35.2 Corporations: Incorporation, Articles and Bylaws, and Corporate Powers
Key Takeaways
RA 11232 removed the minimum of five incorporators but kept the maximum of fifteen, allowed partnerships, associations, and corporations to be incorporators, and dropped the residency requirement.
Perpetual existence is now the default corporate term under Section 11, applying retroactively to all pre-existing corporations unless they elect otherwise, and the former mandatory 25%-25% subscription and paid-up capital requirement at incorporation has been repealed for general stock corporations.
Corporate powers are classified as express, implied, or incidental; acts executed beyond these powers are ultra vires, with illegal acts being void ab initio and incapable of ratification, whereas mere ultra vires acts that are not illicit may be ratified by stockholders or validated through equitable estoppel.
Investing corporate funds in another business or purpose other than the primary purpose requires board approval and ratification by two-thirds of the outstanding capital stock, and gives dissenters an appraisal right.
Corporations: Incorporation, Articles and Bylaws, and Corporate Powers
This section covers how a corporation is formed and what it may do under the Revised Corporation Code: incorporators and the RA 11232 changes, the articles of incorporation and bylaws, corporate names and registration, the general and specific powers of a corporation under Title IV, and the doctrine of ultra vires acts.
1. Modernization of Incorporators and Corporate Formation under RA 11232
The Revised Corporation Code removed several historical rigidities that previously burdened Philippine corporate formation under Batas Pambansa Blg. 68. The following comparative matrix details these critical statutory changes:
| Statutory Feature | Old Corporation Code (BP 68) | Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232) | Exam Implication / Key Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Incorporators | Minimum of five (5) and maximum of fifteen (15) incorporators. | Not more than fifteen (15) incorporators (Sec. 10); the minimum of five was removed. A single stockholder forms a One Person Corporation. | Ordinary stock corporations may now be formed by 2 to 15 incorporators; the 15-person cap remains. |
| Eligible Incorporators | Natural persons only. | Natural persons, partnerships, associations, or corporations. | Juridical entities may now act directly as incorporators (SEC Guidelines require board authorization). |
| Residency Requirement | Majority of incorporators were required to be residents of the Philippines. | Residency requirement repealed. Incorporators may reside anywhere in the world. | Incorporators may all be foreign residents, subject to foreign equity limitations in nationalized industries. |
| Corporate Term (Section 11) | Maximum term of fifty (50) years, extendable for periods not exceeding 50 years. | Perpetual existence is the default statutory rule. Retroactive to existing corporations unless they opt out. | Corporations with expired terms can apply to the SEC for revival of corporate existence (Sec. 11). |
| Minimum Capitalization | Mandatory requirement that at least 25% of ACS be subscribed and at least 25% of subscription paid up (min. PHP 5,000). | 25%-25% rule and PHP 5,000 minimum repealed. No minimum capital unless required by special law. | Stock corporations have no statutory minimum authorized or paid-up capital unless governed by special industry laws. |
Promoters and Pre-Incorporation Contracts
A promoter is a person who undertakes to form a corporation, assemble the necessary financing, procure subscriptions, and establish the business enterprise prior to corporate registration.
- General Rule on Promoter Contracts: A corporation is not bound by contracts entered into by promoters prior to its incorporation. Because the corporation had no legal existence at the time of contract execution, it had no capacity to appoint an agent or give consent.
- Exceptions Binding Corporation: The corporation becomes bound only if, after acquiring juridical personality upon the issuance of its Certificate of Incorporation, it expressly ratifies, adopts, or knowingly accepts the benefits of the promoter's contract.
- Personal Liability of Promoter: A promoter remains personally liable on pre-incorporation contracts unless there is an express novation substituting the newly formed corporation in place of the promoter, or the contract expressly stipulates that the promoter incurs no personal liability.
2. Articles of Incorporation (AOI) and Corporate Bylaws
Articles of Incorporation (Sections 13 and 14)
The Articles of Incorporation constitute the corporate charter—the fundamental foundational contract between the State and the corporation, between the corporation and its stockholders, and among the stockholders themselves. Mandatory contents include:
- Corporate Name: Must be verified and reserved with the SEC. Under Section 17, no corporate name shall be allowed if it is not distinguishable from that already reserved or registered, or if it is contrary to law, rules, or public morals. If a corporation uses a confusingly similar or deceptive name, the SEC has summary authority to issue an order to cease and desist and immediately change the corporate name; failure to comply empowers the SEC to hold the corporation and its officers in administrative contempt and revoke its registration.
- Specific Purpose Clause: Must state the primary purpose and secondary purposes. The purpose defines the scope of corporate capacity and warns investors of the business risks involved. Purpose clauses cannot combine incompatible activities (e.g., banking or insurance cannot be combined with general manufacturing).
