8.3 Heat Exchangers and LMTD
Key Takeaways
Exchanger duty from the process side: Q̇ = ṁ C_p ΔT for sensible heating/cooling (no phase change); match to the other stream’s energy balance.
LMTD = (ΔT₁ − ΔT₂) / ln(ΔT₁/ΔT₂), where ΔT₁ and ΔT₂ are the temperature differences between hot and cold fluids at the two ends.
Counter-current flow usually sustains a more favorable ΔT profile than co-current; co-current cold outlet cannot exceed hot outlet in the simple ideal limit.
Shell-and-tube and double-pipe are common types; multipass shell-and-tube often needs an LMTD correction factor F so Q̇ = U A F (LMTD_cf).
Work LMTD problems by labeling both ends, computing end differences, then applying the log-mean—never the arithmetic mean of the two end ΔT values when they differ.
8.3 Heat Exchangers and LMTD
Quick Answer: Duty Q̇ = ṁ C_p ΔT (sensible). Mean driving force for many exchangers is the log mean temperature difference (LMTD). Counter-current usually beats co-current. Multipass units use Q̇ = U A F (LMTD) with correction F ≤ 1.
Sections 8.1–8.2 built mechanisms and overall U. This section closes Domain C heat transfer for typical UPDA items: energy balance on both streams, LMTD, flow arrangement, and basic shell-and-tube / double-pipe awareness used across Qatar process plants.
Energy Balance on a Heat Exchanger
At steady state, neglecting heat loss to ambient and shaft work:
Heat lost by hot stream = heat gained by cold stream = Q̇
Sensible Heat Only (No Phase Change)
Q̇ = ṁ_h C_p,h (T_h,in − T_h,out) = ṁ_c C_p,c (T_c,out − T_c,in)
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ṁ_h, ṁ_c | Hot and cold mass flow rates |
| C_p,h, C_p,c | Average heat capacities |
| T_h,in, T_h,out | Hot inlet / outlet temperatures |
| T_c,in, T_c,out | Cold inlet / outlet temperatures |
Exam checks:
- Close the energy balance—do not invent a duty inconsistent with both streams.
- Use consistent units (°C differences are fine for ΔT; C_p in kJ/(kg·K) with ṁ in kg/s → Q̇ in kW).
- If a stream condenses or boils at constant pressure, use ṁ × λ (latent heat) instead of ṁ C_p ΔT for that portion.
Worked Duty Example
Cold oil is heated from 35 °C to 75 °C at ṁ_c = 2.4 kg/s with C_p,c = 2.1 kJ/(kg·K).
Q̇ = 2.4 × 2.1 × (75 − 35) = 2.4 × 2.1 × 40 = 201.6 kW
Hot fluid: ṁ_h = 1.8 kg/s, C_p,h = 2.8 kJ/(kg·K), T_h,in = 120 °C. Find T_h,out (no losses).
201.6 = 1.8 × 2.8 × (120 − T_h,out) 201.6 = 5.04 × (120 − T_h,out) 120 − T_h,out = 40.0 T_h,out = 80.0 °C
| Stream | ṁ (kg/s) | C_p (kJ/(kg·K)) | T_in (°C) | T_out (°C) | Q̇ (kW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold | 2.4 | 2.1 | 35 | 75 | +201.6 |
| Hot | 1.8 | 2.8 | 120 | 80 | −201.6 |
LMTD Definition and Formula
For a exchanger with constant U and approximately constant C_p streams, integration along the unit yields:
Q̇ = U A ΔT_lm
Log mean temperature difference:
ΔT_lm = LMTD = (ΔT_a − ΔT_b) / ln(ΔT_a / ΔT_b)
where ΔT_a and ΔT_b are the local hot-minus-cold temperature differences at the two ends of the exchanger.
| If ΔT_a ≈ ΔT_b | Then LMTD ≈ that common ΔT (log mean → arithmetic mean) |
|---|---|
| If ΔT_a and ΔT_b differ a lot | Arithmetic mean overpredicts driving force; use log mean |
Never use (ΔT_a + ΔT_b)/2 as a substitute when the exam is testing LMTD—unless the two end differences are essentially equal.
