5.3 How LES Answers Connect to the Background Investigation

Key Takeaways

  • Appointing authorities run background investigations and may disqualify candidates whose exam answers conflict with what they find.

  • POST's minimum standards under M.G.L. c. 6E, § 4(f) include fingerprinting, a full employment history and good moral character.

  • A felony conviction or a listing in a decertification database bars appointment as a municipal police officer (M.G.L. c. 41, § 96A).

  • Untruthfulness or misrepresentation is a stronger bypass reason than an old, disclosed and explained mistake.

  • Keep contact details, residency and personal records current for the up-to-two-year life of your eligibility.

Last updated: October 2026

5.3 How LES Answers Connect to the Background Investigation

The LES is the first time in the hiring process that you describe your own history, but not the last. If a department reaches your name on a certification, you will complete its background application and talk with investigators, who verify what you report. This section explains how those steps connect and why consistent, candid answers protect you from the start.

What HRD's Guidance Says

The 2019 HRD-format preparation guide said departments conduct their own background investigations and similar procedures on each candidate. During those procedures, agencies obtain specific information related to some WSQ and LES questions. If that information is inconsistent with your exam responses, the agency may disqualify you.

The background investigation is run by the appointing authority, the city, town or MBTA Transit Police, not by HRD. Methods vary by department. HRD's posters also warn that, on request, candidates must provide original supporting documentation to verify copies submitted and claims made, such as residency, veteran status or E/E credit.

What Investigators Typically Check

Massachusetts departments design their own background processes. The POST Commission's minimum certification standards under M.G.L. c. 6E, § 4(f) require every officer to pass a state and national background check that includes:

  • fingerprinting;
  • a full employment history; and
  • for anyone who previously worked in law enforcement, the full employment record, including complaints and discipline.

The same standards require good moral character and fitness for law enforcement work.

In practice, departments commonly review:

AreaCommon sourcesTypical LES overlap
EmploymentFormer supervisors, personnel files, reference contactsEffort, attendance, job changes, reasons for leaving
EducationTranscripts, diplomas, school recordsCompletion, effort, activities
Criminal and court historyRecords checks and fingerprintsConduct-related questions
Driving historyMotor vehicle recordsResponsibility and conduct
Residency claimsLeases, utility bills, other proofResidency preference, not the LES
References and communityNeighbors, coaches, volunteer coordinatorsCommunity involvement

Statutory bars apply regardless of answers. A felony conviction, or listing in the national or Massachusetts decertification database, bars appointment as a municipal police officer (M.G.L. c. 41, § 96A). POST also may not certify anyone convicted of a felony (c. 6E, § 4(f)(2)).

Why Inconsistency Hurts More Than Imperfection

Departments that pass over a higher-ranked candidate must give written reasons, and the candidate can appeal to the Civil Service Commission (Section 1.3). The Commission asks whether the department had reasonable justification based on credible evidence.

A single old mistake that the candidate disclosed and explained is usually a weaker basis for a bypass than evidence that the candidate misrepresented the past. Misrepresentation looks like this:

  • the LES says one thing and the records say another; or
  • the background application omits something the investigator then finds.

That kind of evidence goes directly to the honesty that police work requires. As Chapter 4 explained, a false official report is itself a crime for a public employee (M.G.L. c. 268, § 6A).

A Candor Framework for Past Problems

If your history includes something you would rather not discuss, such as a firing, a court matter, a poor driving record or a period of instability, this approach keeps you consistent across every stage:

  1. Disclose it accurately everywhere it is asked. On the LES, choose the option the facts support. On the background application, answer every question completely, including dates and outcomes.
  2. Keep the facts straight. Use the same dates, employer names and descriptions each time. Pull documents now so you are not relying on memory later.
  3. Own it without excuses. Investigators and interview panels respond better to "I was late repeatedly at that job, I was fired, and here is what I changed" than to blaming others.
  4. Show what changed. Steady employment since, completed education, military service, community work and references who know you now all count as evidence of growth.

Keeping Your Information Current

Your eligibility can last up to two years (Section 1.3). During that time:

  • Update HRD. Keep your email address and contact information current in your Civil Service Online account.
  • Keep records. If you change jobs, move or have a new court or driving issue, keep records. The background application will ask about your history up to the date you complete it.
  • Watch residency. If you claimed residency preference, the appointing authority will verify it before appointment. A move during the 12-month window can end the claim.

The LES is only a few dozen questions on exam day, but it starts a record of your history that continues through the background investigation, POST certification and probation. Accurate answers from the beginning keep that record consistent.

Loading diagram...
From LES Answers to Appointment
Test Your Knowledge

Who conducts the background investigation after a candidate is reached on a certification for a municipal police vacancy?

A

HRD's Civil Service Unit, working from the candidate's LES answer sheet and scores

B

The Civil Service Commission, as part of its appeal review

C

The appointing authority (the hiring city, town or MBTA Transit Police)

D

A private investigator chosen and paid for by the candidate

Test Your Knowledge

Which item is one of the POST Commission's minimum certification standards under M.G.L. c. 6E, § 4(f)?

A

A state and national background check with fingerprinting

B

A four-year college degree in criminal justice

C

At least one year of prior paid employment as a security guard

D

Five years of residency in the hiring municipality

Test Your Knowledge

Ten years ago, a candidate was fired from a retail job for repeated lateness. What approach best protects the candidate during the LES and background process?

A

Answer as if the firing never happened, since it occurred ten years ago

B

Disclose it consistently on every form and show reliable attendance since

C

Disclose it on the background application but leave it off the LES

D

Ask the former employer to delete the personnel record first

Test Your Knowledge

Under M.G.L. c. 41, § 96A, which background fact bars appointment as a municipal police officer regardless of exam score?

A

Having changed jobs three times in five years

B

Having received a speeding ticket

C

Having no community volunteer experience

D

Having been convicted of a felony

Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.