6.3 Out-of-State Prescriptions

Out-of-State Prescriptions

Massachusetts restricts out-of-state prescriptions by statute rather than leaving them to professional judgment, and M.G.L. c. 94C, § 18 does it in four separate paragraphs that answer four different questions. Candidates lose points here by learning one rule — almost always the Maine-and-contiguous-states rule — and then applying it to every prescription that arrives from another state. Identify the schedule and, within Schedule II, identify whether the substance is a narcotic, before you choose a paragraph.

---

The Four Paragraphs of M.G.L. c. 94C, § 18

[!WARNING] The commonest Massachusetts error is treating "Schedule II" as a single category. The Maine-plus-contiguous geography in § 18(d½) governs narcotic Schedule II substances only. A Schedule II non-narcotic — the stimulants used in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are the everyday example — falls under § 18(d), which accepts a prescriber registered in any other state. The two paragraphs share the same five-day clock but not the same map.

---

Narcotic Schedule II — the Geography Rule

Under § 18(d½), a Massachusetts pharmacy may fill a narcotic Schedule II prescription written by an out-of-state practitioner only where that practitioner is licensed, authorised to engage in prescriptive practice and registered in:

• Maine; or
• a state contiguous with the Commonwealth — New Hampshire, Vermont, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island.

Memorise the six as a set: NH, VT, NY, CT, RI + ME. Maine does not border Massachusetts; it is on the list because the statute puts it there, and that mismatch between the legal list and the map is precisely why the point gets tested.

flowchart TD
    A["Schedule II prescription presented"] --> B{"Prescriber registered in Massachusetts"}
    B -->|"Yes"| C["Valid 30 days from issuance - c. 94C s. 23"]
    B -->|"No"| D{"Narcotic or non-narcotic"}
    D -->|"Narcotic"| E{"Registered in ME NH VT NY CT or RI"}
    E -->|"Yes"| F["Fillable if issued within preceding 5 days - s. 18(d1/2)"]
    E -->|"No"| G["Not fillable for a Massachusetts patient"]
    D -->|"Non-narcotic"| H["Any other state - fillable if issued within preceding 5 days - s. 18(d)"]

---

Non-Narcotic Schedule II — Any State, Same Five Days

Section 18(d) authorises the filling of a non-narcotic Schedule II prescription issued by a practitioner "licensed and authorized to engage in prescriptive practice and registered in another state where he resides or practices, if required, and registered under federal law to write prescriptions." There is no geographic limit at all. What survives is the five-day window and a mandatory verification step.

So the Florida amphetamine prescription that candidates confidently reject is in fact fillable — if it was issued within the preceding five days and the pharmacist verifies it. The Florida oxycodone prescription is not fillable for a Massachusetts patient at any age, because oxycodone is a narcotic and Florida is neither Maine nor contiguous with the Commonwealth.

---

Schedules III Through VI — Thirty Days, Not Six Months

This is the second high-value trap in the section. Section 18(c) authorises out-of-state prescriptions in Schedules III through VI, but closes with a hard limit: the paragraph "shall be valid only for the purpose of authorizing the filling of prescriptions, issued within the preceding thirty days."

The ordinary Massachusetts windows — six months and five refills for Schedules III, IV and V, one year for Schedule VI under 247 CMR 9.04 — describe prescriptions written by practitioners registered in Massachusetts. They do not travel with an out-of-state prescriber.

Because Massachusetts Schedule VI captures every non-controlled legend drug, § 18(c) reaches routine medicine. A Connecticut physician's lisinopril prescription written 45 days ago is out of time in Massachusetts, even though the identical prescription from a Boston physician would be good for a year. That result surprises practising pharmacists, which is exactly why it appears on the examination.

One further duty attaches to oral Schedule III through V prescriptions taken under this paragraph: the pharmacist must record that he or she has requested the practitioner to deliver or mail a written prescription within seven days, or such shorter period as federal law requires.

---

Verification Is Mandatory, Not Discretionary

For every out-of-state prescription the pharmacist must determine, in accordance with professional standards and personal judgment, that the prescription is authentic and valid. On top of that, § 18 imposes an express verification duty:

Where verification cannot be obtained, the statute is unambiguous: a pharmacist shall not fill the prescription, and a pharmacist who refuses is protected from liability provided documented good-faith efforts were made. "I left a voicemail and filled it" is not a defence; "I left a voicemail, documented three attempts and declined to fill" is.

