Cheat sheet

Praxis SLP 5331 Cheat Sheet

Foundations & Professional Practice

33%of exam

Typical DevelopmentCranial NervesEtiology CategoriesEthics & ScopeCultural Responsiveness

Screening, Assessment & Diagnosis

33%of exam

Screening & ReferralAssessment ToolsBig Nine AreasAphasia DifferentialMotor SpeechDysphagia Safety

Treatment Planning & Implementation

33%of exam

Treatment PlanningEBP ApproachesOutcomes & DismissalGoal Writing

Quick Facts

Exam Code
5331
Credential
CCC-SLP (ASHA)
Questions
132
Time
150 min
Passing Score
162
Format
Selected-response
Fee
$146
Level
Graduate/entry-level SLP

Cranial Nerves for Swallow

V chews, VII smiles, X swallows most

V: jawVII: face/lipsIX: pharynx/tasteX: palate/larynxXII: tongue

Nodules vs Polyps (Voice)

Vocal Nodules

  • Bilateral
  • Callus-like
  • Phonotrauma overuse

Vocal Polyps

  • Usually unilateral
  • Fluid-filled
  • Single vocal trauma

Bilateral vs unilateral

Typical Development Milestones

First words
Emerge around 12 months
50-word vocabulary
Reached near 18 months
Two-word combinations
Begin 18 to 24mo
Early-8 sounds
m,b,y,n,w,d,p,h early
Middle-8 sounds
t,ng,k,g,f,v,ch,j by 5
Late-8 sounds
sh,s,z,th,voiced-th,l,r,zh by 7-8

Domain Weight Rule

Three domains, each exactly one-third

Foundations: 33%Assessment: 33%Treatment: 33%

Conductive vs Sensorineural Loss

Conductive Loss

  • Outer/middle ear
  • Often medically treatable
  • Air-bone gap present

Sensorineural Loss

  • Inner ear/nerve
  • Usually permanent
  • No air-bone gap

Mechanical vs nerve

Cranial Nerves for Speech

CN V (trigeminal)
Jaw closure, sensation
CN VII (facial)
Lips, facial expression
CN IX (glossopharyngeal)
Pharynx, posterior tongue taste
CN X (vagus)
Palate, pharynx, larynx
CN XII (hypoglossal)
Tongue movement, protrusion
Vagus damage
Biggest swallow/voice risk

Etiology Categories

Genetic
Inherited syndromes, chromosomal
Developmental
Delayed skill acquisition
Disease processes
Acquired medical conditions
Auditory
Hearing loss impact
Neurological
CNS/PNS damage
Structural/functional
Cleft, velopharyngeal insufficiency
Psychogenic
Stress-based, no organic cause

Ethics & Scope of Practice

ASHA Code of Ethics
4 core principles
Principle I
Welfare of clients
Principle II
Professional competence, credentials
Principle III
Honesty to public
Principle IV
Respect colleagues, professionals
Scope of practice
Defines SLP role boundaries
Informed consent
Client understands, agrees

Cultural & Linguistic Practice

Bilingual difference
Not automatically a disorder
Dialect (e.g. AAE)
Rule-governed, not disordered
Trained interpreter
Required, not family member
Non-biased assessment
Multiple measures and contexts
Standardized test bias
Norms may not fit

Big Nine Areas

9 areas span speech to swallowing

Speech soundFluencyVoice/resonanceLanguagePragmaticsCognitionAACHearingSwallowing

Apraxia vs Dysarthria

Apraxia of Speech

  • Planning deficit
  • Inconsistent errors
  • Groping behaviors

Dysarthria

  • Execution deficit
  • Consistent errors
  • Weak/slow movement

Plan vs execute

Which Clinical Step Next

  1. New referral arrivesScreen first(Pass/fail decision)
  2. Screening failsFull assessment(Comprehensive battery)
  3. Assessment completeWrite goals(Treatment planning)
  4. Treatment underwayMonitor progress(Adjust as needed)
  5. Goals metPlan dismissal(Generalization check)

Screening & Referral

Screening goal
Pass/fail, refer decision
Not screening
Diagnosis or severity rating
Vision/hearing check
Rule out sensory cause
Referral sources
Teachers, physicians, parents

Aphasia Fluency Rule

Anterior nonfluent, posterior fluent aphasia

Broca: anterior, nonfluentWernicke: posterior, fluentGlobal: both, nonfluentConduction: fluent, poor repetition

Aspiration vs Penetration

Aspiration

  • Below vocal folds
  • Airway violation
  • May be silent

Penetration

  • Enters larynx only
  • Above vocal folds
  • Less severe

Below vs above folds

Which Assessment Tool

  1. Articulation/phonology concernGFTA-3(Single-word artic)
  2. School-age language concernCELF-5(Norm-referenced)
  3. Infant/preschool languagePLS-5(Birth to 7)
  4. Voice quality concernCAPE-V(Perceptual rating)
  5. Stuttering severitySSI-4(Frequency + duration)
  6. Swallow safety concernMBSS or FEES(Instrumental exam)

Case History & Approach

Case history
Prior history, current concerns
Standardized test
Norm-referenced, standard scores
Criterion-referenced test
Mastery of specific skills
Dynamic assessment
Measures learning potential

