8.3 Heat Exchangers and LMTD
Key Takeaways
- Exchanger duty from the process side: Q̇ = ṁ C_p ΔT for sensible heating/cooling (no phase change); match to the other stream’s energy balance.
- LMTD = (ΔT₁ − ΔT₂) / ln(ΔT₁/ΔT₂), where ΔT₁ and ΔT₂ are the temperature differences between hot and cold fluids at the two ends.
- Counter-current flow usually sustains a more favorable ΔT profile than co-current; co-current cold outlet cannot exceed hot outlet in the simple ideal limit.
- Shell-and-tube and double-pipe are common types; multipass shell-and-tube often needs an LMTD correction factor F so Q̇ = U A F (LMTD_cf).
- Work LMTD problems by labeling both ends, computing end differences, then applying the log-mean—never the arithmetic mean of the two end ΔT values when they differ.
8.3 Heat Exchangers and LMTD
Quick Answer: Duty Q̇ = ṁ C_p ΔT (sensible). Mean driving force for many exchangers is the log mean temperature difference (LMTD). Counter-current usually beats co-current. Multipass units use Q̇ = U A F (LMTD) with correction F ≤ 1.
Sections 8.1–8.2 built mechanisms and overall U. This section closes Domain C heat transfer for typical UPDA items: energy balance on both streams, LMTD, flow arrangement, and basic shell-and-tube / double-pipe awareness used across Qatar process plants.
Energy Balance on a Heat Exchanger
At steady state, neglecting heat loss to ambient and shaft work:
Heat lost by hot stream = heat gained by cold stream = Q̇
Sensible Heat Only (No Phase Change)
Q̇ = ṁ_h C_p,h (T_h,in − T_h,out) = ṁ_c C_p,c (T_c,out − T_c,in)
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ṁ_h, ṁ_c | Hot and cold mass flow rates |
| C_p,h, C_p,c | Average heat capacities |
| T_h,in, T_h,out | Hot inlet / outlet temperatures |
| T_c,in, T_c,out | Cold inlet / outlet temperatures |
Exam checks:
- Close the energy balance—do not invent a duty inconsistent with both streams.
- Use consistent units (°C differences are fine for ΔT; C_p in kJ/(kg·K) with ṁ in kg/s → Q̇ in kW).
- If a stream condenses or boils at constant pressure, use ṁ × λ (latent heat) instead of ṁ C_p ΔT for that portion.
Worked Duty Example
Cold oil is heated from 35 °C to 75 °C at ṁ_c = 2.4 kg/s with C_p,c = 2.1 kJ/(kg·K).
Q̇ = 2.4 × 2.1 × (75 − 35) = 2.4 × 2.1 × 40 = 201.6 kW
Hot fluid: ṁ_h = 1.8 kg/s, C_p,h = 2.8 kJ/(kg·K), T_h,in = 120 °C. Find T_h,out (no losses).
201.6 = 1.8 × 2.8 × (120 − T_h,out) 201.6 = 5.04 × (120 − T_h,out) 120 − T_h,out = 40.0 T_h,out = 80.0 °C
| Stream | ṁ (kg/s) | C_p (kJ/(kg·K)) | T_in (°C) | T_out (°C) | Q̇ (kW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold | 2.4 | 2.1 | 35 | 75 | +201.6 |
| Hot | 1.8 | 2.8 | 120 | 80 | −201.6 |
LMTD Definition and Formula
For a exchanger with constant U and approximately constant C_p streams, integration along the unit yields:
Q̇ = U A ΔT_lm
Log mean temperature difference:
ΔT_lm = LMTD = (ΔT_a − ΔT_b) / ln(ΔT_a / ΔT_b)
where ΔT_a and ΔT_b are the local hot-minus-cold temperature differences at the two ends of the exchanger.
| If ΔT_a ≈ ΔT_b | Then LMTD ≈ that common ΔT (log mean → arithmetic mean) |
|---|---|
| If ΔT_a and ΔT_b differ a lot | Arithmetic mean overpredicts driving force; use log mean |
Never use (ΔT_a + ΔT_b)/2 as a substitute when the exam is testing LMTD—unless the two end differences are essentially equal.
Counter-Current vs Co-Current End Differences
Counter-current (counterflow): hot and cold flow in opposite directions.
- End A: hot inlet meets cold outlet → ΔT_A = T_h,in − T_c,out
- End B: hot outlet meets cold inlet → ΔT_B = T_h,out − T_c,in
Co-current (parallel flow): both enter at the same end.
- Inlet end: ΔT_in = T_h,in − T_c,in
- Outlet end: ΔT_out = T_h,out − T_c,out
| Arrangement | Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Counter-current | Larger LMTD for same terminals; cold can exit hotter than hot outlet | Headering slightly more complex in some layouts |
| Co-current | Can limit metal temperature at the hot end in some services | Cold outlet cannot exceed hot outlet; usually smaller LMTD |
Classic feasibility: In pure co-current flow, T_c,out cannot exceed T_h,out. Counter-current can allow T_c,out > T_h,out while still keeping local ΔT positive everywhere if designed properly.
Using the numerical temperatures above (T_h 120→80 °C, T_c 35→75 °C):
Counter-current ends:
ΔT_A = 120 − 75 = 45 °C ΔT_B = 80 − 35 = 45 °C
LMTD_cf = 45 °C (equal ends)
Co-current ends:
ΔT_in = 120 − 35 = 85 °C ΔT_out = 80 − 75 = 5 °C
LMTD_co = (85 − 5) / ln(85/5) = 80 / ln(17) = 80 / 2.833 ≈ 28.2 °C
Same terminal temperatures, much smaller co-current LMTD → needs more area (or higher U) for the same duty.
| Flow | ΔT_end1 (°C) | ΔT_end2 (°C) | LMTD (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counter-current | 45 | 45 | 45.0 |
| Co-current | 85 | 5 | ~28.2 |
Worked LMTD Numerical Example (Original Numbers)
Problem. A double-pipe exchanger cools a hot process liquid from 155 °C to 95 °C. Cooling water heats from 28 °C to 46 °C. Assume pure counter-current flow, steady state, no heat loss. U = 420 W/(m²·K). Hot stream: ṁ_h = 1.25 kg/s, C_p,h = 2.40 kJ/(kg·K).
