8.2 Trigonometric Method for Multi-Leg Slings

While the Uniform Load Method (ULM) provides a safe, conservative rating system for general-purpose reusable slings, the Trigonometric Method calculates exact sling leg tension based on actual vector geometry. By calculating precise tension forces ($T$) as a function of the specific leg angle, lifting engineers can optimize sling selection for engineered lifts. However, because the Trigonometric Method relies on precise, unvarying geometry, standard regulatory bodies—including LEEA and BS EN standards—impose strict rules governing when and how trigonometric rating may be lawfully applied.

---

Vector Derivation and Mathematical Formulations

In any multi-leg sling system carrying a total weight $W$ evenly distributed across $N$ sling legs, static equilibrium requires that the sum of the vertical force components of all legs must equal the total load weight.

Let:

• $W = \text{Total gross load weight (tonnes or kN)}$
• $N = \text{Number of load-bearing sling legs}$
• $\theta = \beta = \text{Angle of sling leg to the vertical plumb line (degrees)}$
• $\alpha = \text{Angle of sling leg to the horizontal load surface (degrees)}$

Because the vertical plumb line and the horizontal load plane are perpendicular, $\theta + \alpha = 90^\circ$.

1. Formula Using Angle to Vertical ($\theta$)

The vertical force component supported by each leg is $V = \frac{W}{N}$. From right-triangle trigonometry at the hook apex:

$\cos\theta = \frac{\text{Vertical Force per Leg}}{\text{Tension per Leg}} = \frac{W / N}{T}$

Solving for Leg Tension ($T$):

$T = \frac{W}{N \cdot \cos\theta}$

2. Formula Using Angle to Horizontal ($\alpha$)

If the angle is measured from the horizontal surface of the load ($\alpha$):

$\sin\alpha = \frac{W / N}{T} \implies T = \frac{W}{N \cdot \sin\alpha}$

Equivalence of Formulas

Since $\cos\theta = \sin(90^\circ - \theta) = \sin\alpha$, both equations yield identical leg tension values. Riggers must verify which angle convention is being referenced to avoid catastrophic errors (e.g., confusing a $30^\circ$ angle to vertical with a $30^\circ$ angle to horizontal).

---

LEEA Regulations & Conditions for Trig Method Use

Under LEEA guidelines and BS EN 818 / BS EN 13414, general-purpose multi-leg slings intended for routine, day-to-day site lifting must ALWAYS be rated and marked according to the Uniform Load Method.

The Trigonometric Method is ONLY PERMITTED when ALL of the following engineering criteria are satisfied:

1. Dedicated Single-Purpose Lift: The sling assembly is manufactured and used exclusively for a single, specific load item (e.g., a turbine rotor or pre-fabricated offshore module).
2. Fixed and Known Geometry: The picking points, lug positions, and hook height are permanently fixed and cannot change during handling.
3. Verified Center of Gravity: The location of the load's Center of Gravity (CG) is accurately known, verified by engineering calculation or weighing, and centered relative to the picking points.
4. Matched Leg Lengths: The sling legs are manufactured to exact, precision tolerances to ensure equal load sharing.
5. Specialized Tagging: The sling identification tag is explicitly stamped with the specific load geometry, exact leg angle, and dedicated Working Load Limit (e.g., "RATED FOR TURBINE SKID #4 ONLY AT 25° TO VERTICAL").

If a sling rated by the Trigonometric Method is accidentally used for a different load with a wider angle, severe overload and structural failure can result.

---

Angle vs. Tension Multiplier Analysis

To visualize how leg tension increases as sling legs spread wider, consider a 2-leg sling lifting a 1.0-tonne load ($W = 1.0\text{ t}, N = 2$). The vertical load component per leg is $0.5\text{ tonnes}$.

