3.1 Right to Bail & Statutory Exceptions
Key Takeaways
- Section 4 of the Bail Act 1976 creates a general statutory presumption in favour of bail for all accused persons appearing before a court.
- The primary grounds for withholding bail under Schedule 1, Part 1 are substantial grounds for believing the defendant would fail to surrender, commit an offence, or interfere with witnesses.
- Under Schedule 1, Paragraph 9, courts must evaluate the nature and seriousness of the offence, the defendant's character and antecedents, record of complying with bail, and the strength of the evidence.
- The 'No Real Prospect' test under LASPO 2012 prevents remanding a defendant in custody if there is no real prospect of a custodial sentence upon conviction, subject to specified statutory exceptions.
- Section 25 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 restricts bail for defendants charged with murder, manslaughter, or rape who have relevant prior convictions, permitting bail only in exceptional circumstances.
3.1 Right to Bail & Statutory Exceptions
Pre-trial liberty is a fundamental tenet of the criminal justice system in England and Wales. The law balances the constitutional presumption of innocence and the right to liberty under Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) against the public interest in ensuring that defendants attend court, refrain from committing further offences, and do not interfere with the administration of justice.
The Statutory Presumption in Favour of Bail
The primary statutory foundation for pre-trial release is Section 4 of the Bail Act 1976. Section 4 establishes a general statutory presumption in favour of bail:
- Every person accused of an offence appearing before a magistrates' court or the Crown Court must be granted bail, except as provided in Schedule 1 to the Act.
- The right applies to defendants appearing at initial hearings, remanded for inquiries or reports, or awaiting sentence after conviction (unless the court considers there is no real prospect of a non-custodial outcome).
- Bail may be granted by the police (custody officer under PACE 1984 as amended by the Policing and Crime Act 2017) prior to first court appearance, or by the court.
Where a person is brought before a court charged with an imprisonable offence, the court MUST grant bail unless one of the statutory exceptions in Schedule 1 to the Bail Act 1976 is established by the prosecution.
Primary Statutory Exceptions to Bail (Schedule 1, Part 1)
For offences punishable with imprisonment, Schedule 1, Part 1, Paragraph 2 of the Bail Act 1976 sets out the three primary grounds upon which a court may withhold bail. The court must be satisfied that there are substantial grounds for believing that the defendant, if released on bail (whether subject to conditions or not), would:
- Fail to surrender to custody (FTS);
- Commit an offence while on bail (COB); or
- Interfere with witnesses or otherwise obstruct the course of justice (IOCJ).
The Legal Standard: "Substantial Grounds for Believing"
The statutory threshold requires more than mere suspicion or police apprehension. The prosecution must establish, and the court must find, objective facts justifying a reasonable belief that one or more of the specified risks will materialize if the defendant is released.
Secondary Statutory Grounds for Withholding Bail
Beyond the primary three grounds, Schedule 1, Part 1 provides additional specific exceptions:
- Own Protection or Welfare (Paragraph 3): Bail may be refused if the court is satisfied that the defendant should be kept in custody for their own protection or, if a child or young person, for their own welfare.
- Serving Custodial Sentence (Paragraph 4): Bail may be refused if the defendant is already in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment for another offence.
- Lack of Sufficient Information (Paragraph 5): Bail may be withheld for a short period where the court is satisfied that it has not been practicable to obtain sufficient information to make a bail decision for want of time.
- Previous Breach of Conditional Bail (Paragraph 6): Bail may be refused where the defendant has previously been arrested under Section 7 of the Bail Act 1976 for breaching bail conditions in the current proceedings.
The Statutory Balancing Exercise: Schedule 1, Paragraph 9 Factors
When evaluating whether there are substantial grounds under Paragraph 2, the court MUST take into account all relevant statutory factors specified in Schedule 1, Part 1, Paragraph 9 of the Bail Act 1976:
| Statutory Factor | Legal Application and Considerations |
|---|---|
| Nature and Seriousness of Offence | Gravity of the charged offence and probable sentence upon conviction. Facing a lengthy custodial sentence increases the incentive to abscond or obstruct justice. |
| Character, Antecedents, Associations, & Ties | Defendant's criminal record (antecedents), employment history, community ties, family responsibilities, and fixed address. |
| Bail Compliance Record | Defendant's past record regarding compliance with bail conditions and court attendance in previous proceedings. |
| Strength of Prosecution Evidence | A strong prosecution case increases the likelihood of conviction and sentence, reinforcing grounds for remand. |
Restrictions on Refusing Bail: The "Real Prospect" Test
Introduced by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012) into Paragraph 1A of Schedule 1, Part 1, the "Real Prospect" Test restricts pre-trial remands in custody for minor offences.
Under Paragraph 1A, a court CANNOT refuse bail under Paragraph 2 (FTS, COB, IOCJ) if it appears to the court that there is no real prospect that the defendant will be sentenced to a custodial term if convicted of the offence.
This statutory safeguard prevents defendants from serving pre-trial custodial remands that exceed any sentence a court would realistically impose upon conviction. The rule is subject to narrow statutory exceptions (e.g. where there is a risk of domestic violence or previous failure to surrender in the current proceedings).
Statutory Restrictions for Homicide & Serious Sexual Offences
Specific statutory regimes override or restrict the general right to bail for grave offences:
Section 25 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994)
Where a defendant is charged with murder, manslaughter, or rape (or attempt), AND has a prior conviction for any such offence, Section 25 provides that bail MUST NOT be granted unless the court is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying bail.
Exclusive Crown Court Jurisdiction for Murder
Under Section 115 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (amending the Senior Courts Act 1981), a magistrates' court has no jurisdiction to consider or grant bail in murder cases. The magistrates must remand the defendant in custody and send the case to the Crown Court, where a Crown Court judge must hear any bail application within 48 hours of the initial appearance.
A defendant with stable employment, a fixed address, and no prior criminal record appears before a magistrates' court charged with an either-way offence of theft. The prosecution opposes bail solely on the ground that the stolen property has not yet been recovered by the police. The magistrates refuse bail, citing the non-recovery of stolen goods. Which statement correctly evaluates the lawfulness of the magistrates' decision?
A defendant appears before a magistrates' court charged with murder. Defence counsel requests that the magistrates grant conditional bail comprising a curfew and electronic monitoring. How must the magistrates deal with the bail application?
A defendant is charged with common assault, a summary offence carrying a maximum penalty of 6 months imprisonment. The defendant has no prior convictions, and the court determines that there is no real prospect that the defendant would receive a custodial sentence if convicted. The prosecution opposes bail on the sole ground that the defendant might commit a further non-violent summary offence. Can the court remand the defendant in custody under Schedule 1, Part 1, Paragraph 2?