Broca's vs Wernicke's Aphasia

Broca's

  • Nonfluent output
  • Comprehension relatively spared
  • Poor repetition

Wernicke's

  • Fluent but empty
  • Poor comprehension
  • Poor repetition

Output vs comprehension

Assessment Tools by Area

GFTA-3
Articulation/phonology test
CELF-5
Language test, school-age
PLS-5
Language test, birth-7
CAPE-V
Voice quality rating
SSI-4
Stuttering severity instrument
MBSS/VFSS
Videofluoroscopic swallow study
FEES
Endoscopic swallow evaluation
Pure-tone audiometry
Hearing threshold screening

Screening vs Assessment

Screening

  • Pass/fail decision
  • Quick, brief tools
  • No diagnosis

Assessment

  • In-depth evaluation
  • Standardized + informal
  • Yields diagnosis

Refer vs diagnose

The Big Nine Practice Areas

Speech sound production
Articulation, phonology
Fluency
Stuttering, cluttering
Voice/resonance/motor speech
Quality, nasality, dysarthria/apraxia
Language (receptive/expressive)
Comprehension, production skills
Pragmatics
Social communication use
Cognition
Attention, memory, executive function
AAC
Augmentative/alternative communication
Hearing
Auditory function, rehabilitation
Feeding/swallowing
Dysphagia across lifespan

Aphasia Type Differential

Broca's aphasia
Nonfluent, comprehension ok, repetition poor
Wernicke's aphasia
Fluent, comprehension poor, repetition poor
Global aphasia
Nonfluent, all poor
Conduction aphasia
Fluent, repetition poor only
Anomic aphasia
Fluent, word-finding deficit only

Motor Speech Disorders

Apraxia of speech
Planning deficit, inconsistent errors
Dysarthria
Execution deficit, consistent errors
Flaccid dysarthria
LMN damage, hypernasal, breathy
Spastic dysarthria
Bilateral UMN, strained-strangled
Ataxic dysarthria
Cerebellar, scanning speech
Hypokinetic dysarthria
Parkinson's, reduced range

Dysphagia Safety Signs

Aspiration
Food/liquid below vocal folds
Penetration
Enters larynx, above folds
Silent aspiration
No cough, no symptoms
Wet vocal quality
Residue on vocal folds
Thickened liquids
Slows bolus, reduces risk

Compensatory vs Rehabilitative Strategies

Compensatory

  • Immediate safety fix
  • Posture, diet change
  • No lasting change

Rehabilitative

  • Builds swallow strength
  • Exercises, maneuvers
  • Lasting physiologic change

Now vs long-term

Which Dysphagia Strategy

  1. Thin liquid aspirationThicken liquids(Slows bolus)
  2. Delayed swallow triggerChin tuck(Protects airway)
  3. Reduced laryngeal closureEffortful swallow(Rehabilitative)
  4. Reduced tongue-base retractionMendelsohn maneuver(Extends closure)
  5. Unilateral pharyngeal weaknessHead turn(Toward weak side)

Treatment Planning Essentials

SMART goals
Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound
Prognosis factors
Severity, motivation, support, comorbidities
Baseline data
Establishes pre-treatment performance level
Short-term objectives
Steps toward long-term goal
Stimulability
Sound produced with cues
Treatment hierarchy
Isolation to conversation level

Which Treatment Approach

  1. Multiple phonological errorsCycles approach(Rotate patterns)
  2. Few sound contrasts missingMinimal pairs(Meaning-based contrast)
  3. Core stuttering behaviorsStuttering modification(Ease the moment)
  4. Building overall fluencyFluency shaping(Rate, breath control)
  5. Limited functional speechAAC evaluation(Aided or unaided)
  6. Parkinson's hypophoniaLSVT LOUD(Increase vocal loudness)

EBP Treatment Approaches

Minimal pairs
Contrast therapy, phonology
Cycles approach
Phonological patterns, rotating targets
Stuttering modification
Reduce struggle, ease moments
Fluency shaping
Rebuild fluent speech patterns
Milieu teaching
Naturalistic language intervention
PECS
Picture exchange communication system

Outcomes & Dismissal

Generalization
Skill transfers, new contexts
Maintenance
Skill holds without support
Dismissal criteria
Goals met, plateau reached
Progress monitoring
Ongoing data, adjust plan

Common Traps

Screening vs Diagnosis

Screening refers only Assessment yields diagnosis

Bilingual vs Disordered

Difference is not disorder Compare both languages

Aspiration vs Penetration

Aspiration goes below folds Penetration stays above folds

Apraxia vs Dysarthria

Apraxia plans wrong Dysarthria executes weak

Compensation vs Rehabilitation

Compensation is immediate fix Rehab builds strength

Interpreter vs Family Member

Use trained interpreters Avoid child interpreting

Documentation vs Effort Notes

Skilled notes show data Effort alone is insufficient

Last Minute

  1. 1.132 questions, 150 minutes total
  2. 2.Domains split evenly 33/33/33
  3. 3.ASHA requires score of 162
  4. 4.Screen first, then assess fully
  5. 5.Bilingual difference is not disorder
  6. 6.Aspiration goes below vocal folds
  7. 7.Apraxia plans wrong, dysarthria executes weak
  8. 8.Use trained interpreters, not family
  9. 9.Vagus nerve drives most swallowing
  10. 10.Goals need measurable, observable data
Same family resources

Explore More Praxis Exams

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.