PracticeVideosBlogFlashcards

10.1 Driven Pile Axial Capacity & Settlement

Key Takeaways

  • Ultimate static axial pile capacity equals the sum of ultimate base resistance (Qb = qb * Ab) and ultimate shaft resistance (Qs = sum(fs * As)) minus the effective weight of the pile.

  • In cohesionless soils (sands), unit skin friction fs = K * sigma'_v * tan(delta') is subject to a limiting value fs,max, while unit end bearing qb = sigma'_v * Nq is capped by critical depth limits ql.

  • In cohesive soils (clays), total stress analysis uses the empirical adhesion factor alpha (fs = alpha * cu), where alpha ranges from 1.0 in soft clay down to 0.35-0.50 in stiff overconsolidated clay.

  • Elastic settlement of a single axial pile consists of pile stem elastic deformation (S1), settlement caused by load transmitted at the pile tip (S2), and settlement caused by load transmitted along the shaft (S3).

Last updated: July 2026

10.1 Driven Pile Axial Capacity & Settlement

Driven deep foundations are structural members (steel H-piles, pipe piles, precast prestressed concrete piles, or timber piles) forced into the ground using impact or vibratory hammers. Driven piles displace soil (full-displacement or partial-displacement) or cut through it (non-displacement open-ended pipes or H-piles), significantly altering the surrounding soil stress state.

Static Ultimate Axial Capacity Formulation

The ultimate compressive load capacity QuQ_u of a single driven pile is computed as the sum of ultimate skin friction (shaft resistance) QsQ_s and ultimate end bearing (tip resistance) QbQ_b, minus the effective pile weight WpW_p (which is typically neglected in standard geotechnical calculations unless extraordinary pile self-weight exists):

Qu=Qs+Qb−Wp=∑i=1nfs,iAs,i+qbAbQ_u = Q_s + Q_b - W_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} f_{s,i} A_{s,i} + q_b A_b

Where:

  • fs,if_{s,i} = unit skin friction (side resistance) along pile segment (i) (kPa or psf)
  • As,iA_{s,i} = perimeter surface area of pile segment (i) = P⋅ΔziP \cdot \Delta z_i (m² or ft²)
  • (P) = pile perimeter (m or ft)
  • qbq_b = unit end bearing capacity at the pile tip (kPa or psf)
  • AbA_b = gross cross-sectional area of the pile tip (m² or ft²)

To determine the allowable design load QallQ_{all} under Working Stress Design (WSD) or Allowable Stress Design (ASD):

Qall=QuFSorQall=QsFSs+QbFSbQ_{all} = \frac{Q_u}{FS} \quad \text{or} \quad Q_{all} = \frac{Q_s}{FS_s} + \frac{Q_b}{FS_b}

Standard factors of safety range between (FS = 2.0) (when verified by field static load testing or dynamic wave equation analysis) and (FS = 3.0) (for empirical static design without dynamic load testing).


Axial Capacity in Cohesionless Soils (Sands & Gravels)

In granular soils, skin friction and end bearing depend primarily on the effective vertical stress σv′\sigma'_v, the internal friction angle ϕ′\phi', soil-pile interface friction angle δ′\delta', and lateral earth pressure coefficient (K).

1. Unit Side Resistance (Skin Friction)

Unit side resistance at depth (z) is calculated as:

fs=K⋅σv′⋅tan⁡(δ′)≤fs,maxf_s = K \cdot \sigma'_v \cdot \tan(\delta') \le f_{s,max}
  • Earth Pressure Coefficient ((K)): For driven displacement piles (e.g., closed-end pipe, precast concrete), driving compacts the sand, elevating (K) above KoK_o (typically K=1.0 to 2.0K = 1.0\text{ to } 2.0). For non-displacement piles (e.g., H-piles), K≈Ko=1−sin⁡ϕ′K \approx K_o = 1 - \sin\phi'.
  • Interface Friction Angle (δ′\delta'): Usually taken as δ′=0.60ϕ′ to 0.80ϕ′\delta' = 0.60\phi'\text{ to } 0.80\phi' depending on pile material (steel: δ′≈0.7ϕ′\delta' \approx 0.7\phi'; smooth concrete: δ′≈0.8ϕ′\delta' \approx 0.8\phi'; rough concrete: δ′≈1.0ϕ′\delta' \approx 1.0\phi').
  • Limiting Skin Friction (fs,maxf_{s,max}): Due to soil arching and particle crushing along the pile shaft, vertical effective stress reaches a pseudo-critical threshold at depths of (15D) to (20D). Design standards cap fsf_s at maximum thresholds (typically 100 kPa to 150 kPa / 2,000 psf to 3,000 psf).

