Example
| Asset A | Asset B | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Return | 10% | 12% |
| Standard Deviation | 8% | 9% |
| CV | 8/10 = 0.80 | 9/12 = 0.75 |
Asset B has the lower CV despite higher absolute volatility. The higher return more than compensates for the higher risk.
CFP Exam Tip: The asset with the LOWER coefficient of variation has the HIGHER risk-adjusted return. Think: lower risk per unit of return = better.
Beta
Beta measures systematic risk--the volatility of a security relative to the overall market. The market (typically S&P 500) has a beta of 1.0 by definition.
Interpreting Beta
| Beta Value | Interpretation | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Beta = 1.0 | Moves exactly with market | Index funds |
| Beta > 1.0 | More volatile than market | Technology stocks |
| Beta < 1.0 | Less volatile than market | Utilities |
| Beta = 0 | No correlation with market | T-bills (theoretically) |
| Beta < 0 | Moves opposite to market | Inverse ETFs |
When to Use Beta vs. Standard Deviation
| Measure | Measures | Use When |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Deviation | Total risk | Portfolio is NOT diversified |
| Beta | Systematic risk only | Portfolio IS well-diversified |
For a well-diversified portfolio, unsystematic risk has been eliminated, so beta is the appropriate risk measure. For a concentrated portfolio or individual security, standard deviation captures total risk.
R-Squared (Coefficient of Determination)
R-squared (R2) measures what percentage of a portfolio's returns can be explained by the market's returns. It is calculated by squaring the correlation coefficient (r).
Formula
R-squared = (Correlation Coefficient) squared
Interpretation
| R-squared Value | Interpretation | Beta Reliability |
|---|---|---|
| R2 = 1.00 | 100% explained by market | Beta is very reliable |
| R2 = 0.81 | 81% explained by market | Beta is reliable |
| R2 = 0.50 | 50% explained by market | Beta is less reliable |
| R2 = 0.25 | 25% explained by market | Beta is unreliable |
Key Exam Points
- R-squared tells you if beta is meaningful for measuring risk
- High R-squared (>0.70): Beta is appropriate; use Treynor ratio
- Low R-squared (<0.70): Beta is unreliable; use Sharpe ratio (standard deviation)
- R-squared ranges from 0 to 1 (or 0% to 100%)
Example
Fund XYZ has a correlation of 0.90 to the S&P 500. What percent of Fund XYZ's return is due to the market?
R-squared = (0.90) squared = 0.81 = 81%
81% of Fund XYZ's return is explained by market movements. Beta is a reliable risk measure for this fund.
CFP Exam Tip: If the exam gives you R-squared but not correlation, you can tell if beta is appropriate. If R-squared > 0.70, use beta-based measures. If R-squared < 0.70, use standard deviation-based measures.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient (r) measures how two investments move relative to each other. It ranges from -1 to +1.
Interpretation
| Correlation | Meaning | Diversification Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| r = +1 | Move exactly together | No diversification benefit |
| r = 0 | No relationship | Moderate diversification benefit |
| r = -1 | Move exactly opposite | Maximum diversification benefit |
Key Points
- Diversification benefits begin when correlation is less than +1
- The lower the correlation, the greater the diversification benefit
- Negative correlation provides the best diversification (rare in practice)
- Most stocks have positive correlations (0.3 to 0.8 typical)
Covariance
Covariance measures how two securities move together. It combines the standard deviations of two securities with their correlation.
Formula
COV(A,B) = Standard Deviation A x Standard Deviation B x Correlation A,B
Key Points
- Positive covariance: Assets move in the same direction
- Negative covariance: Assets move in opposite directions
- Covariance is used in portfolio variance calculations
- Unlike correlation, covariance is not standardized (harder to interpret)
Alpha (Jensen's Alpha)
Alpha measures the excess return of a portfolio above what the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) predicts. It indicates manager skill.
Formula
Alpha = Actual Return - Expected Return (from CAPM)
Or: Alpha = Rp - [Rf + Beta(Rm - Rf)]
Where:
- Rp = Portfolio's actual return
- Rf = Risk-free rate
- Beta = Portfolio's beta
- Rm = Market return
Interpretation
| Alpha | Meaning | Manager Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha > 0 | Return exceeded expectations | Outperformed on risk-adjusted basis |
| Alpha = 0 | Return matched expectations | Performed as expected for risk taken |
| Alpha < 0 | Return fell short of expectations | Underperformed on risk-adjusted basis |
Example Calculation
A mutual fund returned 15% last year with a beta of 2.0. The risk-free rate was 3% and the market returned 8%. Did the manager outperform?
Step 1: Calculate expected return using CAPM. Expected Return = Rf + Beta(Rm - Rf) Expected Return = 3% + 2.0(8% - 3%) Expected Return = 3% + 2.0(5%) Expected Return = 3% + 10% = 13%
Step 2: Calculate alpha. Alpha = Actual Return - Expected Return Alpha = 15% - 13% = +2%
Interpretation: Positive alpha of 2% means the manager outperformed by 2% on a risk-adjusted basis.
CFP Exam Tip: Alpha is an ABSOLUTE measure. A positive alpha is good by itself--you do not need to compare to other funds. Sharpe and Treynor are RELATIVE measures that must be compared to rankings.
Summary: When to Use Each Measure
| Measure | What It Measures | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Deviation | Total risk | Non-diversified portfolios |
| Beta | Systematic risk | Well-diversified portfolios |
| R-Squared | Market explanation | Determine if beta is reliable |
| Coefficient of Variation | Risk per unit of return | Compare different return levels |
| Correlation | Movement relationship | Assess diversification potential |
| Alpha | Excess return vs. CAPM | Evaluate manager skill |
A mutual fund has a correlation of 0.80 to the S&P 500. What is the R-squared, and what does it indicate?
Which risk measure is most appropriate for evaluating a single, concentrated stock position?
A portfolio manager achieved a return of 14% with a beta of 1.5. If the risk-free rate was 4% and the market returned 10%, what is the portfolio alpha?