2.3 Run-on Sentences & Comma Splices
Key Takeaways
A fused sentence joins two independent clauses with zero punctuation, whereas a comma splice joins two independent clauses with only a comma; both represent severe run-on errors.
Commas lack the grammatical weight to link independent clauses alone; they require a coordinating conjunction (FANBOYS: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so) to form a valid compound sentence.
Four standard methods resolve run-ons: separating clauses with a period, linking them with a semicolon, joining them with a comma plus FANBOYS, or subordinating one clause.
Conjunctive adverbs (e.g., however, therefore, moreover, consequently) and transitional phrases (e.g., in fact, as a result) cannot join independent clauses with only a comma; they require a semicolon or a period.
In Praxis Core revision-in-context items, the optimal correction preserves the intended rhetorical emphasis and logical relationship between propositions without creating awkward, repetitive, or wordy phrasing.
2.3 Run-on Sentences & Comma Splices
While sentence fragments suffer from a deficiency of structural components, run-on sentences suffer from an unmanaged surplus. On the Praxis Core Writing (5723) exam, run-on constructions—specifically the insidious comma splice—rank among the most heavily penalized grammatical infractions. Mastering run-on detection and correction requires understanding why certain punctuation marks can bear the weight of joining independent clauses while others fail.
Defining Run-ons: Fused Sentences vs. Comma Splices
A run-on sentence occurs when two or more independent clauses are joined without adequate punctuation or coordinating conjunctions. Run-ons fall into two distinct mechanical categories:
1. The Fused Sentence (The "True" Run-on)
A fused sentence occurs when two independent clauses are driven together with absolutely zero punctuation or conjunction between them:
- Defective: The high school chemistry laboratory received state-of-the-art ventilation hoods students can now conduct advanced volatile experiments safely.
- Clause 1: The high school chemistry laboratory received state-of-the-art ventilation hoods.
- Clause 2: Students can now conduct advanced volatile experiments safely.
- Analysis: Both clauses possess explicit subjects and finite verbs and express complete thoughts. Crashing them together without an intervening boundary creates an unreadable syntactic collision.
2. The Comma Splice
A comma splice occurs when two independent clauses are joined by a comma alone, without a coordinating conjunction:
- Defective: The formative assessment yielded valuable diagnostic data, teachers adjusted their weekly instructional pacing accordingly.
- Clause 1: The formative assessment yielded valuable diagnostic data.
- Clause 2: Teachers adjusted their weekly instructional pacing accordingly.
- Analysis: While the writer recognized that a boundary exists between the two propositions, a comma by itself is structurally incapable of joining independent clauses.
Why Commas Lack Structural Weight
In standard English grammar, punctuation marks possess different levels of syntactic "load-bearing capacity":
- A period creates a complete hard stop, severing one grammatical ecosystem from the next.
- A semicolon acts as an equal-sign connector, linking two balanced, syntactically complete independent clauses.
- A comma is a weak, soft separator. Its grammatical function is to separate items in a list, set off introductory elements, or isolate nonrestrictive modifiers. A comma signals to the reader that more of the same clause is coming. When placed between two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction, a comma collapses under the structural weight of the two competing predications.
The Four Standard Revision Methods
When repairing a fused sentence or comma splice, standard written English offers four definitive pathways. On the Praxis Core Writing exam, you must not only identify which sentences contain errors, but also determine which of the four repair pathways yields the clearest, most concise, and rhetorically appropriate sentence.
Method 1: Period + Capital Letter (Separate Sentences)
Divide the two independent clauses into two distinct, standalone sentences:
- Revision: The formative assessment yielded valuable diagnostic data. Teachers adjusted their weekly instructional pacing accordingly.
- Rhetorical Utility: Ideal when the two clauses express complex, lengthy ideas or when the author desires an emphatic, definitive pause between assertions.
Method 2: Semicolon
Connect the two independent clauses using an unadorned semicolon:
- Revision: The formative assessment yielded valuable diagnostic data; teachers adjusted their weekly instructional pacing accordingly.
- Rhetorical Utility: Ideal when the two independent clauses are closely linked in meaning, mutually explanatory, or balanced in structural parallelism. A semicolon shows that the second clause immediately completes or contrasts with the first without the clutter of extra words.
Method 3: Comma + Coordinating Conjunction (FANBOYS)
Link the two independent clauses using a comma followed by one of the seven coordinating conjunctions (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so):
- Revision: The formative assessment yielded valuable diagnostic data, so teachers adjusted their weekly instructional pacing accordingly.
- Rhetorical Utility: Ideal when the writer wants to explicitly articulate the logical relationship between the propositions:
- Addition (and)
- Contrast (but, yet)
- Cause/Reason (for)
- Result/Consequence (so)
- Alternative (or, nor)
Method 4: Subordination (Complex Sentence Construction)
Convert one of the independent clauses into a dependent clause using a subordinating conjunction (because, although, since, while, after, if) or a relative pronoun (which, who):
- Revision: Because the formative assessment yielded valuable diagnostic data, teachers adjusted their weekly instructional pacing accordingly.
- Rhetorical Utility: Frequently the most rhetorically sophisticated option on the Praxis Core. Subordination eliminates the choppy rhythm of equal independent clauses and explicitly establishes cognitive hierarchy, signaling which proposition is the primary claim and which is supporting evidence.
The Major Test Trap: The Conjunctive Adverb Comma Splice
The single most common comma splice trap on the Praxis Core Writing exam involves conjunctive adverbs and transitional phrases.