2. Unit End Bearing Capacity

Unit end bearing in sand is derived from bearing capacity theory:

qb=σv′⋅Nq≤qlq_b = \sigma'_v \cdot N_q \le q_l
  • σv′\sigma'_v = effective vertical stress at the pile tip (kPa or psf)
  • NqN_q = bearing capacity factor for deep foundations (from Meyerhof, Berezantsev, or Nordlund charts, which are significantly higher than shallow foundation NqN_q values due to deep embedment containment).
  • qlq_l = limiting unit end bearing capacity (Meyerhof recommendation: ql=0.5⋅Nq⋅tan⁡ϕ′q_l = 0.5 \cdot N_q \cdot \tan\phi' in MPa, or ql=50Nqtan⁡ϕ′q_l = 50 N_q \tan\phi' in kPa).
Pile TypeSoil Type / Relative DensityK/KoK/K_o Ratioδ′/ϕ′\delta'/\phi' RatioLimiting fs,maxf_{s,max} (kPa)
Driven H-PileLoose Sand0.7 - 0.90.6550 - 70
Driven H-PileDense Sand1.0 - 1.20.7080 - 100
Closed Pipe / PrecastMedium Sand1.2 - 1.50.80100 - 120
Closed Pipe / PrecastDense Sand1.5 - 2.00.90120 - 150

Axial Capacity in Cohesive Soils (Clays & Silts)

Design in clay strata utilizes total stress (alpha method) or effective stress (beta and lambda methods).

1. Total Stress Analysis: Alpha (α\alpha) Method

The α\alpha-method relates unit side resistance directly to undrained shear strength cuc_u:

fs=α⋅cuf_s = \alpha \cdot c_u

Where α\alpha is an empirical adhesion factor reflecting clay remolding, stress relief, and pile insertion disturbance. API RP 2A guidelines express α\alpha as a function of the normalized strength ratio ψ=cu/σv′\psi = c_u / \sigma'_v:

α={1.0for ψ≤0.5 0.5⋅ψ−0.5for ψ>0.5(with α≤1.0)\alpha = \begin{cases} 1.0 & \text{for } \psi \le 0.5 \ 0.5 \cdot \psi^{-0.5} & \text{for } \psi > 0.5 \quad (\text{with } \alpha \le 1.0) \end{cases}

For soft to medium clays (cu<50c_u < 50 kPa), α≈0.8−1.0\alpha \approx 0.8 - 1.0. For stiff to hard overconsolidated clays (cu>150c_u > 150 kPa), α\alpha drops to (0.35 - 0.50).

Unit end bearing in clay is evaluated at deep failure conditions using Skempton's limit:

qb=Nc⋅cu=9⋅cuq_b = N_c \cdot c_u = 9 \cdot c_u

Where Nc=9.0N_c = 9.0 for deep embedded circular or square foundations (D/B≥5D/B \ge 5).

2. Effective Stress Analysis: Beta (β\beta) Method

Applicable for long-term drained conditions or fully reconsolidated clays:

fs=β⋅σv′=(K⋅tan⁡δ′)⋅σv′f_s = \beta \cdot \sigma'_v = (K \cdot \tan\delta') \cdot \sigma'_v

For normally consolidated clays, β=(1−sin⁡ϕ′)tan⁡ϕ′≈0.25−0.35\beta = (1 - \sin\phi') \tan\phi' \approx 0.25 - 0.35. For overconsolidated clays, β=(1−sin⁡ϕ′)OCRtan⁡ϕ′\beta = (1 - \sin\phi') \sqrt{OCR} \tan\phi'.

3. Lambda (λ\lambda) Method

The λ\lambda-method incorporates mean effective vertical stress σˉv′\bar{\sigma}'_v and mean undrained shear strength cˉu\bar{c}_u over the total pile penetration length (L):

favg=λ⋅(σˉv′+2cˉu)f_{avg} = \lambda \cdot \left( \bar{\sigma}'_v + 2 \bar{c}_u \right)

Where λ\lambda decreases nonlinearly from (0.32) at pile length L=10 mL = 10\text{ m} to (0.12) at L=70 mL = 70\text{ m}.


Pile Elastic Settlement (Vesic's Method)

The elastic settlement (S) of a single driven pile under working load QwQ_w consists of three structural and geotechnical components:

S=S1+S2+S3S = S_1 + S_2 + S_3
  1. Elastic Compression of Pile Stem (S1S_1):

    S1=(Qwp+ξQws)LApEpS_1 = \frac{(Q_{wp} + \xi Q_{ws}) L}{A_p E_p}

    Where QwpQ_{wp} is the load carried at the pile tip under working load, QwsQ_{ws} is load carried by skin friction, EpE_p is pile elastic modulus, ApA_p is pile cross-sectional area, and ξ\xi is skin friction distribution factor (ξ=0.5\xi = 0.5 for uniform or parabolic distribution, ξ=0.67\xi = 0.67 for triangular distribution increasing with depth).

