14.2 Crime and Fidelity Coverage
Key Takeaways
- ISO commercial crime coverage is written on either the Crime Coverage Form CR 00 20 (discovery) or CR 00 21 (loss sustained); the two forms differ in how they treat when a loss is covered relative to discovery
- Employee Theft (Insuring Agreement 1) is the fidelity component, covering loss of money, securities, and other property caused by a dishonest employee; it is fidelity coverage, not third-party crime coverage
- Forgery or Alteration, Inside the Premises (theft/robbery/safe burglary), Outside the Premises (messenger), Computer Fraud, Funds Transfer Fraud, and Money Orders/Counterfeit Money round out the standard insuring agreements
- Discovery form covers losses discovered during the policy period regardless of when they occurred; loss-sustained form covers losses both occurring and discovered during the policy period (with a discovery extension)
- Crime exclusions remove acts by the named insured, indirect/consequential loss, war, and (critically) trading and inventory shortages provable only by an inventory computation
Fidelity Versus Crime
Fidelity coverage protects the insured against loss caused by its own dishonest employees. Crime coverage is broader, adding loss caused by third parties — robbers, forgers, computer fraudsters. The modern ISO program folds both into one set of insuring agreements under the Commercial Crime Coverage Form.
Quick Answer: Employee Theft is the fidelity piece (inside threat); the other insuring agreements address outside threats.
The two principal forms are the CR 00 20 (Discovery Form) and the CR 00 21 (Loss Sustained Form). Both list the same insuring agreements; they differ only in the trigger that decides whether a loss is covered.
The Standard Insuring Agreements
Each insuring agreement carries its own limit and deductible and must be activated in the declarations.
| # | Insuring Agreement | What It Covers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Employee Theft | Loss of money, securities, property by employee dishonesty (the fidelity core) |
| 2 | Forgery or Alteration | Loss from forged/altered checks, drafts, promissory notes |
| 3 | Inside the Premises - Theft of Money & Securities | Robbery/safe burglary of money and securities on premises |
| 4 | Inside the Premises - Robbery/Safe Burglary of Other Property | Other property taken by robbery or safe burglary |
| 5 | Outside the Premises | Money, securities, property in care of a messenger off premises |
| 6 | Computer Fraud | Theft of property via fraudulent computer entry |
| 7 | Funds Transfer Fraud | Fraudulent transfer instructions to a financial institution |
| 8 | Money Orders & Counterfeit Money | Loss from accepting bad money orders or counterfeit currency |
Know the difference between robbery (taking by threat or force from a person), burglary (forcible entry with visible signs), and theft (any act of stealing, the broadest term). The exam tests these definitions constantly.
Robbery, Burglary, and Theft Defined
The crime form draws sharp lines between these terms, and confusing them is the most common scoring error.
- Robbery is the unlawful taking of property from a person by violence or the threat of violence. A witness is required.
- Safe burglary and burglary require forcible, visible entry (or exit) leaving physical marks — a pried door, a drilled safe.
- Theft is the broadest term: any act of stealing, including shoplifting or mysterious disappearance, regardless of how it was accomplished.
Because an insuring agreement may cover theft, robbery, or burglary specifically, the exam tests whether a fact pattern matches the exact peril named in the agreement that is in force.
Discovery Versus Loss Sustained — the Trigger
This is the single most tested distinction in the crime unit.
| Feature | Discovery Form (CR 00 20) | Loss Sustained Form (CR 00 21) |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger | Loss discovered during the policy period (or extended discovery), no matter when it happened | Loss must occur AND be discovered during the policy period |
| Prior acts | Covered if discovered now, subject to prior-insurance rules | Generally needs continuous coverage to bridge prior policies |
| Discovery window after expiration | 60 days standard | 1 year standard |
Worked Timing Example
A bookkeeper embezzles $40,000 over three years, ending two months before the company buys a Discovery Form. The scheme is uncovered six months into the new policy. Because the Discovery Form covers losses discovered during the policy period regardless of when they occurred, the loss is covered (subject to the limit and any prior-insurance offset). Under a pure Loss Sustained Form, that same loss — which occurred before inception — would generally not be covered unless continuous loss-sustained coverage bridged the prior years.
