10.1 Driven Pile Axial Capacity & Settlement
Key Takeaways
Ultimate static axial pile capacity equals the sum of ultimate base resistance (Qb = qb * Ab) and ultimate shaft resistance (Qs = sum(fs * As)) minus the effective weight of the pile.
In cohesionless soils (sands), unit skin friction fs = K * sigma'_v * tan(delta') is subject to a limiting value fs,max, while unit end bearing qb = sigma'_v * Nq is capped by critical depth limits ql.
In cohesive soils (clays), total stress analysis uses the empirical adhesion factor alpha (fs = alpha * cu), where alpha ranges from 1.0 in soft clay down to 0.35-0.50 in stiff overconsolidated clay.
Elastic settlement of a single axial pile consists of pile stem elastic deformation (S1), settlement caused by load transmitted at the pile tip (S2), and settlement caused by load transmitted along the shaft (S3).
10.1 Driven Pile Axial Capacity & Settlement
Driven deep foundations are structural members (steel H-piles, pipe piles, precast prestressed concrete piles, or timber piles) forced into the ground using impact or vibratory hammers. Driven piles displace soil (full-displacement or partial-displacement) or cut through it (non-displacement open-ended pipes or H-piles), significantly altering the surrounding soil stress state.
Static Ultimate Axial Capacity Formulation
The ultimate compressive load capacity of a single driven pile is computed as the sum of ultimate skin friction (shaft resistance) and ultimate end bearing (tip resistance) , minus the effective pile weight (which is typically neglected in standard geotechnical calculations unless extraordinary pile self-weight exists):
Where:
- = unit skin friction (side resistance) along pile segment (i) (kPa or psf)
- = perimeter surface area of pile segment (i) = (m² or ft²)
- (P) = pile perimeter (m or ft)
- = unit end bearing capacity at the pile tip (kPa or psf)
- = gross cross-sectional area of the pile tip (m² or ft²)
To determine the allowable design load under Working Stress Design (WSD) or Allowable Stress Design (ASD):
Standard factors of safety range between (FS = 2.0) (when verified by field static load testing or dynamic wave equation analysis) and (FS = 3.0) (for empirical static design without dynamic load testing).
Axial Capacity in Cohesionless Soils (Sands & Gravels)
In granular soils, skin friction and end bearing depend primarily on the effective vertical stress , the internal friction angle , soil-pile interface friction angle , and lateral earth pressure coefficient (K).
1. Unit Side Resistance (Skin Friction)
Unit side resistance at depth (z) is calculated as:
- Earth Pressure Coefficient ((K)): For driven displacement piles (e.g., closed-end pipe, precast concrete), driving compacts the sand, elevating (K) above (typically ). For non-displacement piles (e.g., H-piles), .
- Interface Friction Angle (): Usually taken as depending on pile material (steel: ; smooth concrete: ; rough concrete: ).
- Limiting Skin Friction (): Due to soil arching and particle crushing along the pile shaft, vertical effective stress reaches a pseudo-critical threshold at depths of (15D) to (20D). Design standards cap at maximum thresholds (typically 100 kPa to 150 kPa / 2,000 psf to 3,000 psf).
2. Unit End Bearing Capacity
Unit end bearing in sand is derived from bearing capacity theory:
- = effective vertical stress at the pile tip (kPa or psf)
- = bearing capacity factor for deep foundations (from Meyerhof, Berezantsev, or Nordlund charts, which are significantly higher than shallow foundation values due to deep embedment containment).
- = limiting unit end bearing capacity (Meyerhof recommendation: in MPa, or in kPa).
| Pile Type | Soil Type / Relative Density | Ratio | Ratio | Limiting (kPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driven H-Pile | Loose Sand | 0.7 - 0.9 | 0.65 | 50 - 70 |
| Driven H-Pile | Dense Sand | 1.0 - 1.2 | 0.70 | 80 - 100 |
| Closed Pipe / Precast | Medium Sand | 1.2 - 1.5 | 0.80 | 100 - 120 |
| Closed Pipe / Precast | Dense Sand | 1.5 - 2.0 | 0.90 | 120 - 150 |
Axial Capacity in Cohesive Soils (Clays & Silts)
Design in clay strata utilizes total stress (alpha method) or effective stress (beta and lambda methods).
1. Total Stress Analysis: Alpha () Method
The -method relates unit side resistance directly to undrained shear strength :
Where is an empirical adhesion factor reflecting clay remolding, stress relief, and pile insertion disturbance. API RP 2A guidelines express as a function of the normalized strength ratio :
For soft to medium clays ( kPa), . For stiff to hard overconsolidated clays ( kPa), drops to (0.35 - 0.50).
