6.1 Internalizing Disorders & Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions
Key Takeaways
Internalizing disorders in youth frequently manifest through somatic complaints, behavioral withdrawal, and irritable mood, which DSM-5-TR explicitly recognizes as an alternative to depressed mood in pediatric Major Depressive Disorder.
Under IDEA, eligibility under Emotional Disturbance (ED) requires meeting at least one of five criteria over a long period of time and to a marked degree that adversely impacts educational performance, with social maladjustment explicitly excluded unless accompanied by an underlying emotional disturbance.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) operates on the cognitive triangle (thoughts, feelings, behaviors), using cognitive restructuring to dispute distortions such as catastrophizing, mind reading, and all-or-nothing thinking.
The Coping Cat protocol (Kendall) is a 16-session manualized intervention for pediatric anxiety structured around the FEAR plan (Feeling frightened, Expecting bad things, Attitudes/actions that help, Results/rewards), pairing psychoeducation with graded in vivo exposure hierarchies.
Behavioral activation addresses adolescent depression by disrupting the withdrawal cycle, systematically scheduling mastery- and pleasure-oriented activities to restore natural environmental reinforcement.
Internalizing Disorders & Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions
In school settings, internalizing psychopathology represents an insidious threat to academic progress, emotional wellbeing, and social development. Unlike disruptive externalizing conditions that immediately demand educator attention, internalizing disorders—such as depression, generalized anxiety, phobias, and post-traumatic stress—frequently manifest as quiet withdrawal, somatic distress, perfectionism, or passive avoidance. Consequently, students experiencing severe internalizing distress are chronically under-identified in universal screenings and teacher referral pipelines. School psychologists must possess sophisticated clinical diagnostic acumen grounded in the DSM-5-TR and federal special education mandates under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), coupled with mastery of school-based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) protocols.
Diagnostic Profiles of Pediatric Internalizing Disorders
Accurate identification requires understanding how internalizing symptoms present across developmental stages. Diagnostic criteria established for adults cannot simply be downwardly extended without accounting for developmental maturity, cognitive sophistication, and school contextual demands.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in Children and Adolescents
Under the DSM-5-TR, a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder requires the presence of at least 5 out of 9 symptoms during the same 2-week period, representing a distinct change from previous functioning. Crucially, at least one of the symptoms must be either depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure (anhedonia).
- Depressed or Irritable Mood: In children and adolescents, the DSM-5-TR explicitly establishes that mood can present as persistent irritability, touchiness, chronic crankiness, or angry outbursts rather than overt sadness or melancholy.
- Marked Anhedonia: Substantially diminished interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, daily activities (e.g., abandoning sports, recess games, or creative hobbies).
- Vegetative Appetite/Weight Changes: Failure to make expected developmental weight gains (pediatric criterion), or significant unintended weight loss/gain.
- Sleep Disturbances: Insomnia (initial, middle, or terminal) or hypersomnia (sleeping excessively, difficulty waking for school).
- Psychomotor Agitation or Retardation: Observable restlessness (pacing, hand-wringing) or noticeable slowing of speech, thinking, and body movements.
- Fatigue or Loss of Energy: Chronic exhaustion, difficulty completing basic school routines.
- Feelings of Worthlessness or Excessive Guilt: Delusional or non-delusional self-blame, feeling like a burden to family or peers.
- Diminished Concentration and Executive Indecisiveness: Sharp drop in academic productivity, inability to sustain attention on instructional tasks.
- Recurrent Suicidal Ideation or Thoughts of Death: Passive death wishes ("I wish I wouldn't wake up") or active suicidal plans and attempts.
Persistent Depressive Disorder (Dysthymia)
Persistent Depressive Disorder represents a chronic depressed or irritable mood occurring for most of the day, for more days than not. While adult diagnostic criteria mandate a 2-year duration, the DSM-5-TR establishes a 1-year duration requirement for children and adolescents. The mood must be accompanied by at least two vegetative or cognitive symptoms (appetite changes, sleep disturbance, low energy, low self-esteem, poor concentration, feelings of hopelessness) without an absence of symptoms for more than 2 consecutive months.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder is characterized by excessive, uncontrollable anxiety and worry across multiple domains (academic performance, athletic competence, punctuality, family financial stability, catastrophic events) occurring more days than not for at least 6 months. While adults must exhibit at least three associated physiological symptoms, children and adolescents require only one physiological symptom from the following list:
- Restlessness or feeling keyed up or on edge
- Being easily fatigued
- Difficulty concentrating or mind going blank
- Irritability
- Muscle tension
- Sleep disturbance
In school settings, youth with GAD are often described as "perfectionistic," seeking frequent adult reassurance, erasing and rewriting assignments repeatedly, and making frequent somatic visits to the nurse's clinic.
