7.4 First Loss, Excess, Betterment and Recoveries

Study Focus

First-loss cover and agreed-value provisions affect the application of average. An excess deducts an amount, while an ordinary franchise acts as a threshold.

Contractual Exceptions to the Condition of Average

While the pro-rata average clause is standard across fire, commercial property, and industrial all-risks policies, specific insurance lines operate under different principles where average is explicitly excluded:

1. First Loss Policies

A First Loss Policy is designed for risks where a total loss of all insured property is practically or physically impossible within a single event. It is standard in commercial Burglary, Theft, and Water Damage (Burst Pipes) insurance.

For example, a heavy machinery dealership holds RM 5,000,000 worth of bulky excavators and spare parts in a secure showroom. A thief could not realistically steal the entire inventory overnight. The business owner purchases a Burglary First Loss policy with a sum insured of RM 200,000 (the estimated Maximum Probable Loss from a single burglary break-in). If thieves break in and steal RM 80,000 worth of tools, the insurer pays the entire RM 80,000 in full without applying average, provided the total inventory value was honestly declared at inception.

2. Valued Policies (Agreed Value Policies)

In a standard unvalued (indemnity) policy, the sum insured is merely an upper limit of liability; the insured must prove the actual market or replacement value at the time of loss. In contrast, under a Valued Policy, the insurer and policyholder agree upon a fixed valuation of the subject matter at contract inception (typically validated by a professional appraisal report).

• Common Applications: Antiques, fine art, unique historical artifacts, vintage collector cars, and Marine Hull insurance.
• Claims Operation: If a total loss occurs, the insurer pays the agreed sum insured in full without requiring proof of current market value or deducting depreciation, and without applying average.

---

Policy Excess vs. Deductible vs. Franchise Clauses

Insurers utilize risk retention mechanisms to eliminate petty, high-frequency claims (which are administratively costly to adjust) and ensure that policyholders maintain a financial interest in loss prevention.

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                       RISK RETENTION MECHANISMS                          |
|                                                                          |
|  EXCESS / DEDUCTIBLE : Subtracted from every eligible claim payment      |
|  - Assessed Loss: RM 2,000 | Excess: RM 500  --> Insurer pays: RM 1,500  |
|  - Assessed Loss: RM   400 | Excess: RM 500  --> Insurer pays: RM     0  |
|                                                                          |
|  ORDINARY FRANCHISE  : Threshold to trigger payment; no deduction once met|
|  - Assessed Loss: RM   400 | Franchise: RM 500 --> Insurer pays: RM   0  |
|  - Assessed Loss: RM 2,000 | Franchise: RM 500 --> Insurer pays: RM 2,000|
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1. Excess and Deductible

While the terms are often used interchangeably in Malaysian insurance practice, their subtle technical distinction is:

• Excess: The initial amount of an adjusted claim that the insured must bear out of pocket. For example, under a private car policy, a compulsory excess of RM 400 applies if an unnamed driver was operating the vehicle.
• Deductible: Functionally identical in modern property and liability policies; it represents the specified sum deducted from the aggregate adjusted loss before the insurer disburses payment.

2. Franchise Clauses

A Franchise differs fundamentally from an excess. A franchise sets a minimum threshold that a loss must reach before the policy responds. However, once the loss reaches or exceeds that threshold, the insurer pays the entire claim in full without deducting anything.

• Ordinary Franchise: If a marine cargo policy has a 5% franchise on RM 100,000 cargo (RM 5,000):
  • A loss of RM 4,500 falls below the franchise: The insurer pays RM 0.
  • A loss of RM 6,000 reaches the franchise: The insurer pays the full RM 6,000 (unlike an excess, which would have paid RM 1,000).
• Disintegrating Franchise: The deductible gradually diminishes as the loss size escalates, disappearing completely once the loss surpasses an agreed upper limit.

Comparison Table: Excess vs. Ordinary Franchise

---

Betterment and Depreciation in Claims Settlements

Under the principle of indemnity, an insured cannot receive a "new for old" windfall when repairing an aged asset. When worn or damaged components are replaced with brand new parts, the property's overall condition and lifespan are improved. This improvement is termed betterment.

Betterment in Motor Claims

Malaysian motor insurers apply an industry betterment scale when an older vehicle is repaired with brand-new parts. The policyholder contributes a percentage of the cost of the new parts, starting at 15% for a five-year-old vehicle and rising by 5% a year to a maximum of 40% for vehicles aged 10 years and above (Section 6.2 sets out the full scale). Betterment is charged only on the new parts, not on labour or towing, and it is an industry practice rather than a statutory rule.

---

Subrogation and Salvage upon Total Loss Settlement

When an insurer settles a property loss, two complementary legal rights arise under indemnity law:

1. Subrogation Rights

Upon indemnifying the policyholder, the insurer is legally subrogated to all rights and remedies the policyholder possessed against any negligent third party who caused the loss. The insurer can file suit against the wrongdoer in the insured's name to recover the disbursed claim monies. The insurer can never recover more than the amount it paid out.

2. The Doctrine of Salvage

When an insurer pays a total loss (or constructive total loss) settlement representing the full insured value of the property, the legal ownership of whatever remains of the damaged property (salvage) transfers entirely to the insurer. The insurer sells the wreckage or scrap to licensed recovery merchants, and the proceeds offset the net claims payout. If the policyholder were permitted to retain the total loss payout and keep the salvage, they would recover more than their actual loss, violating the fundamental principle of indemnity.