10.1 Pharmacokinetics, ADME & Receptor Dynamics

Key Takeaways

  • Bioavailability (F) quantifies the fraction of an administered drug reaching systemic circulation intact; first-pass hepatic metabolism significantly reduces oral bioavailability relative to intravenous delivery (F = 100%).

  • The Henderson-Hasselbalch principle dictates that non-ionized (uncharged) drug molecules cross lipid membranes; local anesthetics are weak bases whose efficacy is severely compromised in acidic infected tissue due to ion trapping in the charged conjugate acid form.

  • Apparent volume of distribution (Vd) reflects drug partitioning between plasma and peripheral tissues; acidic drugs preferentially bind serum albumin, while basic drugs bind alpha-1-acid glycoprotein.

  • Hepatic metabolism comprises Phase I functionalization (CYP450 oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis) and Phase II conjugation (glucuronidation, acetylation, sulfation); CYP inducers accelerate substrate elimination, whereas CYP inhibitors precipitate drug accumulation and toxicity.

  • Drug elimination follows first-order kinetics (constant fraction per unit time; constant half-life) or saturable zero-order kinetics (constant amount per unit time; variable half-life e.g., phenytoin, ethanol, high-dose aspirin); steady state is attained after 4 to 5 half-lives.

Last updated: October 2026

10.1 Pharmacokinetics, ADME & Receptor Dynamics

Independent Study Guide Notice: Independent study guide by OpenExamPrep. This educational resource is developed independently by OpenExamPrep and is not sponsored, endorsed, or affiliated with the National Board of Podiatric Medical Examiners (NBPME) or Meazure Learning.


Introduction to Pharmacokinetics vs. Pharmacodynamics

Pharmacology is divided into two core conceptual disciplines:

  1. Pharmacokinetics (PK): What the body does to the drug. PK governs the time course of drug concentration in plasma and tissues through the processes of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Elimination (ADME).
  2. Pharmacodynamics (PD): What the drug does to the body. PD investigates receptor interactions, biochemical signal transduction cascades, graded and quantal dose-response relationships, and the magnitude of physiologic or toxicologic effects.

Dose Administered→PharmacokineticsPlasma Concentration→PharmacodynamicsClinical Effect / Toxicity\text{Dose Administered} \xrightarrow{\textbf{Pharmacokinetics}} \text{Plasma Concentration} \xrightarrow{\textbf{Pharmacodynamics}} \text{Clinical Effect / Toxicity}


ADME: Absorption & Bioavailability

Absorption Mechanisms

For a pharmacologic agent to exert a systemic effect, it must traverse biological lipid bilayer membranes to enter the vascular compartment. Drug absorption occurs primarily through:

  • Passive Transcellular Diffusion: Driven by concentration gradients; favored by non-ionized, low-molecular-weight, highly lipophilic molecules.
  • Facilitated Diffusion & Active Transport: Mediated by membrane solute carrier (SLC) transporters or ATP-binding cassette (ABC) efflux pumps (e.g., P-glycoprotein / MDR1).
  • Paracellular Transport: Aqueous filtration through intercellular junctions.

Bioavailability (FF)

Bioavailability (FF) is defined as the fraction or percentage of an administered drug dose that reaches the systemic circulation in an active, unchanged molecular state:

F=AUCoralAUCIV×100%F = \frac{\text{AUC}_{\text{oral}}}{\text{AUC}_{\text{IV}}} \times 100\%

Where AUC\text{AUC} represents the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve.

  • Intravenous (IV) Administration: Bypasses absorption barriers and first-pass hepatic extraction entirely, yielding F=1.0F = 1.0 (100%100\%).
  • Oral (PO) Administration: Typically exhibits F<1.0F < 1.0 due to incomplete gastrointestinal mucosal dissolution, gastric acid degradation, bacterial enzymatic metabolism, P-glycoprotein extrusion, and first-pass hepatic metabolism.

First-Pass Hepatic Elimination

Drugs absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract (stomach, small intestine, and proximal colon) enter the mesenteric venous drainage and travel via the hepatic portal vein directly to the liver before accessing systemic circulation. Extensive hepatic extraction or enzymatic biotransformation during this primary transit markedly reduces systemic bioavailability. For example, lidocaine undergoes approximately 70% to 90% first-pass hepatic metabolism, rendering oral administration clinically ineffective and necessitating parenteral or topical delivery.


Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation, Ion Trapping & Local Anesthetic Failure

The Physicochemical Basis of Ionization

The majority of therapeutic drugs are either weak acids or weak bases. Biological membranes consist of hydrophobic phospholipid bilayers that are permeable to uncharged, lipid-soluble molecules, but act as impermeable barriers to charged, water-soluble ionized species.

  • Weak Acids (HA⇌H++A−HA \rightleftharpoons H^+ + A^-):
    • Non-ionized (protonated) form: HAHA (uncharged, lipophilic, membrane-permeable).
    • Ionized (unprotonated) form: A−A^- (negatively charged, hydrophilic, membrane-impermeable).
  • Weak Bases (BH+⇌H++BBH^+ \rightleftharpoons H^+ + B):
    • Ionized (protonated) form: BH+BH^+ (positively charged, hydrophilic, membrane-impermeable).
    • Non-ionized (unprotonated) form: BB (uncharged, lipophilic, membrane-permeable).

The mathematical relationship governing the ratio of non-ionized to ionized species is defined by the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:

pH−pKa=log⁡([unprotonated][protonated])\text{pH} - \text{p}K_a = \log\left(\frac{[\text{unprotonated}]}{[\text{protonated}]}\right)

For Weak Acids:pH−pKa=log⁡([A−][HA])\text{For Weak Acids:} \quad \text{pH} - \text{p}K_a = \log\left(\frac{[A^-]}{[HA]}\right)

For Weak Bases:pH−pKa=log⁡([B][BH+])\text{For Weak Bases:} \quad \text{pH} - \text{p}K_a = \log\left(\frac{[B]}{[BH^+]}\right)

Ion Trapping in Renal Tubular Clearance

When a drug crosses a biological membrane into a physiological compartment with a different pH, the fraction that ionizes cannot diffuse back across the lipid barrier, becoming "trapped" in that compartment.

Clinical ObjectiveTarget IntoxicationModulating AgentBiochemical MechanismClinical Board Pearl
Alkalinization of UrineWeak Acids (Aspirin / Salicylates, Phenobarbital, Methotrexate)Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3NaHCO_3)Increases tubular urine pH (>7.5> 7.5), shifting HA→H++A−HA \rightarrow H^+ + A^-. The charged A−A^- cannot cross back across the tubular epithelium, accelerating renal excretion.Prevents systemic salicylic toxicity and pulmonary edema in aspirin overdose.
Acidification of UrineWeak Bases (Amphetamines, Phencyclidine / PCP)Ammonium Chloride (NH4ClNH_4Cl) or Ascorbic AcidDecreases urine pH, shifting B+H+→BH+B + H^+ \rightarrow BH^+. The charged BH+BH^+ conjugate acid is trapped within the renal tubular lumen.Rarely used clinically due to risk of systemic metabolic acidosis; forced diuresis preferred.

High-Yield Board Pearl: Local Anesthetics in Acidic Infected Tissue

Local anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine) are chemically weak bases with dissociation constants (pKa\text{p}K_a) ranging between 7.87.8 and 9.09.0:

BH+ (Charged, active intracellular blocker)⇌B (Uncharged base, membrane-permeable)+H+ (Proton)BH^+ \text{ (Charged, active intracellular blocker)} \rightleftharpoons B \text{ (Uncharged base, membrane-permeable)} + H^+ \text{ (Proton)}

In healthy subcutaneous connective tissue with a physiological extracellular pH of 7.47.4, a sufficient fraction of the anesthetic exists in the uncharged free base form (BB) to penetrate the hydrophobic lipid epineurium and axonal membrane of sensory peripheral nerves. Once inside the axoplasm (physiological pH 7.27.2), the uncharged base BB re-equilibrates into the charged protonated form BH+BH^+, which binds with high affinity to the intracellular channel pore of voltage-gated sodium channels (NaVNa_V) to halt depolarization and conduct nociceptive blockade.