- Principal Office Address: Under SEC rules, the AOI must state the specific city or municipality within the Philippines where the principal office is located (e.g., "Makati City, Metro Manila"). Stating merely "Metro Manila" is insufficient. The principal office serves as the legal venue for actions, the site for maintaining books, and the address for service of summons.
- Corporate Term: Stated as perpetual unless the articles provide for a specific fixed term.
- Capital Stock Structure: Authorized capital stock, classes of shares, par values (or statement of no-par shares), rights, privileges, and restrictions attached to each class.
Corporate Bylaws (Sections 45 to 47)
Bylaws represent the internal private statutes of the corporation, regulating the management of corporate affairs and defining the rights, duties, and conduct of directors, officers, and stockholders.
- Adoption: Under RA 11232, bylaws may be adopted and submitted simultaneously with the Articles of Incorporation, or adopted post-incorporation by the affirmative vote of stockholders representing at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock (or a majority of members in a non-stock corporation).
- Amendment of Bylaws (Section 47): Bylaws may be amended, repealed, or new bylaws adopted by the affirmative vote of:
- A majority of the board of directors/trustees AND stockholders representing at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock (or majority of members); OR
- The board of directors alone, provided that the power to amend bylaws has been delegated by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the outstanding capital stock (or members). This delegated power may be revoked at any time by a vote of a majority of the outstanding capital stock (or members).
3. Corporate Powers under Title IV (Sections 35 to 44)
Corporate powers are divided into three broad categories:
- Express Powers (Section 35): Those explicitly enumerated by the RCC, special statutes, and the corporate charter (e.g., power to sue and be sued, adopt bylaws, issue stock, purchase and mortgage property, enter into mergers, make reasonable donations for public welfare, hospital, charitable, cultural, scientific, or civic purposes).
Statutory Prohibition: No foreign or domestic corporation shall give donations in aid of any political party or candidate or for purposes of partisan political activity (Section 35[i]).
- Implied Powers: Powers that are reasonably necessary, customary, and proper to execute and carry out the corporation's express powers (e.g., borrowing money to finance authorized manufacturing operations).
- Incidental Powers: Powers inherent in corporate existence that attach automatically upon incorporation without express grant (e.g., right of succession, power to have a corporate name and seal).
The Ultra Vires Doctrine (Section 44)
An ultra vires act is an act committed outside the express, implied, or incidental powers of the corporation as conferred by law or its articles of incorporation.
Ultra Vires Acts under Section 44
│
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
Illegal / Illicit Corporate Acts Mere Ultra Vires Acts
(Contrary to law, morals, public policy; (Merely outside corporate charter powers;
Section 44, Civil Code Article 1409) not illegal or contrary to law per se)
• VOID AB INITIO and completely non-existent • UNENFORCEABLE if wholly executory
• CANNOT be ratified by stockholders • CAN BE RATIFIED by unanimous/required stockholder vote
• Directors solidarily liable for damages • Validated by performance or EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL
Voting Thresholds for Fundamental Corporate Acts
The Revised Corporation Code establishes rigorous voting and ratification gates for fundamental corporate transactions. The following master matrix summarizes these statutory thresholds:
| Corporate Transaction | Board of Directors Approval | Stockholders / Members Vote | Appraisal Right Available? | SEC Approval / Filing Required? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extend or Shorten Corporate Term (Sec. 36) | Majority of quorum | 2/3 of Outstanding Capital Stock (OCS) / Members | YES | YES (Amended Articles) |
| Increase or Decrease Capital Stock (Sec. 37) | Majority of quorum | 2/3 of Outstanding Capital Stock | NO | YES (SEC Approval Mandatory) |
| Incur, Create, or Increase Bonded Indebtedness (Sec. 37) | Majority of quorum | 2/3 of Outstanding Capital Stock | NO | YES (SEC Registration) |
| Sale, Lease, or Disposal of All or Substantially All Assets (Sec. 39) | Majority of quorum | 2/3 of Outstanding Capital Stock / Members | YES | NO (Unless regulated industry) |
| Invest Corporate Funds in Another Business or Purpose (Sec. 41) | Majority of quorum | 2/3 of Outstanding Capital Stock / Members | YES | NO |
| Invest Corporate Funds in Primary Purpose or Incidental Thereto (Sec. 41) | Majority of quorum | NONE REQUIRED (Board authority alone) | NO | NO |
| Acquire Own Shares (Treasury Stock) (Sec. 40) | Majority of quorum | NONE REQUIRED (Board authority alone) | NO | NO (Must have Unrestricted Retained Earnings) |
| Declare Cash or Property Dividends (Sec. 42) | Majority of quorum | NONE REQUIRED (Board authority alone) | NO | NO (Must have Unrestricted Retained Earnings) |
| Declare Stock Dividends (Sec. 42) | Majority of quorum | 2/3 of Outstanding Capital Stock | NO | NO (Requires URE capitalized into legal capital) |
| Enter into Management Contract (General Rule) (Sec. 43) | Majority of quorum | Majority of Outstanding Capital Stock / Members of each firm | NO | NO |
| Enter into Management Contract (Interlocking Control Rule) (Sec. 43) | Majority of quorum | 2/3 of Outstanding Capital Stock of managed corporation | NO | NO |
Exam Distinction on Management Contracts (Section 43): Stockholder approval of a management contract normally requires a majority of the outstanding capital stock of both the managing and managed corporations. However, a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the outstanding capital stock of the managed corporation is required when: (1) stockholders representing the same interest of both corporations own or control more than one-third (1/3) of the capital stock entitled to vote of the managing company; or (2) a majority of the members of the board of the managing company also constitute a majority of the members of the board of the managed company.