Counter-Current vs Co-Current End Differences
Counter-current (counterflow): hot and cold flow in opposite directions.
- End A: hot inlet meets cold outlet → ΔT_A = T_h,in − T_c,out
- End B: hot outlet meets cold inlet → ΔT_B = T_h,out − T_c,in
Co-current (parallel flow): both enter at the same end.
- Inlet end: ΔT_in = T_h,in − T_c,in
- Outlet end: ΔT_out = T_h,out − T_c,out
| Arrangement | Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Counter-current | Larger LMTD for same terminals; cold can exit hotter than hot outlet | Headering slightly more complex in some layouts |
| Co-current | Can limit metal temperature at the hot end in some services | Cold outlet cannot exceed hot outlet; usually smaller LMTD |
Classic feasibility: In pure co-current flow, T_c,out cannot exceed T_h,out. Counter-current can allow T_c,out > T_h,out while still keeping local ΔT positive everywhere if designed properly.
Using the numerical temperatures above (T_h 120→80 °C, T_c 35→75 °C):
Counter-current ends:
ΔT_A = 120 − 75 = 45 °C ΔT_B = 80 − 35 = 45 °C
LMTD_cf = 45 °C (equal ends)
Co-current ends:
ΔT_in = 120 − 35 = 85 °C ΔT_out = 80 − 75 = 5 °C
LMTD_co = (85 − 5) / ln(85/5) = 80 / ln(17) = 80 / 2.833 ≈ 28.2 °C
Same terminal temperatures, much smaller co-current LMTD → needs more area (or higher U) for the same duty.
| Flow | ΔT_end1 (°C) | ΔT_end2 (°C) | LMTD (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counter-current | 45 | 45 | 45.0 |
| Co-current | 85 | 5 | ~28.2 |
Worked LMTD Numerical Example (Original Numbers)
Problem. A double-pipe exchanger cools a hot process liquid from 155 °C to 95 °C. Cooling water heats from 28 °C to 46 °C. Assume pure counter-current flow, steady state, no heat loss. U = 420 W/(m²·K). Hot stream: ṁ_h = 1.25 kg/s, C_p,h = 2.40 kJ/(kg·K).
Find: (1) duty Q̇, (2) required cold-water mass flow if C_p,c = 4.18 kJ/(kg·K), (3) LMTD, (4) required area A.
Step 1 — Duty from hot stream
Q̇ = 1.25 × 2.40 × (155 − 95) = 1.25 × 2.40 × 60 = 180 kW = 180,000 W
Step 2 — Cold-water flow
180 = ṁ_c × 4.18 × (46 − 28) 180 = ṁ_c × 4.18 × 18 180 = ṁ_c × 75.24 ṁ_c = 2.39 kg/s (approximately)
Step 3 — Counter-current end differences
ΔT₁ = T_h,in − T_c,out = 155 − 46 = 109 °C ΔT₂ = T_h,out − T_c,in = 95 − 28 = 67 °C
LMTD = (109 − 67) / ln(109/67) = 42 / ln(1.627) = 42 / 0.4867 ≈ 86.3 °C
Step 4 — Area
Q̇ = U A (LMTD) 180,000 = 420 × A × 86.3 A = 180,000 / (420 × 86.3) ≈ 180,000 / 36,246 ≈ 4.97 m²
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Q̇ | 180 kW |
| ṁ_c | ~2.39 kg/s |
| ΔT₁ | 109 °C |
| ΔT₂ | 67 °C |
| LMTD | ~86.3 °C |
| U | 420 W/(m²·K) |
| A | ~5.0 m² |
Arithmetic-mean trap: (109 + 67)/2 = 88 °C, close here because the ratio is moderate—but still not the definition. When one end ΔT is small (pinch), arithmetic mean badly overestimates driving force and undersizes the exchanger.
