5.1 Agency Authority and Duties to the Principal

Study Focus

Actual authority can be express or implied. Apparent authority depends on the principal’s representation to the third party.

5.1 Law of Agency in Malaysian Insurance Practice

In the Malaysian insurance industry, the vast majority of insurance policies are transacted through intermediaries. Prospective policyholders rarely interact directly with the executive underwriters or board of directors of an insurance company; instead, they interface with registered insurance agents. Consequently, understanding the Law of Agency is essential for any insurance professional. The law of agency defines who has the legal authority to bind whom, who bears financial liability for misstatements or negligence, and how contractual commitments are recognized by Malaysian courts.

---

1. Legal Foundation of Agency: The Contracts Act 1950

In Malaysia, the general legal foundation governing agency relationships is codified under Part X of the Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136), spanning Sections 135 to 191. Insurance agency operates within this general contractual framework, supplemented by the specialized regulatory requirements of the Financial Services Act 2013 (FSA 2013) and guidelines issued by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM).

Statutory Definitions and the Tripartite Structure

Under Section 135 of the Contracts Act 1950:

• Agent: An "agent" is a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons.
• Principal: The "principal" is the person for whom such act is done, or who is so represented.

In the context of the Malaysian insurance industry, this establishes a tripartite relationship:

1. The Principal: The licensed insurance company or takaful operator that underwrites the risk and issues the policy.
2. The Agent: The registered insurance agent appointed by the insurer to solicit proposals, service policyholders, and collect premiums.
3. The Third Party: The proposer, policyholder, or life assured who purchases the insurance contract.

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|                   THE TRIPARTITE RELATIONSHIP               |
|                                                             |
|         PRINCIPAL                                AGENT      |
|    (Insurance Company)  [==================]  (Insurance    |
|             \         Agency Contract/FSA 2013   Agent)     |
|              \                                   /          |
|               \                                 /           |
|    Creates     \                               / Solicits / |
|   Insurance     \                             /  Services   |
|    Contract      \                           /              |
|                   v                         v               |
|                              THIRD PARTY                    |
|                          (Proposer / Insured)               |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+

Legal Capacity to Create Agency

The Contracts Act 1950 sets strict rules regarding who may enter into an agency relationship:

• Capacity of the Principal (Section 136): Any person who is of the age of majority according to the law to which they are subject (18 years of age under the Malaysian Age of Majority Act 1971), and who is of sound mind, may employ an agent. A minor or an individual of unsound mind cannot appoint an agent.
• Capacity of the Agent (Section 137): As between the principal and third persons, any person may become an agent. However, to be liable to the principal for breach of duty, the agent must have reached the age of majority and be of sound mind. Furthermore, under BNM regulations and the rules of the Life Insurance Association of Malaysia (LIAM), Persatuan Insurans Am Malaysia (PIAM) and the Malaysian Takaful Association (MTA), an individual must be at least 18, pass the relevant qualifying examination (the PCEIA for insurance agents) and be registered with the relevant association before soliciting business.
• No Consideration Required (Section 138): Unlike ordinary commercial contracts where valuable consideration is mandatory to create an enforceable agreement, no consideration is necessary to create an agency. An agency agreement is legally binding even if the agent acts gratuitously, though commercial insurance agents are compensated via commissions.

---

2. Creation and Scope of Agency Authority

An agent can bind the principal only when acting within the scope of their authority. If an agent acts within their legal authority, the contracts entered into and the liabilities incurred are legally imputed to the principal. Agency authority in Malaysian law arises through five distinct mechanisms:

1. Express Actual Authority

Express actual authority is explicitly granted by the principal to the agent, whether orally or in writing (Section 140, Contracts Act 1950). In the insurance industry, express authority is almost universally documented through a formal, comprehensive Agency Agreement executed between the insurer and the agent.