4. Worked Problem: Investment in Secondary Purpose vs Primary Purpose
Problem: Prime Milling Corp is incorporated with a primary purpose of "milling, processing, and distributing flour and wheat products." Its secondary purpose includes "investing in commercial real estate, hotels, and tourist resorts." At a regular meeting, the Board of Directors of Prime Milling, by a vote of 5 out of 7 directors, approved the appropriation of PHP 150,000,000 of corporate surplus funds to acquire and operate a luxury beach resort in Palawan. A group of minority stockholders holding 28% of the outstanding capital stock objected, demanding that the transaction be submitted to a stockholders' meeting for ratification. The board refused, arguing that because the acquisition is covered by the secondary purpose expressly stated in the Articles of Incorporation, board approval alone is legally sufficient. Is the board's position correct?
Analysis and Solution:
- Statutory Rule under Section 41: Under Section 41 of the Revised Corporation Code, a corporation may invest its corporate funds in any other business or purpose, or for any purpose other than the primary purpose for which it was organized, only when approved by a majority of the board of directors AND ratified by the vote of stockholders representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock at a meeting called for that purpose.
- Secondary Purpose Distinction: The inclusion of an activity in the secondary purpose clause grants the corporation the legal capacity to engage in that business without amending its charter; however, it does not exempt the corporation from the mandatory statutory approval procedure under Section 41. Stockholder ratification is dispensed with only when the investment is reasonably necessary to accomplish the primary purpose of the corporation.
- Conclusion: The board's position is INCORRECT. Investing corporate funds in a luxury beach resort is not necessary to execute the primary purpose of flour milling. The transaction is ultra vires unless ratified by stockholders owning at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock. Furthermore, dissenting stockholders are entitled to exercise their appraisal right under Section 80.
The Board of Directors of Horizon Energy Corp, a corporation with the primary purpose of solar power generation, voted by a 6-to-1 majority to invest PHP 80,000,000 of corporate funds into a commercial pineapple plantation venture, which is enumerated as an authorized secondary purpose in its Articles of Incorporation. Stockholders representing 62% of the outstanding capital stock voted in favor of the investment during a special stockholders' meeting, while stockholders representing 38% voted against it. Which of the following legal statements correctly defines the status and enforceability of this investment under the Revised Corporation Code?
The investment is valid and fully enforceable because it was approved by a majority of the board and is explicitly covered by an authorized secondary purpose in the corporate charter.
The investment is invalid and cannot proceed because investing corporate funds in a secondary business purpose requires the affirmative ratification of at least two-thirds of the outstanding capital stock.
The investment is valid because non-primary investments require only a majority vote of the outstanding capital stock when recommended by the board of directors.
The investment is void ab initio because corporations are legally prohibited from engaging in any business activity outside their primary purpose under Section 44.
Three domestic corporate entities and two natural persons who are all non-resident foreign citizens executed Articles of Incorporation to organize a general trading corporation in the Philippines with an authorized capital stock of PHP 10,000,000. The incorporators subscribed to PHP 1,000,000 of shares and paid PHP 250,000 at the time of incorporation. The SEC registration examiner rejected the application, citing that: (1) corporations cannot act as incorporators, (2) the majority of incorporators are not Philippine residents, and (3) the subscription fails the mandatory 25%-25% capitalization rule. Is the examiner's rejection legally sound under Republic Act No. 11232?
No, the examiner's rejection is entirely erroneous because RA 11232 permits corporations to act as incorporators, repealed the residency requirement for incorporators, and abolished the general 25%-25% subscription and paid-up capital rule.
Yes, the rejection is sound because the Revised Corporation Code strictly preserves the rule that incorporators must be natural persons residing in the Philippines.
Yes, the rejection is sound because while corporations may now be incorporators, all stock corporations remain subject to the mandatory 25% subscription and 25% paid-up capital threshold under Section 12.
No, the rejection is erroneous solely because foreign non-residents may incorporate, but the examiner was correct that domestic corporations are barred from organizing new corporate subsidiaries.
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.