Important

The Mechanism of Local Anesthetic Failure in Infected Tissue: When a podiatric physician attempts digital nerve blockade or infiltration around an acute purulent abscess, infected ulcer, or paronychia, the extracellular tissue pH drops precipitously to 5.5−6.05.5 - 6.0 as a consequence of bacterial anaerobic glycolysis, lactic acid accumulation, and inflammatory cellular lysis. According to the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:

pH−pKa=log⁡([B][BH+])  ⟹  5.5−7.9=−2.4  ⟹  [B][BH+]=10−2.4≈1250\text{pH} - \text{p}K_a = \log\left(\frac{[B]}{[BH^+]}\right) \implies 5.5 - 7.9 = -2.4 \implies \frac{[B]}{[BH^+]} = 10^{-2.4} \approx \frac{1}{250}

In this acidic microenvironment, the equilibrium is driven overwhelmingly toward the charged, water-soluble conjugate acid form (BH+BH^+). Less than 0.5%0.5\% of the drug exists as the uncharged base (BB). Because charged BH+BH^+ cannot traverse the hydrophobic perineural lipid sheath, the local anesthetic is effectively locked out of the nerve axon. This produces severe anesthetic failure or incomplete sensory blockade, requiring regional nerve block proximal to the inflamed site (where tissue pH is normal) rather than direct local infiltration.

Loading diagram...
Local Anesthetic Membrane Transport and Ion Trapping in Normal vs. Acidic Tissue

Volume of Distribution & Plasma Protein Binding

Apparent Volume of Distribution (VdV_d)

The Volume of Distribution (VdV_d) is a theoretical pharmacokinetic parameter that equates the total amount of drug present in the entire body to the concentration of drug measured in the vascular plasma compartment:

Vd=Total Amount of Drug in BodyPlasma Drug Concentration (C0)=Dose (IV)C0V_d = \frac{\text{Total Amount of Drug in Body}}{\text{Plasma Drug Concentration } (C_0)} = \frac{\text{Dose (IV)}}{C_0}

VdV_d does not reflect an actual physical anatomical volume; rather, it reflects the degree to which a drug partitions into peripheral tissues versus remaining confined within circulating plasma:

VdV_d Compartment SizeNumerical Range (70 kg adult)Physicochemical Drug ProfileExemplary Agents
Low VdV_d (Vascular Plasma)3−8 L3 - 8\text{ L} (0.05−0.1 L/kg0.05 - 0.1\text{ L/kg})High molecular weight, highly ionized, or extensively bound to plasma albumin; unable to exit fenestrations.Warfarin (Vd≈7 LV_d \approx 7\text{ L}), Heparin, Monoclonal antibodies
Medium VdV_d (Extracellular Fluid)12−16 L12 - 16\text{ L} (0.2−0.3 L/kg0.2 - 0.3\text{ L/kg})Small, hydrophilic, water-soluble; distributes through capillary fenestrations into interstitial fluid, but cannot cross cell membranes.Aminoglycosides (Gentamicin), Vancomycin, Beta-lactams
High VdV_d (Total Body Water & Tissue Storage)>42 L> 42\text{ L} up to >1000 L> 1000\text{ L} (>0.6 L/kg> 0.6\text{ L/kg})Highly lipophilic, low plasma protein binding; distributes into intracellular fluid, accumulates in peripheral adipose or binds tissue proteins.Digoxin (Vd≈500 LV_d \approx 500\text{ L}), Chloroquine, Morphine, Amiodarone

Plasma Protein Binding

Drugs in systemic circulation exist in a dynamic equilibrium between a protein-bound fraction and an unbound (free) fraction:

  • Albumin: Primary binding protein for acidic and neutral drugs (e.g., Warfarin, Phenytoin, Diazepam, NSAIDs, Ceftriaxone).
  • Alpha-1-Acid Glycoprotein (AAG): Acute-phase reactant synthesizing primarily in the liver; binds basic drugs (e.g., Lidocaine, Bupivacaine, Propranolol, Quinidine).

Note

Clinical Significance of Protein Binding: Only the unbound (free) drug fraction is pharmacologically active, capable of diffusing across vascular endothelium into target tissues, and subject to hepatic biotransformation and glomerular filtration. In clinical states characterized by severe hypoalbuminemia—such as hepatic cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, malnutrition, or chronic non-healing diabetic ulcerations with exudative protein loss—the free active fraction of highly protein-bound acidic drugs (e.g., phenytoin, warfarin) rises dramatically, producing unexpected clinical toxicity despite normal total plasma drug concentrations.


Biotransformation: Phase I vs. Phase II Metabolism

The ultimate goal of hepatic biotransformation is to convert lipophilic compounds into polar, water-soluble, hydrophilic metabolites that can be excreted by the kidneys or biliary tract.

