10.3 Probability Rules: Independent & Dependent Events
Key Takeaways
- When outcomes are equally likely, P(E) = (number of favorable outcomes) / (number of possible outcomes). The numerator and the denominator are counting problems.
- P(A and B) = P(A) × P(B | A). If A and B are independent, P(B | A) = P(B), so the product is P(A)P(B).
- Without replacement makes later draws dependent: both the denominator and, often, the numerator drop after each draw. With replacement restores independence.
- P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) − P(A and B). Skip the subtraction only when A and B cannot happen together (mutually exclusive).
- Independence is not disjointness. Independent events usually can happen together; disjoint events with positive probability are dependent.
Equally Likely Outcomes
Official Guide Math Review 3.4 puts probability on the same map as counting. On Focus Edition Quantitative Reasoning, probability is still Problem Solving: 21 questions, 45 minutes, no calculator. GMAC tests fractions you can reduce by hand, not a statistics-course toolkit. You will not run a density function, and you will not need a named Bayes formula as a topic.
When every outcome in a finite sample space is equally likely,
P(E) = (number of favorable outcomes) / (number of possible outcomes)
The denominator is a counting problem. The numerator is a counting problem with extra restrictions. Sections 10.1 and 10.2 are the engine; this section names the ratio.
A probability is between 0 and 1 inclusive. P = 0 is impossible. P = 1 is certain. Complements, which 10.4 leans on, use P(not E) = 1 − P(E) because E and not-E partition the sample space.
Worked example. Fair six-sided die. P(rolling a 4) = 1/6. P(even) = 3/6 = 1/2. P(greater than 4) = 2/6 = 1/3. P(at most 2) = 2/6 = 1/3.
Worked example. A bag holds 5 red and 3 blue marbles, well mixed, one marble drawn. P(red) = 5/8. P(blue) = 3/8. These add to 1 because every marble is red or blue.
Worked example that uses combinations. Two cards from 5 distinct cards {A, B, C, D, E}, unordered, equally likely hands. P(the hand includes A) = C(4, 1) / C(5, 2) = 4 / 10 = 2/5. The complementary count is C(4, 2) / 10 = 6/10 = 3/5 for hands that omit A, and 2/5 + 3/5 = 1.
And: Multiply, Then Ask Whether the Second Factor Changes
P(A and B) = P(A) × P(B | A)
P(B | A) is the probability of B given that A has already happened. If A changes the sample space (cards drawn and not replaced, marbles removed), P(B | A) is not P(B).
If A does not change B — separate dice, coins, with-replacement draws, independent machines — then P(B | A) = P(B), and
P(A and B) = P(A) × P(B) for independent events.
| Setup | Second factor | Independent? |
|---|---|---|
| Two fair coins | P(second heads) = 1/2 always | Yes |
| Two fair dice | P(second is 6) = 1/6 always | Yes |
| Marbles with replacement | Denominator restored; mix restored | Yes |
| Marbles without replacement | Denominator drops by 1; numerator drops if you took that color | No |
| Two cards from a deck, no replacement | 51 cards remain | No |
Worked example, independent. Two fair coins. P(two heads) = (1/2) × (1/2) = 1/4. Four equally likely ordered outcomes HH, HT, TH, TT; one favorable.
Worked example, independent. Fair die and a fair coin. P(die shows 6 and coin shows heads) = (1/6) × (1/2) = 1/12.
Worked example, dependent. Bag of 5 red and 3 blue. Two marbles without replacement. P(both red) = (5/8) × (4/7) = 20/56 = 5/14.
After the first red is gone, 4 red remain and 7 marbles remain. Using (5/8) × (5/8) = 25/64 would be the with-replacement (or independent) version, and it is a standard wrong answer.
Check with combinations: C(5, 2) / C(8, 2) = 10 / 28 = 5/14. Same fraction. Unordered hands and ordered sequential products agree when you are consistent about both the numerator and the denominator.
Worked example, dependent mixed colors. Same bag, P(red then blue) = (5/8) × (3/7) = 15/56. P(blue then red) = (3/8) × (5/7) = 15/56. P(one of each, in either order) = 15/56 + 15/56 = 30/56 = 15/28.
