1.4 Verbosity, Redundancy & Executive Conciseness

Key Takeaways

  • Executive conciseness requires trimming unnecessary wordiness (deadwood) while preserving complete semantic detail and legal clarity.
  • Tautology—the repetition of an idea in different words—is a primary error type in government reports (e.g., advance planning, collaborate together, null and void).
  • Nominalizations (converting strong verbs into weak noun phrases, like make a decision instead of decide) dilute executive authority and inflate sentence length.
  • Expletive constructions (There is / It is) obscure sentence actors and add bureaucratic clutter to policy statements.
  • Streamlining complex administrative prose transforms passive, verbose sentences into direct, actionable executive communication suitable for decision-makers.
Last updated: July 2026

1.4 Verbosity, Redundancy & Executive Conciseness

In executive leadership, time is a critical institutional resource. Senior officials, Cabinet Secretaries, and legislators consume vast quantities of briefing papers, policy memoranda, and analytical reports daily. Communication that is wordy, indirect, or laden with bureaucratic deadwood obscures vital facts, slows decision-making, and undermines executive authority.

Conciseness is not merely cutting words; it is maximizing the density of meaning per word. The CES-WE Verbal Ability subtest explicitly tests a candidate's capacity to spot redundancy, eliminate wordy prepositions, unpack heavy nominalizations, and streamline complex sentences without losing semantic precision or legal accuracy.


1. Deconstructing Redundancy and Tautology

Redundancy occurs when a sentence includes words that repeat a meaning already expressed elsewhere in the sentence. Tautology is a specific form of redundancy where an idea is repeated in different words within the same phrase.

A. Common Bureaucratic Tautologies and Pleonasms

In government writing, certain redundant word pairings become habitual through administrative tradition. Candidates must train themselves to identify and excise these pleonastic modifiers.

Redundant PhraseHidden Duplicate MeaningExecutive Conciseness Revision
Advance planningPlanning is inherently done in advance.Planning
Close proximityProximity already means closeness.Proximity or closeness
Collaborate togetherCollaborate means to work together.Collaborate
Consensus of opinionConsensus means general opinion agreement.Consensus
End resultA result is by definition at the end.Result or outcome
Future prospectsProspects refer inherently to the future.Prospects
Joined togetherJoined implies being brought together.Joined
Mutual cooperationCooperation is intrinsically mutual.Cooperation
Null and voidDoublet expressing the single concept of invalidity.Void or invalid
Repeat againRepeat means to state or do again.Repeat
Sum totalTotal is the complete sum.Total

B. Categorical Redundancies

Categorical redundancy occurs when an adjective or modifying phrase states the obvious category of the noun it modifies.

  • Redundant: "The office building was rectangular in shape and blue in color."
  • Executive Revision: "The office building was rectangular and blue."
  • Redundant: "The audit was conducted over a period of three months time."
  • Executive Revision: "The audit was conducted over three months."

2. Eliminating Bureaucratic Deadwood

Bureaucratic deadwood refers to multi-word prepositional phrases and wordy connectors that can be replaced by a single, direct word. Using deadwood inflates sentence length by 30% to 50% without adding any informational value.

Deadwood Expressions vs. Executive Alternatives:

  BUREAUCRATIC DEADWOOD                   EXECUTIVE REPLACEMENT
  ┌───────────────────────────────────┐   ┌───────────────────────┐
  │ At the present point in time      │──>│ Currently / Now       │
  │ Due to the fact that              │──>│ Because               │
  │ For the purpose of                │──>│ To                    │
  │ In spite of the fact that         │──>│ Although              │
  │ In the event that                 │──>│ If                    │
  │ In view of the fact that          │──>│ Since / Because       │
  │ Until such time as                │──>│ Until                 │
  │ With reference / regard to        │──>│ Regarding / About     │
  └───────────────────────────────────┘   └───────────────────────┘

Transformation Example

  • Verbose Draft: "In view of the fact that the department lacks sufficient funds for the purpose of procurement, action must be deferred until such time as additional allocations are released." (29 words)
  • Executive Streamline: "Because the department lacks procurement funds, action must be deferred until additional allocations are released." (16 words — 45% reduction).