Find: (1) duty Q̇, (2) required cold-water mass flow if C_p,c = 4.18 kJ/(kg·K), (3) LMTD, (4) required area A.
Step 1 — Duty from hot stream
Q̇ = 1.25 × 2.40 × (155 − 95) = 1.25 × 2.40 × 60 = 180 kW = 180,000 W
Step 2 — Cold-water flow
180 = ṁ_c × 4.18 × (46 − 28) 180 = ṁ_c × 4.18 × 18 180 = ṁ_c × 75.24 ṁ_c = 2.39 kg/s (approximately)
Step 3 — Counter-current end differences
ΔT₁ = T_h,in − T_c,out = 155 − 46 = 109 °C ΔT₂ = T_h,out − T_c,in = 95 − 28 = 67 °C
LMTD = (109 − 67) / ln(109/67) = 42 / ln(1.627) = 42 / 0.4867 ≈ 86.3 °C
Step 4 — Area
Q̇ = U A (LMTD) 180,000 = 420 × A × 86.3 A = 180,000 / (420 × 86.3) ≈ 180,000 / 36,246 ≈ 4.97 m²
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Q̇ | 180 kW |
| ṁ_c | ~2.39 kg/s |
| ΔT₁ | 109 °C |
| ΔT₂ | 67 °C |
| LMTD | ~86.3 °C |
| U | 420 W/(m²·K) |
| A | ~5.0 m² |
Arithmetic-mean trap: (109 + 67)/2 = 88 °C, close here because the ratio is moderate—but still not the definition. When one end ΔT is small (pinch), arithmetic mean badly overestimates driving force and undersizes the exchanger.
Shell-and-Tube and Double-Pipe Awareness
| Type | Configuration | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Double-pipe | One pipe inside another; often pure counterflow | Small duties, high pressure, teaching ideal LMTD |
| Shell-and-tube | Bundle of tubes in a shell; baffles drive shell-side crossflow | Workhorse for process plants (Qatar gas/oil/chem) |
| Air-cooled (fin-fan) | Process in tubes, air forced over fins | Cooling water scarcity or air cooler banks |
| Plate | Gasketed or welded plates | Compact liquid–liquid services |
When the F Correction Appears
True pure counterflow LMTD is exact only for certain arrangements (e.g., ideal double-pipe counterflow, or 1-1 pure counterflow).
Multipass shell-and-tube exchangers (e.g., 1 shell pass / 2 tube passes) mix crossflow and multipass patterns. Industry practice:
Q̇ = U A F (LMTD_counterflow)
- LMTD_counterflow is computed as if the exchanger were pure counterflow with the same four terminal temperatures
- F is a correction factor from charts (function of two dimensionless temperature ratios), 0 < F ≤ 1
- If F is low (often warned below ~0.75–0.8), temperature crosses or multipass limits—consider more shell passes or different arrangement
UPDA level: Know why F exists (flow is not pure counterflow) and that F multiplies LMTD, reducing effective driving force. You are not expected to redraw TEMA F-charts from memory.
Qualitative Design Notes
- Put fouling or corrosive fluid on the tube side when that eases cleaning/metallurgy (common heuristic—not absolute)
- Cooling water often on tube side in many plant standards
- Baffles raise shell-side h (velocity) but increase ΔP
- Approach temperature: difference between hot outlet and cold inlet (or other specified pair)—small approaches need large A
Linking U, A, LMTD, and Fouling
From Section 8.2, fouling lowers U. For fixed A and terminal temperatures (fixed LMTD), duty falls. Operators may open utility valves (change flows → new terminals and new LMTD) until limits. Designers pick A using dirty U and appropriate F × LMTD so the unit still delivers required Q̇ at end of run.
Common Traps
- Using co-current end pairs while claiming counterflow LMTD
- Arithmetic mean instead of log mean when ΔT₁ ≠ ΔT₂
- Forgetting F conceptually on multipass shells (overestimating driving force)
- Mismatched energy balance (hot Q̇ ≠ cold Q̇) before computing LMTD
- Celsius vs kelvin confusion—ΔT in °C equals ΔT in K; absolute T only needed for radiation
Exam Workflow
- Draw streams; label all four temperatures.
- Compute Q̇ from the fully known stream; find the missing flow or temperature on the other side.
- Choose counter vs co-current end ΔT pairs as the stem requires.
- Compute LMTD = (ΔT₁ − ΔT₂)/ln(ΔT₁/ΔT₂).
- Apply Q̇ = U A (F)(LMTD); solve for the unknown (often A or U).
- Comment on fouling or F if the stem mentions dirty service or multipass shells.
With mechanisms (8.1), overall U and fouling (8.2), and LMTD exchangers (8.3), you have the heat half of Domain C transport. Mass transfer and separations follow in Chapter 9.
For sensible heating of a cold stream in a steady adiabatic exchanger (no heat loss), which energy-balance statement is correct?
The LMTD for an exchanger with end temperature differences ΔT₁ = 40 °C and ΔT₂ = 10 °C is closest to which value?
Why do multipass shell-and-tube exchangers often use a correction factor F with the counterflow LMTD?