All Practice Exams

200+ Free CO Bar Practice Questions

Pass your Colorado Bar Examination exam on the first try — instant access, no signup required.

✓ No registration✓ No credit card✓ No hidden fees✓ Start practicing immediately
~75-85% Pass Rate
200+ Questions
100% Free
1 / 200
Question 1
Score: 0/0

A couple marries, then one spouse inherits $100,000 during the marriage and keeps it in a separate account. Colorado is an equitable-distribution state. At divorce, how is the inheritance generally treated?

A
B
C
D
to track
2026 Statistics

Key Facts: CO Bar Exam

276

Required UBE Total Score

Colorado Office of Attorney Admissions

200

MBE Questions (Day 2, 50%)

NCBE / Colorado Office of Attorney Admissions

6 essays + 2 MPTs

Written Components (Day 1)

Colorado Office of Attorney Admissions

Sept 2012

Early UBE Adoption Date

NCBE

$710

Regular Application Fee

Colorado Office of Attorney Admissions (2026)

100+

Practice Questions Here

OpenExamPrep question bank

The Colorado Bar Exam is the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE) requiring a total score of 276 — one of the higher cut scores among UBE states. Day 1 (written): 6 MEE essay questions (30% of score) and 2 MPT lawyering tasks (20%). Day 2: the MBE — 200 multiple-choice questions across 7 subjects (50% of score). Colorado was an early UBE adopter (September 2012), and its score is portable to other UBE jurisdictions. While the UBE tests general law, Colorado practice involves distinctive state law: prior-appropriation water rights, specialized water courts, modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar, and abolition of joint and several liability. Colorado plans to transition to the NextGen bar exam in July 2028.

Sample CO Bar Practice Questions

Try these sample questions to test your CO Bar exam readiness. Each question includes a detailed explanation. Start the interactive quiz above for the full 200+ question experience with AI tutoring.