3. Unpacking Nominalizations (Smothered Verbs)

A nominalization occurs when a strong, action-oriented verb is transformed into a weak abstract noun, which then requires helper verbs (conduct, make, perform, undertake, provide) to function. Nominalizations drain energy from prose and obscure agency.

Rule: Convert smothered nouns back into active verbs.

Nominalized Weak Syntax:
"The committee made a decision to conduct an investigation of the complaint."
  │                 │                    │
  └─ Helper Verb    └─ Nominalization    └─ Nominalization

Active Executive Architecture:
"The committee decided to investigate the complaint."

High-Frequency Nominalization Transformations

Nominalized Phrase (Smothered Verb)Active Executive Verb Replacement
Conduct an evaluation ofEvaluate
Give consideration toConsider
Reach a conclusionConclude
Perform an audit ofAudit
Effectuate an improvement inImprove
File an application forApply for
Provide assistance toAssist
Make an assumption thatAssume

4. Dismantling Expletive Openers ("There is / It is")

Expletive constructions begin sentences with empty filler words such as There is, There are, It is essential that, or It is important to note that. These openers push the real subject and action deeper into the sentence.

  • Verbose Expletive: "There are three key factors that influence public sector performance."
  • Direct Executive: "Three key factors influence public sector performance."
  • Verbose Expletive: "It is imperative that the Executive Director sign the agreement immediately."
  • Direct Executive: "The Executive Director must sign the agreement immediately."

5. Comprehensive Before-and-After Executive Restructuring

To solidify these principles for the CES-WE, study how multiple conciseness principles combine to transform bloated bureaucratic prose into executive-level communication.

Case Study: Policy Memorandum Directive

Original Bloated Bureaucratic Sentence (47 words): "It is important to bring to your attention the fact that, due to the fact that there was a lack of mutual cooperation among the regional offices, the task force was unable to reach a decision regarding the final outcome of the project at the present point in time."

Deconstruction of Flaws:

  1. "It is important to bring to your attention the fact that" -> Empty expletive deadwood opener.
  2. "due to the fact that" -> Wordy preposition (replace with because).
  3. "lack of mutual cooperation" -> Tautology (cooperation is mutual).
  4. "reach a decision" -> Nominalization (replace with decide).
  5. "final outcome" -> Tautology (outcome is final).
  6. "at the present point in time" -> Deadwood phrase (replace with currently or now).

Streamlined Executive Revision (17 words): "Because uncooperative regional offices hindered the task force, it cannot currently decide on the project outcome."


Conciseness Audit Checklist for CES-WE Candidates

When reviewing choices on Error Recognition or Verbal Conciseness items, apply the following 5-point audit:

  1. Delete Tautologies: Strip out modifying words that merely repeat the noun's definition (advance planning -> planning).
  2. Slash Prepositional Deadwood: Replace multi-word connectors (due to the fact that) with single conjunctions (because).
  3. Activate Nominalizations: Turn weak noun phrases (make an assessment of) back into vibrant verbs (assess).
  4. Remove Expletives: Eliminate empty there is/are and it is sentence openers.
  5. Preserve Legal Precision: Ensure that trimming words does not remove essential statutory conditions, qualifications, or legal safeguards.
Test Your Knowledge

Identify the sentence that suffers from tautological wordiness and redundancy.

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Which of the following revisions best replaces the verbose phrase "due to the fact that" in a formal policy briefing without altering the sentence's logical meaning?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Examine the following sentence excerpt from a administrative review: "The Oversight Board will conduct an evaluation of the financial statements and make a determination of eligibility." Which option most effectively eliminates nominalizations while preserving executive authority?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Consider the following bloated expletive sentence: "There are four regional directors who have submitted their objections regarding the proposed restructuring plan." Which revision provides the most concise, direct executive structure?

A
B
C
D