Cheat sheet

ISPON HSE Level 3 Cheat Sheet

HSE Management Systems and Auditing

Not publishedof exam

Risk Assessment and Change Control

Not publishedof exam

Permits, SIMOPS and Emergency Response

Not publishedof exam

Environment, EIA and Spill Response

Not publishedof exam

Nigerian Law and HSE Performance

Not publishedof exam

Quick Facts

Exam
ISPON HSE Level 3
Body
ISPON, Nigeria
Tier
Supervisory HSE
Course fee
N150,000 listed by ISPON
Format
Not published by ISPON
Pass mark
Not published by ISPON
Weights
Not published by ISPON
Booking
ISPON branch office
Used for
GISPN membership route
Blueprint
None published

PDCA in ISO 45001

Plan 4-6, Do 7-8, Check 9, Act 10

Plan: context, leadership, planningDo: support and operationCheck: performance evaluationAct: improvement

Correction vs Corrective Action

Correction

  • Fixes the outcome
  • Clean, replace, re-brief
  • Event can recur

Corrective action

  • Removes the cause
  • Requires cause investigation
  • Checks elsewhere too

Symptom versus cause

Grading an Audit Finding

  1. Required process absentMajor nonconformity
  2. System-wide breakdownMajor nonconformity
  3. Many minors, one clauseMajor nonconformity(Clustered lapses)
  4. Isolated single lapseMinor nonconformity
  5. Risk seen, no breachObservation
  6. Better method availableOpportunity for improvement

ISO 45001 Clause Map

Clauses 1-3
No auditable requirementsNot audited
Clause 4
Context, interested parties, scope
Clause 5
Leadership, policy, worker participation
Clause 6
Hazards, legal duties, objectives
Clause 7
Resources, competence, communication, records
Clause 8
Controls, change, procurement, emergency
Clause 9
Monitoring, internal audit, review
Clause 10
Incident, nonconformity, corrective action

Why Shortcuts Win

Soon, Certain, Positive beats Late, Uncertain, Negative

Shortcut pays immediatelyInjury stays uncertainChange the consequence

Internal Audit vs Management Review

Internal audit

  • Clause 9.2
  • Independent sampling
  • Conformity and implementation

Management review

  • Clause 9.3
  • Top management decides
  • Suitability, adequacy, effectiveness

Audit feeds the review

Clause 8 Sub-Clauses

8.1.1
Operational planning and control
8.1.2
Eliminate hazards, reduce risks
8.1.3
Management of change
8.1.4.1
Procurement control, general
8.1.4.2
Contractor coordination and criteria
8.1.4.3
Outsourced function control
8.2
Emergency preparedness and response

Consultation vs Participation

Consultation

  • Seeking workers' views
  • Before the decision
  • Views may be declined

Participation

  • Involvement in deciding
  • Non-managerial workers emphasised
  • Barriers must be removed

Asked versus involved

Audit Evidence Chain

Criteria
Standard, law, own procedure
Evidence
Records, statements, observations
Finding
Evidence judged against criteria
Conclusion
Outcome of whole audit
Major NC
Required process absent or collapsed
Minor NC
Isolated lapse, system works
Observation
Risk flagged, no breach
OFI
Suggestion, no action compelled

Prequalification vs Bridging Document

Prequalification

  • Before contract award
  • Capability and record
  • Screens the bidder

Bridging document

  • After contract award
  • Whose procedure governs
  • Activity by activity

Select versus integrate

ISO 19011 Audit Principles

Integrity
Basis of professional conduct
Fair presentation
Report truthfully and accurately
Due professional care
Diligence and sound judgement
Confidentiality
Protect information obtained
Independence
Impartial, no conflict of interest
Evidence-based
Verifiable, reproducible conclusions
Risk-based
Added in 2018 revisionNew 2018

Contractor HSE Control

Prequalification
Screen capability before award
HSE award criteria
Required by clause 8.1.4
Bridging document
States whose procedure governs
Kick-off meeting
Agree scope, controls, interfaces
Site induction
Before any work starts
Interface hazards
Yours, theirs, third parties
Performance review
Measured during the contract
Close-out rating
Feeds the next prequalification

Behavioural Safety Terms

ABC model
Antecedent, behaviour, consequence
Strong consequence
Soon, certain and positive
Observation card
Records behaviour, never names
Bradley Curve
Reactive to interdependent, four stages
Hudson ladder
Pathological to generative, five rungs
Just culture
Separates error from violation

Change Triggers: Four Ps

Plant, Process, People, Procedure

Each triggers risk reviewTemporary change needs expiryName a restoring owner

HAZOP vs Task Risk Assessment

HAZOP

  • Design or process deviations
  • Team, nodes, guide words
  • Applies to the plant