1A plaintiff from Colorado sues a defendant from Kansas in federal district court in Colorado, asserting only a state-law negligence claim and seeking $70,000 in damages. The defendant moves to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. How should the court rule?
A.Grant the motion, because the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000
B.Deny the motion, because there is complete diversity of citizenship
C.Deny the motion, because federal courts have supplemental jurisdiction over all state claims
D.Grant the motion, because negligence claims must be brought in state court
Explanation: Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, diversity jurisdiction requires both complete diversity of citizenship AND an amount in controversy that exceeds $75,000. Although the Colorado and Kansas parties are diverse, the $70,000 sought does not exceed the $75,000 threshold, so the federal court lacks diversity jurisdiction and must dismiss.
2A corporation is incorporated in Delaware and has its corporate headquarters and principal executive offices in Colorado, where its officers direct the company's activities. For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, where is the corporation a citizen?
A.Only Delaware, its state of incorporation
B.Both Delaware and Colorado
C.Only Colorado, where it conducts most operations
D.Every state where it does business
Explanation: Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1), a corporation is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and the state of its principal place of business. Under Hertz Corp. v. Friend (2010), the principal place of business is the 'nerve center' — where the corporation's high-level officers direct and control its activities. Here that is Colorado, so the corporation is a citizen of both Delaware and Colorado.
3A defendant is served with process while voluntarily present in the forum state to attend a business meeting unrelated to the lawsuit. The plaintiff sues the defendant in that state. Is personal jurisdiction proper?
A.No, because the contacts are unrelated to the claim
B.No, unless the defendant is domiciled in the forum
C.Yes, based on tag jurisdiction from in-state personal service
D.Yes, but only if the defendant consented in writing
Explanation: Under Burnham v. Superior Court (1990), transient or 'tag' jurisdiction permits a court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant who is personally served with process while voluntarily present in the forum state, even if the claim is unrelated to that presence. This traditional basis for jurisdiction survives the minimum-contacts analysis of International Shoe.
4In a federal diversity action governed by Colorado substantive law, the parties dispute whether a state statute of limitations or the more generous federal common-law tolling rule applies. Which governs?
A.The federal tolling rule, because federal courts apply federal procedure
B.Whichever rule the federal judge believes is fairer
C.Neither; the court must certify the question to the Colorado Supreme Court
D.The Colorado statute of limitations, because it is substantive under Erie
Explanation: Under Erie R.R. v. Tompkins (1938) and Guaranty Trust Co. v. York (1945), a federal court sitting in diversity applies state substantive law. Statutes of limitations are treated as substantive under the outcome-determinative test because they can be dispositive of the claim. Therefore the Colorado limitations period controls.
5A plaintiff files a complaint in federal court. The defendant believes the complaint, even if all facts are true, fails to state a legally cognizable claim. Which motion should the defendant file?
A.A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6)
B.A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56
C.A motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 7
D.A motion for a more definite statement under Rule 8
Explanation: A Rule 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint, asking whether the well-pleaded facts, accepted as true, state a plausible claim for relief under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal. Because the defendant challenges legal sufficiency rather than disputing facts, 12(b)(6) is the correct vehicle.
6During discovery in federal court, a party seeks production of documents prepared by the opposing party's attorney in anticipation of litigation. The documents contain factual summaries but no legal opinions. May the requesting party obtain them?
A.Yes, automatically, because all discoverable material must be produced
B.Yes, but only upon a showing of substantial need and undue hardship in obtaining the equivalent
C.No, because attorney work product is absolutely privileged
D.No, because the documents are protected by attorney-client privilege
Explanation: Under Rule 26(b)(3) and Hickman v. Taylor, ordinary work product (fact work product) is qualifiedly protected and may be discovered only upon a showing of substantial need and an inability to obtain the substantial equivalent without undue hardship. Opinion work product reflecting an attorney's mental impressions receives nearly absolute protection.
7A plaintiff sues a defendant in federal court and loses on the merits after a full trial. The plaintiff then files a second suit against the same defendant asserting a different legal theory arising from the same transaction. The defendant raises claim preclusion. What is the result?
A.The second suit proceeds, because it asserts a new legal theory
B.The second suit proceeds, because preclusion applies only to identical legal theories
C.The second suit is barred, because claim preclusion bars relitigation of claims that were or could have been raised from the same transaction
D.The second suit is barred only if the first judgment was appealed
Explanation: Claim preclusion (res judicata) bars a party from relitigating a claim that was or could have been litigated in a prior action that ended in a final judgment on the merits between the same parties. Under the transactional test (Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 24), a 'claim' encompasses all rights to relief arising from the same transaction, so a new legal theory from the same facts is barred.
8A federal civil jury trial is demanded. How many jurors must a federal civil jury have, and what is the verdict requirement absent a stipulation otherwise?
A.Exactly 12 jurors and a unanimous verdict
B.At least 6 jurors and a majority verdict
C.Exactly 9 jurors and a two-thirds verdict
D.At least 6 and no more than 12 jurors, with a unanimous verdict
Explanation: Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 48, a federal civil jury must have at least 6 and no more than 12 members, and the verdict must be unanimous unless the parties stipulate otherwise. All jurors who participate must agree on the verdict unless the parties have agreed to accept a non-unanimous verdict.
9A case is filed in state court in Colorado. The defendant, a citizen of another state, wishes to remove to federal court based on diversity. Which statement is correct about removal?
A.Removal is generally barred if any properly joined defendant is a citizen of Colorado, the forum state
B.The defendant may remove only if the plaintiff consents
C.Removal must occur within 90 days of service in all cases
D.Removal is available only for federal-question cases
Explanation: Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2), the forum-defendant rule bars removal of a diversity case if any properly joined and served defendant is a citizen of the state in which the action was brought. Because Colorado is the forum, an in-state defendant cannot remove a diversity action. Removal generally must occur within 30 days under § 1446(b).
10A party moves for summary judgment under Rule 56. What must the movant show to prevail?
A.That a reasonable jury could find in the movant's favor
B.That there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
C.That the opposing party's evidence is merely weak
D.That the case presents a close question of fact for the jury
Explanation: Under Rule 56(a) and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant; a 'genuine' dispute exists only if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmovant (Anderson v. Liberty Lobby).

About the CO Bar Exam

The Colorado Bar Examination is the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE), which Colorado adopted as an early UBE jurisdiction in September 2012. Administered over two days by the Colorado Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Admissions, it consists of the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE, 200 multiple-choice questions, 50% of the score), the Multistate Essay Examination (MEE, 6 essays, 30%), and the Multistate Performance Test (MPT, 2 tasks, 20%). Colorado requires a total UBE score of 276 — one of the higher cut scores in the country. The portable UBE score may be transferred to other UBE jurisdictions.

Questions

200 scored questions

Time Limit

2 days (Day 1: 6 MEE essays + 2 MPTs; Day 2: 200 MBE)

Passing Score

276 (UBE total)

Exam Fee

$710 (regular) (Colorado Supreme Court, Office of Attorney Admissions)

CO Bar Exam Content Outline

50%

MBE Core Subjects (7 Areas)

Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, and Torts — 200 multiple-choice questions on Day 2 (175 scored, 25 unscored pretest items)

30%

MEE Essay Subjects

Six essays covering Business Associations (agency, partnerships, corporations, LLCs), Conflict of Laws, Family Law, Trusts & Estates, Secured Transactions (UCC Article 9), plus MBE subjects in essay form

20%

Multistate Performance Test (MPT)

