PracticeVideosBlogFlashcards

8.4 Temporary Support of Excavations

Key Takeaways

  • In braced cuts, inward wall movement is restricted near top struts, causing soil arching that redistributes earth pressure into rectangular or trapezoidal shapes rather than Rankine triangular distributions.

  • Terzaghi and Peck (1967) apparent earth pressure envelopes provide empirical design loads for struts, wales, and soldier piles in sand, soft-to-medium clay, and stiff clay.

  • Basal heave stability in deep soft clay excavations depends on the ratio of undrained shear strength to overburden pressure, evaluated via safety factor FSheave=cuNcγH+q\text{FS}_{heave} = \frac{c_u N_c}{\gamma H + q}.

  • Common excavation wall systems include soldier piles with timber lagging, tangent pile walls, secant pile walls (interlocking hard/soft piles), and diaphragm (slurry) walls.

  • Dewatering and seepage control are necessary to prevent quicksand fluidization, piping failure, and bottom blowout under high upward hydraulic gradients.

Last updated: July 2026

Mechanics of Soil Arching in Braced Cuts

Deep vertical excavations in urban environments require temporary support systems (braced cuts) to protect adjacent infrastructure. Braced cuts consist of vertical wall elements (soldier piles, sheet piles, secant piles, or diaphragm walls), horizontal beams (wales), and cross-excavation compression members (struts or tieback anchors).

The construction sequence of a braced cut creates a deformation pattern fundamentally different from conventional retaining walls:

  1. Excavation proceeds to a shallow depth (1.5−2.0 m1.5 - 2.0\text{ m}), and the top strut level is installed and preloaded.
  2. As excavation continues deeper, the top strut prevents lateral movement at the top of the wall.
  3. Lower unbraced wall segments yield inward toward the excavation before lower struts are placed.

Because upper wall movement is restricted while mid-to-lower wall sections deflect inward, soil arching occurs. Lateral earth pressure is transferred away from yielding middle soil zones upward to the rigid top strut and downward to lower struts. Consequently, classical Rankine or Coulomb triangular pressure distributions are invalid for braced excavations.


Terzaghi and Peck Apparent Earth Pressure Envelopes (1967)

Terzaghi and Peck developed empirical apparent earth pressure envelopes based on field measurements of strut loads in deep excavations. These envelopes represent fictitious, envelope-bounding pressure diagrams designed to ensure all individual strut loads are safely enveloped.

   SAND (Dense to Loose)        SOFT-MEDIUM CLAY (Ns > 4)         STIFF CLAY (Ns <= 4)
  +---------------------+        +---------------------+        +--------------------+
  | p = 0.65 Ka gamma H |        | 0 to 0.25H: Linear  |        | 0 to 0.25H: Linear |
  |                     |        | 0.25H to 0.75H: max |        | 0.25H to 1.0H: max |
  | UNIFORM RECTANGLE   |        | 0.75H to 1.0H: lin  |        | (0.2 to 0.4) gamma H|
  +---------------------+        +---------------------+        +--------------------+

1. Braced Cuts in Sand

For loose to dense sand, the apparent earth pressure envelope is uniform rectangular over total height HH:

pa=0.65KaγHp_a = 0.65 K_a \gamma H

where Ka=tan⁡2(45∘−ϕ′/2)K_a = \tan^2(45^\circ - \phi'/2). Total horizontal thrust per unit length of wall is:

Pa=0.65KaγH2P_a = 0.65 K_a \gamma H^2

2. Braced Cuts in Soft to Medium Clay (Stability Number Ns>4N_s > 4)

The stability number (NsN_s) evaluates deep plastic yielding in cohesive soil:

Ns=γHcuN_s = \frac{\gamma H}{c_u}

When Ns>4N_s > 4, the apparent pressure envelope is trapezoidal. Maximum pressure (pap_a) is the larger of:

pa=γH(1−4cuγH)orpa=0.20γH to 0.40γHp_a = \gamma H \left( 1 - \frac{4 c_u}{\gamma H} \right) \quad \text{or} \quad p_a = 0.20 \gamma H \text{ to } 0.40 \gamma H
  • Pressure increases linearly from zero at z=0z=0 to pap_a at depth z=0.25Hz = 0.25 H.
  • Pressure remains uniform at pap_a from z=0.25Hz = 0.25 H to z=0.75Hz = 0.75 H.
  • Pressure decreases linearly from pap_a at z=0.75Hz = 0.75 H to zero at the bottom (z=Hz = H).

3. Braced Cuts in Stiff Clay (Ns≤4N_s \le 4)

For overconsolidated, stiff cohesive soils, the envelope is trapezoidal with maximum pressure:

pa=0.20γH to 0.40γH(typically use 0.30γH for design)p_a = 0.20 \gamma H \text{ to } 0.40 \gamma H \quad \text{(typically use } 0.30 \gamma H \text{ for design)}
  • Pressure increases linearly from zero at z=0z=0 to pap_a at z=0.25Hz = 0.25 H.
  • Pressure remains uniform at pap_a from z=0.25Hz = 0.25 H to z=1.0Hz = 1.0 H.

