4.3 Pricing with Cost Information: Full-Cost-Plus, Marginal-Cost-Plus, Mark-Ups, Margins and Return Targets
Key Takeaways
Full-cost-plus pricing adds a mark-up to the full cost per unit, so every unit is priced to recover a share of fixed costs as well as variable cost.
Marginal-cost-plus pricing adds a larger mark-up to variable cost only; the mark-up must be big enough to cover fixed costs and the required profit.
A mark-up is profit as a percentage of cost, while a margin is profit as a percentage of selling price; a 25% mark-up equals a 20% margin.
A return-on-investment target is converted into a required profit (target % × capital employed), which is then divided by budgeted units and added to cost per unit.
Cost-plus prices ignore demand, and the full cost per unit depends on the budgeted volume used to spread fixed costs.
Why this topic is examined
Syllabus area B2(e) asks you to apply cost information in pricing decisions: "marginal cost pricing and full-cost pricing to achieve specified targets (return on sales, return on investment, mark-up and margins)". Questions are almost always calculations. The common traps are confusing mark-up with margin, forgetting that a return on investment is based on capital employed rather than on cost, and using the wrong cost base.
Two cost bases for pricing
Full-cost-plus pricing
The price is set by adding a percentage mark-up to the full cost per unit:
"Full cost" may mean full production cost (variable production cost plus absorbed fixed production overhead) or total cost (also including a share of administration, selling and distribution costs). A question will say which to use; read it carefully.
Marginal-cost-plus pricing
The price is set by adding a mark-up to the marginal (variable) cost per unit:
Because variable cost is smaller than full cost, the mark-up percentage must be much larger to produce the same price. The mark-up has to cover all fixed costs and the profit.
Mark-up versus margin
| Term | Profit expressed as a percentage of | Formula for price |
|---|---|---|
| Mark-up | Cost | |
| Margin (return on sales) | Selling price |
Converting between them:
| Mark-up on cost | Equivalent margin on price |
|---|---|
| 20% | 16.67% |
| 25% | 20% |
| 33.33% | 25% |
| 50% | 33.33% |
| 100% | 50% |
Warning
"A 20% margin" does not mean cost × 1.20. If cost is $40 and the required margin is 20%, the price is $40 ÷ 0.80 = $50 (profit $10, which is 20% of $50). Cost × 1.20 = $48 gives only a 16.67% margin.
A return on sales target is simply a margin: profit as a percentage of revenue.
Pricing to achieve a return on investment (ROI)
A return on investment (return on capital employed) target relates profit to the capital employed in the product or business, not to cost or revenue.
- Required annual profit = target ROI % × capital employed.
- Required profit per unit = required annual profit ÷ budgeted units.
- Price = cost per unit + required profit per unit.
Worked example
Castell Ltd is setting the price of a new product:
- Variable cost: $24 per unit
- Fixed costs attributed to the product: $180,000 per year
- Budgeted sales: 20,000 units per year
- Capital employed in the product: $500,000
- Target return on investment: 18% per year
Full cost per unit:
Required profit:
Price:
The same price expressed three ways:
| Measure | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Mark-up on full cost | $4.50 ÷ $33.00 | 13.64% |
| Margin (return on sales) | $4.50 ÷ $37.50 | 12.00% |
| Mark-up on marginal cost | ($37.50 − $24.00) ÷ $24.00 | 56.25% |
The marginal-cost mark-up is 56.25% because it must cover $9.00 of fixed cost as well as $4.50 of profit: ($9.00 + $4.50) ÷ $24.00 = 56.25%.
Check the ROI: 20,000 units × ($37.50 − $33.00) = $90,000 profit, and $90,000 ÷ $500,000 = 18%.
If a return on sales target is set instead
If Castell wanted a 20% return on sales on full cost:
The volume problem in full-cost pricing
The fixed cost per unit depends on the budgeted volume. If Castell had budgeted 15,000 units, fixed cost per unit would be $12.00 and full cost $36.00, pushing the price up. A higher price may reduce demand, which pushes the fixed cost per unit higher still. Full-cost-plus pricing can therefore price a product out of the market when demand is weak. Pricing decisions should always be checked against what customers will pay and what competitors charge.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Full-cost-plus | Simple; aims to recover all costs over the long run; easy to justify to customers (for example, in cost-plus contracts) | Ignores demand and competition; fixed cost per unit depends on the budgeted volume and on arbitrary apportionment; a profit is not guaranteed if volumes fall short |
| Marginal-cost-plus | Simple; uses the cost that actually varies; shows contribution clearly; useful for short-term and special-order pricing | Risk that prices are set too low to cover fixed costs; ignores demand; the large mark-up can look arbitrary |
Tip
Special orders with spare capacity (Section 12.3) are the classic case for marginal-cost thinking: any price above the incremental cost adds contribution. For ongoing products, prices must cover fixed costs in the long run, which is why full cost is still widely used.
A product has a variable cost of $15 per unit and attributable fixed costs of $120,000 a year. Budgeted sales are 10,000 units. Capital employed in the product is $400,000 and the company requires a 15% return on investment. What full-cost-plus price per unit achieves the target return?
$31.05
$21.00
$39.00
$33.00
A company prices its products with a 25% mark-up on total cost. What is the equivalent margin on selling price?
25%
20%
33.3%
16.7%
What is the main risk of using marginal-cost-plus pricing for a company's regular product range?
Prices may be set too low to recover fixed costs and earn a profit over the long run
It always produces higher prices than full-cost-plus pricing
It cannot be used unless fixed overheads are absorbed into unit costs
It is prohibited by IAS 2 for internal pricing decisions
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.