8.2 Heat Transfer Coefficients and Overall U
Key Takeaways
- The film (convective) coefficient h appears in Q̇ = h A ΔT_film; small h means large thermal resistance 1/(hA).
- Resistances in series add: process film + wall conduction + utility film (+ fouling layers) for a composite barrier.
- Overall heat transfer coefficient U is defined by Q̇ = U A ΔT_overall, so 1/(UA) equals the sum of the individual resistances (with area basis stated).
- Fouling factors R_f increase thermal resistance over time as deposits build; dirty exchangers need higher ΔT or more area for the same duty.
- Plant maintenance—cleaning, filtration, proper velocities, and water treatment—protects design U and energy efficiency on Qatar process units.
8.2 Heat Transfer Coefficients and Overall U
Quick Answer: Each film has resistance 1/(hA); a wall has L/(kA). Sum series resistances to get 1/(UA). Then Q̇ = U A ΔT. Fouling factors add more resistance as deposits grow—cleaning and good fluid quality protect U.
Section 8.1 defined h and k. Equipment design almost never uses a single film alone: heat crosses two fluids and a wall (plus dirt). The overall heat transfer coefficient U packages that stack so duty calculations stay compact. On UPDA/MMUP Chemical Domain C, expect conceptual questions about controlling resistance, dirty vs clean U, and what happens when one film coefficient changes.
Film Coefficient h in Equipment Language
For one convective surface:
Q̇ = h A (T_surface − T_bulk)
| If h is… | Resistance 1/(hA) is… | Temperature drop across that film is… |
|---|---|---|
| Large (turbulent liquid, boiling) | Small | Small for a given Q̇ |
| Small (gas film, natural convection, viscous oil) | Large | Large—this side “controls” |
Rule of thumb: The side with the smallest h (largest film resistance) often dominates the overall resistance unless the wall is thick insulation or heavy fouling intervenes.
What Raises h?
- Higher velocity / turbulence (higher Re) for single-phase forced flow
- Higher fluid thermal conductivity (helps Nu and the fluid k in h = Nu k/L)
- Phase change (boiling/condensation) when properly designed
- Inserts, fins, or enhanced surfaces (raise effective A or disrupt films)
What Lowers h?
- Laminar flow, low velocity, high viscosity
- Gas instead of liquid on that side
- Maldistribution, bypassing, or stratified two-phase regimes (advanced plant issues)
Resistances in Series
For steady heat flow through layers with no accumulation, the heat rate Q̇ is the same through each layer. Temperature drops add:
ΔT_total = Q̇ (R₁ + R₂ + R₃ + …)
Plane-Wall Composite (Same Area A)
Imagine process fluid | fouling | metal wall | fouling | utility fluid:
| Layer | Resistance |
|---|---|
| Process film | 1 / (h_h A) |
| Process-side fouling | R_f,h / A (if R_f is a fouling factor in m²·K/W) |
| Metal wall | L / (k_w A) |
| Utility-side fouling | R_f,c / A |
| Utility film | 1 / (h_c A) |
Then:
1 / (U A) = 1/(h_h A) + R_f,h/A + L/(k_w A) + R_f,c/A + 1/(h_c A)
Cancel A (same area basis):
1/U = 1/h_h + R_f,h + L/k_w + R_f,c + 1/h_c
U then satisfies:
Q̇ = U A ΔT
where ΔT is the overall driving force between the two bulk fluids (or a suitable mean such as LMTD in Section 8.3).
Cylindrical Walls (Pipes and Tubes)
Inner and outer areas differ. Engineers define U on inside or outside area:
Q̇ = U_i A_i ΔT = U_o A_o ΔT
Wall resistance becomes a logarithmic form, e.g. ln(r_o/r_i)/(2π k L) for length L. For UPDA MCQs, remember:
- State the area basis when comparing U values
- Thin metal tubes: wall resistance is often small vs films and fouling
- Thick insulation on pipe OD: conduction resistance can dominate
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient U
| Quantity | Meaning |
|---|---|
| U | Overall coefficient including all series resistances (W/(m²·K)) |
| A | Reference heat-transfer area (often tube OD or ID) |
| ΔT | Overall bulk-to-bulk temperature difference (or mean) |
| Clean U | Calculated without fouling factors |
| Service / dirty U | Includes fouling; used for sizing for end-of-run |
Typical order-of-magnitude U values (very approximate; depend strongly on fluids):
| Duty type | Rough U (W/(m²·K)) |
|---|---|
| Gas–gas (no fins) | 10–50 |
| Gas–liquid | 20–300 |
| Liquid–liquid (low viscosity) | 200–1500 |
| Condensing steam–liquid | 500–4000+ |
Do not memorize a single “correct” U for all exchangers; use the table as relative intuition: gas films and viscous oils pull U down; condensing steam pulls U up.