Phase I Reactions: Functionalization

Phase I reactions introduce or unmask a polar functional group (−OH,−NH2,−SH,−COOH-OH, -NH_2, -SH, -COOH) on the parent substrate. These reactions are catalyzed predominantly by the Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) monooxygenase enzyme superfamily localized within the smooth endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes.

  • Reaction Types: Oxidation (CYP-mediated), Reduction, and Hydrolysis.
  • Metabolic Outcome: Yields active, inactive, or toxic metabolites. In the case of prodrugs (e.g., codeine, clopidogrel, enalapril), Phase I bioactivation is required to generate the therapeutically active compound.
  • Geriatric Decline: Phase I metabolism declines significantly in elderly individuals due to decreased hepatic blood flow and hepatic microsomal mass, prolonging drug half-lives.

Cytochrome P450 Inducers vs. Inhibitors

Modulation of hepatic CYP450 isozymes (chiefly CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP1A2) accounts for major drug-drug interactions encountered on licensing examinations:

CategoryPharmacokinetic Effect on SubstratesCommon Inducers / InhibitorsHigh-Yield Clinical Sequelae
CYP450 InducersAccelerates substrate metabolism; ↓\downarrow plasma drug levels →\rightarrow therapeutic failureRifampin, Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, St. John's wort, Phenobarbital, Chronic ethanol, GriseofulvinCo-administration of rifampin with warfarin decreases INR, risking recurrent DVT; reduces oral contraceptive efficacy.
CYP450 InhibitorsDecreases substrate metabolism; ↑\uparrow plasma drug levels →\rightarrow supratherapeutic toxicityAzole antifungals (Fluconazole, Ketoconazole, Itraconazole), Macrolides (Erythromycin, Clarithromycin; NOT Azithromycin), Ciprofloxacin, Cimetidine, Ritonavir, Grapefruit juiceCo-administration of fluconazole with warfarin elevates INR, causing major gastrointestinal or operative bleeding; erythromycin co-administered with statins precipitates rhabdomyolysis.

Phase II Reactions: Conjugation

Phase II reactions conjugate the parent drug or Phase I intermediate with an endogenous hydrophilic substrate, creating large, highly polar, biologically inactive molecules ready for excretion.

  • Reaction Types:
    • Glucuronidation: Most common Phase II pathway; catalyzed by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Deficient in neonates (causing chloramphenicol "Gray Baby Syndrome").
    • Sulfation: Catalyzed by sulfotransferases.
    • Acetylation: Catalyzed by N-acetyltransferase (NAT2).
    • Glutathione Conjugation: Neutralizes toxic electrophilic intermediates, notably NAPQI generated by acetaminophen.
  • Geriatric Preservation: Phase II conjugation reactions (mnemonic: "Geriatrics have more GAS" — Glucuronidation, Acetylation, Sulfation) remain relatively preserved in elderly patients.
  • Pharmacogenetic Variation in Acetylation: Individuals are genetically categorized as fast acetylators or slow acetylators based on NAT2 polymorphisms. Slow acetylators possess reduced hepatic NAT2 activity, predisposing them to elevated drug concentrations and severe adverse reactions, including Drug-Induced Lupus Erythematosus (DILE) from Hydralazine, Procainamide, or Isoniazid (INH), as well as INH-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Quantitative Pharmacokinetics: Dosing & Elimination Kinetics

                    First-Order vs. Zero-Order Elimination
     First-Order Elimination                 Zero-Order Elimination
   [Plasma Conc vs. Time: Curve]           [Plasma Conc vs. Time: Linear]
   Concentration                           Concentration
   │ *                                     │ *
   │   *                                   │   *
   │     *                                 │     *
   │       *                               │       *
   │         *                             │         *
   └───────────── Time                     └───────────── Time
   - Constant fraction (%)/time            - Constant amount/time
   - Rate proportional to conc             - Rate independent of conc (saturable)
   - Half-life is constant                 - Half-life decreases as conc falls
   - Most drugs at normal doses            - Phenytoin, Ethanol, high-dose Aspirin