Typical express powers granted in an agency contract include:

• Soliciting and procuring insurance applications within specified geographic areas.
• Collecting initial premiums from proposers and issuing official temporary receipts.
• Delivering policy documents and renewal notices to policyholders.
• Assisting clients with the completion of standard claim documentation.

Importantly, standard agency agreements expressly prohibit agents from altering policy terms, waiving warranties, accepting risks outside underwriting guidelines, or admitting liability on behalf of the insurer without prior written consent.

2. Implied Actual Authority

Implied actual authority refers to powers that are not explicitly stated in writing but are reasonably necessary, incidental, or customary to execute the express authority granted (Section 140, Contracts Act 1950).

For example, if an agency agreement expressly authorizes an agent to collect renewal premiums, the agent has the implied authority to issue an official signed receipt, provide a preliminary calculation of the premium due including applicable taxes, and deposit the monies into the designated collection account. Similarly, an agent has implied authority to conduct business according to the recognized customs of the insurance trade, provided those customs are lawful and reasonable.

3. Apparent or Ostensible Authority (Holding Out)

Apparent or ostensible authority is established by estoppel or "holding out" under Section 190 of the Contracts Act 1950. It arises when the principal, by words, conduct, or inaction, represents or permits it to appear to a third party that an agent has authority to act on the principal's behalf, even though the agent lacks actual express or implied authority.

If a third party reasonably relies on that representation in good faith, the principal is legally bound by the agent's acts and is "estopped" (prevented) from denying the agent's authority.

Leading Legal Principle (Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties Ltd [1964]): Apparent authority requires that:

1. A representation was made to the contractor that the agent had authority to enter on behalf of the company into a contract of the kind sought to be enforced.
2. Such representation was made by a person or persons who had "actual" authority to manage the business of the company.
3. The contractor was induced by such representation to enter into the contract (i.e., relied upon it in good faith).

Insurance Application in Malaysia:

Suppose an insurer provides an agent with official company cover note books, corporate receipt books, and promotional banners bearing the insurer's registered logo. If the insurer has an internal guideline that the agent is not allowed to underwrite high-performance sports cars, but never communicates this restriction to the public, an innocent motorist who purchases coverage and receives an official cover note from the agent is protected. The insurer cannot repudiate the policy by claiming the agent exceeded their internal authority, because the insurer "held out" the agent as possessing full authority by equipping them with official documentation.

4. Agency by Ratification

Under Sections 149 to 153 of the Contracts Act 1950, agency by ratification occurs when an agent acts without prior authority (or exceeds authorized limits), and the principal subsequently elects to accept, adopt, and confirm the unauthorized act.

Once the principal ratifies the transaction, the legal effect is retroactive: the act is treated as if it had been authorized from the beginning (omnis ratihabitio retrotrahitur et mandato priori aequiparatur).

Statutory Conditions for Valid Ratification:

• The agent must have expressly contracted as an agent for a named or identifiable principal, not on their own personal account (Section 149).
• The principal must have been in existence and legally competent at the time the contract was made.
• Ratification must be done with full knowledge of all material facts, as an invalid ratification occurs if the principal's consent is obtained under a misapprehension of facts (Section 151).
• The principal must ratify the whole transaction; they cannot ratify the beneficial portions while repudiating the burdens (Section 152).
• Ratification must not injure or prejudice third parties (Section 153).

5. Agency by Necessity

Under Section 142 of the Contracts Act 1950, an agency of necessity arises when an emergency occurs, making it impossible for an individual to communicate with the property owner, compelling that individual to act immediately to preserve the owner's property or interests from imminent loss or destruction.

To establish agency by necessity under common law and Malaysian jurisprudence:

1. It must be practically impossible to communicate with the principal for instructions.
2. The action taken must be bona fide and imperative for the preservation of the principal's interests.
3. The agent must have acted prudently as a reasonable person would act in their own case.

In modern insurance practice, agency by necessity is rare because of instant electronic telecommunications, but it remains historically and conceptually significant in marine salvage and emergency transit scenarios.