Task risk assessment

  • One crew, one job
  • Today's actual conditions
  • Applies to the work

Plant versus task

Risk Assessment Review Triggers

Incident or near miss
Same task reassessed
Plant change
New or modified equipment
Process change
New method, chemical, sequence
People change
New crew or competence gap
Procedure change
Revised instruction or permit
Control failure
Barrier found not working
Legal change
New law or standard
Review date
Stated expiry already reached

Assessor vs Risk Owner

Assessor

  • Signs the method
  • Applied the technique
  • No budget authority

Line manager

  • Accepts residual risk
  • Owns the actions
  • Controls people and money

Method versus accountability

Bow-Tie Anatomy

Threat
Cause on the left
Top event
Loss of control
Consequence
Outcome on the right
Preventive barrier
Left of top event
Recovery barrier
Limits consequence severity
Escalation factor
Defeats a chosen barrier
Escalation control
Protects that barrier

HAZOP Guide Words

No or none
Design intent not achieved
More
Higher flow, pressure, temperature
Less
Lower than design intent
Reverse
Opposite of design intent
As well as
Intent plus something extra
Part of
Only some intent achieved
Other than
Completely different result

Emergency Exercise Picker

  1. Test decisions cheaplyTabletop exercise
  2. Plan never exercisedTabletop first(Cheapest failure)
  3. Test one system liveFunctional drill
  4. Prove muster timingTimed evacuation drill
  5. Test whole responseFull-scale exercise
  6. After real emergencyReview and revise plan(Clause 8.2)

Permit System Audit Checks

Live permit sample
Compare against actual work
Isolation cross-reference
Permit names isolation certificate
Register reconciliation
Office list versus field
Expired permits
Closed without handback signature
Gas test timing
Retested after breaks, changes
Role separation
Issuer never the holder
Display at worksite
Permit present where work happens
SIMOPS clash matrix
Reviewed at daily meeting

Emergency Preparedness Elements

Planned response
Written, role-specific actions
Training
Everyone knows their duty
Periodic testing
Exercises on a schedule
Post-event revision
Update after test, emergency
Communication
Workers, contractors, visitors, authorities
Mutual aid
External resources agreed beforehand
Rescue plan
Non-entry retrieval planned first
Receiving hospital
Named and capability confirmed

Incident Command Basics

Span of control
Three to seven reports
Optimal span
Five direct reports
Unity of command
One supervisor per responder
Command post
Single agreed control point
Muster roll call
Named list, not headcount
Media handling
Never the on-scene supervisor

Nigeria EIA Sequence

Screen, Scope, Study, Review, Decide, Monitor

Screen: ten working daysPublic review: 21 daysCertificate before constructionAudit after commissioning

EIA Category I vs II

Category I

  • Full EIA mandatory
  • Mandatory study list
  • Highest impact potential

Category II

  • Partial EIA normally
  • Sensitive area reassigns it
  • Then full EIA required

Location can upgrade category

Nigeria EIA Process Stages

Project proposal
Submitted to the Ministry
Screening
Category I, II or III
Screening report
Ten working days
Scoping
Terms of reference agreed
Draft EIA report
Full study submitted
Review method notice
Fifteen working days
Public display
Twenty-one working days
Certification
Certificate, then post-commissioning audit

EIA Minimum Content

Proposed activities
Described in the report
Affected environment
Baseline conditions described
Impacts and alternatives
Direct, indirect, cumulative, long-term
Mitigation measures
Identified and assessed
Knowledge gaps
Uncertainty stated explicitly
Transboundary effects
Other states or countries
Non-technical summary
Brief, plain-language overview

Oil Spill Tiers Nigeria

Tier 1 inland
25 barrels or less
Tier 1 land/coastal
250 barrels or less
Tier 2 inland
25 to 250 barrels
Tier 2 land/coastal
250 to 2,500 barrels
Tier 3 inland
250 barrels or more
Tier 3 land/coastal
Over 2,500 barrels
Tier 1 resources
Operator's own equipment
Tier 2 resources
Mutual aid, Clean Nigeria Associates
Tier 3 activation
NOSDRA National Commander
Spill notification
Within 24 hours, writtenNOSDRA

Waste Duty of Care

Classify at source
Where the waste arises
Segregate
Separate streams, no mixing
Transfer note
Tracks each consignment
Permitted carrier
Licence checked and copied
Permitted destination
Named facility, current permit
Returned copy
Proof of lawful disposal
Aspect
Activity touching the environment
Impact
Resulting environmental change

Scene Evidence: Four Ps

People, Position, Parts, Paper

People: witnesses firstPosition: photograph before movingParts: components and damagePaper: permits, logs, handovers