First-Order vs. Zero-Order Elimination Kinetics

CharacteristicFirst-Order EliminationZero-Order Elimination
Elimination RateConstant fraction (percentage) of drug cleared per unit time (e.g., 10%10\% per hour).Constant absolute amount of drug cleared per unit time (e.g., 10 mg10\text{ mg} per hour).
Concentration DependenceRate of elimination is directly proportional to plasma concentration (−dCdt=k⋅C-\frac{dC}{dt} = k \cdot C).Rate of elimination is constant and independent of drug concentration (−dCdt=k-\frac{dC}{dt} = k).
Half-Life (t1/2t_{1/2})Constant, independent of dose or plasma concentration.Variable; increases as dose or concentration increases.
MechanismElimination mechanisms (enzymes, transporters) operate well below saturation (C≪KmC \ll K_m).Elimination mechanisms are completely saturated (C≫KmC \gg K_m).
High-Yield Examples>95%> 95\% of all clinical drugs at therapeutic dosing.Phenytoin, Ethanol, Aspirin (at high/toxic doses) (Mnemonic: "PEA is a flat zero").

Core Pharmacokinetic Equations

Clearance (CL):CL=Rate of EliminationCp=0.693×Vdt1/2\textbf{Clearance (CL):} \quad CL = \frac{\text{Rate of Elimination}}{C_p} = \frac{0.693 \times V_d}{t_{1/2}}

Half-Life (t1/2):t1/2=0.693×VdCL\textbf{Half-Life } (t_{1/2}): \quad t_{1/2} = \frac{0.693 \times V_d}{CL}

Steady-State Concentration (Css):Css=F×DoseCL×τ\textbf{Steady-State Concentration } (C_{ss}): \quad C_{ss} = \frac{F \times \text{Dose}}{\text{CL} \times \tau}

Where τ\tau is the dosing interval.

Attainment of Steady State

When a drug is administered via continuous IV infusion or regular intermittent maintenance dosing, steady state (CssC_{ss}) is reached when the rate of drug administration equals the rate of drug elimination. The time required to attain steady state depends exclusively on the drug's elimination half-life (t1/2t_{1/2}), completely independent of the dose, dosing interval, or route of administration:

  • 1 half-life=50% of Css1\text{ half-life} = 50\% \text{ of } C_{ss}
  • 2 half-lives=75% of Css2\text{ half-lives} = 75\% \text{ of } C_{ss}
  • 3 half-lives=87.5% of Css3\text{ half-lives} = 87.5\% \text{ of } C_{ss}
  • 4 half-lives=93.75% of Css4\text{ half-lives} = 93.75\% \text{ of } C_{ss}
  • 4−5 half-lives=95−97% of Css4 - 5\text{ half-lives} = 95 - 97\% \text{ of } C_{ss} (Clinical Steady State attained)

Similarly, complete drug elimination (washout) following drug discontinuation requires 44 to 55 half-lives.

Loading Dose vs. Maintenance Dose Calculations

Loading Dose (LD):LD=Css×VdF\textbf{Loading Dose (LD):} \quad \text{LD} = \frac{C_{ss} \times V_d}{F}

Maintenance Dose (MD):MD=Css×CL×τF\textbf{Maintenance Dose (MD):} \quad \text{MD} = \frac{C_{ss} \times CL \times \tau}{F}

Caution

Dose Adjustments in Renal Impairment: In patients with renal failure (decreased creatinine clearance), systemic clearance (CLCL) decreases while volume of distribution (VdV_d) remains essentially unchanged. Therefore, the Loading Dose remains unaltered, ensuring rapid attainment of target plasma levels. However, the Maintenance Dose must be decreased (or the dosing interval τ\tau prolonged) in direct proportion to the reduction in renal clearance to avoid drug accumulation and severe toxicity.


Pharmacodynamics: Dose-Response Relationships & Antagonism

Graded Dose-Response Curves: Potency vs. Efficacy

  • Potency: Refers to the concentration or dose of a drug required to produce 50%50\% of its maximal effect, represented by the EC50EC_{50} (effective concentration 50). On a semi-logarithmic dose-response curve, a leftward shift indicates greater potency (less drug is needed to elicit the response).
  • Efficacy: Refers to the maximal biological response (Emax⁡E_{\max}) achievable by a drug at saturating concentrations. On a dose-response plot, efficacy is represented by the height (plateau) of the curve. Clinically, efficacy is vastly more important than potency.