Worked Numerical: Clean Plane Composite
A flat heat-transfer surface has:
- h_hot = 800 W/(m²·K)
- Wall: L = 0.005 m, k_w = 40 W/(m·K)
- h_cold = 400 W/(m²·K)
- No fouling
1/U = 1/800 + 0.005/40 + 1/400 = 0.00125 + 0.000125 + 0.0025 = 0.003875 m²·K/W
U ≈ 258 W/(m²·K)
| Term | Contribution to 1/U |
|---|---|
| Hot film | 0.00125 |
| Wall | 0.000125 |
| Cold film | 0.00250 |
| Sum | 0.003875 |
Interpretation: The cold film is the largest resistance (~64% of 1/U). Improving cold-side turbulence raises U more than polishing an already conductive thin metal wall. The wall term is almost negligible—classic for thin steel.
If cold-side h doubles to 800 W/(m²·K):
1/U = 0.00125 + 0.000125 + 0.00125 = 0.002625 → U ≈ 381 W/(m²·K)
A large gain from fixing the controlling film.
Fouling Factors and Why Plants Care
Fouling is unwanted deposit on heat-transfer surfaces: scale, sludge, corrosion products, biological growth, coke, polymer, or sand/silt.
Fouling factor R_f (m²·K/W) is an extra series resistance. Designers often take values from standards or company practice for water, crude, etc.
1/U_dirty = 1/U_clean + R_f,total
(with R_f,total the sum of side-specific factors on the chosen area basis).
| Effect of fouling | Process consequence |
|---|---|
| U decreases | For fixed area and terminal temperatures, duty falls |
| To keep duty | Need more area, higher ΔT, or more utilities |
| Pressure drop | Deposits can also raise ΔP and hurt pumps/compressors |
| Reliability | Under-deposit corrosion, hot spots, tube failures |
Worked Numerical: Add Fouling
Using the previous clean U ≈ 258 W/(m²·K), add total fouling R_f = 0.0004 m²·K/W:
1/U_dirty = 1/258 + 0.0004 ≈ 0.003876 + 0.0004 = 0.004276
U_dirty ≈ 234 W/(m²·K) (~9% drop)
If fouling is severe, R_f = 0.002 m²·K/W:
1/U = 0.003876 + 0.002 = 0.005876 → U ≈ 170 W/(m²·K) (~34% drop)
| Case | U (W/(m²·K)) |
|---|---|
| Clean | 258 |
| Light fouling R_f = 0.0004 | 234 |
| Heavy fouling R_f = 0.002 | 170 |
Maintenance and Operations Implications (Qatar Plant Context)
Process facilities in Qatar—gas processing, LNG, refining, petrochemicals, desalination-related utilities—run exchangers hard in hot, sometimes dusty or saline environments. Exam-relevant links:
- Cooling water systems: scale and biofouling; treatment programs protect U and reduce cleaning frequency
- Crude / heavy hydrocarbon services: fouling factors are large by design; plan turnaround cleaning
- Air coolers: fin-side fouling (dust, sand) cuts air-side h and effective U
- Velocity selection: higher velocity can reduce deposition but raises pressure drop and erosion risk—an engineering tradeoff
- Monitoring: rising approach temperatures or falling duty at fixed flows signals fouling or lost area
Design practice: Size on dirty U so the exchanger still meets duty at end of run; clean U is higher at start-up (overperformance until fouling builds).
Controlling Resistance Diagnosis
| Observation | Likely message |
|---|---|
| One fluid is a gas, other is a liquid | Gas film often controls |
| Both sides liquid, thin metal, clean | Smaller h side controls |
| Heavy insulation or polymer lining | Wall/conduction may control |
| Performance collapses after months on hard water | Fouling resistance grew |
| Doubling metal thickness barely changes duty | Wall was not controlling |
Fins are added on the low-h side (usually gas) to increase area where resistance is high—conceptual point for equipment awareness.
Coupling to Energy Balances
From Chapter 4, a single-stream cooler needs Q̇ = ṁ C_p ΔT_fluid (approx.). That duty must also equal U A ΔT_overall (with proper mean ΔT). If fouling drops U, either outlet temperatures move (less cooling/heating) or operators raise utility flow/temperature difference—until limits are hit.
Common Traps
- Adding conductivities instead of resistances
- Comparing U values defined on different area bases (ID vs OD)
- Ignoring fouling on water or crude services when the stem emphasizes “after six months online”
- Assuming metal wall always dominates (usually false for thin tubes)
- Confusing h (one film) with U (overall)
Exam Workflow
- Sketch layers: film | foul | wall | foul | film.
- Write each R; sum for 1/(UA).
- Identify the largest R (controlling).
- Predict effect of changing h, L, k, or R_f on U and Q̇.
- Connect dirty U to cleaning and end-of-run design.
Section 8.3 applies U and A with LMTD (and F corrections) for real exchangers—the temperature difference is no longer a single flat ΔT when both streams change temperature along the unit.
For thin-walled tubular exchangers with two liquid films, which statement about series resistances is most accurate?
How is the overall heat transfer coefficient U related to individual series resistances when all are written on the same area basis?
A cooler is designed with fouling factors so that U_dirty < U_clean. What is the main plant implication?