5.1 Algebraic Manipulation & Special Products
Key Takeaways
The three classical GMAT identities are (a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2, (a - b)^2 = a^2 - 2ab + b^2, and a^2 - b^2 = (a - b)(a + b).
Difference of squares is the highest-yield factoring pattern on Quant and often hides inside large integers (103^2 - 97^2) or even powers (x^4 - y^4).
From a sum S = a + b and a product P = ab you can recover a^2 + b^2 = S^2 - 2P without solving for a and b separately.
Cubes factor by SOAP: a^3 ± b^3 = (a ± b)(a^2 ∓ ab + b^2). Four-term polynomials usually factor by grouping.
Expressions such as ax^4 + bx^2 + c or 4^x + k·2^x + c are quadratic in form: substitute u for the inner piece, factor, then substitute back.
On the GMAT Focus Edition Quantitative Reasoning section you answer 21 Problem Solving questions in 45 minutes with no calculator. Algebraic manipulation sits in Official Guide Quantitative Review 2026–2027 Math Review 3.2, Algebra, Equalities, and Inequalities. Quant tests arithmetic and elementary algebra applied to Problem Solving. Euclidean geometry is not in this section, and Data Sufficiency lives in Data Insights.
The no-calculator rule is the design of the item, not a handicap. GMAT algebra is written so that brute-force expansion is slow and special products are fast. Recognizing a difference of squares inside two large integers, or recovering a^2 + b^2 from a known sum and product, often turns a 90-second grind into a 20-second product you can cancel.
The three classical quadratic identities
Memorize these three identities forwards (expand) and backwards (factor). Fluency means you do not pause to re-derive the middle term.
Difference of squares
This is the single most useful factoring pattern on Quant. It applies to ordinary integers, monomials, and compound binomials.
- Numeric: .
- Higher even power: .
- Nested radicals, with : .
does not factor over the reals. A sum of squares is not a difference of squares.
Square of a sum and square of a difference
The middle term is twice the product. Dropping is the most common expansion error on the exam: is not .
The three identities are linked, and the links are as useful as the identities themselves:
Hidden difference of squares with large numbers
GMAT writers love integers that look too large to square by hand. They are almost always in disguise. Do not expand as unless you have already ruled out the identity.
Worked example 1. Evaluate .
Squaring both numbers and subtracting also gives , but that is slower and more error-prone without a calculator.
Worked example 2. Evaluate .
Worked example 3. Evaluate .
Check: and , and . Same result, more work.
Worked example 4. Evaluate .
Write as :
Worked example 5. A consecutive-odd-pair shortcut. For any ,
So . You never square or .
Worked example 6. Factor completely over the integers.
Stop after one difference-of-squares step only if the remaining sum of squares is what the later cancel needs. If a linear factor is still sitting inside , factor again.
Finding from and
You often know the sum and the product without knowing and separately. Do not solve the quadratic if the question only wants a symmetric expression.
| Target expression | Identity in and |
|---|---|
Worked example. If and , find and .
The compact cube formula gives the same : . Then
You never found and . (They happen to be and , and , but that is a check, not the method.)
Sum and difference of cubes
SOAP mnemonic for the signs: the binomial factor has the Same sign as the original cube sum or difference; the trinomial's middle term has the Opposite sign; the last term is Always Positive.
Binomial cubes, useful when and are known:
Worked example. Factor .
Worked example. Factor .
Do not write . Expanding produces two extra middle terms.
Factoring by grouping
Four-term polynomials usually factor by pairing terms that share a common binomial:
Worked example. Factor .
Worked example. Factor .
If the first pairing produces no common binomial, try pairing the first term with the third. The GMAT rarely requires more than one regrouping.
Quadratic-form substitution
An expression is quadratic in form when a substitution turns it into .
Common substitutions on Quant:
- for
- for
- for , because
- for , then
Worked example. Factor .
Let . Then . Back-substitute:
Worked example. Solve .
Let with . Then , so , and or . Thus gives , and gives .
Special-product reference
| Identity | Factored / expanded form | Highest-yield use |
|---|---|---|
| Difference of squares | Large-integer products; cancelling rational expressions | |
| Square of a sum | Recover from and | |
| Square of a difference | Recover without finding and | |
| Sum of cubes | Cancel a cubic numerator against | |
| Difference of cubes | Cancel a cubic numerator against | |
| Difference of fourth powers | Two-stage factoring |
Traps to mark on scratch paper
- is not . The missing piece is .
- does not factor over the reals. Only does.
- is not . SOAP gives the linear times quadratic factorization.
- After cancelling from , the original expression is still undefined at . State the restriction.
- factors twice. Stopping after can hide a linear factor you needed to cancel.
If x + y = 7 and xy = 10, what is the numerical value of x^4 + y^4?
641
721
841
941
Which expression is equivalent to (x^6 - 64) / (x^2 - 4) for all real x with x^2 not equal to 4?
x^4 + 16
x^4 + 4x^2 + 16
x^4 - 4x^2 + 16
x^3 + 8
If 9^x - 10(3^x) + 9 = 0, what is the sum of all possible real values of x?
0
1
2
3
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.