Separation Anxiety Disorder
Developmentally inappropriate and excessive fear or anxiety concerning separation from attachment figures, persisting for at least 4 weeks in children and adolescents (versus 6 months in adults). Manifestations include recurrent excessive distress when anticipating or experiencing separation, persistent worry about losing attachment figures to illness or disaster, refusal to attend school (school refusal behavior), reluctance to sleep alone, and recurrent somatic complaints (nausea, vomiting, stomachaches, headaches) when separation is imminent. While normative separation anxiety peaks between 9 and 18 months of age, clinical separation anxiety severely disrupts school transitions.
Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)
Marked fear or anxiety about one or more social or performance situations in which the student is exposed to possible scrutiny by others (e.g., reading aloud, presenting in class, eating in the cafeteria, initiating peer conversations) persisting for at least 6 months. In children, the anxiety must occur in peer settings, not just during interactions with adults. Children may express anxiety behaviorally through crying, tantrums, freezing, clinging, shrinking, or failing to speak in social situations.
Selective Mutism
Selective Mutism is a severe manifestation of social anxiety characterized by a consistent failure to speak in specific social situations where there is an expectation to speak (e.g., at school, during reading circles) despite speaking fluently in other familiar settings (e.g., at home with immediate family). The disturbance must persist for at least 1 month and cannot be limited to the first month of school (where shyness or acculturation may be normative). The condition cannot be attributed to a lack of knowledge of the spoken language or an underlying communication disorder (such as childhood-onset fluency disorder).
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) & Acute Trauma Response
PTSD arises following exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence. Symptoms must persist for more than 1 month across four distinct diagnostic symptom clusters:
- Intrusion Symptoms: Recurrent involuntary distressing memories, distressing dreams, flashbacks, or intense psychological distress at exposure to internal/external trauma cues. In young children, intrusive memories may appear as repetitive trauma-reenactment play.
- Avoidance: Persistent avoidance of internal thoughts/feelings or external reminders (people, places, conversations, classroom activities) associated with the trauma.
- Negative Alterations in Cognitions and Mood: Inability to remember key aspects of the trauma, persistent negative emotional states (fear, horror, anger, guilt), diminished interest in significant activities, feelings of detachment from peers.
- Alterations in Arousal and Reactivity: Hypervigilance, exaggerated startle response, irritable behavior and angry outbursts, reckless self-destructive behavior, sleep disturbance, and severe concentration deficits.
Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) shares these clinical features but occurs between 3 days and 1 month immediately following the traumatic exposure.
Diagnostic Comparison of Pediatric Internalizing Disorders
| Disorder | Minimum Duration | Core Pediatric Criteria & Hallmarks | Primary School Manifestation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) | 2 Weeks | ≥ 5 of 9 symptoms; irritable mood accepted in place of depressed mood; anhedonia; vegetative signs. | Academic decline, chronic fatigue, task refusal, self-deprecating remarks, passive death wishes. |
| Persistent Depressive Disorder (Dysthymia) | 1 Year (youth) | Depressed or irritable mood most of the day, plus ≥ 2 cognitive/somatic symptoms; no break > 2 months. | Chronic low-level demoralization, sluggish pacing, apathy, lack of school connectedness. |
| Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) | 6 Months | Excessive, uncontrollable worry across domains; only 1 somatic symptom required in youth. | Perfectionistic erasures, reassurance seeking, somatic complaints, fear of academic failure. |
| Separation Anxiety Disorder | 4 Weeks (youth) | Developmentally inappropriate anxiety regarding separation from major attachment figures. | School refusal, morning clinic visits, distress at parent drop-off, distress during field trips. |
| Social Anxiety Disorder | 6 Months | Fear of scrutiny/embarrassment in social/performance situations; must occur with peers. | Refusal to read aloud, mutism in group tasks, avoidance of cafeteria/recess, panic during speeches. |
| Selective Mutism | 1 Month (not 1st mo) | Consistent failure to speak in specific social settings despite speaking normally at home. | Non-verbal in class, nodding/pointing instead of speaking, total vocal inhibition with adults/peers. |
| PTSD | > 1 Month | Trauma exposure; intrusion, avoidance, cognitive/mood changes, marked hyperarousal. | Traumatic play, extreme startle response to loud bells, aggressive outbursts, dissociative blanking. |
IDEA Emotional Disturbance (ED) Criteria vs. Clinical Diagnosis
A critical distinction on the Praxis exam is the fundamental divergence between a psychiatric medical diagnosis under the DSM-5-TR and educational eligibility under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). A student may possess a formal clinical diagnosis of MDD or GAD from an outpatient psychiatrist yet fail to qualify for special education services if the condition does not produce an adverse educational impact requiring specialized instruction.