---

Comparison of Agency Authority Creation

---

3. Duties of the Agent to the Principal

Because an agency relationship is a fiduciary relationship founded upon mutual trust and confidence, the Contracts Act 1950 imposes strict statutory duties upon the agent:

1. Duty to Follow Principal's Instructions (Section 164)

An agent is legally bound to conduct the business of the agency according to the directions given by the principal. In the absence of specific directions, the agent must conduct business according to the custom prevailing in doing business of the same kind at the place where the agent conducts it.

• If the agent disobeys lawful instructions and a loss occurs, the agent must make good the loss to the principal.
• If a profit is sustained from the disobedience, the agent must account for and hand over the entire profit to the principal.

2. Duty to Exercise Reasonable Skill and Diligence (Section 165)

An agent is bound to conduct the agency business with as much skill as is generally possessed by persons engaged in similar business, unless the principal has notice of their lack of skill. The agent is always bound to act with reasonable diligence, to use such skill as they possess, and to make compensation to their principal for direct consequences of their own neglect, want of skill, or misconduct.

• Example: If an insurance agent fails to submit a signed proposal form and premium payment to the head office within the required timeframe, causing the policy not to be in force when the insured suffers a loss, the agent can be held personally liable to indemnify the insurer for any resulting liabilities.

3. Duty to Render Proper Accounts (Section 166)

An agent is bound to render proper accounts to their principal on demand. In Malaysian insurance practice, this duty is reinforced by Bank Negara Malaysia's Cash-Before-Cover (CBC) regulations and premium warranty rules:

• Insurance agents must maintain transparent, accurate financial records of all premium collections.
• Monies collected from policyholders must be deposited immediately into a designated Clients' Account and remitted to the insurer within the period set by the agency agreement and industry rules (for example, PIAM's agent regulations require motor premiums to be remitted within 7 working days).
• Agents are strictly prohibited from commingling client insurance funds with their personal bank accounts or using client premiums for personal cash flow.

4. Duty to Pay Over Monies Received (Section 171)

Subject to any lawful deductions (such as authorized advances or agreed commission deductions permitted under the contract), the agent is legally bound to pay to the principal all sums received on the principal's account.

5. Duty to Avoid Conflicts of Interest & Prohibition of Secret Profits (Sections 168 & 169)

An agent occupies a fiduciary role and must not place themselves in a position where their personal interest conflicts with their duty to the principal:

• No Dealing on Own Account (Section 168): If an agent deals on their own account in the agency business without first obtaining the consent of the principal and acquainting the principal with all material circumstances, the principal may repudiate the transaction.
• Prohibition of Secret Profits and Bribes (Section 169): An agent must not make any secret profit, pocket undisclosed rebates, or accept bribes from third parties. If an agent receives an unauthorized financial benefit or kickback from an insured or panel repair workshop, the principal is entitled to recover that secret profit from the agent and terminate the agency contract immediately without compensation.

6. Duty of Confidentiality and Data Protection

An agent regularly receives sensitive financial, medical, and personal information regarding proposers and policyholders. Agents owe a common law duty of confidentiality, further codified under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA) and BNM's risk management standards. Agents must not disclose confidential business plans of the insurer or client data to rival companies or unauthorized third parties.

7. Duty Not to Delegate Authority (Delegatus Non Potest Delegare - Section 143)

The general legal maxim delegatus non potest delegare dictates that "a delegate cannot delegate." Because the principal selects an agent based on personal trust, professional integrity, and technical qualification, Section 143 of the Contracts Act 1950 establishes that an agent cannot lawfully employ another to perform acts which the agent has expressly or impliedly undertaken to perform personally.

• Exceptions: An agent may appoint a sub-agent only if permitted by the express terms of the agency agreement, by the ordinary custom of trade, or where the nature of the agency necessarily requires the employment of a sub-agent (e.g., appointing a courier or administrative clerk for purely ministerial non-discretionary clerical tasks).

---