Key Takeaways
- Value investing seeks undervalued securities trading below intrinsic value; growth investing targets companies with high earnings growth potential
- Momentum investing capitalizes on price trends; contrarian investing buys out-of-favor assets
- Dollar-cost averaging reduces timing risk by investing fixed amounts at regular intervals
- Buy-and-hold minimizes transaction costs and taxes while capturing long-term market returns
- Core-satellite approach combines passive core holdings (typically 60-80%) with active satellite positions for alpha generation
- Factor investing (smart beta) systematically targets return drivers like value, momentum, quality, and low volatility
Common Investment Strategies
Beyond the active versus passive decision, investors and portfolio managers employ various investment strategies to pursue returns, manage risk, and align portfolios with client goals. Understanding these strategies—their mechanics, advantages, and limitations—is essential for CFP professionals constructing client portfolios.
This section covers style-based investing, systematic approaches, portfolio construction methods, and the increasingly popular factor investing (smart beta) approach.
Style-Based Investment Strategies
Style-based investing categorizes securities and portfolios based on specific characteristics. The most common style distinction is between value and growth investing.
Value Investing
Value investing is a strategy focused on identifying securities trading below their intrinsic value. Value investors believe the market occasionally misprices securities, creating opportunities to buy "cheap" stocks that will eventually appreciate to fair value.
Key Characteristics of Value Stocks:
- Low price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios
- Low price-to-book (P/B) ratios
- High dividend yields
- Often mature, established companies
- May be temporarily out of favor with the market
| Value Metric | What It Measures | Value Stock Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | Price relative to earnings | Below market average (typically <15) |
| P/B Ratio | Price relative to book value | Often below 1.5 or market average |
| Dividend Yield | Annual dividend / stock price | Higher than market average |
| Price/Cash Flow | Price relative to cash generation | Below peers or market |
Historical Performance: Value stocks have historically outperformed growth stocks over very long periods, though this "value premium" has been inconsistent in recent decades. The 2010s saw significant growth outperformance, leading some to question whether value investing remains effective.
When Value Works Best:
- Early economic recoveries
- Rising interest rate environments
- Mean reversion periods following growth bubbles
- Periods of market pessimism
Growth Investing
Growth investing focuses on companies expected to grow earnings faster than the overall market. Growth investors are willing to pay premium valuations for superior growth prospects.
Key Characteristics of Growth Stocks:
- High P/E and P/B ratios
- Low or no dividends (reinvesting profits)
- Strong revenue and earnings growth rates
- Often in technology, healthcare, or emerging industries
- Higher volatility than value stocks
| Growth Metric | What It Measures | Growth Stock Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | Year-over-year sales increase | >15-20% annually |
| Earnings Growth | EPS growth rate | >15-20% annually |
| PEG Ratio | P/E divided by growth rate | <1.0 considered attractive |
| Return on Equity | Profitability relative to equity | Higher than peers |
When Growth Works Best:
- Low or falling interest rate environments
- Economic expansions
- Periods of technological disruption
- Strong consumer confidence periods
Value vs. Growth Comparison
| Factor | Value Investing | Growth Investing |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | Buy underpriced assets | Buy future earnings |
| Valuation | Low multiples | High multiples |
| Risk Profile | Downside protection | Higher volatility |
| Income | Often higher dividends | Little or no dividends |
| Horizon | Patient, long-term | Growth trajectory dependent |
| Best Environment | Economic recovery, rising rates | Expansion, low rates |
CFP Exam Tip: Value and growth often perform differently across market cycles. Diversified portfolios typically include both styles, allowing them to complement each other over time.
Momentum Investing
Momentum investing is based on the observation that securities that have performed well recently tend to continue performing well in the near term, and vice versa. Momentum investors buy "winners" and sell or avoid "losers."
How Momentum Works:
- Identify securities with strong recent performance (typically 3-12 months)
- Buy securities showing positive momentum
- Sell securities showing negative momentum
- Rebalance regularly to capture new trends
Momentum Metrics:
| Metric | Time Frame | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | 3-12 months | Rank securities by total return |
| Relative Strength | Varies | Compare performance to benchmark |
| Moving Averages | 50, 100, 200 days | Trading signals when crossing |
| Risk-Adjusted Momentum | Varies | Momentum divided by volatility |
Research Evidence: Academic research has documented a persistent "momentum premium" across asset classes and geographies. However, momentum strategies are subject to:
- Sharp reversals ("momentum crashes")
- High turnover and trading costs
- Tax inefficiency due to short holding periods
- Implementation challenges at scale
Contrarian Investing
Contrarian investing is the opposite of momentum—buying assets that are out of favor and selling those that are popular. Contrarians believe markets overreact to both good and bad news, creating opportunities.