Federal Criteria for Emotional Disturbance (34 CFR § 300.8(c)(4))
To qualify under the federal category of Emotional Disturbance (ED), a student must exhibit one or more of the following five characteristics over a long period of time and to a marked degree that adversely affects educational performance:
- Criterion A: An inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual, sensory, or health factors.
- Criterion B: An inability to build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers.
- Criterion C: Inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal circumstances.
- Criterion D: A general pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression.
- Criterion E: A tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated with personal or school problems.
The Three Limiting Conditions ("The Gatekeepers")
Exhibiting one of the five criteria is insufficient on its own. The multidisciplinary evaluation team must document all three limiting conditions:
- Long Period of Time: Typically interpreted as persisting for at least 6 months, demonstrating chronicity rather than a transient developmental adjustment.
- Marked Degree: The intensity, frequency, and severity of the symptoms must significantly exceed developmental and cultural norms, presenting as acute impairment across school contexts.
- Adverse Educational Impact: The condition must measurably impair educational performance. Importantly, under federal court precedents and Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) policy letters, educational performance encompasses both academic achievement and non-academic/social-emotional competencies (e.g., peer interactions, emotional regulation, behavioral functioning).
The Social Maladjustment Exclusion Clause
The federal definition concludes with an explicit statutory exclusion: "Emotional disturbance includes schizophrenia. The term does not apply to children who are socially maladjusted, unless it is determined that they have an emotional disturbance."
Praxis Exam Trap: The law does not define "social maladjustment." However, professional consensus and judicial interpretations define social maladjustment as willful, conduct-violating behavior driven by an intentional disregard for societal norms (often characterized by gang involvement, truancy, substance abuse, and peer-supported delinquency) where the student retains intact emotional regulation and reality testing. If a student exhibits severe disruptive conduct but shows no internalizing distress, remorse, or mood pathology, they may be deemed socially maladjusted and excluded from ED eligibility. Conversely, if a student possesses conduct difficulties co-occurring with an underlying mood disorder or internalizing trauma response, they remain eligible under Criterion C or D.
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in Schools
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy is an empirically validated, structured, problem-focused psychotherapy that posits psychological distress is largely maintained by cognitive distortions and maladaptive behavioral patterns. In schools, CBT is delivered as a brief Tier 2 or Tier 3 counseling intervention targeting educational functioning.
The Cognitive Triangle
Originating from Aaron Beck’s cognitive model and Albert Ellis’s Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), CBT centers on the Cognitive Triangle—the continuous, bidirectional, reciprocal interaction among three distinct components:
- Thoughts (Cognitions): How we interpret events, automatic appraisals, core beliefs, and inner dialogue.
- Feelings (Emotions/Affect): Affective and physiological states (anxiety, sadness, anger, somatic tension).
- Behaviors (Actions): Observable motor responses, avoidance, withdrawal, aggression, or proactive problem-solving.