Shell-and-Tube and Double-Pipe Awareness
| Type | Configuration | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Double-pipe | One pipe inside another; often pure counterflow | Small duties, high pressure, teaching ideal LMTD |
| Shell-and-tube | Bundle of tubes in a shell; baffles drive shell-side crossflow | Workhorse for process plants (Qatar gas/oil/chem) |
| Air-cooled (fin-fan) | Process in tubes, air forced over fins | Cooling water scarcity or air cooler banks |
| Plate | Gasketed or welded plates | Compact liquid–liquid services |
When the F Correction Appears
True pure counterflow LMTD is exact only for certain arrangements (e.g., ideal double-pipe counterflow, or 1-1 pure counterflow).
Multipass shell-and-tube exchangers (e.g., 1 shell pass / 2 tube passes) mix crossflow and multipass patterns. Industry practice:
Q̇ = U A F (LMTD_counterflow)
- LMTD_counterflow is computed as if the exchanger were pure counterflow with the same four terminal temperatures
- F is a correction factor from charts (function of two dimensionless temperature ratios), 0 < F ≤ 1
- If F is low (often warned below ~0.75–0.8), temperature crosses or multipass limits—consider more shell passes or different arrangement
UPDA level: Know why F exists (flow is not pure counterflow) and that F multiplies LMTD, reducing effective driving force. You are not expected to redraw TEMA F-charts from memory.
Qualitative Design Notes
- Put fouling or corrosive fluid on the tube side when that eases cleaning/metallurgy (common heuristic—not absolute)
- Cooling water often on tube side in many plant standards
- Baffles raise shell-side h (velocity) but increase ΔP
- Approach temperature: difference between hot outlet and cold inlet (or other specified pair)—small approaches need large A
Linking U, A, LMTD, and Fouling
From Section 8.2, fouling lowers U. For fixed A and terminal temperatures (fixed LMTD), duty falls. Operators may open utility valves (change flows → new terminals and new LMTD) until limits. Designers pick A using dirty U and appropriate F × LMTD so the unit still delivers required Q̇ at end of run.
Common Traps
- Using co-current end pairs while claiming counterflow LMTD
- Arithmetic mean instead of log mean when ΔT₁ ≠ ΔT₂
- Forgetting F conceptually on multipass shells (overestimating driving force)
- Mismatched energy balance (hot Q̇ ≠ cold Q̇) before computing LMTD
- Celsius vs kelvin confusion—ΔT in °C equals ΔT in K; absolute T only needed for radiation
Exam Workflow
- Draw streams; label all four temperatures.
- Compute Q̇ from the fully known stream; find the missing flow or temperature on the other side.
- Choose counter vs co-current end ΔT pairs as the stem requires.
- Compute LMTD = (ΔT₁ − ΔT₂)/ln(ΔT₁/ΔT₂).
- Apply Q̇ = U A (F)(LMTD); solve for the unknown (often A or U).
- Comment on fouling or F if the stem mentions dirty service or multipass shells.
With mechanisms (8.1), overall U and fouling (8.2), and LMTD exchangers (8.3), you have the heat half of Domain C transport. Mass transfer and separations follow in Chapter 9.
For sensible heating of a cold stream in a steady adiabatic exchanger (no heat loss), which energy-balance statement is correct?
Q̇ equals only U A with no need for stream ΔT or flow data
The cold stream duty is ṁ_c C_p,c (T_c,in − T_c,out) when the stream is heated
Hot and cold duties are independent and need not match at steady state
Heat gained by the cold stream equals heat lost by the hot stream: Q̇ = ṁ_c C_p,c (T_c,out − T_c,in) = ṁ_h C_p,h (T_h,in − T_h,out)
The LMTD for an exchanger with end temperature differences ΔT₁ = 40 °C and ΔT₂ = 10 °C is closest to which value?
25 °C, the arithmetic mean, which is always exact
21.6 °C from (40 − 10)/ln(40/10)
40 °C because the larger end difference always controls alone
10 °C because design must use only the smaller end difference
Why do multipass shell-and-tube exchangers often use a correction factor F with the counterflow LMTD?
F converts Celsius temperature differences into kelvin automatically
F accounts for fouling resistance, replacing R_f in all calculations
F ≤ 1 corrects pure-counterflow LMTD because actual multipass/crossflow patterns are less effective than ideal counterflow
F is always greater than 1 to reward baffles for increasing turbulence
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.