If the stem says "one red and one blue" without order, add both ordered paths, or use C(5, 1) × C(3, 1) / C(8, 2) = 15 / 28.
With replacement restores independence
Put the marble back. P(both red) = (5/8) × (5/8) = 25/64. The second draw does not know about the first. GMAT signals this with "replaced," "restored," "independent tosses," or separate physical objects (two dice).
Or: Add, Then Subtract the Overlap
P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) − P(A and B)
The subtraction removes outcomes that sat in both lists and got counted twice. If A and B cannot happen together, they are mutually exclusive (disjoint), P(A and B) = 0, and the formula collapses to P(A) + P(B).
Worked example, mutually exclusive. Fair die. P(2 or 5) = 1/6 + 1/6 = 1/3. A single roll cannot be both 2 and 5.
Worked example, overlap. Fair die. P(even or greater than 4).
- Even: 2, 4, 6 → 3/6
- Greater than 4: 5, 6 → 2/6
- Both (even and greater than 4): 6 → 1/6
- Union: 3/6 + 2/6 − 1/6 = 4/6 = 2/3
List check: {2, 4, 5, 6} has 4 of 6 faces. Adding 3/6 + 2/6 without subtracting produces 5/6, which double-counts the 6.
Worked example, cards. From a 52-card deck, one card. P(king or heart) = 4/52 + 13/52 − 1/52 = 16/52 = 4/13. The king of hearts is both a king and a heart.
Worked example, independent events that still overlap. P(A) = 1/3, P(B) = 1/4, A and B independent.
P(A and B) = (1/3)(1/4) = 1/12 P(A or B) = 1/3 + 1/4 − 1/12 = 4/12 + 3/12 − 1/12 = 6/12 = 1/2
Independence does not mean disjoint. Independent events usually can happen together; disjoint events with positive probability are as dependent as events get (if A happened, B cannot have).
| Relationship | And | Or |
|---|---|---|
| Independent | P(A)P(B) | P(A)+P(B)−P(A)P(B) |
| Mutually exclusive | 0 | P(A)+P(B) |
| Dependent, not disjoint | P(A)P(B|A) | P(A)+P(B)−P(A and B) |
Building the Denominator Carefully
Count what the experiment actually is.
- Two dice, ordered pairs: 6 × 6 = 36 outcomes, not 12 and not 6.
- Three coins: 2³ = 8 outcomes.
- Two marbles without replacement, order recorded: 8 × 7 sequential slots.
- Two marbles without replacement, unordered: C(8, 2) = 28 hands.
Mixing an ordered numerator with an unordered denominator (or the reverse) is how 5/14 becomes 20/28 without reducing, or 10/56 left unreduced next to a reduced trap. Pick one convention and stay there.
Worked example. Two fair dice. P(sum is 7). Ordered pairs that sum to 7: (1,6), (2,5), (3,4), (4,3), (5,2), (6,1) — 6 pairs. P = 6/36 = 1/6. P(sum is 2) = 1/36 (only 1+1). P(sum is 12) = 1/36. The distribution of sums is not uniform; that is why you count ordered pairs, not the 11 possible sum-values from 2 through 12 as if they were equally likely.
P(sum is 8) uses 5 pairs: (2,6), (3,5), (4,4), (5,3), (6,2), so 5/36. Notice (4,4) appears once as an ordered pair. There is no second (4,4).
Traps on Quant
- Adding P(A) + P(B) when A and B overlap.
- Inventing a fake overlap when A and B are disjoint.
- Using P(A)P(B) without replacement.
- Treating "A or B" as exclusive English "one or the other but not both" when the stem includes the overlap.
- Writing 36 + 36 = 72 for two dice instead of 6 × 6 = 36.
- A probability greater than 1: a sure sign you added when you should have used a union formula, or counted ordered and unordered in the same fraction.
- Replacing P(B | A) with P(A | B) by reading the stem backward.
A fair six-sided die is rolled once. What is the probability that the result is even or greater than 4?
A bag contains 5 red marbles and 3 blue marbles. Two marbles are drawn at random without replacement. What is the probability that both marbles are red?
Events A and B are independent, with P(A) = 1/3 and P(B) = 1/4. What is P(A or B)?