[ Thoughts ]
/ \
"I'm going to fail" "Everyone thinks I'm weird"
/ \
▼ ▼
[ Feelings ] ◄────────► [ Behaviors ]
Panic, Despair, Avoidance, School Refusal,
Somatic Nausea Crying, Isolation
CBT operates on the core premise that events themselves do not cause emotional distress; rather, our cognitive appraisal of the event dictates our emotional and behavioral response. By altering maladaptive thoughts (cognitive restructuring) and modifying counterproductive habits (behavioral experiments/activation), emotional distress is alleviated.
Identifying and Challenging Cognitive Distortions
Children and adolescents with internalizing disorders systematically process environmental information through negative cognitive biases or cognitive distortions:
- Catastrophizing (Magnification): Expecting the absolute worst-case scenario to occur and assuming one cannot survive it ("If I stumble over a word while reading aloud, everyone will laugh and my life will be ruined").
- All-or-Nothing Thinking (Black-and-White Polarization): Evaluating events in rigid, dichotomous categories with no middle ground ("Because I received a B on the algebra test, I am a complete failure").
- Fortune Telling: Arbitrarily predicting that future events will turn out disastrously without empirical evidence ("I know I’m going to freeze during the science presentation tomorrow").
- Mind Reading: Assuming one knows the negative thoughts of others without checking the facts ("The teacher called on someone else because she thinks I am stupid").
- Personalization: Incorrectly attributing the cause of external negative events entirely to oneself ("My parents are arguing because I didn't finish my chores").
- Emotional Reasoning: Assuming that because an emotion feels intense, it must reflect objective reality ("I feel terrified of the school bus, therefore the school bus is dangerous").
Socratic Questioning & Cognitive Restructuring
The school psychologist guides the student through structured thought disputation using Three-Column Thought Records:
- Situation: Describe the objective activating event (e.g., "Teacher announces pop quiz").
- Automatic Thought: Identify the underlying cognition and associated distortion (e.g., "I will fail and get held back" → Catastrophizing).
- Evidence Testing & Rational Replacement: The practitioner uses Socratic dialogue to test the hypothesis:
- What is the objective evidence that supports this thought? What is the evidence against it?
- Has this ever happened before? What was the actual outcome?
- If my best friend had this thought, what would I tell them?
- What is the most likely, realistic outcome?
- Coping Thought: "I studied last night. Even if this quiz is hard, one quiz will not determine my final grade."
Evidence-Based Interventions for Anxiety: Coping Cat & Exposure
The Coping Cat Protocol (Philip Kendall)
The Coping Cat program is a gold-standard, manualized CBT intervention specifically developed for youth aged 7 to 13 with Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, and Separation Anxiety Disorder. Spanning 16 sessions, the protocol is divided into two distinct 8-session phases:
[Phase I: Sessions 1-8] [Phase II: Sessions 9-16]
Skill Acquisition & Psychoeducation ──► Graded Exposure Practice
• Somatic awareness (Body Clues) • Construct Fear Hierarchy (SUDS)
• Cognitive restructuring (FEAR plan) • In vivo & Imaginal exposures
• Relaxation & coping modeling • Self-evaluation & reinforcement
Central to the Coping Cat curriculum is the FEAR Plan, an acronym that equips youth with a portable cognitive-behavioral framework:
- F = Feeling frightened?: Recognizing internal somatic cues of anxiety (muscle tightness, rapid heart rate, butterflies in stomach).
- E = Expecting bad things to happen?: Catching automatic anxious self-talk and catastrophic cognitive expectations.
- A = Attitudes and actions that can help: Implementing coping thoughts, problem-solving steps, and relaxation tools to counter the anxiety.
- R = Results and rewards: Evaluating the coping effort and providing self-reinforcement regardless of the immediate emotional outcome.
Exposure Hierarchies & Systematic Desensitization
The active, curative ingredient in anxiety treatment is exposure. Anxiety is maintained through negative reinforcement: avoiding a feared stimulus immediately reduces unpleasant autonomic arousal, which reinforces avoidance behavior and prevents the student from learning that the feared catastrophe will not occur.
- Systematic Desensitization (Joseph Wolpe): Based on classical conditioning and reciprocal inhibition—the neurophysiological premise that one cannot be simultaneously relaxed and terrified. The student is taught deep somatic relaxation and then exposed imaginally to anxiety-provoking stimuli of ascending intensity.