Contrarian Principles:
- Buy when others are fearful; sell when others are greedy
- Look for securities with excessive pessimism priced in
- Avoid "crowded trades" where everyone agrees
- Requires patience—being early can feel like being wrong
Contrarian Indicators:
| Indicator | Contrarian Signal |
|---|---|
| Investor Sentiment | Extreme pessimism = buy opportunity |
| Short Interest | High short interest = potential squeeze |
| Fund Flows | Heavy outflows = potential opportunity |
| Media Coverage | Negative headlines = contrarian buy |
CFP Exam Tip: Contrarian strategies require strong conviction and a long time horizon. Explaining to clients why you're buying unpopular investments requires effective communication.
Systematic Investment Strategies
Systematic strategies follow predetermined rules for investing, removing emotion and timing uncertainty from the process.
Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA)
Dollar-cost averaging involves investing a fixed dollar amount at regular intervals, regardless of market conditions. This systematic approach reduces timing risk and behavioral mistakes.
How DCA Works:
| Month | Investment | Share Price | Shares Purchased |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | $500 | $50 | 10.00 |
| February | $500 | $40 | 12.50 |
| March | $500 | $25 | 20.00 |
| April | $500 | $35 | 14.29 |
| May | $500 | $50 | 10.00 |
| June | $500 | $55 | 9.09 |
| Total | $3,000 | Avg: $42.50 | 75.88 |
| Avg Cost/Share | $39.54 |
Notice that the average cost per share ($39.54) is lower than the average share price ($42.50). This occurs because more shares are purchased when prices are low.
DCA Advantages:
- Reduces timing risk and eliminates market timing decisions
- Enforces disciplined investing
- Average cost per share is lower than average price (when prices fluctuate)
- Psychologically easier than lump-sum investing
- Appropriate for regular income situations (401(k) contributions)
DCA Limitations:
- May underperform lump-sum investing in rising markets
- Research shows lump-sum beats DCA approximately 2/3 of the time
- Best for risk-averse investors or those with regular cash flows
Buy-and-Hold Strategy
Buy-and-hold is a long-term investment approach where investors purchase securities and hold them for extended periods regardless of short-term market fluctuations.
Key Benefits:
| Benefit | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Lower costs | Minimal trading = minimal transaction fees |
| Tax efficiency | Long-term capital gains rates; deferred taxes |
| Behavioral benefit | Reduces impulse to trade on emotion |
| Compound growth | Returns compound uninterrupted |
| Time in market | Captures full market returns over time |
When Buy-and-Hold Works Best:
- Long time horizons (10+ years)
- Diversified portfolios
- Low-cost index funds or ETFs
- Investors prone to behavioral mistakes
Potential Concerns:
- May hold through significant drawdowns
- Requires discipline during market stress
- Rebalancing still necessary for risk management
CFP Exam Tip: Buy-and-hold is most appropriate for long-term investors in diversified portfolios. It minimizes the two major drags on returns: taxes and transaction costs.
Portfolio Construction Strategies
These approaches address how to structure an overall portfolio, combining multiple asset classes and strategies.
Sector Rotation
Sector rotation involves shifting portfolio allocations among market sectors based on the economic cycle. Different sectors tend to outperform at different stages of the business cycle.
Economic Cycle and Sector Performance:
| Economic Phase | Characteristics | Outperforming Sectors |
|---|---|---|
| Early Expansion | Recovery beginning, rates low | Financials, Consumer Discretionary, Real Estate |
| Mid Expansion | Strong growth, rising employment | Technology, Industrials, Materials |
| Late Expansion | Peak growth, rising inflation | Energy, Materials, Healthcare |
| Contraction | Slowing growth, recession | Consumer Staples, Utilities, Healthcare |
Sector Rotation Challenges:
- Difficult to accurately time economic cycles
- Sectors don't always follow historical patterns
- High turnover increases costs and taxes
- Requires accurate macroeconomic forecasting
Core-Satellite Approach
The core-satellite approach is a portfolio construction method that combines a stable "core" of passive, diversified investments with smaller "satellite" positions designed to generate alpha or express specific views.
