21.1 Independence: Financial Interests, Relationships, Rotation, Services, and Fees
Key Takeaways
Independence requires both Independence of Mind and Independence in Appearance; holding a direct financial interest or material indirect financial interest in an audit client is strictly prohibited with no allowable safeguards.
Loans from a bank audit client are allowed under normal lending terms; loans from a non-bank audit client are allowed only if immaterial to both parties.
Revised SRC Rule 68 requires rotation of the signing partner every five years with a two-year cooling-off period, while the Code limits PIE key audit partners to seven years.
Auditors must never assume management responsibilities, charge contingent fees for audits, or accept more than trivial gifts from audit clients.
Independence Requirements for Audit and Review Engagements
Independence is required for every audit and review engagement under Part 4A of the Code of Ethics and is reinforced by SEC rules for regulated entities. This section covers independence of mind and in appearance, the independence period, and specific rules on financial interests, loans, employment relationships, partner rotation, non-assurance services, fees, gifts, family relationships, and public interest entities.
1. Independence Requirements for Audit and Review Engagements
Independence is the cornerstone of the auditing profession. Under Part 4A of the Code, independence is required for all audit and review engagements.
Dual Facets of Independence
Independence consists of two distinct, indispensable components:
Independence
│
┌─────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
Independence of Mind Independence in Appearance
(Independence in Fact) (Public / Objective Perception)
• The state of mind that permits expressing • The avoidance of facts and circumstances that
a conclusion without being affected by are so significant that a reasonable and
influences that compromise professional judgment. informed third party would conclude that a
• Requires intellectual integrity, objectivity, firm's or audit team member's integrity,
and rigorous professional skepticism. objectivity, or skepticism has been compromised.
An auditor may possess impeccable mental objectivity (independence of mind), but if circumstantial facts suggest a compromising connection (e.g., living in the client president's mansion rent-free), the auditor lacks independence in appearance, and public trust is destroyed.
The Independence Period
Independence must be maintained throughout the engagement period and the period covered by the financial statements:
- The engagement period starts when the audit team begins performing audit services and ends when the audit report is issued.
- If the engagement is recurring, the engagement period ends at the later of the notification by either party that the professional relationship has terminated or the issuance of the final audit report.
2. Specific Independence Rules and Prohibitions
Financial Interests
A financial interest in an audit client represents an interest in an equity or other security, debenture, loan, or other debt instrument issued by the client:
Financial Interests Rules
│
┌─────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
Direct Financial Interest Indirect Financial Interest
• Owned directly by or under the control of • Owned through a collective investment
the firm, audit partner, or audit team member. vehicle, estate, or trust with no control.
• Beneficially owned through an intermediary • PROHIBITED ONLY IF MATERIAL to the
over which the person has control. net worth of the investor.
• STRICTLY PROHIBITED regardless of materiality! • Immaterial indirect interest is permitted.
- Direct Financial Interest: Any direct ownership of shares, bonds, or stock options of an audit client held by the audit firm, a network firm, an audit team member, or their immediate family members (spouse or dependent children) is strictly prohibited. No safeguard can reduce the self-interest threat to an acceptable level.
- Indirect Financial Interest: Holding shares in a diversified mutual fund or unit investment trust that happens to hold stock in the audit client is permitted, provided the interest is indirect and immaterial to the individual's net worth, and the individual has no influence over investment decisions of the fund.
- Inadvertent Acquisitions: If an audit team member inherits shares in an audit client, the interest must be disposed of immediately (or, for an indirect interest, enough of it disposed of so that the remaining interest is no longer material), or the individual must be removed from the audit team.
Loans and Guarantees
- Loans from a Client that is a Bank or Lending Institution: Permitted provided the loan or guarantee is made under normal commercial lending procedures, terms, and conditions (e.g., standard residential mortgage, car loan, credit card balance within routine limits). If the loan is material to the audit firm or client, safeguards (such as independent review) must be applied.
- Loans from a Client that is NOT a Financial Institution: A firm, audit team member, or immediate family member shall not accept a loan, or a guarantee of a loan, from an audit client that is not a bank or similar institution, unless the loan or guarantee is immaterial to both the firm or individual and the client.
Employment Relationships with Audit Clients
- Former Partner Joining a Client: If a former audit partner joins an audit client as a director, officer, or senior financial employee (e.g., CFO or Controller), a significant self-interest and familiarity threat arises. Independence is compromised unless the individual has severed all capital and financial ties with the audit firm and does not participate in the firm's business. For a public interest entity, a former key audit partner who joins the client as a director, officer, or employee with significant influence compromises independence unless the client has since issued audited financial statements covering at least 12 months in which that individual was not on the audit team.
- Audit Team Member Negotiating Employment: An audit team member must notify the firm upon entering into employment negotiations with an audit client. The firm must immediately remove the professional from the audit engagement team and re-examine any significant judgments made by that individual.
Long Association of Senior Personnel (Partner Rotation Rules)
Familiarity threats build up over time when senior personnel are assigned to an audit engagement for extended periods. To protect objectivity:
| Jurisdiction / Regulatory Framework | Rotation Threshold | Mandatory Cooling-Off Period | Applicable Personnel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Philippine SEC (Revised SRC Rule 68) | Rotation after every 5 years of engagement | 2-year cooling-off before the same signing partner or individual auditor is re-engaged | Signing partner or individual auditor of SEC-regulated entities covered by the Rule |
| IESBA / Philippine Code of Ethics Benchmark | Maximum 7 cumulative years | Engagement Partner: 5 years; EQR: 3 years; Other Key Audit Partners: 2 years | Key Audit Partners (KAPs) of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) |
During the cooling-off period, the rotated individual shall not:
- Act as a member of the audit engagement team;
- Provide quality review (EQR) for the client;
- Consult with the engagement team or client regarding technical or industry-specific matters;
- Lead or coordinate professional services provided by the firm to the audit client.