- Graded In Vivo Exposure: Modern exposure therapy relies primarily on real-world (in vivo) contact with feared stimuli without relying on relaxation as a crutch. Exposure works through habituation (biological reduction in autonomic arousal over prolonged exposure) and inhibitory learning (forming new safety associations that override old threat associations).
- The Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS): Students rate their internal distress on a scale from 0 to 10 (or 0 to 100), often conceptualized visually as a Fear Thermometer.
- Constructing the Hierarchy: The student and psychologist co-construct a 10-step ladder ranging from low-distress triggers (SUDS 20) to the peak feared event (SUDS 100).
SUDS Level Exposure Step for School Social Anxiety
[100] ──► Deliver a 5-minute presentation to the entire class
[80] ──► Read one paragraph aloud from textbook when called on
[60] ──► Raise hand and answer a teacher's question in class
[40] ──► Ask a peer for a pencil during independent work
[20] ──► Say "Good morning" to the librarian when checking out a book
Classic Exposure Guideline: Exposure should be prolonged, repeated, and free of safety behaviors. Traditional habituation-based protocols keep the student in the situation until distress falls substantially (a drop of about 50% from peak is a common benchmark). Newer inhibitory-learning approaches focus less on a fixed SUDS drop and more on letting the student test and disconfirm the feared outcome. Either way, escaping while anxiety peaks negatively reinforces avoidance and strengthens the fear.
Somatic Regulation Techniques
- Diaphragmatic Breathing: Slow, deep belly breathing (e.g., box breathing: 4 seconds inhale, 4 seconds hold, 4 seconds exhale, 4 seconds hold). By expanding the diaphragm, this triggers the vagus nerve, stimulating the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and slowing cardiac output.
- Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR): Developed by Edmund Jacobson. Involves systematically tensing specific muscle groups for 5 seconds and releasing tension for 10–15 seconds, noticing the sensation of warmth and release. In youth, concrete metaphors are utilized: "squeezing lemons" (hands), "turtle pulling head into shell" (shoulders/neck), and "squishing toes in mud" (feet).
Behavioral Activation for Depression
Depression initiates a self-reinforcing downward spiral: depressed mood leads to fatigue and withdrawal, which strips the student's environment of natural sources of positive reinforcement. In the absence of rewarding experiences, feelings of worthlessness and anhedonia deepen, driving further withdrawal.
Behavioral Activation (BA) is an empirically supported, structured intervention that breaks this cycle by systematically scheduling activities that provide mastery (a sense of achievement or competence) and pleasure (enjoyment or social connection).
[Depressed Mood / Lethargy] ──► [Inactivity & Social Withdrawal]
▲ │
│ ▼
[Deepened Hopelessness] ◄── [Loss of Environmental Rewards]
Key Components of School-Based Behavioral Activation
- Activity Monitoring: The student tracks hourly activities across several school days, rating each on a 0–10 scale for Mastery (M) and Pleasure (P).
- Graded Task Assignment: Overwhelming academic tasks (e.g., writing a 5-page research paper) are dissected into small, highly achievable micro-steps (e.g., finding two source articles, writing an outline). Achieving each micro-step generates immediate mastery reinforcement.
- Activity Scheduling: Collaboratively embedding pre-scheduled pleasure and mastery activities directly into the student’s daily school planner (e.g., 15 minutes of drawing during study hall, joining the robotics club, walking during recess with a friend).
- Overcoming Avoidance: Treating avoidance not as a character flaw but as a behavioral trap that requires active counter-scheduling.
Case Vignette: Applying School-Based CBT for School Refusal
Student: Maya, age 12, 7th grade.
Referral: Maya has accumulated 18 unexcused absences during the first semester. On days she attends, she spends 1–2 hours in the nurse’s office complaining of debilitating stomach pain, nausea, and trembling. Medical examinations rule out organic pathology. Maya tearfully reveals to the school psychologist, "If I go to gym or eat in the cafeteria, everyone stares at my clothes and whispers that I'm disgusting. If I fail my tests, my mom will be disappointed and my life is over."
Diagnostic & Problem Analysis
- Clinical Presentation: Symptom profile aligns with Social Anxiety Disorder and comorbid panic symptoms triggering secondary School Refusal Behavior.