---

Counting the Days

A five-day or thirty-day window is only as precise as the counting convention, and Massachusetts publishes one. Under 247 CMR 9.04(10), "in order to determine whether a prescription is within date, a pharmacist shall count the day after the prescription was written as day one." A prescription written on the 1st therefore has the 2nd as day one, and a five-day window closes at the end of the 6th.

---

The Copy to the Department

Both Schedule II paragraphs carry a reporting duty that has no in-state equivalent. After filling an out-of-state Schedule II prescription under § 18(d) or § 18(d½), the pharmacist shall within 30 days deliver to the Department a copy of the prescription. The copy may not include the patient's name and address, and it is not a public record within the meaning of M.G.L. c. 4, § 7, being subject to the restrictions in M.G.L. c. 66A, § 2.

---

What § 18 Does Not Authorise

Two limits appear in every paragraph and are easy marks:

• The authorisation runs to filling prescriptions in Massachusetts only. It does not authorise the out-of-state practitioner to possess, administer or dispense controlled substances under c. 94C, § 9, and it does not authorise that practitioner to practise within the Commonwealth.
• "Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to authorize any mail order pharmacies." Section 18 is not a route to interstate mail-order dispensing.

---

Dispensing Out of Massachusetts — the Export Carve-Out

Section 18(d½) also contains a proviso running the other way. A retail pharmacy in the Commonwealth may fill narcotic Schedule II prescriptions for residents of states other than Maine and the contiguous states, provided that the pharmacy is licensed for retail in Massachusetts and registered with the relevant authorities in the receiving state and the DEA as applicable; the prescription is written by a practitioner licensed and registered in the destination state or a state contiguous to it; it reaches the pharmacy by mail, commercial carrier or an equivalent electronic means authorised by federal law; it is verified; and the finished prescription is delivered by mail or commercial carrier to a verified address in that state. The statute adds the controlling condition: the dispensed substance shall not enter into the hands of any person in the Commonwealth.

---

Foreign Prescribers

A practitioner licensed only outside the United States can hold neither a DEA registration nor a Massachusetts Controlled Substances Registration, so no paragraph of § 18 reaches such a prescription. Because Schedule VI makes ordinary legend drugs controlled substances under state law, that conclusion covers routine medicines as well as scheduled ones. The practical answer for a traveller is a consultation with a locally licensed prescriber.

---

Non-Resident Pharmacies Shipping In — the Mirror Image

The reverse question is a pharmacy located elsewhere that ships into the Commonwealth. Under 247 CMR 9.20, a non-resident pharmacy shall comply with all Massachusetts laws and regulations governing the practice of pharmacy when filling, dispensing or shipping medication into Massachusetts, unless otherwise specified. It must hold a Massachusetts non-resident licence, designate a Massachusetts-licensed pharmacist in charge, and report under 247 CMR 20.07. Note the "unless otherwise specified": the physical-security rules in 247 CMR 9.21 expressly do not apply to non-resident pharmacies, and neither do the general reporting duties in 247 CMR 20.02. See section 9.4.

---

Worked Traps

• A Connecticut physician's oxycodone prescription written four days ago. Fillable — contiguous state, narcotic Schedule II, inside the five-day window, subject to verification.
• The same prescription presented on day seven. Not fillable; the window has closed and verification cannot extend it.
• A Maine physician's hydromorphone prescription written three days ago. Fillable — Maine is expressly named in § 18(d½).
• A Florida physician's oxycodone prescription written yesterday, for a Boston patient. Not fillable — narcotic Schedule II, wrong geography.
• A Florida physician's lisdexamfetamine prescription written yesterday. Fillable under § 18(d) after verification — Schedule II non-narcotic, any state, five days.
• A New York physician's Schedule IV prescription written three months ago with refills remaining. Not fillable — § 18(c) authorises out-of-state prescriptions only where issued within the preceding 30 days, notwithstanding the six-month in-state window.
• A Vermont physician's amoxicillin prescription written six weeks ago. Not fillable — Schedule VI is still within § 18(c), so the 30-day limit applies rather than the one-year Schedule VI window.