Key engineering observations from this data:

• At $\theta = 45^\circ$, leg tension is $1.414$ times the vertical load share ($0.707 W$).
• At $\theta = 60^\circ$, leg tension doubles relative to vertical baseline ($1.000 W$), meaning each leg carries the entire weight of the load.
• Beyond $60^\circ$, tension grows exponentially. At $\theta = 75^\circ$, each leg experiences nearly double the total load weight ($1.932 W$).

---

Horizontal Compressive Vector Forces

In addition to vertical leg tension, angled sling legs exert powerful inward horizontal forces ($H$) on the load. These compressive forces attempt to crush structural members, buckling slender beams or cylindrical shells.

The horizontal force per sling leg is calculated as:

$H = T \cdot \sin\theta = \left(\frac{W}{N \cdot \cos\theta}\right) \cdot \sin\theta = \frac{W}{N} \cdot \tan\theta$

For a 2-leg sling lifting weight $W$:

• At $\theta = 30^\circ$: $H = (W / 2) \cdot \tan(30^\circ) = 0.289 W$
• At $\theta = 45^\circ$: $H = (W / 2) \cdot \tan(45^\circ) = 0.500 W$
• At $\theta = 60^\circ$: $H = (W / 2) \cdot \tan(60^\circ) = 0.866 W$

When lifting fragile or thin-walled structures, a spreader beam must be used to absorb these horizontal compressive forces, keeping the sling legs vertical below the beam.

---

Step-by-Step Worked Numerical Examples

Worked Example 1: Precision Trigonometric Tension Calculation

Problem: A dedicated offshore compressor skid weighing $14.5\text{ tonnes}$ is fitted with a custom 4-leg wire rope sling. The rigging geometry is fixed such that each leg forms an angle of exactly $\theta = 22^\circ$ to the vertical plumb line. A spreader frame ensures equal load sharing across all 4 legs ($N = 4$). Calculate:

1. Tension in each sling leg ($T$).
2. Total inward horizontal compressive force acting on the skid frame.

Solution:

1. Calculate Leg Tension ($T$): $T = \frac{W}{N \cdot \cos\theta} = \frac{14.5\text{ tonnes}}{4 \cdot \cos(22^\circ)}$ $\cos(22^\circ) = 0.9272$ $T = \frac{14.5}{4 \cdot 0.9272} = \frac{14.5}{3.7087} = 3.910\text{ tonnes per leg}$

2. Calculate Horizontal Compressive Force per Side ($H$): $H = \frac{W}{N} \cdot \tan(22^\circ) = \frac{14.5}{4} \cdot 0.4040 = 3.625 \times 0.4040 = 1.465\text{ tonnes per leg}$ Since there are two legs on each side of the frame, the total horizontal compression along the longitudinal axis is $2 \times 1.465 = 2.93\text{ tonnes}$.

Worked Example 2: Comparing Trigonometric Method vs. ULM Capacity

Problem: Compare the rated capacity of a 2-leg 16mm Grade 80 chain sling ($WLL_{single} = 8.0\text{ tonnes}$) operating at a fixed angle of $\theta = 20^\circ$ to the vertical using:

1. The Uniform Load Method.
2. The Trigonometric Method.

Solution:

1. ULM Capacity: For $20^\circ$ to vertical ($0^\circ$–$45^\circ$ range), ULM factor is $1.4$: $WLL_{ULM} = 1.4 \times 8.0\text{ t} = 11.2\text{ tonnes}$

2. Trigonometric Capacity: $WLL_{Trig} = 2 \cdot WLL_{single} \cdot \cos(20^\circ) = 2 \cdot 8.0 \cdot 0.9397 = 15.035\text{ tonnes}$

Engineering Analysis: The Trigonometric Method allows a higher payload ($15.03\text{ t}$ vs $11.2\text{ t}$) because the actual angle ($20^\circ$) is significantly steeper than the conservative $45^\circ$ baseline assumed by ULM. However, this higher capacity is ONLY legal if the lift satisfies all LEEA requirements for dedicated, fixed-geometry lifting!