- Function of Behavior: School refusal is maintained by negative reinforcement (avoidance of aversive social evaluation in cafeteria/gym and relief from somatic nausea).
- Cognitive Distortions Identified: Catastrophizing ("My life is over"), Mind Reading ("Everyone whispers that I'm disgusting"), and Emotional Reasoning ("I feel sick, so I must stay home").
Multicomponent CBT Intervention Plan
- Psychoeducation & Somatic Training (Weeks 1–2): Introduced the Cognitive Triangle. Taught Maya diaphragmatic breathing and PMR ("lemon squeezing") to regulate autonomic arousal before leaving home in the morning.
- Cognitive Restructuring (Weeks 3–5): Utilized thought records to challenge mind reading. Conducted a behavioral survey experiment: Maya observed peers in the cafeteria for 10 minutes and recorded how many actually looked at her or whispered (finding: zero peers stared; all were focused on their own conversations).
- Graded In Vivo Exposure Hierarchy (Weeks 6–10):
- Step 1: Arrive at school 15 minutes early and sit in the quiet library with counselor (SUDS = 30).
- Step 2: Eat lunch in the counselor's office with one chosen peer (SUDS = 45).
- Step 3: Enter the cafeteria for the final 10 minutes of lunch with the counselor present (SUDS = 65).
- Step 4: Eat full lunch at a cafeteria table with two peers (SUDS = 85).
- Step 5: Full day attendance including physical education class (SUDS = 95).
- Systemic School Contingency Management: Protocol instituted with the school nurse: somatic evaluations capped at 5 minutes; if temperature and vitals are normal, Maya is guided through 3 minutes of diaphragmatic breathing and escorted back to class, extinguishing the escape function of clinic visits.
Outcomes
By Week 10, Maya's unexcused absences dropped to zero, nurse visits ceased entirely, and her self-reported Fear Thermometer rating during cafeteria lunches declined from 85 to 25, reflecting robust habituation and social re-engagement.
A 14-year-old eighth-grade student is referred to the school psychologist following a pronounced drop in academic grades over the past two months. The student presents with chronic irritability, frequent angry snapping at teachers, severe insomnia, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness, and anhedonia regarding her previously beloved track team. According to the DSM-5-TR, which diagnostic consideration is most accurate?
The student meets diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder, because irritable mood is explicitly recognized as an alternative to depressed mood in pediatric populations.
The student cannot meet criteria for Major Depressive Disorder because she does not demonstrate overt depressed or sad mood across the two-month period.
The student should be diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder due to her frequent irritability and verbal snapping toward school authority figures.
The student meets criteria for Persistent Depressive Disorder, which requires a minimum duration of two months in adolescent populations.
A school psychologist designs an exposure hierarchy for a sixth-grade student exhibiting severe social phobia around speaking during group presentations. Which procedural guideline is essential for ensuring effective habituation and inhibitory learning during exposure sessions?
Allow the student to hold a comforting transitional object and exit the classroom immediately when their reported SUDS reaches a peak level.
Ensure the student practices deep progressive muscle relaxation simultaneously during the public presentation to eliminate all physiological arousal.
Require the student to remain in the anxiety-provoking situation until their Subjective Units of Distress (SUDS) declines by at least 50% without utilizing avoidance or safety behaviors.
Instruct the student to focus exclusively on positive affirmations while looking away from peer faces to reduce sensory overload.
A high school evaluation team convenes to consider special education eligibility for a 16-year-old student who exhibits chronic truancy, substance use, shoplifting, and defiance toward school administrators. The student displays intact social relationships with a delinquent peer group, denies feelings of sadness or anxiety, and expresses no remorse for school infractions. How should the multidisciplinary team evaluate this student under IDEA's Emotional Disturbance criteria?
The student qualifies under Emotional Disturbance Criterion C due to displaying inappropriate behaviors under normal circumstances.
The student should be considered socially maladjusted rather than emotionally disturbed, which excludes special education eligibility under federal regulations unless an underlying emotional disturbance is established.
The student qualifies under Emotional Disturbance Criterion B because his chronic disciplinary infractions prove an inability to maintain satisfactory relationships.
The student must be classified under Emotional Disturbance because any persistent violation of school conduct codes demonstrates an educational disability.
Sections you finish are checked off in the contents.