Unit end bearing in clay is evaluated at deep failure conditions using Skempton's limit:
Where for deep embedded circular or square foundations ().
2. Effective Stress Analysis: Beta () Method
Applicable for long-term drained conditions or fully reconsolidated clays:
For normally consolidated clays, . For overconsolidated clays, .
3. Lambda () Method
The -method incorporates mean effective vertical stress and mean undrained shear strength over the total pile penetration length (L):
Where decreases nonlinearly from (0.32) at pile length to (0.12) at .
Pile Elastic Settlement (Vesic's Method)
The elastic settlement (S) of a single driven pile under working load consists of three structural and geotechnical components:
-
Elastic Compression of Pile Stem ():
Where is the load carried at the pile tip under working load, is load carried by skin friction, is pile elastic modulus, is pile cross-sectional area, and is skin friction distribution factor ( for uniform or parabolic distribution, for triangular distribution increasing with depth).
-
Settlement Caused by Load at Pile Tip ():
Where is an empirical coefficient (0.02 for sand/gravel, 0.04 for clay), and (D) is pile diameter/width.
-
Settlement Caused by Load Transmitted Along Shaft ():
Where .
PE-Style Worked Example: Driven Pile Capacity
Problem: A closed-end steel pipe pile with an outer diameter (0.406 m) is driven to a depth into a layered soil profile. The soil profile consists of:
- Layer 1 (0 to 6 m): Soft to medium clay, , undrained shear strength .
- Layer 2 (6 to 18 m): Dense sand, , effective friction angle , (K = 1.4), .
- The groundwater table is located at depth. Below GWT, unit weight of water .
Calculate:
- Ultimate shaft resistance
- Ultimate tip resistance (using , capped at )
- Allowable design load using a factor of safety (FS = 2.5).
Solution Step-by-Step:
1. Pile Geometry Parameters:
- Perimeter
- Tip Area
2. Layer 1 (Soft Clay, 0 to 6 m):
- Shaft Area
- Adhesion Factor : For , , so .
- Unit Skin Friction
- Shaft Capacity Layer 1:
3. Layer 2 (Dense Sand, 6 to 18 m):
-
Thickness
-
Shaft Area
-
Compute effective stress profile :
-
Average effective stress in Layer 2 (6 to 18 m):
-
Unit Skin Friction Layer 2:
(This is below typical limit , so ).
-
Shaft Capacity Layer 2:
-
Total Ultimate Shaft Resistance:
4. Ultimate End Bearing at :
- Effective vertical stress at pile tip:
- Calculated unit end bearing:
- Check limiting unit end bearing .
- Since , use .
- Total Ultimate Base Capacity:
5. Total Ultimate Capacity and Allowable Load:
- Ultimate Capacity
- Allowable Design Load:
In cohesive soil total stress design, how does the empirical adhesion factor alpha behave as the undrained shear strength cu increases from soft clay to stiff overconsolidated clay?
Alpha decreases from approximately 1.0 for soft clays down to 0.35-0.50 for stiff clays.
Alpha increases linearly from 0.35 in soft clay to 1.50 in stiff clay.
Alpha remains constant at 0.95 regardless of undrained shear strength.
Alpha is inversely proportional to pile perimeter but independent of soil shear strength.
Why is unit skin friction fs in sand capped at a maximum limiting value fs,max at high embedment depths?
Because effective vertical stress becomes zero below the groundwater table.
Because soil arching, stress redistribution, and particle crushing prevent linear increases of skin friction with depth.
Because steel and concrete piles lose flexural stiffness at depths exceeding 10 meters.
Because groundwater pressure overrides effective lateral earth pressure at deep embedment.
What is the theoretical value of Skempton's bearing capacity factor Nc for deep foundations (D/B >= 5) embedded in saturated cohesive soil under undrained conditions?
Nc = 5.14
Nc = 6.20
Nc = 9.00
Nc = 12.50
According to Vesic's elastic settlement method, which formula accurately represents the elastic axial deformation (S1) of a pile stem of length L, cross-sectional area Ap, and elastic modulus Ep?
S1 = (Qwp * Cp) / (D * qb)
S1 = (Qws * Cs) / (L * qb)
S1 = (Qwp * L) / (Ap * Ep)
S1 = ((Qwp + xi * Qws) * L) / (Ap * Ep)
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.