1.1 BSB Centralised Assessment Structure & Regulations

1.1 BSB Centralised Assessment Structure & Regulations

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) regulates barristers in England and Wales and sets the qualification standards for call to the Bar. Under the Bar Training framework that replaced the BPTC from the 2020/21 academic year, two subjects are centrally examined: Civil Litigation and Evidence, and Criminal Litigation, Evidence and Sentencing. Both papers are written and marked by the BSB through its Central Examination Board (CEB) — a panel of senior practitioners, academics and psychometricians — and sat through your Authorised Education and Training Organisation (AETO). Knowing exactly what the paper is, how the pass standard is built, and which decisions belong to the BSB rather than your provider is the first piece of exam technique, because it determines what you can and cannot challenge after results day.

---

1. Examination parameters

The distinction between an MCQ and an SBA matters. In a conventional MCQ one option is right and the rest are wrong. In an SBA, several options may be legally accurate statements, but only one is the best answer to the question actually asked — usually the correct next procedural step, the correct statutory route, or the rule that actually governs the facts. Distractors are typically right rules applied at the wrong stage, in the wrong court, or by the wrong party. Each item gives a short factual vignette, a lead-in question, and four options.

---

2. What the syllabus actually is

The examinable content is fixed by the annual Bar Training Criminal Litigation Syllabus, published by the BSB. The 2026 syllabus was published on 10 December 2025, applies to every centrally set assessment sat in the calendar year 2026, and is expressed as 28 numbered topics broken down into numbered sub-topics. For each sub-topic it names the precise paragraphs of Blackstone's that are examinable — often down to "first sub-paragraph ending '…'".

Three consequences follow, and they are worth more marks than any revision technique:

1. If it is not in the syllabus list, it is not on the paper. The syllabus is exhaustive, not indicative.
2. The syllabus distinguishes "explanatory material (which will not be assessed)" from "examinable material". Topic 1 is almost entirely explanatory scaffolding; Topics 14–17 are dense examinable material.
3. There is a content cut-off date. The 2026 syllabus is up to date to 31 July 2025, the date to which the main volume of Blackstone's 2026 is current. Later reforms are not examinable unless the BSB issues an amendment.

The BSB also publishes an indicative guide to the spread of questions by topic. It is a guide only: a "0" against a topic does not mean the topic is excluded. The BSB does not publish percentage domain weightings for this assessment — any source quoting fixed percentage weights for Criminal Litigation is not quoting the BSB.

---

3. Standard setting: how the pass mark is built

The BSB does not use a fixed raw pass mark. The CEB uses the Angoff method, a criterion-referenced, test-centred standard-setting technique also used for postgraduate medical MCQ examinations.

1. Judges, drawn from experienced practitioners and academics, review every item on the paper.
2. For each item, each judge estimates how a group of borderline (just-competent) candidates would perform — i.e. what proportion would answer it correctly.
3. Estimates are collated, discussed and refined, and the sum across the 75 items produces a recommended pass standard for that paper.
4. The Final Board endorses (or adjusts) that recommendation, after removing or double-keying any item that performed badly.

Because the standard tracks the difficulty of the paper actually sat, the raw mark needed changes between sittings. Recent published pass standards for Criminal Litigation have included 41/75, 42/75, 44/75 and 46/75.

The reporting rule that confuses candidates: whatever the raw pass standard, marks are translated and reported to AETOs on a scale where the pass mark equals 60%. So if the pass standard is 43/75 (in reality 57.3%), a candidate scoring 43 is reported as having scored 60%, and every other score is rescaled accordingly. A "60%" on your transcript therefore tells you that you reached the standard — not that you scored 60% of the marks.

Grading. Under the current Bar Training regime the BSB does not prescribe grade boundaries: centralised assessments are reported as competent or not competent. Individual AETOs may attach their own institutional labels (Distinction/Merit/Pass, or Outstanding/Very Competent/Competent) to your academic award, and those labels are not comparable between providers. The four-band Outstanding / Very Competent / Competent / Not Competent scheme in older CEB Chairs' Reports belongs to the legacy BPTC.

---

4. Attempts, currency and who decides what

• Re-sits. For candidates on the current Bar training pathways, the BSB does not cap the number of re-sits you may take at a centralised assessment. Your AETO may impose a maximum number of attempts under its own institutional assessment regulations, so the operative limit is usually your provider's, not the regulator's. (Legacy BPTC candidates had three attempts at each assessment.)
• Five-year currency. You have five years from enrolment in which to pass all vocational-component assessments. No extension of time is possible after five years have elapsed, under any circumstances.
• "Fit to sit". This is an AETO policy, not an absolute BSB rule. Some AETOs require a fit-to-sit form on the day; others take a declaration at enrolment that presenting yourself for the exam means you are fit to sit it. Where such a policy applies, sitting the paper generally forecloses a later mitigating-circumstances claim about your condition on the day — so read your provider's policy before, not after, the exam.
• Who to ask. Reasonable adjustments, mitigating circumstances, deferrals, overseas sittings, fit-to-sit queries, mock papers and results-release dates are all AETO matters. The BSB will not correspond with individual candidates about results.

---

5. After results: what can and cannot be challenged

Both applications are made through MyBar, and an outcome is communicated within 20 working days of receipt of the request or payment, whichever is later. Neither route allows you to argue that a question was too hard or that another option was arguably right: that is academic judgment, and it is not reviewable.

---

Exam traps in this section

• Do not state a fixed pass mark. The pass standard is set per sitting; 60% is the reported figure, not the raw threshold.
• Do not assume the BSB limits re-sits under the current regime; the cap, if any, is your AETO's.
• Do not treat "fit to sit" as a BSB rule of universal application — it is an AETO policy.
• The syllabus text is Blackstone's, not Archbold. Archbold is an excellent practitioner work; it is not the BSB's syllabus text.