5.1 Pharmacodynamics and Dose-Response
Key Takeaways
- Affinity (Kd) governs receptor binding, while intrinsic activity determines the maximum effect a drug can produce once bound.
- Full agonists achieve Emax; partial agonists plateau below Emax and can act as competitive antagonists in the presence of a full agonist.
- Competitive antagonists shift the agonist dose-response curve rightward without reducing Emax; noncompetitive antagonists reduce Emax and are insurmountable.
- Therapeutic index equals TD50 divided by ED50; values near or below 2 indicate a narrow, dangerous margin between efficacy and harm.
- Tachyphylaxis is an acute loss of response after repeated doses, whereas tolerance develops more slowly and often involves pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic adaptation.
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Most drugs produce effects by binding to specific receptors — cellular macromolecules (usually proteins) that recognize endogenous ligands and translate binding into a biological response. The classic lock-and-key model treats the receptor as a rigid pocket with a fixed shape complementary to the ligand. The more dynamic induced-fit model recognizes that both receptor and ligand undergo conformational changes on binding, which explains how a single receptor can accommodate structurally related ligands and how partial agonists stabilize distinct active states.
Two quantitative properties describe receptor interactions. Affinity is the strength of binding, conventionally expressed as the dissociation constant Kd — the concentration at which 50% of receptors are occupied. Lower Kd means higher affinity. Intrinsic activity (efficacy) is the ability of the bound drug to activate the receptor and generate a response. A drug can bind tightly (high affinity) yet produce no effect (zero intrinsic activity, e.g., a pure antagonist).
Receptor Classifications
Pharmacology classifies receptors by structure and signal transduction mechanism:
| Superfamily | Examples | Time Course |
|---|---|---|
| G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) | Adrenergic, muscarinic, opioid, serotonin | Seconds |
| Ligand-gated ion channels | Nicotinic, GABA-A, NMDA, 5-HT3 | Milliseconds |
| Voltage-gated ion channels | Na+, Ca2+, K+ channels | Milliseconds |
| Enzyme-linked receptors | Receptor tyrosine kinases (insulin, EGFR) | Minutes to hours |
| Intracellular/nuclear receptors | Steroid, thyroid, vitamin D receptors | Hours |
Nuclear receptors act as ligand-activated transcription factors; their delayed onset explains why levothyroxine and corticosteroids take days to weeks to produce clinical effects.
Agonists and Antagonists
A full agonist produces the maximal response the tissue can give (Emax = 1). A partial agonist has intrinsic activity between 0 and 1 — it cannot reach Emax even when all receptors are occupied, and in the presence of a full agonist it behaves as a competitive antagonist, lowering the overall response. Clinical examples include pindolol at beta receptors and buprenorphine at mu opioid receptors. An inverse agonist produces an effect opposite to that of an agonist by stabilizing the inactive conformation of a receptor that exhibits constitutive activity (spontaneous signaling without ligand); examples include naloxone at mu receptors and mirtazapine at H1/5-HT2A receptors.
Antagonists are classified by mechanism:
- Competitive (surmountable) — bind reversibly to the same site as the agonist; increasing agonist concentration overcomes the block. The dose-response curve shifts rightward in parallel with no change in Emax.
- Noncompetitive (insurmountable) — bind irreversibly or to an allosteric site; the curve shows reduced Emax that cannot be overcome by more agonist.
- Physiological — two drugs produce opposing effects through different receptors (e.g., insulin vs. glucagon on blood glucose).
- Chemical — one drug binds another directly in solution (e.g., protamine neutralizing heparin, chelators binding heavy metals).
Dose-Response Relationships
The graded dose-response curve (individual subject, log dose on x-axis, effect on y-axis) is a sigmoid curve; it describes potency and efficacy for a single patient. The quantal dose-response curve (population) describes the cumulative proportion of subjects achieving a predefined response at each dose and is used to derive ED50, TD50, and LD50:
- ED50 — dose effective in 50% of the population
- TD50 — dose toxic in 50% of the population
- LD50 — dose lethal in 50% of the population
Potency vs Efficacy
| Property | Definition | Clinical Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Potency | Concentration producing 50% of Emax (EC50) | Lower EC50 = more potent; affects dose size |
| Efficacy | Maximum effect achievable (Emax) | Determines whether the drug can fully control the disease |
A highly potent drug is not necessarily more clinically effective — efficacy is what determines whether the therapeutic goal is achievable. Potency mainly affects the dose required.
Therapeutic Index and Safety
Therapeutic index (TI) = TD50 / ED50. A larger TI indicates a wider safety margin. Drugs such as penicillin have a very large TI, whereas digoxin, lithium, warfarin, and chemotherapeutics have a narrow TI and require monitoring. The therapeutic window is the range between the minimum effective concentration and the minimum toxic concentration — the practical clinical correlate of TI used in therapeutic drug monitoring.
Spare receptors exist when a maximal response is achieved while only a fraction of receptors are occupied; this signal amplification explains why high-affinity agonists can produce full effects at low receptor occupancy, particularly at GPCRs.
Tachyphylaxis, Tolerance, and Desensitization
Tachyphylaxis is an acute, rapid loss of response after repeated dosing over minutes to hours (e.g., ephedrine, indirect sympathomimetics that deplete norepinephrine stores). Tolerance is a slower loss of response over days to weeks, often involving pharmacokinetic induction (e.g., CYP induction by carbamazepine) or homeostatic receptor downregulation (e.g., opioids). Desensitization is receptor-level refractoriness — rapid phosphorylation and internalization of GPCRs (e.g., beta-agonists in asthma) — and is often reversible within minutes after the agonist is withdrawn.
A patient on a high-efficacy beta-agonist for asthma is started on pindolol, a partial agonist at beta receptors. What is the expected net effect on bronchodilation compared with the full agonist alone?
A new investigational analgesic has an ED50 of 20 mg and a TD50 of 60 mg in human trials. Which interpretation is most accurate?