Two 90-minute closed-universe tasks testing lawyering skills: drafting memoranda, persuasive briefs, client letters, or contract provisions from a provided file and library

Essays/Practice

Colorado Water Law & Real Property

Prior-appropriation doctrine ('first in time, first in right'), beneficial use as the basis/measure/limit of a water right, senior vs. junior appropriators, and Colorado's seven specialized water courts

Essays/Practice

Colorado Tort Distinctions

Modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar under C.R.S. 13-21-111 (plaintiff barred at 50% or more fault), abolition of joint and several liability under C.R.S. 13-21-111.5, premises-liability statute (C.R.S. 13-21-115)

Essays/Practice

Colorado Civil Procedure

Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, district courts (general jurisdiction) vs. county courts (civil claims up to $25,000), 21-day response period, and the unique water-court system

How to Pass the CO Bar Exam

What You Need to Know

  • Passing score: 276 (UBE total)
  • Exam length: 200 questions
  • Time limit: 2 days (Day 1: 6 MEE essays + 2 MPTs; Day 2: 200 MBE)
  • Exam fee: $710 (regular)

Keys to Passing

  • Complete 500+ practice questions
  • Score 80%+ consistently before scheduling
  • Focus on highest-weighted sections
  • Use our AI tutor for tough concepts

CO Bar Study Tips from Top Performers

1The MBE is 50% of your score, so master all 7 subjects — Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, and Torts — and complete at least 1,500-2,000 practice MBE questions before exam day
2For the 6 MEE essays, drill the essay-only subjects hardest: Business Associations, Conflict of Laws, Family Law, Trusts & Estates, and Secured Transactions (UCC Article 9), which do not appear on the MBE
3Learn Colorado's modified comparative negligence 50% bar (C.R.S. 13-21-111): a plaintiff who is 50% or more at fault is completely barred, unlike the 51% bar used in some states
4Understand Colorado water law: the prior-appropriation doctrine ('first in time, first in right'), beneficial use as the basis and limit of a water right, and the state's unique seven water courts that have exclusive jurisdiction over water rights
5Practice the 2 MPT tasks under timed conditions (90 minutes each) — they are 20% of your score and test lawyering skills using only the provided file and library, so points come from following instructions, not memorized law
6On the MBE, remember 25 of the 200 questions are unscored pretests; keep a steady pace of about 1.8 minutes per question and do not dwell on any one item

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the passing score for the Colorado Bar Exam?

Colorado requires a total Uniform Bar Examination (UBE) score of 276 to pass — one of the higher cut scores among UBE jurisdictions. The score combines the MBE (weighted 50%), the MEE essays (30%), and the MPT tasks (20%). Because Colorado uses the UBE, the score is portable and may be transferred to other UBE states, subject to each state's own requirements.

How is the Colorado Bar Exam structured?

The Colorado Bar Exam is the Uniform Bar Examination, administered over two days. Day 1 consists of 6 Multistate Essay Examination (MEE) questions and 2 Multistate Performance Test (MPT) tasks. Day 2 is the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE): 200 multiple-choice questions in two three-hour sessions (175 scored, 25 unscored pretest items). The MBE counts for 50%, MEE for 30%, and MPT for 20% of the total UBE score.

Is Colorado a UBE state?

Yes. Colorado adopted the Uniform Bar Examination as an early UBE jurisdiction in September 2012. The UBE produces a single, portable score that an applicant may transfer to other UBE jurisdictions to seek admission, subject to each state's passing score, deadlines, and character-and-fitness requirements. Colorado's required UBE score is 276.

What subjects are tested on the Colorado Bar Exam?

The MBE tests seven subjects: Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, and Torts. The MEE essays add Business Associations, Conflict of Laws, Family Law, Trusts & Estates, and Secured Transactions (UCC Article 9), and may also test the MBE subjects. Although the UBE tests general principles, Colorado practitioners must also know state-specific law such as prior-appropriation water rights and modified comparative negligence.

What Colorado-specific law should I know beyond the UBE subjects?

Colorado has several distinctive rules. It follows the prior-appropriation doctrine for water rights ('first in time, first in right'), administered through specialized water courts. Colorado uses modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar (C.R.S. 13-21-111): a plaintiff who is 50% or more at fault recovers nothing. It has abolished joint and several liability in most negligence cases (C.R.S. 13-21-111.5), so defendants are generally liable only for their own percentage of fault.

How much does the Colorado Bar Exam cost and when is it offered?

The regular application fee is $710; a late application adds a $200 fee, totaling $910. The exam is offered twice per year, in late February and late July. Applications are filed with the Colorado Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Admissions. Colorado plans to transition to the NextGen bar exam in July 2028; until then it administers the current UBE.