Structural Design of Braced Cut Components

1. Strut Load Calculation

Struts are structural compression members (steel wide-flange beams or structural steel pipes) spanning horizontally across the cut. Strut loads are calculated using tributary area methods or by treating the vertical sheeting as a continuous beam pinned at strut levels (the Hinge Method):

Axial Strut Load: Pstrut=pa⋅Sh⋅Δz\text{Axial Strut Load: } P_{\text{strut}} = p_a \cdot S_h \cdot \Delta z

where ShS_h is horizontal strut spacing, and Δz\Delta z is vertical tributary height.

Thermal Effects on Struts: Exposed steel struts expand under solar radiation. Thermal axial force increments must be added to structural loads: ΔPtemp=α⋅ΔT⋅E⋅A\Delta P_{\text{temp}} = \alpha \cdot \Delta T \cdot E \cdot A where α=1.2×10−5/∘C\alpha = 1.2 \times 10^{-5} /^\circ\text{C} for structural steel.

2. Waler Design

Wales are continuous horizontal beams bolted to soldier piles or sheet piles to transfer wall reaction forces to struts. Wales are designed as continuous beams subjected to uniform line loads w=pa⋅Δzw = p_a \cdot \Delta z. Maximum bending moment is:

Mwaler≈wSh210orwSh28M_{\text{waler}} \approx \frac{w S_h^2}{10} \quad \text{or} \quad \frac{w S_h^2}{8}

3. Soldier Piles and Lagging

  • Soldier Piles (H-Piles): Driven or pre-drilled vertically at 1.8−3.0 m1.8 - 3.0\text{ m} spacing prior to excavation. Designed as vertical beams spanning between wale supports.
  • Timber/Concrete Lagging: Installed horizontally between soldier pile flanges as excavation proceeds. Due to soil arching between soldier piles, design pressure on lagging is reduced to 50%−60%50\% - 60\% of the apparent pressure envelope.

Basal Stability (Heave) in Cohesive Soils

In deep excavations in soft clay, high overburden stresses (γH+q\gamma H + q) outside the cut push soft clay downward, driving the base of the excavation to heave upward inside the cut.

 Outside Excavation          Inside Excavation
 Ground Surface               Bottom of Cut
   |                            |
   | Overburden                 | Heave Resistance
   v gamma H + q                v cu Nc
  ================================================
           <-- Deep Plastic Shear Flow -->

Terzaghi's Factor of Safety against basal heave (FSheave\text{FS}_{heave}) is:

FSheave=cuNcγH+q−cuHB1\text{FS}_{heave} = \frac{c_u N_c}{\gamma H + q - \frac{c_u H}{B_1}}

where NcN_c is the bearing capacity factor (typically Nc=5.14N_c = 5.14 for strip cuts, increasing up to 7.57.5 for deep square cuts based on Bjerrum and Eide charts), and B1B_1 is failure zone width (B/2B/\sqrt{2} or wall penetration depth).

If FSheave<1.50\text{FS}_{heave} < 1.50, soldier piles or sheet piles must be driven deeper into rigid underlying stratum, or ground improvement (jet grouting, deep soil mixing) applied below the excavation floor.


Seepage, Piping, and Bottom Blowout

When excavating below the water table, upward hydraulic gradients (ii) develop at the bottom of the cut. If the upward seepage force exceeds effective soil weight, fluidization (quicksand condition or piping) occurs:

∋crit=γ′γw=γsat−γwγw\ni_{\text{crit}} = \frac{\gamma'}{\gamma_w} = \frac{\gamma_{sat} - \gamma_w}{\gamma_w} FSpiping=icritiexit≥1.50−2.00\text{FS}_{piping} = \frac{i_{\text{crit}}}{i_{\text{exit}}} \ge 1.50 - 2.00

To prevent bottom piping and hydrodynamic instability, structural wall cutoffs (secant piles or slurry diaphragm walls) are driven deep into impermeable clay or bedrock to lengthen the seepage path.


Advanced Excavation Support Wall Systems

Wall SystemConstruction MethodWatertightnessRelative Stiffness
Soldier Piles & LaggingDriven/drilled H-piles + timber laggingNon-watertight (requires dewatering)Low to Moderate
Sheet Pile WallInterlocking steel profiles driven into groundModerate (interlocks can leak under head)Moderate
Tangent Pile WallConcrete drilled shafts touching edge-to-edgeNon-watertight at jointsHigh
Secant Pile WallOverlapping primary (soft) and secondary (hard) pilesFully WatertightVery High
Diaphragm (Slurry) WallContinuous cast-in-place reinforced concrete in bentonite trenchFully WatertightMaximum Stiffness

Worked Numerical Example: Braced Cut Strut Forces

Problem Statement

A 9.0 m9.0\text{ m} deep braced excavation in dense sand is supported by sheet piling and three levels of horizontal struts placed at depths z1=1.0 mz_1 = 1.0\text{ m}, z2=4.0 mz_2 = 4.0\text{ m}, and z3=7.0 mz_3 = 7.0\text{ m}. Horizontal strut spacing Sh=3.0 mS_h = 3.0\text{ m}. Soil properties:

  • Unit weight γ=19.0 kN/m3\gamma = 19.0\text{ kN/m}^3, friction angle ϕ′=36∘\phi' = 36^\circ, c′=0c' = 0.
  • Water table is deep below the base.

