6.4 Part C Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists

Key Takeaways

  • Part C is first-party coverage that pays the insured for bodily injury when the at-fault driver is uninsured, a hit-and-run, insolvent, or underinsured
  • UM triggers when the liable driver has no insurance; UIM triggers when the liable driver has insurance but limits below the insured's damages
  • Many states use a reduction/offset approach where the UIM limit is reduced by the liability amount paid; others use an excess add-on approach
  • Insurers must offer UM/UIM and the insured's rejection generally must be in writing; some states permit stacking of limits across vehicles or policies
  • An uninsured-driver accident can pay Part B medical and Part C bodily injury together, with anti-duplication rules preventing the insured from recovering twice
Last updated: June 2026

Why Part C Exists

Part C — Uninsured Motorists Coverage protects the insured when the at-fault driver has no insurance or not enough insurance to pay the insured's injuries. It is first-party coverage that responds in place of the negligent party's missing liability coverage. Critically, Part C requires that the other driver be legally liable — the insured must establish fault and the amount of damages the insured is legally entitled to recover.

Part C principally pays bodily injury the insured is entitled to recover from the owner or operator of an uninsured motor vehicle. Some states also offer Uninsured Motorists Property Damage (UMPD), but the core, nationally tested coverage is bodily injury.

UM vs. UIM

Two related coverages live in Part C:

CoverageTriggered whenExample
Uninsured Motorists (UM)At-fault driver has no liability insurance, is a hit-and-run, or insurer is insolventA hit-and-run driver injures the insured
Underinsured Motorists (UIM)At-fault driver has liability insurance, but limits are less than the insured's damagesAt-fault driver carries $25,000; insured's injuries total $90,000

An uninsured motor vehicle includes a vehicle with no liability bond or policy, a hit-and-run vehicle whose driver cannot be identified, and a vehicle whose insurer denies coverage or becomes insolvent. It does not include a vehicle owned by or furnished for the regular use of the insured, a self-insured vehicle, or a government-owned vehicle (definitions vary by state).

Hit-and-run nuance: Because a hit-and-run driver is treated as uninsured, the insured recovers under UM, not UIM. Many states require prompt reporting to police and the insurer, and some require physical contact between the vehicles (or independent corroboration) so that staged "phantom vehicle" claims cannot be manufactured.

Worked Example — UIM Limit Math

UIM is the most-tested calculation. The standard approach: the insured's UIM limit is reduced by the amount actually paid by the at-fault driver's liability insurer (a "reduction" or "offset" approach used in many states).

The insured carries $100,000 UIM. The insured's damages are $120,000. The at-fault driver carried $30,000 liability and pays it in full.

StepAmount
Insured's total damages$120,000
Paid by at-fault liability$30,000
Insured's UIM limit$100,000
UIM available after offset ($100,000 − $30,000)$70,000
Total the insured recovers ($30,000 + $70,000)$100,000

Under the reduction approach the insured collects $100,000 — the UIM limit — leaving a $20,000 uncovered gap because damages exceeded the UIM limit. Note some states use an excess (add-on) approach where UIM stacks on top of the liability payment; always read the state's UM/UIM rule.

Trap: UIM only triggers when the at-fault limits are below the insured's UIM limit. If the at-fault driver carried more than the insured's UIM limit, UIM does not apply at all.

Offers, Stacking, and Exclusions

Mandatory offer: Most states require insurers to offer UM/UIM coverage; the insured may reject it, but the rejection generally must be in writing. If the insurer fails to obtain a valid written rejection, UM/UIM may attach by operation of law at limits equal to the liability limits.

Stacking: In some states an insured with multiple vehicles or multiple policies may stack (add together) UM/UIM limits. Anti-stacking clauses are common but are not enforceable in every state.

Arbitration: When the insurer and insured disagree on whether the insured is legally entitled to recover or the amount, the PAP provides for arbitration, historically at either party's demand.

Key exclusions: there is no UM/UIM coverage for bodily injury while occupying or struck by a vehicle owned by the insured but not insured for UM under the policy (the "owned-but-not-insured" trap), for losses that would benefit a workers compensation carrier, or for use as a public or livery conveyance.

Putting the Four Parts Together

A single auto accident can trigger several coverages at once. Suppose an uninsured driver injures the named insured:

  • Part A does not pay — the insured is not the liable party.
  • Part B pays the insured's medical bills up to its per-person limit, no-fault.
  • Part C (UM) pays the insured's bodily injury damages (pain and suffering, lost wages, excess medical) the insured is legally entitled to recover from the uninsured driver.
  • Part D (if carried) pays for damage to the insured's vehicle, subject to the deductible — and a separate UMPD option exists in some states.

Because Part B and Part C can both pay medical-related amounts, the insurer coordinates to prevent double recovery: typically Part B pays first, and a Part C settlement is reduced by amounts already paid under Part B. This anti-duplication logic is a frequent exam theme — the insured is made whole once, not twice.

Uninsured vs. Underinsured Motorists and How Limits Apply

Part C covers what a negligent driver should have paid but cannot. Uninsured motorists (UM) coverage applies when the at-fault driver has no liability insurance, is a hit-and-run driver who cannot be identified, or whose insurer is insolvent. Underinsured motorists (UIM) coverage applies when the at-fault driver has liability insurance but limits lower than the insured's damages. The two are distinct triggers: UM responds to the absence of coverage, UIM responds to insufficient coverage. Many states require UM to be offered and let the insured reject UIM in writing.

The limit mechanics are tested closely. UM/UIM pays the bodily injury damages the insured is legally entitled to recover from the at-fault driver, up to the insured's UM/UIM limit. For UIM, states use one of two approaches: a difference (excess) approach pays the gap between the at-fault driver's liability limit and the insured's UIM limit, while a reduction (offset) approach pays the insured's UIM limit minus what the at-fault driver paid. Knowing which approach a problem uses changes the answer.

Some states add uninsured motorists property damage (UMPD) for damage to the insured's vehicle by an uninsured driver, and stacking (combining limits across multiple vehicles or policies) may be allowed or barred by anti-stacking clauses. UM/UIM generally does not pay the at-fault uninsured driver and excludes injuries the insured could recover under workers compensation to avoid duplication.

Worked UIM scenario (difference approach): the insured has a $100,000 UIM limit and suffers $90,000 in damages; the at-fault driver carries only a $25,000 liability limit. The liability insurer pays $25,000, and UIM pays the $65,000 difference up to the insured's limit, making the insured whole. Under a reduction approach, UIM would pay $100,000 minus the $25,000 received, or $75,000, capped at actual damages. Recognizing the trigger (UM versus UIM) and the limit approach is the core Part C skill.

Key Takeaways

Part C uninsured motorists coverage applies when the at-fault driver has no insurance, is a hit-and-run, or whose insurer is insolvent, while underinsured motorists applies when the at-fault limit is below the insured's damages. UIM pays under a difference approach (gap between limits) or a reduction approach (insured's limit minus amounts received). UMPD and stacking vary by state, and Part C coordinates with Part B to prevent double recovery, making the insured whole once.

Test Your Knowledge

An insured carries $100,000 UIM. Her injuries total $120,000. The at-fault driver carried $30,000 in liability and paid it in full. Under a state using the reduction (offset) approach, how much total does the insured recover?

A
B
C
D
Test Your Knowledge

Which situation triggers Underinsured Motorists (UIM) coverage rather than Uninsured Motorists (UM) coverage?

A
B
C
D