  2. Settlement Caused by Load at Pile Tip (S2S_2):

    S2=QwpCpD⋅qbS_2 = \frac{Q_{wp} C_p}{D \cdot q_b}

    Where CpC_p is an empirical coefficient (0.02 for sand/gravel, 0.04 for clay), and (D) is pile diameter/width.

  3. Settlement Caused by Load Transmitted Along Shaft (S3S_3):

    S3=QwsCsL⋅qbS_3 = \frac{Q_{ws} C_s}{L \cdot q_b}

    Where Cs=(0.93+0.16L/D)CpC_s = (0.93 + 0.16 \sqrt{L/D}) C_p.


PE-Style Worked Example: Driven Pile Capacity

Problem: A closed-end steel pipe pile with an outer diameter D=406 mmD = 406\text{ mm} (0.406 m) is driven to a depth L=18 mL = 18\text{ m} into a layered soil profile. The soil profile consists of:

  • Layer 1 (0 to 6 m): Soft to medium clay, γ1=17.5 kN/m3\gamma_1 = 17.5\text{ kN/m}^3, undrained shear strength cu=40 kPac_u = 40\text{ kPa}.
  • Layer 2 (6 to 18 m): Dense sand, γsat=19.5 kN/m3\gamma_{sat} = 19.5\text{ kN/m}^3, effective friction angle ϕ′=36∘\phi' = 36^\circ, (K = 1.4), δ′=28∘\delta' = 28^\circ.
  • The groundwater table is located at z=3.0 mz = 3.0\text{ m} depth. Below GWT, unit weight of water γw=9.81 kN/m3\gamma_w = 9.81\text{ kN/m}^3.

Calculate:

  1. Ultimate shaft resistance QsQ_s
  2. Ultimate tip resistance QbQ_b (using Nq=55N_q = 55, capped at ql=10 MPaq_l = 10\text{ MPa})
  3. Allowable design load QallQ_{all} using a factor of safety (FS = 2.5).

Solution Step-by-Step:

1. Pile Geometry Parameters:

  • Perimeter P=π⋅D=π⋅0.406 m=1.2755 mP = \pi \cdot D = \pi \cdot 0.406\text{ m} = 1.2755\text{ m}
  • Tip Area Ab=π4D2=π4(0.406)2=0.1295 m2A_b = \frac{\pi}{4} D^2 = \frac{\pi}{4} (0.406)^2 = 0.1295\text{ m}^2

2. Layer 1 (Soft Clay, 0 to 6 m):

  • Shaft Area As1=P⋅6.0 m=1.2755⋅6.0=7.653 m2A_{s1} = P \cdot 6.0\text{ m} = 1.2755 \cdot 6.0 = 7.653\text{ m}^2
  • Adhesion Factor α\alpha: For cu=40 kPac_u = 40\text{ kPa}, cu<50 kPac_u < 50\text{ kPa}, so α=1.0\alpha = 1.0.
  • Unit Skin Friction fs1=α⋅cu=1.0⋅40=40 kPaf_{s1} = \alpha \cdot c_u = 1.0 \cdot 40 = 40\text{ kPa}
  • Shaft Capacity Layer 1: Qs1=fs1⋅As1=40⋅7.653=306.1 kNQ_{s1} = f_{s1} \cdot A_{s1} = 40 \cdot 7.653 = 306.1\text{ kN}

3. Layer 2 (Dense Sand, 6 to 18 m):

  • Thickness Δz2=12.0 m\Delta z_2 = 12.0\text{ m}

  • Shaft Area As2=P⋅12.0 m=1.2755⋅12.0=15.306 m2A_{s2} = P \cdot 12.0\text{ m} = 1.2755 \cdot 12.0 = 15.306\text{ m}^2

  • Compute effective stress profile σv′(z)\sigma'_v(z):

    • σv′(z=0)=0\sigma'_v(z=0) = 0
    • σv′(z=3 m)=3.0⋅17.5=52.5 kPa\sigma'_v(z=3\text{ m}) = 3.0 \cdot 17.5 = 52.5\text{ kPa}
    • σv′(z=6 m)=52.5+3.0⋅(17.5−9.81)=52.5+23.07=75.57 kPa\sigma'_v(z=6\text{ m}) = 52.5 + 3.0 \cdot (17.5 - 9.81) = 52.5 + 23.07 = 75.57\text{ kPa}
    • σv′(z=18 m)=75.57+12.0⋅(19.5−9.81)=75.57+116.28=191.85 kPa\sigma'_v(z=18\text{ m}) = 75.57 + 12.0 \cdot (19.5 - 9.81) = 75.57 + 116.28 = 191.85\text{ kPa}
  • Average effective stress in Layer 2 (6 to 18 m):