Limits, Deductibles, and Key Exclusions
Each insuring agreement has a per-occurrence Limit of Insurance and a Deductible Amount that applies to each occurrence. Employee Theft can be written per loss or per employee, which changes how a scheme involving multiple colluding employees is counted.
Worked Deductible Example
Employee Theft limit $100,000, deductible $5,000. A single dishonest employee steals $72,000 in one continuous scheme (one occurrence). The insurer pays $72,000 minus $5,000 = $67,000. If two employees acting independently each steal $72,000, that is two occurrences, each subject to its own deductible — $67,000 each, up to the limit per occurrence.
Critical Exclusions
- Inventory shortage. Loss provable only by an inventory computation or profit-and-loss calculation is excluded — you must show actual employee dishonesty, not just a missing-stock spreadsheet. This is a favorite trap.
- Acts of the named insured / owners. Dishonesty by the insured or its partners is not covered.
- Indirect or consequential loss — lost income from the theft event is excluded; only the direct loss is paid.
- War, governmental action, and legal expenses to prove a loss are excluded.
Common Exam Traps
- "Employee Theft is third-party crime." No — it is the fidelity (inside) coverage.
- Inventory proof. A shortage shown only by inventory records is not a covered employee-theft loss.
- Robbery vs. burglary. Robbery involves a person; burglary requires forcible-entry evidence.
A retailer discovers, four months into its current Commercial Crime Discovery Form, that a former clerk embezzled $30,000 during the prior year — before this policy incepted. The clerk's dishonesty is documented through bank records, not merely an inventory shortage. The Employee Theft limit is $50,000 with a $2,500 deductible. How does the form respond?
Which type of loss is specifically EXCLUDED from the Employee Theft insuring agreement of the ISO Commercial Crime form?
The Standard Crime Insuring Agreements
ISO commercial crime is assembled from named insuring agreements, each addressing a distinct theft exposure:
| Insuring Agreement | What It Covers |
|---|---|
| Employee Theft (fidelity) | Loss caused by a dishonest employee - the fidelity component |
| Forgery or Alteration | Forged checks, drafts, promissory notes |
| Inside the Premises - Theft of Money/Securities | Robbery, safe burglary on premises |
| Inside the Premises - Robbery/Safe Burglary of Other Property | Non-money property |
| Outside the Premises | Loss while a messenger transports property |
| Computer Fraud | Theft via fraudulent computer entry |
| Funds Transfer Fraud | Fraudulent transfer instructions |
| Money Orders & Counterfeit Money | Accepting bad money orders/counterfeit |
Employee Theft is fidelity coverage (loss from your own dishonest employee), distinct from third-party crime coverage like robbery.
Discovery vs. Loss-Sustained and Key Exclusions
The two trigger forms decide when a loss is covered:
- Discovery form (CR 00 20) - covers losses discovered during the policy period regardless of when they occurred. Ideal when an employer fears undiscovered past theft.
- Loss-Sustained form (CR 00 21) - covers losses both occurring and discovered during the policy period (with a limited discovery extension after expiration). This mirrors an occurrence trigger.
Crime exclusions remove acts by the named insured (you cannot steal from yourself), indirect or consequential loss, war, and - critically tested - trading losses and inventory shortages provable only by an inventory computation. The inventory-shortage exclusion exists because a shortage shown only by counting could be shrinkage, error, or theft, so the insurer requires independent proof of actual employee dishonesty.
An employer discovers in 2026 that an employee embezzled funds in 2023, before the current crime policy began. The policy is written on the Discovery form. Is the loss covered?