The Anatomy of the Trap
Conjunctive adverbs include:
- however, therefore, moreover, furthermore, consequently, nevertheless, nonetheless, thus, meanwhile, instead, similarly, otherwise
Transitional expressions include:
- in fact, as a result, for example, on the other hand, in addition, in contrast
Because these words express strong logical transitions—such as contrast, cause, or addition—test-takers instinctively treat them as conjunctions. They place a simple comma before them, creating an egregious comma splice:
- ILLEGAL COMMA SPLICE: The school board approved the capital bond measure, however, several council members questioned the construction timeline.
- ILLEGAL COMMA SPLICE: The student mastered the algebraic concepts, therefore, she assisted her peers during independent practice.
The Correct Punctuation Patterns
Conjunctive adverbs and transitional phrases are grammatically categorized as adverbs, not conjunctions. When they link two independent clauses, you must use one of the following punctuation patterns:
- Semicolon Before, Comma After:
- The school board approved the capital bond measure; however, several council members questioned the construction timeline.
- The student mastered the algebraic concepts; therefore, she assisted her peers during independent practice.
- Period Before, Comma After:
- The school board approved the capital bond measure. However, several council members questioned the construction timeline.
- The student mastered the algebraic concepts. Therefore, she assisted her peers during independent practice.
- Internal Parenthetical Commas (When within a single clause):
- The student mastered the algebraic concepts. She was able, therefore, to assist her peers during independent practice.
Note
The Two-Finger Diagnostic Test for Comma Splices: When analyzing a sentence containing a comma on the exam, place one finger over the first clause and one finger over the second clause. If both sides of the comma can stand independently as complete sentences, ask yourself: Is there a FANBOYS coordinating conjunction immediately following the comma?
- If YES (e.g.,
...data, and teachers...): The sentence is grammatically valid. - If NO (e.g.,
...data, teachers...or...data, however, teachers...): You have found a comma splice.
Rhetorical Selection in Revision in Context
In the Revision in Context portion of the Praxis Core Writing test, you will not simply be asked to identify whether a comma splice exists. Instead, you will be given an entire passage and asked to select the best revision of a run-on sentence.
To choose the optimal correction, apply three strategic evaluative filters:
- Eliminate Non-Grammatical Options: Immediately discard any option that perpetuates a comma splice, introduces a fragment, or combines a semicolon with a coordinating conjunction (
...measure; and several...is incorrect). - Examine Logical Coherence: Ensure the connector matches the intended semantic relationship:
- Do not replace a causal relationship (because, therefore) with an additive one (and).
- Do not invert cause and effect (e.g., making the result the subordinate clause instead of the cause).
- Prioritize Conciseness and Flow: Avoid overly wordy or passive constructions. If one option uses sixteen words with passive voice while another uses ten words with active voice and clean subordination, standard written English favors the concise, active option.
Comparative Framework: Evaluating the Four Repair Options
| Strategy | Defective Baseline | Revised Construction | Rhetorical Impact & Best Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Method 1: Two Sentences | The library expanded digital access, circulation rose fifty percent. | The library expanded digital access. Circulation rose fifty percent. | Clean, emphatic; best for separating long or conceptually distinct assertions. |
| Method 2: Semicolon | The library expanded digital access, circulation rose fifty percent. | The library expanded digital access; circulation rose fifty percent. | Tight, parallel; best when the two ideas are immediate mirror propositions. |
| Method 3: FANBOYS | The library expanded digital access, circulation rose fifty percent. | The library expanded digital access, and circulation rose fifty percent. | Balanced compound; best when connecting equal, coordinated thoughts. |
| Method 4: Subordination | The library expanded digital access, circulation rose fifty percent. | After the library expanded digital access, circulation rose fifty percent. | Hierarchical; best for clarifying temporal, causal, or conditional priority. |
By internalizing these four pathways and guarding against the conjunctive adverb trap, you will navigate sentence structure questions on the Praxis Core Writing exam with speed and precision.
Which of the following sentences correctly repairs the comma splice in the sentence below?
'The district implemented a new grading policy, therefore, teachers attended professional development workshops throughout August.'
The district implemented a new grading policy, teachers attended professional development workshops throughout August.
The district implemented a new grading policy and, therefore teachers attended professional development workshops throughout August.
The district implemented a new grading policy; therefore, teachers attended professional development workshops throughout August.
The district implemented a new grading policy, but therefore, teachers attended professional development workshops throughout August.
Which revision most effectively corrects the fused sentence below by subordinating one of the clauses?
'Standardized testing data revealed persistent achievement gaps administrators restructured the remedial reading program.'
Standardized testing data revealed persistent achievement gaps administrators, restructured the remedial reading program.
Standardized testing data revealed persistent achievement gaps; and administrators restructured the remedial reading program.
Standardized testing data revealed persistent achievement gaps, so administrators restructured the remedial reading program.
Because standardized testing data revealed persistent achievement gaps, administrators restructured the remedial reading program.
Which of the following sentences is grammatically correct and free of comma splices or fused sentences?
The biology laboratory received updated microscopes; however, the district could not afford new dissection specimens.
The biology laboratory received updated microscopes, however, the district could not afford new dissection specimens.
The biology laboratory received updated microscopes however the district could not afford new dissection specimens.
The biology laboratory received updated microscopes, the district could not afford new dissection specimens.
Read the draft sentence from a teacher's reflective essay:
'The principal encouraged teachers to incorporate more formative assessments, student engagement had plateaued during the second marking period.'
Which revision corrects the comma splice while creating the most coherent logical relationship between the two clauses?
The principal encouraged teachers to incorporate more formative assessments student engagement had plateaued during the second marking period.
The principal encouraged teachers to incorporate more formative assessments because student engagement had plateaued during the second marking period.
The principal encouraged teachers to incorporate more formative assessments, student engagement had plateaued during the second marking period, however.
The principal encouraged teachers to incorporate more formative assessments; and student engagement had plateaued during the second marking period.
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.