Improvement vs Prohibition Notice

Improvement notice

  • Section 37
  • States the danger
  • Work may continue

Prohibition notice

  • Section 38
  • Stops the process
  • Revoked after rectification

Fix it versus stop

Investigation Method Picker

  1. Single obvious causal chain5 Whys(Fast, one branch)
  2. Cause genuinely unknownFishbone diagram(Spreads candidate causes)
  3. Barrier failure suspectedBow-tie analysis(Exposes single barriers)
  4. Sequence unclearTimeline and causal factors
  5. Equipment failure logicFault tree analysis
  6. Repeat organisational eventTripod Beta or ICAM

Factories Act Duties

Section 23
Instruct, then train or supervise
Section 51
Death or over 3 days
Section 53
Notify occupational disease forthwith
Section 58
General register of accidents
Section 59
Keep records seven years
Section 60
Post abstract, inspector address
Section 61
Workers must not misuse safeguards
Section 73
Agent liable as the occupier
Section 74
Occupier defence, three days notice

TRIR vs LTIFR

TRIR

  • Base 200,000 hours
  • All recordable cases
  • OSHA convention

LTIFR

  • Base 1,000,000 hours
  • Lost-time injuries only
  • ILO and IOGP convention

Different bases, never compare

Who to Notify in Nigeria

  1. Death at workFactory inspector, forthwith(Factories Act section 51)
  2. Disabled beyond three daysFactory inspector, forthwith(Factories Act section 51)
  3. Occupational disease suspectedNearest factory inspector(Factories Act section 53)
  4. Any employee injuryBoard within 7 days(Compensation Act section 5)
  5. Oil spill occursNOSDRA within 24 hours(Written notification)
  6. Hazardous substance dischargedNESREA(NESREA Act section 27)
  7. New project, significant impactsFederal Ministry of Environment(EIA Act)

Enforcement and Liability

Section 37
Improvement notice, work continues
Section 38
Prohibition notice, work stops
Section 39
Appeal Minister, then Federal High Court
Section 71
Penalty when death, injury
NESREA section 27
Hazardous discharge is prohibited
NESREA 27(4)
Person in charge deemed guilty
Due diligence defence
Prove no knowledge, full diligence
ISPON Act 2014
Holding out unregistered is offence

HSE Performance Metrics

TRIR
Recordables per 200,000 hours
LTIFR
Lost-time injuries per 1,000,000 hours
Severity rate
Days lost per event
Leading indicator
Audits, observations, actions closed
Lagging indicator
Injuries, illnesses, spills, losses
Exposure hours
Denominator includes contractors

Compensation Act Clocks

Employee notice
14 days to employer
Employer report
7 days to Board
Death report
Immediately to the Board
Claim window
One year from occurrence
Special circumstances
Extended to three years
Employer contribution
Minimum 1.0 per cent payroll
Fund administrator
NSITF Management Board
No employee notice
Bars the compensation claim

Common Traps

Correction vs cause

Correction fixes the outcome Corrective action removes cause

Audit vs review

Audit samples for conformity Review is top management

Improvement vs prohibition

Improvement notice: work continues Prohibition notice: work stops

Injury rate bases

TRIR uses 200,000 hours LTIFR uses 1,000,000 hours

Consultation vs participation

Consultation seeks views only Participation shares the decision

Category II is not safe

Category II normally partial Sensitive area forces full

ILO-OSH is not certifiable

ISO 45001 certifies ILO-OSH is voluntary guidance

Spill tiers differ by water

Inland thresholds are lower Land and coastal ten-fold

Who owns residual risk

Assessor signs the method Line manager accepts risk

Filed permits prove nothing

Files prove forms completed Field sampling proves control

Last Minute

  1. 1.Clauses 4-10 = auditable requirements
  2. 2.Correction = outcome; corrective = cause
  3. 3.Major NC = required process absent
  4. 4.Audit samples; management review decides
  5. 5.Clause 8.1.4 = contractor HSE criteria
  6. 6.Untested plan fails clause 8.2
  7. 7.Inspector notified: death, over 3 days
  8. 8.Occupational disease: notify inspector forthwith
  9. 9.Oil spill: NOSDRA within 24 hours
  10. 10.Employer reports injury within 7 days
  11. 11.Employee notifies employer within 14 days
  12. 12.Section 73 = supervisor personally liable
  13. 13.Improvement notice continues; prohibition stops work
  14. 14.TRIR = 200,000; LTIFR = 1,000,000
  15. 15.EIA screening report: 10 working days
  16. 16.Public EIA display = 21 working days
  17. 17.Tier 1 inland = 25 barrels
  18. 18.Every temporary change needs expiry
  19. 19.ISPON format and weights: not published
Same family resources

Explore More Institute of Safety Professionals of Nigeria (ISPON)

Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.