6.3 Writing Assessment: Content, Organisation, Language
Key Takeaways
- Each Writing part (Part 6 and Part 7) is marked on Content, Organisation, and Language at 0–5 each, using whole marks only.
- The maximum for Part 6 is 15 marks and the maximum for Part 7 is 15 marks (30 writing marks in total inside Reading & Writing).
- Content checks whether all required points or pictures are covered and whether the reader is informed.
- Organisation checks cohesion, connectors, and sensible paragraphing or sequencing for the task type.
- Language checks range and control of simple A2 grammar and vocabulary; errors that impede understanding lower the score.
6.3 Writing Assessment: Content, Organisation, Language
Quick Answer: For each of Writing Part 6 and Part 7, examiners award Content 0–5, Organisation 0–5, and Language 0–5—whole marks only. That is 15 marks maximum per part and 30 writing marks in total. Content asks whether the reader is fully informed; Organisation asks whether the message is cohesive; Language asks whether simple A2 grammar and vocabulary are controlled.
Knowing the task is not enough. You also need to know how marks are given. Candidates often polish rare words while missing a content point, or write accurate grammar that never becomes a real story. This section unpacks the three criteria with Part 7 focus (and Part 6 comparisons), shows what moves a script up or down the 0–5 bands, and gives practical checklists you can use in the last minute of the paper.
The mark map at a glance
| Part | Task type | Content | Organisation | Language | Part total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 6 | Guided message (email/note) | 0–5 | 0–5 | 0–5 | 15 |
| Part 7 | Picture story | 0–5 | 0–5 | 0–5 | 15 |
| Both writing parts | — | — | — | — | 30 |
Whole marks only
Scores are integers: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 on each criterion. There are no half marks such as 3.5. When you self-assess practice work, force yourself to choose a whole number and justify it with evidence from the script.
Why three separate scores matter
A script can be uneven:
- Great language, missing picture → high Language, low Content
- All pictures covered, list-like captions → higher Content, lower Organisation and Language
- Connected story with many blocking errors → mid Content/Organisation, low Language
Improving your weakest criterion often raises the part total faster than polishing your strongest one.
Criterion 1: Content (0–5)
Content answers: Does the writing do the job of the task? Is the target reader informed?
Part 7 Content means picture coverage
For the picture story, Content is mainly about:
- Including all three pictures as stages of the story
- Keeping them in a logical order matching the visual sequence
- Making the main event understandable to a reader who cannot see the pictures
- Reaching a length that can actually carry that information (35+ words as the published minimum)
If a friendly stranger reads your story aloud, they should be able to sketch roughly the same three stages.
Part 6 Content means bullet coverage
For comparison, Part 6 Content is about covering all notes/content points in the task (for example, answer three questions in an email). Missing one bullet lowers Content even if the English is beautiful. The same philosophy applies to Part 7: missing a picture is like missing a bullet.
What high Content looks like (Part 7)
- Picture 1 action clearly present
- Picture 2 problem/development clearly present
- Picture 3 result clearly present
- No major contradiction of what the pictures show
- Story feels complete, not cut off mid-event
What low Content looks like
| Problem | Why Content falls |
|---|---|
| Only describes Picture 1 | Reader not informed about the full task |
| Writes a different story (unrelated holiday) | Task not done |
| Under-length fragment (12 words) | Not enough content to inform the reader |
| Ends before the final picture result | Incomplete message |
| Misreads a key object (calls a bus a plane with no visual basis) | Reader gets the wrong information |
Content is not “interestingness”
You do not get extra Content marks for humour, rare plot twists, or advanced themes. You get Content marks for completing the communicative task. A plain, accurate three-stage story can score strongly on Content.
Criterion 2: Organisation (0–5)
Organisation answers: Is the writing put together so the reader can follow it easily?
Examiners look for cohesion (ideas stick together), connectors, and paragraphing where appropriate.
Part 7 Organisation features
At A2 story length, Organisation often means:
- Clear beginning → middle → end order
- Sequence words or other logical links (Then, After that, Finally, so, because, but)
- Sentences that relate to the same people and event
- Not jumping randomly between unrelated ideas
- Optional short paragraphs if you naturally separate opening and ending—but one tight paragraph can also be well organised at this length
Part 6 Organisation features
Emails/notes may use a greeting, ordered answers to points, and a simple closing. Linking between points (Also, and, but) still matters. Do not force Part 6 email layout onto Part 7 stories.
Connectors as Organisation evidence
Compare:
- Weak organisation: Mia at bus. Rain. Friend car. Happy.
- Stronger organisation: First, Mia missed the bus. Then it started to rain. Finally, her friend took her home and she was happy.
The second version guides the reader through time. That is Organisation in action.
Paragraphing “where appropriate”
For a 40–60 word story, one paragraph is often fine. If you write two short paragraphs (setup + ending), that can also work. Organisation is not a prize for artificial paragraph breaks; it is a prize for readable order and linking. Giant blocks of unconnected sentences, or three one-word lines, score poorly.
Criterion 3: Language (0–5)
Language answers: What range of simple grammar and vocabulary does the candidate control, and do errors stop understanding?