Provision of Non-Assurance Services (NAS) to Audit Clients
Providing non-audit services to an audit client frequently creates self-review, self-interest, or advocacy threats. The Code establishes stringent prohibitions, particularly for Public Interest Entities (PIEs):
Non-Assurance Services to PIE Audit Clients
│
┌─────────────────────────┬────────────────┴────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
Accounting & Bookkeeping Internal Audit Services Tax Calculations & IT Systems Design
• Posting journal entries • Designing internal controls Valuation Services • Designing/operating
• Preparing financial • Performing operational audits • Valuation affecting IT systems that form
statements or trial that generate financial data balance sheet accounts a significant part of
balances • Management functions • Advocacy before tax financial controls
• STRICTLY PROHIBITED! • STRICTLY PROHIBITED! courts: PROHIBITED! • STRICTLY PROHIBITED!
- Management Responsibilities Prohibition: The auditor must never assume a management responsibility for an audit client. Assuming management responsibilities (e.g., authorizing transactions, choosing accounting policies, directing personnel) creates insurmountable self-review and self-interest threats that cannot be mitigated by any safeguard.
Fees and Pricing Arrangements
- Overdue Fees: If fees from an audit client remain unpaid for an extended period, especially if a significant portion is unpaid prior to issuing the audit report for the following year, the unpaid fee closely resembles a loan granted to the client. The firm must require payment of overdue fees before the report is issued or have an independent professional review the audit work.
- Contingent Fees Prohibition: A contingent fee is a fee calculated on a predetermined basis relating to the outcome of a transaction or result of the work performed (e.g., fee based on obtaining a bank loan or achieving a specific profit level). Charging contingent fees for audit and assurance engagements is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. No safeguard can eliminate the self-interest threat generated by contingent compensation.
- Fee Dependency: If the gross fees generated from an audit client represent a large proportion (e.g., exceeding 15% for PIEs over two consecutive years) of the firm's total fees, the firm must disclose this to Those Charged with Governance (TCWG) and implement an independent pre-issuance or post-issuance review.
Gifts, Hospitality, and Personal Relationships
- Gifts and hospitality: a firm or audit team member shall not accept gifts or hospitality from an audit client unless the value is trivial and inconsequential.
- Immediate family (spouse or equivalent and dependents): if an immediate family member is a director, officer, or employee able to exert significant influence over the accounting records or financial statements, the individual must be removed from the audit team.
- Close family (parents, non-dependent children, siblings) in such a position creates threats that must be evaluated and addressed, for example by restructuring the team's responsibilities.
Public Interest Entities (PIEs)
The Code applies stricter independence rules to PIEs, which include listed entities and other entities defined by law, regulation, or the firm as having a large number and wide range of stakeholders (such as banks and insurance companies). Stricter rules for PIEs cover partner rotation, the prohibition of non-assurance services that create self-review threats, fee-dependency disclosure, and communication with those charged with governance about non-assurance services.
An audit manager assigned to the statutory audit of a commercial manufacturing company discovers that their spouse has just inherited 5,000 common shares of stock in that client, representing a 0.05% ownership interest. Under the Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which of the following actions is legally and ethically required?
The audit manager may continue on the engagement without modification because a 0.05% interest is clearly immaterial.
The audit manager may continue provided that an independent quality review of the inventory audit program is performed.
The audit manager must be removed from the audit engagement team immediately, or the spouse must divest the shares immediately, because holding a direct financial interest creates an insurmountable self-interest threat.
The audit firm must immediately resign from the statutory audit engagement and notify the Securities and Exchange Commission.
A Certified Public Accountant in public practice is approached by a corporate client seeking an independent financial statement audit. The client offers an audit fee structured as PHP 200,000 plus an additional bonus of PHP 300,000 if the audited financial statements support a successful loan approval with a commercial bank. How should the CPA respond under the Philippine Code of Ethics?
The CPA may accept the fee structure provided the contingent bonus is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
The CPA must decline the engagement unless the total fee is deposited into an escrow account prior to the start of field work.
The CPA may accept the arrangement if an independent Engagement Quality Reviewer signs off on the audit working papers.
The CPA must reject the contingent fee arrangement because charging contingent fees for assurance engagements is strictly prohibited.
Under Revised SRC Rule 68 of the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission, what is the rotation rule for the signing partner who audits an entity covered by the Rule?
Rotation after every seven years of engagement, with a three-year cooling-off period
Rotation after every five years of engagement, with a two-year cooling-off period
Rotation after every ten years of engagement, with a five-year cooling-off period
Rotation after every three years of engagement, with a one-year cooling-off period
The audit client's president offers the engagement partner the free use of a beach villa for a week, which has significant value. Under the Code of Ethics, how should the partner respond?
Accept, as long as the gift is disclosed in the audit report
Accept, because hospitality is not a financial interest
Accept only if the audit fee is reduced by the value of the stay
Decline, because gifts and hospitality from an audit client may be accepted only if trivial and inconsequential
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.