Structure:
| Component | Allocation | Purpose | Investment Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | 60-80% | Market exposure, stability | Index funds, broad ETFs |
| Satellite | 20-40% | Alpha generation, tactical | Active funds, individual securities, themes |
Common Satellite Strategies:
- Active management in less efficient markets (small-cap, emerging markets)
- Sector or thematic bets (technology, clean energy)
- Factor tilts (value, momentum, quality)
- Alternative investments (REITs, commodities)
- Individual security selection
Benefits of Core-Satellite:
- Captures most market returns at low cost (core)
- Preserves potential for outperformance (satellites)
- Controls overall portfolio costs
- Allows expression of views without betting entire portfolio
- Tax-efficient core can offset satellite turnover
Factor Investing (Smart Beta)
Factor investing, also called smart beta, is a systematic approach that targets specific drivers of returns rather than relying on market-cap weighting or individual security selection.
What Are Factors?
Factors are persistent, documented characteristics that have historically been associated with higher returns or lower risk.
| Factor | Definition | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Stocks with low prices relative to fundamentals | Compensation for distress risk or behavioral mispricing |
| Momentum | Stocks with recent strong performance | Behavioral underreaction to information |
| Quality | Stocks with high profitability, low leverage | Compensation for business risk |
| Low Volatility | Stocks with lower price fluctuation | Behavioral preference for "lottery" stocks |
| Size | Smaller companies | Compensation for liquidity and information risk |
Smart Beta ETF Strategies
Smart beta ETFs use alternative weighting schemes instead of traditional market-cap weighting:
| Weighting Method | Description | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Equal Weight | Same weight for each stock | Reduce concentration in largest stocks |
| Fundamental | Weight by revenue, earnings, dividends | Tilt toward value characteristics |
| Minimum Variance | Optimize for lowest portfolio volatility | Risk reduction |
| Multi-Factor | Combine multiple factors | Diversified factor exposure |
Smart Beta Considerations:
| Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|
| Lower cost than active management | Higher cost than pure passive |
| Systematic, rules-based approach | Factors can underperform for extended periods |
| Transparent methodology | Past factor premiums may not persist |
| Targets documented return drivers | Can be complex to understand |
| Tax-efficient vs. active | Crowding may reduce future returns |
CFP Exam Tip: Smart beta sits between purely passive indexing and active management. It systematically targets factors that have historically produced excess returns, at lower cost than traditional active management.
Choosing Investment Strategies for Clients
When recommending investment strategies, consider:
| Client Factor | Strategy Implication |
|---|---|
| Time Horizon | Longer = more tolerance for volatility, value, momentum |
| Risk Tolerance | Lower = buy-and-hold, DCA, low volatility |
| Tax Situation | Taxable = buy-and-hold, passive; Tax-deferred = more flexibility |
| Investment Beliefs | Efficient markets = passive; Opportunities exist = active/factor |
| Behavioral Tendencies | Impulsive = systematic strategies; Disciplined = more flexibility |
| Portfolio Size | Larger = more diversification across strategies |
Strategy Summary Table
| Strategy | Time Horizon | Risk Level | Cost | Tax Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buy-and-Hold | Long | Varies | Low | High |
| Dollar-Cost Averaging | Ongoing | Reduces timing risk | Low | Moderate |
| Value Investing | Long | Moderate | Varies | Moderate |
| Growth Investing | Long | Higher | Varies | Lower |
| Momentum | Short-Medium | Higher | Higher | Lower |
| Contrarian | Long | Higher | Varies | Moderate |
| Sector Rotation | Medium | Higher | Higher | Lower |
| Core-Satellite | Long | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
| Factor/Smart Beta | Long | Varies | Moderate | Moderate |
An investor using dollar-cost averaging invests $500 monthly. Over three months, the share prices are $50, $25, and $50. What is the investor's average cost per share?
A client wants to minimize transaction costs and taxes while maintaining broad market exposure. Which portfolio approach would be MOST appropriate for the core of their portfolio?
Which factor in smart beta investing seeks securities that have recently outperformed, based on the belief that trends tend to persist in the short term?