AFQT and ASVAB Skills
Not publishedof exam
Delivery and Format
Not publishedof exam
Navy PaperComputer AFCTCAT versus PaperConfirm Locally
Service Retest Workflow
Not publishedof exam
Army RetestNavy RetestMarine NCMISAuthorization
Quick Facts
- Exam
- AFCT
- Purpose
- In-service classification retest
- AFQT
- 1-99 percentile
- AFQT inputs
- AR, MK, PC, WK
- Army wait
- Six months standard
- Navy floor
- 30 days minimum
- Navy paper
- Forms 18F, 19G
- Format
- Confirm local assignment
AFQT Four
AR MK PC WK feed AFQT
AR: word mathMK: mathPC: passagesWK: words
AFQT vs Percent Correct
AFQT
- 1-99 percentile
- Reference group
- Four inputs
Percent correct
- Raw accuracy
- Not AFQT
- No direct conversion
Percentile is not accuracy
AFQT Inputs
- AR
- Arithmetic word problems
- MK
- Mathematics principles
- PC
- Written passage information
- WK
- Contextual word meanings
- AFQT
- Four-subtest percentile
- Standard score
- Norm-referenced subtest score
- Percentile
- Reference-group comparison
AFQT vs Subtest Score
AFQT
- Four subtests
- Percentile result
- Overall measure
Subtest
- Single ability
- Standard score
- Specific skill
Composite versus component
AFQT Categories
- Category I
- 93-99 percentile
- Category II
- 65-92 percentile
- Category IIIA
- 50-64 percentile
- Category IIIB
- 31-49 percentile
- Category IVA
- 21-30 percentile
- Category IVB
- 16-20 percentile
- Category IVC
- 10-15 percentile
- Category V
- 1-9 percentile
Public ASVAB Content Map
- GS
- Physical and biological sciences
- EI
- Electricity and electronics
- AI
- Automobile technology
- SI
- Tools and shop practices
- MC
- Mechanical and physical principles
- AO
- Object assembly ability
- Verbal
- WK and PC inputs
- Math
- AR and MK inputs
Format Rule
Tables teach; test offices assign
Public: content mapLocal: assigned form
Public Table vs Appointment
Public ASVAB
- Content reference
- CAT and paper
- General format
AFCT appointment
- Test-site assigned
- Site specific
- Confirm locally
Reference versus assignment
Format Confirmation
- Booked Navy site→Ask about 18F/19G
- Non-Navy site→Confirm computer delivery
- Seeing ASVAB table→Treat as content map
- Need subtest count→Ask test office
- Need time limit→Use candidate instructions
- Need AO practice→Review public format table
- Need review rules→Ask administrator
- Format still unknown→Delay format-specific drills
Format Boundaries
- Navy paper
- Forms 18F and 19G
- Computer AFCT
- Most other DoD sites
- Public CAT
- ASVAB computer table
- Public paper
- ASVAB paper table
- Paper AS
- AI and SI combined
- Paper AO
- Listed in public table
- Assigned form
- Confirm with test office
Retest Rule
Army six; Navy thirty; Marines NCMIS
Army: ETP pathNavy: EMF firstMarines: approval
Retest Workflow
- Army under six months→Obtain approved ETP
- Army new training→Document changed potential
- Army six months passed→Contact APT
- Navy under 30 days→Wait minimum interval
- Navy score unposted→Wait for EMF
- Navy retest planned→Get written command authorization
- Marine retest planned→Submit NCMIS request
- Marine early retest→Submit NCMIS waiver request
- Other Service→Ask test-control office
Army Retest Rules
- Standard wait
- Six months
- Governing rule
- AR 611-5
- ETP
- Earlier retest approval
- ETP evidence
- Changed potential evidence
- Possible basis
- Education, job, training
- After ETP
- Confirm later retest timing
- Army contact
- APT or Education Center
Marine Request vs Waiver
Retest request
- NCMIS submission
- O-5 routing
- Education Center
Early waiver
- MCO 1230.5C
- HQMC final review
- Progress may matter
Request versus exception
Marine Retest Workflow
- NCMIS
- Request submission system
- O-5 route
- Commander or designee
- Approved request
- Then Education Center
- Early retest
- Waiver review
- Waiver policy
- MCO 1230.5C
- Academic progress
- May support waiver
- Authorization life
- 90 days; no extensions
Common Traps
Percentile vs accuracy
AFQT compares people ≠ Not percent correct
ASVAB table vs AFCT
Public table informs ≠ Local office assigns
Army vs Navy wait
Army: six months ≠ Navy: 30 days
Paper vs computer
Navy paper forms ≠ Most other sites computer
Authorization vs appointment
Approval comes first ≠ Scheduling follows
AFQT vs job requirement
AFQT uses four ≠ Programs may differ
Last Minute
- 1.AFQT uses AR, MK, PC, WK
- 2.AFQT is a percentile
- 3.Public tables are not appointments
- 4.Confirm assigned AFCT format
- 5.Navy paper: 18F or 19G
- 6.Army: six months; approved ETP
- 7.Navy: 30 days; EMF first
- 8.Marine retest: NCMIS request
- 9.Verify local authorization requirements
- 10.Study confirmed requirement, not rumors
Buy on Amazon
Study guide on MometrixSame family resources
Explore More Military Aptitude Tests
Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.
More From This Family
Videos and articles for deeper review.
VideoAFCT Study Guide 2026: Format, Scores, and Service-Specific Retest RulesThis examVideoASVAB Exam Guide 2026: All 10 Subtests, AFQT & ScoresVideoASVAB Hardest Sections Ranked 2026: Expert Strategies to Conquer Every SubtestVideoASVAB Jobs by Score 2026: Line Scores to Military Jobs (FREE)ArticleAFCT Study Guide 2026: Format, Scores, and Service-Specific Retest Rules15 min readArticleFREE PiCAT Exam Guide 2026: Verification Test, At-Home ASVAB, Branch Cutoffs21 min readArticleASVAB Exam Guide 2026: All 10 Subtests, AFQT & Scores15 min readArticleEDPT Test Guide 2026: Official Facts, Reported Format, and a 14-Day Prep Plan13 min read