Competitive vs. Non-Competitive Antagonists

Antagonist TypeReceptor InteractionEffect on EC50EC_{50} (Potency)Effect on Emax⁡E_{\max} (Efficacy)Overcome by Increasing Agonist?
Competitive AntagonistReversibly binds to the same active receptor site as the agonist; competes for occupancy.Increases EC50EC_{50} (Curve shifts RIGHT)Unchanged (Emax⁡E_{\max} preserved)YES; high agonist concentrations displace the antagonist.
Non-Competitive AntagonistIrreversibly binds the active site (covalent bond) or binds an allosteric regulatory site.Unchanged EC50EC_{50} (or variable)Decreases Emax⁡E_{\max} (Curve shifts DOWNWARD)NO; agonist cannot overcome allosteric inactivation or covalent blockade.

Therapeutic Index & Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

The Therapeutic Index (TI) is a quantitative metric of drug safety, defined as the ratio between toxic dose and effective dose:

Therapeutic Index (TI)=TD50ED50(or LD50ED50 in preclinical animal models)\text{Therapeutic Index (TI)} = \frac{TD_{50}}{ED_{50}} \quad \left(\text{or } \frac{LD_{50}}{ED_{50}} \text{ in preclinical animal models}\right)

  • Wide Therapeutic Index: Large safety margin; plasma drug concentration monitoring is unnecessary (e.g., penicillin, beta-blockers).
  • Narrow Therapeutic Index (NTI): Small difference between therapeutic efficacy and lethal toxicity; requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of trough/peak levels to prevent catastrophe.
  • Classic Narrow TI Drugs: Warfarin, Digoxin, Lithium, Theophylline, Vancomycin, Aminoglycosides (Gentamicin/Tobramycin), Phenytoin, and Carbamazepine.
Test Your Knowledge

A podiatric surgeon attempts a local digital nerve block using 1% lidocaine (pKa 7.9) to perform an emergency partial nail avulsion on a patient with an acutely abscessed, erythematous hallux paronychia (tissue pH measured at 5.7). Despite administering an adequate volume of anesthetic directly adjacent to the infected hallux base, the patient experiences severe pain during the procedure. What physicochemical mechanism accounts for the failure of local anesthesia in this infected microenvironment?

A

Extracellular acidosis shifts lidocaine toward its charged, protonated form, leaving too little uncharged base to cross the axonal membrane

B

Bacterial beta-lactamases produced by staphylococci enzymatically cleave the amide linkage of lidocaine within the infected interstitium

C

Accelerated lymphatic drainage in inflamed tissue rapidly clears the uncharged anesthetic into the venous circulation before it can diffuse

D

Severe tissue inflammation induces upregulation of presynaptic voltage-gated sodium channels that are refractory to local anesthetic binding

Test Your Knowledge

A 64-year-old male maintained on chronic warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation presents with distal subungual onychomycosis of both great toenails. The podiatric physician initiates a course of oral fluconazole. One week later, the patient presents to the emergency department with gross hematuria, epistaxis, and an INR of 7.8 (therapeutic target 2.0-3.0). What pharmacokinetic interaction explains this clinical toxicity?

A

Fluconazole displaces warfarin from plasma albumin, dramatically increasing its volume of distribution while accelerating total clearance

B

Fluconazole inhibits renal P-glycoprotein efflux pumps, leading to impaired tubular excretion of unchanged parent warfarin

C

Fluconazole induces CYP3A4, thereby accelerating the metabolic conversion of warfarin into an active toxic intermediate

D

Fluconazole competitively inhibits hepatic CYP2C9, impairing clearance of the more potent S-enantiomer and raising warfarin levels

Test Your Knowledge

A 72-year-old female with severe diabetic calcaneal osteomyelitis and chronic kidney disease (estimated GFR 20 mL/min, baseline serum creatinine 2.8 mg/dL) requires intravenous vancomycin therapy. In comparing this patient's pharmacokinetics to a healthy individual with normal renal clearance, how should the clinical dosing regimen be formulated?

A

Keep the loading dose (volume of distribution is unchanged) and reduce the maintenance dose or frequency in proportion to clearance

B

The loading dose should be increased to overcome expanded extracellular fluid volume, while the maintenance dose remains unchanged

C

Both the loading dose and the maintenance dose should be decreased by 75% to prevent immediate ototoxicity

D

The maintenance dose remains unchanged because vancomycin elimination is primarily mediated by hepatic Phase II glucuronidation

Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.