What A2 Language looks like on a good Part 7 script
- Past simple forms mostly correct (went, saw, bought, helped)
- Occasional past continuous used correctly if attempted
- Basic word order: subject–verb–object patterns clear
- Everyday vocabulary matched to the pictures (bus, rain, bag, smile, park)
- Simple sentences and a few compound sentences with and/but/so/because
- Spelling good enough that words are recognisable
Errors that impede understanding lower Language (and can hurt Content)
Not every mistake is equal:
| Error type | Example | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Small, non-blocking | She help ed her friend (spacing/typo) but meaning clear | Minor |
| Local grammar slip | She goed to the shop (meaning still clear) | Limited damage if rare |
| Blocking error | Bus no rain friend car happy because | Reader cannot follow; Language falls hard |
| Wrong message | They flew to the moon when pictures show a bus stop | Language and Content both at risk |
Control matters more than stuffing advanced structures. One accurate Suddenly, the bag broke is better than a broken attempt at a complex clause.
Range without risk
“Range” at A2 does not mean sounding like C1. It means you are not stuck on three words only. Show a little variety:
- Verbs: waited, missed, started, helped, thanked
- Adjectives: wet, happy, surprised, kind
- Time/sequence: Yesterday, Then, Finally
That is enough range for a strong elementary story.
How the three criteria work together (Part 7 scenarios)
Scenario A — Balanced strong script (illustrative mid–high band thinking)
Last Saturday, Leo bought apples at the supermarket. Then his bag broke and the apples fell on the street. Finally, a kind woman helped him and he thanked her.
- Content: all three stages present
- Organisation: Then / Finally, clear order
- Language: past forms, simple vocabulary, meaning clear
Scenario B — Pretty language, missing middle
A candidate writes elegant sentences about shopping and a happy ending but never mentions the broken bag shown in Picture 2.
- Content: reduced because the reader is not informed about a required stage
- Language: may still look strong
- Organisation: may look fine locally but the overall task cohesion is weak
Scenario C — All pictures listed, no links
Boy shop. Bag break. Woman help.
- Content: partial (ideas present but underdeveloped)
- Organisation: very weak
- Language: very limited range and control
Scenario D — Full coverage, many blocking errors
The story tries to include all pictures but verbs and word order collapse so the reader cannot follow who did what.
- Content: may be pulled down if meaning is unclear
- Language: low
- Organisation: hard to reward if links are invisible
Self-check checklist (last 60–90 seconds)
Use this after drafting Part 7 (and adapt for Part 6):
Content check
- Picture 1 present?
- Picture 2 present?
- Picture 3 present?
- Order matches the pictures?
- ≥35 words of real sentences?
Organisation check
- Can I point to sequence or logical links?
- Same characters/event throughout?
- Clear ending, not a sudden stop?
Language check
- Past endings on regular verbs?
- Irregulars I used (went, saw, bought…) correct?
- Any sentence I cannot understand if I read it slowly? Fix or simplify it.
- Spelling of key picture words (because wrong key nouns can confuse Content)?
Marks arithmetic for study targets
Because each criterion is 0–5, small improvements matter:
| Criterion scores | Part total |
|---|---|
| 3 + 3 + 3 | 9 / 15 |
| 4 + 3 + 3 | 10 / 15 |
| 4 + 4 + 3 | 11 / 15 |
| 5 + 4 + 4 | 13 / 15 |
| 5 + 5 + 5 | 15 / 15 |
Moving Content from 2 to 4 by adding the missing picture is often easier than hunting a perfect 5 on Language. Fix task coverage first.
Part 6 and Part 7: same criteria, different evidence
| Criterion | Part 6 evidence | Part 7 evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Content | All notes answered; purpose of message clear | All pictures used; story informs reader of the event |
| Organisation | Greeting/order of points/closing; links between ideas | Sequence of stages; connectors; readable narrative order |
| Language | Simple message grammar/vocab for emails and notes | Narrative tenses, story vocab, controlled simple sentences |
Studying criteria once helps both writing parts. Practise applying the same three questions: Did I cover everything? Is it easy to follow? Is the English clear at A2?
What examiners are not looking for
- Native-speaker slang
- Perfect punctuation of advanced quotes
- Literary metaphors
- Exact word count rituals beyond meeting the minimum with full coverage
- Copying memorised stories that ignore the actual pictures
Memorised “one-size” stories are a Content risk: if the pictures show rain and a car, a memorised beach holiday will not inform the reader about these pictures.
Turning criteria into weekly practice
- Write one Part 7 story under 8–10 minutes.
- Score yourself 0–5 × 3 with whole numbers only.
- Rewrite once targeting the lowest criterion.
- Keep a log: “Missed Picture 2 twice this week” or “Forgot irregular buy → bought.”
- Every two weeks, write one Part 6 and one Part 7 in the same sitting to simulate paper pressure.
Final synthesis for Chapter 6 writing goals
- Part 7 task: three pictures → one story ≥35 words, beginning–middle–end.
- Language tools: past simple core, past continuous as needed, sequence words, time phrases, optional short dialogue.
- Assessment: Content + Organisation + Language, each 0–5 whole marks, 15 per part.
If you can explain your own practice script with those three criterion names—I lost a Content mark because Picture 2 was missing; Organisation is a 4 thanks to Then/Finally; Language is a 3 because two irregulars were wrong—you are preparing the way examiners actually mark. That awareness, combined with timed picture practice, is the fastest path to stronger Writing scores on A2 Key.
How are Content, Organisation, and Language scored on each A2 Key writing part?
What is the maximum total for Writing Part 6 and for Writing Part 7?
What does the Content criterion mainly reward on Part 7?
Which problem is most likely to lower the Language score?