11.3 Key CGL Exclusions and Endorsements
Key Takeaways
- Coverage A excludes expected or intended injury, contractual liability, pollution, and damage to the insured's own work and product.
- The Damage to Your Work exclusion (j and l) and Damage to Your Product exclusion push warranty-type losses outside the CGL.
- The Insured Contract definition restores contractual liability the insured assumes under specified agreements.
- Additional Insured endorsements (CG 20 10, CG 20 37) extend coverage to owners, lessees, and contractors.
- The Absolute Pollution Exclusion and the Employers Liability exclusion are heavily tested coverage gaps.
Why exclusions exist
The Commercial General Liability (CGL) form insures third-party liability, not the insured's own business risk. Many exclusions exist to keep the CGL from acting as a performance bond or product warranty. The exam tests whether you can tell a covered third-party loss from an excluded business risk.
The Coverage A (Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability) exclusions are lettered (a) through (n). The high-yield ones are below.
The most-tested Coverage A exclusions
| Exclusion | What it removes |
|---|---|
| (a) Expected or Intended Injury | Harm the insured expected or intended (self-defense excepted) |
| (b) Contractual Liability | Liability assumed by contract, unless it is an Insured Contract |
| (e) Employers Liability | Injury to employees in the course of employment (workers comp handles this) |
| (f) Pollution | Bodily injury/property damage from pollutants (the Absolute Pollution Exclusion) |
| (j) Damage to Property | The insured's work or property in the insured's care |
| (k) Damage to Your Product | The insured's own product |
| (l) Damage to Your Work | The insured's completed work |
| (m) Damage to Impaired Property | Loss of use of property not physically injured |
Business-risk exclusions: Your Work and Your Product
The Damage to Your Product (k) and Damage to Your Work (l) exclusions are pure business-risk exclusions. If a contractor's faulty pipe joint leaks, the CGL will not pay to repair the contractor's own defective pipework, because that is the cost of doing the job right, which belongs in pricing and warranty, not insurance.
But the CGL will pay for resulting damage to other property. If the leaking pipe ruins a customer's hardwood floors, that third-party property damage is covered. The exam loves this split:
- Repairing the defective work itself: excluded.
- Resulting damage to other property: covered.
A roofing contractor installs a roof defectively. Rainwater enters through the bad roof and destroys the building owner's furniture and drywall. Under an unendorsed CGL, what is the likely coverage outcome?
Contractual liability and the Insured Contract
Exclusion (b) removes liability the insured assumes by contract. That sounds broad, but the form gives back an exception for an Insured Contract. An Insured Contract includes specified agreements such as leases of premises, easement agreements, and, importantly, the part of any contract where the insured assumes the tort liability of another to pay damages (the classic hold-harmless or indemnification clause).
So if a tenant signs a lease agreeing to indemnify the landlord for liability arising from the tenant's operations, that assumed liability is restored as an Insured Contract. Trap: liability the insured would have had anyway (its own negligence) is covered regardless; the Insured Contract provision specifically restores liability of another party that the insured agreed to assume.
Pollution and Employers Liability gaps
Two exclusions create gaps that other policies must fill:
- The Absolute Pollution Exclusion (f) bars bodily injury and property damage arising from the discharge, dispersal, or escape of pollutants. Pollution legal liability must be bought separately or via specialty endorsement.
- The Employers Liability Exclusion (e) bars injury to the insured's own employees in the course of employment. This is intentional: Workers Compensation and Employers Liability policies handle that exposure, not the CGL.
A candidate who forgets these gaps will wrongly assume the CGL is a catch-all liability policy.
Additional insured endorsements
Contracts often require one party to name another as an additional insured on the CGL. ISO publishes scheduled endorsements for this:
- Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees or Contractors - Scheduled Person or Organization (CG 20 10) typically covers the additional insured for ongoing operations.
- Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees or Contractors - Completed Operations (CG 20 37) covers the additional insured for completed operations and is paired with CG 20 10 to give full-cycle protection.
| Endorsement | Covers the additional insured for |
|---|---|
| CG 20 10 | Ongoing operations |
| CG 20 37 | Completed operations |
Trap: naming a party as an additional insured on the certificate is not enough; the actual endorsement must be attached, and CG 20 10 alone leaves a completed-operations gap that CG 20 37 fills.
A general contractor requires a subcontractor's CGL to cover the GC as an additional insured for both work in progress and work after the job is finished. Which combination is correct?
The Most-Tested CGL Exclusions
Coverage A's exclusions define the gaps an insured must fill elsewhere:
| Exclusion | What It Removes | Where Coverage Lives Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Expected/intended injury | Deliberate harm | (Uninsurable) |
| Contractual liability | Liability assumed by contract | Restored for an insured contract |
| Pollution (absolute) | Most pollution releases | Separate pollution/environmental policy |
| Employers liability | Injury to the insured's employees | Workers' comp Part Two |
| Auto / aircraft / watercraft | Liability from these | Commercial auto, aviation, marine |
| Damage to your work / your product | The insured's own faulty work/product | Performance bond / warranty |
| Damage to property in your care | Bailee exposures | Bailee or installation floater |
The damage to your work (exclusions j and l) and your product exclusions push warranty-type losses outside the CGL - the policy covers the damage your faulty work causes to others, not the cost to redo the work itself.
Insured Contracts and Additional Insured Endorsements
The contractual-liability exclusion has a major carve-back: the "insured contract" definition restores coverage for certain liability the insured assumes under specified agreements - leases of premises, sidetrack agreements, easements, and the tort liability of another assumed in a contract (a typical construction hold-harmless). This is why a properly drafted hold-harmless clause can shift a subcontractor's CGL to respond for the general contractor.
Additional Insured endorsements extend the named insured's coverage to others who require it by contract:
- CG 20 10 - owners, lessees, or contractors for ongoing operations.
- CG 20 37 - the same parties for completed operations.
The Absolute Pollution Exclusion and the Employers Liability Exclusion are the two most heavily tested coverage gaps: pollution must be insured under a separate environmental policy, and employee injury is covered by workers' compensation, not the CGL.
A general contractor requires a subcontractor to add the GC as an additional insured for ongoing operations. Which CGL endorsement accomplishes this?