Calculate:

  1. Terzaghi and Peck uniform apparent earth pressure (pap_a).
  2. Strut compressive load at each level (Pstrut1,Pstrut2,Pstrut3P_{strut1}, P_{strut2}, P_{strut3}) using the Tributary Area Method.

Step-by-Step Solution

1. Calculate Active Earth Pressure Coefficient and Apparent Pressure

Ka=tan⁡2(45∘−36∘/2)=tan⁡2(27∘)=0.2596K_a = \tan^2(45^\circ - 36^\circ/2) = \tan^2(27^\circ) = 0.2596 pa=0.65KaγH=0.65×0.2596×19.0×9.0=28.87 kPap_a = 0.65 K_a \gamma H = 0.65 \times 0.2596 \times 19.0 \times 9.0 = 28.87\text{ kPa}

2. Determine Vertical Tributary Heights (Δzi\Delta z_i)

  • Strut 1 (at z1=1.0 mz_1 = 1.0\text{ m}):

    • Top boundary: z=0 mz = 0\text{ m}
    • Midpoint to Strut 2: z=1.0+4.0−1.02=2.50 mz = 1.0 + \frac{4.0 - 1.0}{2} = 2.50\text{ m}
    • Tributary height: Δz1=2.50−0=2.50 m\Delta z_1 = 2.50 - 0 = 2.50\text{ m}
  • Strut 2 (at z2=4.0 mz_2 = 4.0\text{ m}):

    • Upper midpoint: z=2.50 mz = 2.50\text{ m}
    • Midpoint to Strut 3: z=4.0+7.0−4.02=5.50 mz = 4.0 + \frac{7.0 - 4.0}{2} = 5.50\text{ m}
    • Tributary height: Δz2=5.50−2.50=3.00 m\Delta z_2 = 5.50 - 2.50 = 3.00\text{ m}
  • Strut 3 (at z3=7.0 mz_3 = 7.0\text{ m}):

    • Upper midpoint: z=5.50 mz = 5.50\text{ m}
    • Bottom boundary: z=9.0 mz = 9.0\text{ m}
    • Tributary height: Δz3=9.0−5.50=3.50 m\Delta z_3 = 9.0 - 5.50 = 3.50\text{ m}

3. Compute Axial Load Per Strut (P=pa⋅Sh⋅ΔziP = p_a \cdot S_h \cdot \Delta z_i)

  • Strut Level 1:

    Pstrut1=28.87 kPa×3.0 m×2.50 m=216.53 kNP_{\text{strut1}} = 28.87\text{ kPa} \times 3.0\text{ m} \times 2.50\text{ m} = 216.53\text{ kN}
  • Strut Level 2:

    Pstrut2=28.87 kPa×3.0 m×3.00 m=259.83 kNP_{\text{strut2}} = 28.87\text{ kPa} \times 3.0\text{ m} \times 3.00\text{ m} = 259.83\text{ kN}
  • Strut Level 3:

    Pstrut3=28.87 kPa×3.0 m×3.50 m=303.14 kNP_{\text{strut3}} = 28.87\text{ kPa} \times 3.0\text{ m} \times 3.50\text{ m} = 303.14\text{ kN}
Loading diagram...
Terzaghi-Peck Apparent Pressure Envelopes and Braced Cut System
Test Your Knowledge

Why do braced excavation cuts in dense sand exhibit a uniform rectangular apparent earth pressure envelope rather than a Rankine triangular distribution?

A

Sand expands hydrostatically when placed under strut preloads

B

Groundwater levels automatically drop to zero inside braced excavation cuts

C

Soil arching transfers lateral pressures from inward-yielding lower wall segments upward to rigid strut supports

D

Rankine theory applies exclusively to cohesive clay soils with water-filled tension cracks

Test Your Knowledge

A deep excavation cut is executed in a soft clay layer with undrained shear strength cu=30 kPac_u = 30\text{ kPa} and total unit weight γ=18.0 kN/m3\gamma = 18.0\text{ kN/m}^3. Using Terzaghi's basal heave formulation (Nc=5.7N_c = 5.7), what is the critical excavation depth (HcH_c) at which basal failure becomes imminent (FS=1.0\text{FS} = 1.0) without surcharge?

A

4.75 m

B

6.20 m

C

8.10 m

D

9.50 m

Test Your Knowledge

What is the primary operational distinction between a secant pile wall and a tangent pile wall in deep excavation applications?

A

Secant pile walls are constructed exclusively with timber lagging between steel H-beams

B

Secant piles interlock by drilling overlapping primary (soft) and secondary (hard) shafts to create a watertight cutoff barrier

C

Tangent piles overlap each other to form a structural compression arch without reinforcement

D

Secant piles rely on external tieback anchors while tangent piles require internal steel struts

Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.