    σˉv2′=75.57+191.852=133.71 kPa\bar{\sigma}'_{v2} = \frac{75.57 + 191.85}{2} = 133.71\text{ kPa}
  • Unit Skin Friction Layer 2:

    fs2=K⋅σˉv2′⋅tan⁡(δ′)=1.4⋅133.71⋅tan⁡(28∘)=1.4⋅133.71⋅0.5317=99.53 kPaf_{s2} = K \cdot \bar{\sigma}'_{v2} \cdot \tan(\delta') = 1.4 \cdot 133.71 \cdot \tan(28^\circ) = 1.4 \cdot 133.71 \cdot 0.5317 = 99.53\text{ kPa}

    (This is below typical limit fs,max=120 kPaf_{s,max} = 120\text{ kPa}, so fs2=99.53 kPaf_{s2} = 99.53\text{ kPa}).

  • Shaft Capacity Layer 2: Qs2=fs2⋅As2=99.53⋅15.306=1523.4 kNQ_{s2} = f_{s2} \cdot A_{s2} = 99.53 \cdot 15.306 = 1523.4\text{ kN}

  • Total Ultimate Shaft Resistance:

    Qs=Qs1+Qs2=306.1+1523.4=1829.5 kNQ_s = Q_{s1} + Q_{s2} = 306.1 + 1523.4 = 1829.5\text{ kN}

4. Ultimate End Bearing QbQ_b at z=18 mz = 18\text{ m}:

  • Effective vertical stress at pile tip: σv′(z=18)=191.85 kPa\sigma'_v(z=18) = 191.85\text{ kPa}
  • Calculated unit end bearing: qb=σv′⋅Nq=191.85 kPa⋅55=10,551.75 kPa=10.55 MPaq_b = \sigma'_v \cdot N_q = 191.85 \text{ kPa} \cdot 55 = 10,551.75\text{ kPa} = 10.55\text{ MPa}
  • Check limiting unit end bearing ql=10.0 MPa=10,000 kPaq_l = 10.0\text{ MPa} = 10,000\text{ kPa}.
  • Since 10.55 MPa>10.0 MPa10.55\text{ MPa} > 10.0\text{ MPa}, use qb=10,000 kPaq_b = 10,000\text{ kPa}.
  • Total Ultimate Base Capacity: Qb=qb⋅Ab=10,000 kPa⋅0.1295 m2=1295.0 kNQ_b = q_b \cdot A_b = 10,000 \text{ kPa} \cdot 0.1295\text{ m}^2 = 1295.0\text{ kN}

5. Total Ultimate Capacity and Allowable Load:

  • Ultimate Capacity Qu=Qs+Qb=1829.5+1295.0=3124.5 kNQ_u = Q_s + Q_b = 1829.5 + 1295.0 = 3124.5\text{ kN}
  • Allowable Design Load: Qall=QuFS=3124.5 kN2.5=1249.8 kN≈1250 kNQ_{all} = \frac{Q_u}{FS} = \frac{3124.5\text{ kN}}{2.5} = 1249.8\text{ kN} \approx 1250\text{ kN}
Loading diagram...
Figure 10.1: Driven Pile Axial Load Transfer Mechanisms
Test Your Knowledge

In cohesive soil total stress design, how does the empirical adhesion factor alpha behave as the undrained shear strength cu increases from soft clay to stiff overconsolidated clay?

A

Alpha decreases from approximately 1.0 for soft clays down to 0.35-0.50 for stiff clays.

B

Alpha increases linearly from 0.35 in soft clay to 1.50 in stiff clay.

C

Alpha remains constant at 0.95 regardless of undrained shear strength.

D

Alpha is inversely proportional to pile perimeter but independent of soil shear strength.

Test Your Knowledge

Why is unit skin friction fs in sand capped at a maximum limiting value fs,max at high embedment depths?

A

Because effective vertical stress becomes zero below the groundwater table.

B

Because soil arching, stress redistribution, and particle crushing prevent linear increases of skin friction with depth.

C

Because steel and concrete piles lose flexural stiffness at depths exceeding 10 meters.

D

Because groundwater pressure overrides effective lateral earth pressure at deep embedment.

Test Your Knowledge

What is the theoretical value of Skempton's bearing capacity factor Nc for deep foundations (D/B >= 5) embedded in saturated cohesive soil under undrained conditions?

A

Nc = 5.14

B

Nc = 6.20

C

Nc = 9.00

D

Nc = 12.50

Test Your Knowledge

According to Vesic's elastic settlement method, which formula accurately represents the elastic axial deformation (S1) of a pile stem of length L, cross-sectional area Ap, and elastic modulus Ep?

A

S1 = (Qwp * Cp) / (D * qb)

B

S1 = (Qws * Cs) / (L * qb)

C

S1 = (Qwp * L) / (Ap * Ep)

D

S1 = ((Qwp + xi * Qws) * L) / (Ap * Ep)

Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.